Results for: "wolfgang Search Results
Family Filter:
Wolfgang Künstle hat sich mit großem Erfolg eine neue Existenz im Internetmarketing aufgebaut. Unter und berichtet er auf interessanten, abwechslungsreichen Blogs von seiner Leidenschaft, dem Reisen. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auch unter
══► Really Nice Song And Music !!! ══► I made this video for Me and for my love Marina ♥ ... and for my friends from Russia, Unites States of America, Spain, France, Dubai, England and Bulgaria :-) Enjoy !
1 Jul 2017
Share Video

German speaking seo copywriter and text-writer for online marketing and content marketing. Further info on: www-texterseo_at
15 Jun 2017
Share Video

Ein "kurzes" Video zum erfolgreichen Bestseller-Buch: Nie wieder New York - 2 Jahre in New York City von Wolfgang Ga(e)bler Kindle, iPad und gedruckte Version auf Amazon und iTunes erhältlich. Ein Buch für Auswanderer und solche, die es werden wollen. Auch ein Buch für New York Liebhaber und Fans. Witzig und lehrreich gleichermaßen. New York aus der Sicht eines schonungslosen Insiders. Man kann es auch Hassliebe nennen... ;-)
15 Mar 2017
Share Video

Enjoy life & style *******www.humanic**** Credits: Advertising Agency: Agency4e7, Vienna, Austria Creative Director: Alex Schönburg Art Director: Jon Ladron de Guevara Account Supervisor: Lea Ravnjak Film Director: Wolfgang Zac Producer: Julia Hofer Music: Sounddesign
8 Sep 2016
Share Video

The Energy Globe World Award goes to Nicaragua! With a happy “Muchas Gracias”, Martha Veronica Rocha received the 13 kg bronze statue for her organization FUPROSOMUNIC in the studio of the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation Salzburg. Salzburg Governor Wilfried Haslauer, Mayor Heinz Schaden, Cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church Peter Turkson and Energy Globe Founder Wolfgang Neumann presented the award. Austria also excelled as a category winner in “Fire.” Wolfgang Neumann: “These projects are a strong signal – they show the world that our environmental problems can be solved.” To view the Multimedia News Release, go to *******www.multivu****/mnr/64995-energy-globe-world-award-solar-women
6 Feb 2014
Share Video

View the Vibe's Samantha Millar was lucky enough to head to The Shopping Channel’s headquarters for a one-on-one meet with Celebrity Chef extraordinaire, Wolfgang Puck. He was in town filming segments for his new line of cookware, available now. While in the presence of the famed fellow, we took the liberty to quiz him about his (massive) restaurant empire... Read the full article here: *******viewthevibe****/chattin-in-the-kitchen-with-wolfgang-puck/
4 Dec 2013
Share Video

