Results for: deception Search Results
Family Filter:
4:54
After I saw the movie I felt compelled to make a video that shows Briony in her true colors. This is my results. In the video Briony is guilt ridden about what she has done to Robbie and her sister, and it does not help that she has volunteered as a nurse for the war effort. Furthermore, Robbie's restless soul haunts her, and shows her the horrible things that he saw, and his own death.
23 Jul 2010
823
Share Video

10:00
Short video on the nature of human language as non-creating and the distinction between Jesus Christ as Word of God and Human Language covering idealized free will, fatalism, idealized limited resources, etc. God and Lucifer do not share the same speech, etc..
29 Oct 2009
156
Share Video

2:15
This is a simple technique used by many companies who want you to part with your money and might be trying to look more impressive than they really are.
20 Nov 2009
83
Share Video

2:54
*******current****/1cs9q4c *******creativecitizen**** This week's Hype To Habit is all about bringing everyone up to speed on space-age technology: LA & NASA: Radical Collaboration for Green Innovation *******ecomattersdaily****/2009/07/los-angeles-and-nasa-radical-collaboration-for-green-innovation/ Bio-Plastics as the New Fool's Gold *******ecomattersdaily****/2009/07/bio-plastics-are-not-the-answer/ Arctic Ice Almost Extinct *******ecomattersdaily****/2009/07/arctic-ice-almost-extinct/ For more about Hype To Habit, go to *******causecast****/hypetohabit
7 Jan 2010
133
Share Video

9:01
Dean Kenyon, who was a leading Origin Of Life researcher and the primary college textbook author on the subject, admitted after years of extensive research: "We have not the slightest chance for the chemical evolutionary origin of even the simplest self-replicating molecule". THE FOSSILS IN THE CREATION MUSEUM - 1000's of pictures of ancient "living" fossils that have not changed for millions of years: *******www.fossil-museum****/fossils/?page=0&limit=30 Ancient Fossils That Evolutionists Don't Want You To See - video *******www.youtube****/watch?v=eLzqDLZoufQ Fossil Record - No Transitional Fossils - video *******www.youtube****/watch?v=i0ZlcrumE2s "The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find' over and over again' not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another." Paleontologist, Derek V. Ager "A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants - instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God." Paleontologist, Mark Czarnecki "There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways, it has become almost unmanageably rich and discovery is outpacing integration. The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps." Professor of paleontology - Glasgow University, T. Neville George Intelligent Design - The Anthropic Hypothesis *******lettherebelight-77.blogspot****/
18 Jan 2010
499
Share Video

6:54
Dr. David Berlinski: What Does It Take for Change? (Clip 5) *******www.youtube****/watch?v=DRqdvhL3pgM Richard Sternberg and Steven Meyer - On Whale Evolution - audio *******www.youtube****/watch?v=lCsmeSL-9RY Part 2 *******www.youtube****/watch?v=jRV8_L8Lmzg Whales Designed or Evolved? Marc Surtees video *******edinburghcreationgroup****/whales.xml In A Whale of Trouble *******www.scienceagainstevolution****/v3i11f.htm Whale Tale Two Excerpt: We think that the most logical interpretation of the Pakicetus fossils are that they represent land-dwelling mammals that didnt even have teeth or ears in common with modern whales. This actually pulls the whale evolution tree out by the roots. Evolutionists are back to the point of not having any clue as to how land mammals could possibly have evolved into whales. *******www.scienceagainstevolution****/v6i2f.htm#new For Complete Video by Dr. Terry Mortenson please see: *******video.google****/videoplay?docid=2278048305135275986&ei=o5_wSvqlLIvGqwLbvcDSCQ&q=origin+of+species&hl=en# Intelligent Design - The Anthropic Hypothesis *******lettherebelight-77.blogspot****/
16 Jan 2010
1791
Share Video

4:22
"Perhaps the most obvious challenge is to demonstrate evolution empirically. There are, arguably, some 2 to 10 million species on earth. The fossil record shows that most species survive somewhere between 3 and 5 million years. In that case, we ought to be seeing small but significant numbers of originations (new species) .. every decade." Keith Stewart Thomson, Professor of Biology and Dean of the Graduate School, Yale University (Nov. -Dec. American Scientist, 1997 pg. 516) A materialist will try to assert evolution of species is happening all the time, all over the place, with a lot of suggestive evidence which is far from being scientifically conclusive. Once again the hard evidence of extensive and exhaustive experimentation betrays the materialist in his attempts to validate his evolutionary scenario. “Whatever we may try to do within a given species, we soon reach limits which we cannot break through. A wall exists on every side of each species. That wall is the DNA coding, which permits wide variety within it (within the gene pool, or the genotype of a species)-but no exit through that wall. Darwin's gradualism is bounded by internal constraints, beyond which selection is useless." R. Milner, Encyclopedia of Evolution (1990) At one of her many public talks, she [Lynn Margulis] asks the molecular biologists in the audience to name a single unambiguous example of the formation of a new species by the accumulation of mutations. Her challenge goes unmet. Michael Behe - Darwin's Black Box - Page 26 Natural Selection and Evolution's Smoking Gun, - American Scientist - 1997 “A matter of unfinished business for biologists is the identification of evolution's smoking gun,”... “the smoking gun of evolution is speciation, not local adaptation and differentiation of populations.” Keith Stewart Thomson - evolutionary biologist “The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. At the risk of doing violence to the position of some people at the meeting, the answer can be given as a clear, No.” Roger Lewin - Historic Chicago “Macroevolution” conference of 1980 Evolution - Tested And Falsified - Don Patton - video *******www.metacafe****/watch/4036803/evolution_tested_and_falsified_dr_don_patton/ Dogs Stay Dogs and Bugs Stay Bugs - David Berlinski - video *******www.youtube****/watch?v=aW2GkDkimkE Intelligent Design - The Anthropic Hypothesis *******lettherebelight-77.blogspot****/
11 Feb 2010
469
Share Video