*******www.freezerburns**** Since 2008 I have reviewed over 600 items in the freezer aisle. The most common question I get asked is what is the best frozen food? The answer I always give is it depends on which type of food. So for this episode, episode 600, I'm going to tell you the 50 best frozen foods in less than 60 seconds. Best frozen ice cream bar: Magnum Gold Best frozen pizza brand: Freschetta Best frozen burrito: evol Chicken, beans, and Rice Best frozen quesadilla: Red's Pulled Pork Best frozen mac and cheese: Trader Joe's Best frozen pot pie: Twin Hens Chicken Pot Pie Best frozen fruit pie: Marie Callender's Razzleberry Pie Best frozen chicken nuggets: Coleman Organic Chicken Nuggets Best frozen fish sticks: Trident Ultimate Fish Sticks Best frozen vegan meal: Amy's Tofu Scramble Best frozen breakfast sandwich: Jimmy Dean's D-lights Best frozen italian meal: Michael Angelo's Eggplant Parmesan Best frozen flatbread pizza: Palermo's Roasted Vegetable Flatbread Best frozen indian meal: Saffron Road Chicken Tikka Masala Best frozen tator tot: Alexia Sweet Potato Puffs Best frozen fruit bar: Fruttare Strawberry and Milk Dessert Bar Best frozen Hot Pocket: Limited Edition Spicy Hawaiian Style Pizza Best frozen gluten-free pizza: Bella Monica Best frozen vanilla ice cream: Haagen Dazs Five Vanilla Bean Best frozen snack food: CRUNCHtables Pretzel Coated Dill Pickle Chips Best frozen french fries: Checkers Famous Frozen Fries Best frozen potstickers: Ling Ling's Best frozen cheesesteak: Tony Luke's Pronto Best frozen low-fat ice cream: Skinny Cow Best frozen chicken wings: Perdue Buffalo-Style Best frozen meatballs: Cooked Perfect Best Popsicle: Jolly Rancher Popsicles Best frozen vegetable: Birds Eye Steamables Best frozen vegetarian meal: Healthy Choice Portabella Marsala Pasta Best frozen kids meal: KidFresh Totally Twisted Pasta and Meatballs Best frozen pancake: DeWafelbakkers Best frozen gluten-free meal: Amy's Gluten Free Mac and Cheese Best cheap frozen pizza: Totino's Party Pizza Best frozen veggie burger: Morningstar Grillers Prime Best frozen hamburger: Bubba's Best frozen lasagna: Stouffer's Best frozen garlic bread: Pepperidge Farm Texas Toast Best frozen soup: CP Shrimp Wonton Soup Best frozen chili: Kettle Cuisine Angus Steak Chili with Beans Best frozen oatmeal: Good Food Made Simple Best frozen pretzel: Kim and Scott's Pizza Pretzel Best frozen corndog: StateFair Classic Corndogs Best frozen dinner roll: Sister Schubert's Parker House Rolls Best frozen dip: Paula Deen's Shore is Good Seafood Dip Best frozen breakfast: Bridgford Monkey Bread Best frozen non-dairy ice cream: Tofutti Cuties Best frozen pierogies: Mrs. T's Potato, Spinach & Feta Best frozen chocolate ice cream: Ben and Jerry's Chocolate Therapy Best frozen waffle: Kashi Blueberry Waffles Best frozen cheese pizza: Wolfgang Puck All-Natural Margherita There you have it guys. You want to hit up the freezer aisle, start with these items. Agree with my choices? Disagree and think I'm a chump? Let me know in the comments. This is a special episode for me because it is not only episode 600 but it marks my 5th anniversary of Freezerburns. Thank you so much for your continued support of the show! -FFM
12 Oct 2013
Share Video

Wolfgang Peter May is no stranger to war. As a young child, he fled from his home in Breslau, Germany—now Wroclaw, Poland—during World War II and witnessed the destruction of Dresden. He immigrated to the United States and eventually joined the US Army. While in the army, he became an intelligence operations officer of the Fourth Armored Division in Germany, and he served in the Vietnam War. These life events profoundly impacted May’s view of war. In The War Around Us, he explores and debates the many past and present faces of war. Juxtaposing his personal experiences with world events, May delivers a thought-provoking view of warfare. May discusses World War I, the development of the atomic bomb, war criminals, and the ineffectiveness of political leaders. He even comes to grips with his own war guilt from the Vietnam War and shares his family’s experience in Germany during World War II. May’s observations offer a sobering statement of how armed conflict can leave a legacy that will resonate for generations to come. Part memoir and part commentary, The War Around Us delivers a hard-hitting, first-person look at the true face of war. To learn more or order the book: *******bookstore.trafford****/Products/SKU-000140759/The-War-Around-Us.aspx
27 Jun 2013
Share Video

24 Jun 2013
Share Video

by : *******africasiaeuro****/videos/videolinks.html - played instrumental music with accordion and guitar, consider summer holidays in Austria and Slovenia - holidays in Europe , country music south Austrian style like with evening grilling sausages in the wilderness with myriads of mosquitoes buzzing around us. These sausages bought them in Interspar in Radkersburg, Austria. Somewhat funny video They are called 'Kaesekrainer' (cheese and sausage meat deliciously blended to a wonderfully tasting sausages. Picknic in the green .. Whilst pal is grilling we are filming. Delicious food in green surrounding. The landscape between Austria and Slovenia is hilly and green with large agricultural area. This is as natural as it gets. We are going on a summer holiday . .. Clearing out our farm building is on our agenda. Listening to music of Wolfgang Ambros and other Austrian pop greats, including folk songs from Austria sung and played on Accordion by Johann Pfuisi.Thus this meal has a special character. You are welcome to join us on our tour 2013 from Austria to Slovenia .. ( Please note : This is no gangam style video ) yet taylor swift and lil wayne would be happy to join us. contact us on facebook fanpage : *******www.facebook****/test.videos or on any of our video pages : *******africasiaeuro****/videos - *******africasiaeuro****/videos_test - cheers .. when we are young music videos from africasiaeuro****/videos good music comes to your screen (use it as workout music ) too if you like ..
23 May 2013
Share Video

Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Wolfgang Kaiser – Ihr Rechtsspezialist in Düsseldorf-Benrath. Als Fachanwalt für Familienrecht mit den Schwerpunkten Familien- und Erbrecht stehe ich Ihnen zuverlässig und kompetent zur Seite. Dies gilt auch für die Bereiche Arbeits- und Verkehrs-recht sowie für die Forderungsbeitreibung. Dabei ist es mein Ziel, Ihnen die Juristensprache allgemeinverständlich zu erklären und dass Sie nicht nur Recht haben, sondern es auch be-kommen. Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Wolfgang Kaiser – mehr als 25 Jahre juristische Erfahrung. Kontakt: Rechtsanwalt Wolfgang Kaiser, Hauptstrasse 17, 40597 Düsseldorf, Tel: 0211 – 713077-78,, *******
16 Apr 2013
Share Video

Neo-Darwinism isn’t ‘science’ because, besides its stunning failure at establishing empirical validation in the lab, it has no mathematical basis, and furthermore neo-Darwinism can have no mathematical basis because of the atheistic insistence for the ‘random’ variable postulate at the base of its formulation: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness – Talbott – Fall 2011 Excerpt: In the case of evolution, I picture Dennett and Dawkins filling the blackboard with their vivid descriptions of living, highly regulated, coordinated, integrated, and intensely meaningful biological processes, and then inserting a small, mysterious gap in the middle, along with the words, “Here something random occurs.” This “something random” looks every bit as wishful as the appeal to a miracle. It is the central miracle in a gospel of meaninglessness, a “Randomness of the gaps,” demanding an extraordinarily blind faith. At the very least, we have a right to ask, “Can you be a little more explicit here?” *******www.thenewatlantis****/publications/evolution-and-the-illusion-of-randomness “It is our contention that if ‘random’ is given a serious and crucial interpretation from a probabilistic point of view, the randomness postulate is highly implausible and that an adequate scientific theory of evolution must await the discovery and elucidation of new natural laws—physical, physico-chemical, and biological.” Murray Eden, “Inadequacies of Neo-Darwinian Evolution as a Scientific Theory,” Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution, editors Paul S. Moorhead and Martin M. Kaplan, June 1967, p. 109. Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Wolfgang Pauli on the Empirical Problems with Neo-Darwinism - Casey Luskin - February 27, 2012 Excerpt: "In discussions with biologists I met large difficulties when they apply the concept of 'natural selection' in a rather wide field, without being able to estimate the probability of the occurrence in a empirically given time of just those events, which have been important for the biological evolution. Treating the empirical time scale of the evolution theoretically as infinity they have then an easy game, apparently to avoid the concept of purposesiveness. While they pretend to stay in this way completely 'scientific' and 'rational,' they become actually very irrational, particularly because they use the word 'chance', not any longer combined with estimations of a mathematically defined probability, in its application to very rare single events more or less synonymous with the old word 'miracle.'" Wolfgang Pauli (pp. 27-28) - *******www.evolutionnews****/2012/02/nobel_prize-win056771.html “nobody to date has yet found a demarcation criterion according to which Darwin can be described as scientific” – Imre Lakatos (November 9, 1922 – February 2, 1974) a philosopher of mathematics and science, quote as stated in 1973 LSE Scientific Method Lecture “On the other hand, I disagree that Darwin’s theory is as `solid as any explanation in science.; Disagree? I regard the claim as preposterous. Quantum electrodynamics is accurate to thirteen or so decimal places; so, too, general relativity. A leaf trembling in the wrong way would suffice to shatter either theory. What can Darwinian theory offer in comparison?” (Berlinski, D., “A Scientific Scandal?: David Berlinski & Critics,” Commentary, July 8, 2003) Dr. David Berlinski: Head Scratching Mathematicians – video ***********/watch?v=hEDYr_fgcP8 quote from preceding video: “John Von Neumann, one of the great mathematicians of the twentieth century, just laughed at Darwinian theory, he hooted at it!” Dr. David Berlinski Macroevolution, microevolution and chemistry: the devil is in the details – Dr. V. J. Torley – February 27, 2013 Excerpt: After all, mathematics, scientific laws and observed processes are supposed to form the basis of all scientific explanation. If none of these provides support for Darwinian macroevolution, then why on earth should we accept it? Indeed, why does macroevolution belong in the province of science at all, if its scientific basis cannot be demonstrated? *******www.uncommondescent****/intelligent-design/macroevolution-microevolution-and-chemistry-the-devil-is-in-the-details/ Moreover Darwinism isn’t science because math, as far as math is able to be put to Darwinian claims through population genetics, and probability, falsifies Darwinian claims,,, Using Numerical Simulation to Test the Validity of Neo-Darwinian Theory – 2008 Abstract: Evolutionary genetic theory has a series of apparent “fatal flaws” which are well known to population geneticists, but which have not been effectively communicated to other scientists or the public. These fatal flaws have been recognized by leaders in the field for many decades—based upon logic and mathematical formulations. However population geneticists have generally been very reluctant to openly acknowledge these theoretical problems, and a cloud of confusion has come to surround each issue. Numerical simulation provides a definitive tool for empirically testing the reality of these fatal flaws and can resolve the confusion. The program Mendel’s Accountant (Mendel) was developed for this purpose, and it is the first biologically-realistic forward-time population genetics numerical simulation program. This new program is a powerful research and teaching tool. When any reasonable set of biological parameters are used, Mendel provides overwhelming empirical evidence that all of the “fatal flaws” inherent in evolutionary genetic theory are real. This leaves evolutionary genetic theory effectively falsified—with a degree of certainty which should satisfy any reasonable and open-minded person. *******www.icr****/i/pdf/technical/Using-Numerical-Simulation-to-Test-the-Validity-of-Neo-Darwinian-Theory.pdf The Universal Plausibility Metric (UPM) & Principle (UPP) - Abel - Dec. 2009 Excerpt: Mere possibility is not an adequate basis for asserting scientific plausibility. A precisely defined universal bound is needed beyond which the assertion of plausibility, particularly in life-origin models, can be considered operationally falsified. But can something so seemingly relative and subjective as plausibility ever be quantified? Amazingly, the answer is, "Yes.",,, cΩu = Universe = 10^13 reactions/sec X 10^17 secs X 10^78 atoms = 10^108 cΩg = Galaxy = 10^13 X 10^17 X 10^66 atoms = 10^96 cΩs = Solar System = 10^13 X 10^17 X 10^55 atoms = 10^85 cΩe = Earth = 10^13 X 10^17 X 10^40 atoms = 10^70 *******www.tbiomed****/content/6/1/27 Programming of Life - Probability - Defining Probable, Possible, Feasible etc.. - video ***********/user/Programmingoflife#p/c/AFDF33F11E2FB840/8/kckv0wVBYpA Could Chance Arrange the Code for (Just) One Gene? "our minds cannot grasp such an extremely small probability as that involved in the accidental arranging of even one gene (10^-236)." *******www.creationsafaris****/epoi_c10.htm Probabilities Of Life - Don Johnson PhD. - 38 minute mark of video a typical functional protein - 1 part in 10^175 the required enzymes for life - 1 part in 10^40,000 a living self replicating cell - 1 part in 10^340,000,000 *******www.vimeo****/11706014 "The probability for the chance of formation of the smallest, simplest form of living organism known is 1 in 10^340,000,000. This number is 10 to the 340 millionth power! The size of this figure is truly staggering since there is only supposed to be approximately 10^80 (10 to the 80th power) electrons in the whole universe!" (Professor Harold Morowitz, Energy Flow In Biology pg. 99, Biophysicist of George Mason University) Dr. Morowitz did another probability calculation working from the thermodynamic perspective with a already existing cell and came up with this number: DID LIFE START BY CHANCE? Excerpt: Molecular biophysicist, Horold Morowitz (Yale University), calculated the odds of life beginning under natural conditions (spontaneous generation). He calculated, if one were to take the simplest living cell and break every chemical bond within it, the odds that the cell would reassemble under ideal natural conditions (the best possible chemical environment) would be one chance in 10^100,000,000,000. You will have probably have trouble imagining a number so large, so Hugh Ross provides us with the following example. If all the matter in the Universe was converted into building blocks of life, and if assembly of these building blocks were attempted once a microsecond for the entire age of the universe. Then instead of the odds being 1 in 10^100,000,000,000, they would be 1 in 10^99,999,999,916 (also of note: 1 with 100 billion zeros following would fill approx. 20,000 encyclopedias) *******members.tripod****/~Black_J/chance.html “The statistical probability that organic structures and the most precisely harmonized reactions that typify living organisms would be generated by accident, is zero.” Ilya Prigogine, Gregoire Nicolis, and Agnes Babloyantz, Physics Today 25, pp. 23-28. (Sourced Quote) “The formation within geological time of a human body by the laws of physics (or any other laws of similar nature), starting from a random distribution of elementary particles and the field, is as unlikely as the separation by chance of the atmosphere into its components.” Kurt Gödel, was a preeminent mathematician/logician who is considered one of the greatest to have ever lived. Of Note: Godel was a Christian Theist! In Barrow and Tippler's book The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, they list ten steps necessary in the course of human evolution, each of which, is so improbable that if left to happen by chance alone, the sun would have ceased to be a main sequence star and would have incinerated the earth. They estimate that the odds of the evolution (by chance) of the human genome is somewhere between 4 to the negative 180th power, to the 110,000th power, and 4 to the negative 360th power, to the 110,000th power. Therefore, if evolution did occur, it literally would have been a miracle and evidence for the existence of God. William Lane Craig William Lane Craig - If Human Evolution Did Occur It Was A Miracle - video ***********/watch?v=GUxm8dXLRpA ,,, Yet Darwinists refuse to accept falsification through mathematics.,,, “However, mathematical population geneticists mainly deny that natural selection leads to optimization of any useful kind. This fifty-year old schism is intellectually damaging in itself, and has prevented improvements in our concept of what fitness is.” – On a 2011 Job Description for a Mathematician, at Oxford, to ‘fix’ the persistent mathematical problems with neo-Darwinism within two years. Thou Shalt Not Put Evolutionary Theory to a Test – Douglas Axe – July 18, 2012 Excerpt: “For example, McBride criticizes me for not mentioning genetic drift in my discussion of human origins, apparently without realizing that the result of Durrett and Schmidt rules drift out. Each and every specific genetic change needed to produce humans from apes would have to have conferred a significant selective advantage in order for humans to have appeared in the available time (i.e. the mutations cannot be ‘neutral’). Any aspect of the transition that requires two or more mutations to act in combination in order to increase fitness would take way too long (>100 million years). My challenge to McBride, and everyone else who believes the evolutionary story of human origins, is not to provide the list of mutations that did the trick, but rather a list of mutations that can do it. Otherwise they’re in the position of insisting that something is a scientific fact without having the faintest idea how it even could be.” Doug Axe PhD. *******www.evolutionnews****/2012/07/thou_shalt_not062351.html Michael Behe on the theory of constructive neutral evolution – February 2012 Excerpt: I don’t mean to be unkind, but I think that the idea seems reasonable only to the extent that it is vague and undeveloped; when examined critically it quickly loses plausibility. The first thing to note about the paper is that it contains absolutely no calculations to support the feasibility of the model. This is inexcusable. – Michael Behe “No human investigation can be called true science without passing through mathematical tests.” Leonardo Da Vinci Accounting for Variations – Dr. David Berlinski: – video ***********/watch?v=aW2GkDkimkE Moreover neo-Darwinism isn’t science because the random variable postulate at the base of its formulation, when it is pushed to the limits of its explanatory power for our ability to comprehend reality through science, winds up driving the entire enterprise of science into epistemological failure: BRUCE GORDON: Hawking’s irrational arguments – October 2010 Excerpt: What is worse, multiplying without limit the opportunities for any event to happen in the context of a multiverse – where it is alleged that anything can spontaneously jump into existence without cause – produces a situation in which no absurdity is beyond the pale. For instance, we find multiverse cosmologists debating the “Boltzmann Brain” problem: In the most “reasonable” models for a multiverse, it is immeasurably more likely that our consciousness is associated with a brain that has spontaneously fluctuated into existence in the quantum vacuum than it is that we have parents and exist in an orderly universe with a 13.7 billion-year history. This is absurd. The multiverse hypothesis is therefore falsified because it renders false what we know to be true about ourselves. Clearly, embracing the multiverse idea entails a nihilistic irrationality that destroys the very possibility of science. *******www.washingtontimes****/news/2010/oct/1/hawking-irrational-arguments/ The Absurdity of Inflation, String Theory and The Multiverse – Dr. Bruce Gordon – video *******vimeo****/34468027 This ‘lack of a guarantee’, for trusting our perceptions and reasoning in science to be trustworthy in the first place, even extends into evolutionary naturalism (neo-Darwinism) itself; Scientific Peer Review is in Trouble: From Medical Science to Darwinism – Mike Keas – October 10, 2012 Excerpt: Survival is all that matters on evolutionary naturalism. Our evolving brains are more likely to give us useful fictions that promote survival rather than the truth about reality. Thus evolutionary naturalism undermines all rationality (including confidence in science itself). Renown philosopher Alvin Plantinga has argued against naturalism in this way (summary of that argument is linked on the site:). Or, if your short on time and patience to grasp Plantinga’s nuanced argument, see if you can digest this thought from evolutionary cognitive psychologist Steve Pinker, who baldly states: “Our brains are shaped for fitness, not for truth; sometimes the truth is adaptive, sometimes it is not.” Steven Pinker, evolutionary cognitive psychologist, How the Mind Works (W.W. Norton, 1997), p. 305. *******blogs.christianpost****/science-and-faith/scientific-peer-review-is-in-trouble-from-medical-science-to-darwinism-12421/ Alvin Plantinga – Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism – video ***********/watch?v=r34AIo-xBh8 God = ? NYU Questions World-class Philosopher Alvin Plantinga on Science & Religion - March 2012 - video ***********/watch?v=7Sp7U9Es3yw Philosopher Sticks Up for God Excerpt: Theism, with its vision of an orderly universe superintended by a God who created rational-minded creatures in his own image, “is vastly more hospitable to science than naturalism,” with its random process of natural selection, he (Plantinga) writes. “Indeed, it is theism, not naturalism, that deserves to be called ‘the scientific worldview.’” *******www.nytimes****/2011/12/14/books/alvin-plantingas-new-book-on-god-and-science.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all “Modern science was conceived, and born, and flourished in the matrix of Christian theism. Only liberal doses of self-deception and double-think, I believe, will permit it to flourish in the context of Darwinian naturalism.” ~ Alvin Plantinga Why No One (Can) Believe Atheism/Naturalism to be True - video Excerpt: "Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not concerned with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life." Richard Dawkins - quoted from "The God Delusion" ***********/watch?v=N4QFsKevTXs The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences – Eugene Wigner – 1960 Excerpt: ,,certainly it is hard to believe that our reasoning power was brought, by Darwin’s process of natural selection, to the perfection which it seems to possess.,,, *******
15 Apr 2013
Share Video