0:23
A secret code has been discovered that will shock the whole world.
23 Feb 2010
360
Share Video

5:14
Falsehoods In Textbooks - Ten Icons of Evolution - overview - Dr. Jonathan Wells - video *******www.metacafe****/watch/4050609/falsehoods_in_textbooks_icons_of_evolution_jonathan_wells/ Dr. Wells writes a article defending his criticism against the Ten Icons of Evolution in detail here: Inherit the Spin: The NCSE Answers "Ten Questions to Ask Your Biology Teacher About Evolution" *******www.evolutionnews****/2008/08/inherit_the_spin_the_ncse_answ.html#more Evolution of the Genus Homo - Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences - Tattersall, Schwartz, May 2009 Excerpt: "Definition of the genus Homo is almost as fraught as the definition of Homo sapiens. We look at the evidence for “early Homo,” finding little morphological basis for extending our genus to any of the 2.5–1.6-myr-old fossil forms assigned to “early Homo” or Homo habilis/rudolfensis." *******arjournals.annualreviews****/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100202 Harvard zoologist Richard Lewontin wrote in 1995 that When we consider the remote past, before the origin of the actual species Homo sapiens, we are faced with a fragmentary and disconnected fossil record. Despite the excited and optimistic claims that have been made by some paleontologists, no fossil hominid species can be established as our direct ancestor. My Question: HUMAN ORIGINS. Why are artists drawings of ape-like humans used to justify materialistic claims that we are just animals and our existence is a mere acc^id^ent--when fossil experts cannot even agree on who our supposed ancestors were or what they looked like? NCSE's Answer: Drawings of humans and our ancestors illustrate the general outline of human ancestry, about which there is considerable agreement, even if new discoveries continually add to the complexity of the account. The notion that such drawings are used to 'justify materialistic claims' is ludicrous and not borne out by an examination of textbook treatments of human evolution. My Response in Outline: (a) The field of human origins is actually one of the most contentious in biology, because individual researchers interpret the relatively meager evidence on the basis of different biases and preconceptions. (b) Darwin's followers--like Darwin himself--agree that humans evolved from ape-like animals. This theoretical consensus, however, owes less to the evidence than to materialistic philosophy. (c) One consequence of this philosophy is the claim that there has been no purpose or direction in the history of life. Many biology textbooks promote this view and use drawings of ape-like humans to convince students that we are no exception to it. My Response in Detail: (a) Contrary the NCSE's claim of 'considerable agreement,' the field of human origins (paleoanthropology) is actually one of the most contentious in biology. According to experts in the field, this is because of subjective interpretations of the relatively meager evidence. Berkeley evolutionary biologist F. Clark Howell wrote in 1996: 'There is no encompassing theory of [human] evolution... Alas, there never really has been.' According to Howell, the field is characterized by 'narrative treatments' based on little evidence, so 'it is probably true that an encompassing scenario' of human evolution 'is beyond our grasp, now if not forever.' Arizona State University paleoanthropologist Geoffrey Clark was equally pessimistic in 1997: 'Scientists have been trying to arrive at a consensus about modern human origins for more than a century. Why haven't they been successful?' Clark is convinced it is because paleoanthropologists proceed from different 'biases, preconceptions and assumptions.' And in 1999 Henry Gee, chief science writer for Nature, pointed out that all the evidence for human evolution 'between about 10 and 5 million years ago--several thousand generations of living creatures--can be fitted into a small box.' According to Gee, the conventional picture of human evolution as lines of ancestry and descent is 'a completely human invention created after the fact, shaped to accord with human prejudices.' 21 (b) Of course, Darwins followers--like Darwin himself--agree that humans evolved from ape-like animals. This agreement, however, represents a theoretical consensus. It does not emerge from the evidence--not the meager evidence for human origins, nor (as we have seen) the evidence from four-winged fruit flies, Darwin's finches, peppered moths, vertebrate embryos, comparative anatomy, or the fossil record of the animal phyla. On what, then, is this theoretical consensus based? (c) It seems to me that it is based largely on a philosophical commitment--specifically, a commitment to materialism, the philosophical doctrine that the physical universe is the only reality; God, spirit and mind are illusions. One consequence of this doctrine is the claim that there has been no purpose or direction in the history of life. According to the NCSE, the notion that textbooks use drawings of supposed human ancestors to justify this claim is 'ludicrous.' Yet Guttman's Biology (1999) tells students that living things have developed 'just by chance,' by a roll of the 'cosmic dice,' through 'the action of random evolutionary forces.' Miller and Levine's Biology (5th Edition, 2000) asserts that 'evolution works without plan or purpose,' so 'evolution is random and undirected.' Purves, Sadava, Orians and Heller's Life: The Science of Biology (6th Edition, 2001) states that 'evolution is not directed toward a final goal or state.' And all three of these textbooks include fanciful drawings of ape-like humans that help to convince students we are no exception to the rule of purposelessness. Some biology textbooks use other kinds of illustrations as well as interviews with famous Darwinists to persuade students that human beings are merely accidental by-products of purposeless natural processes. Raven and Johnson's Biology (5th Edition, 1999) depicts a speculative reconstruction of the famous 'Lucy' fossil after treating students to an interview with Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould, who tells them: 'Humans represent just one tiny, largely fortuitous, and late-arising twig on the enormously arborescent bush of life.' Campbell, Reece and Mitchell's Biology (5th Edition, 1999) uses drawings of reconstructed fossil skulls rather than whole animals, and features an interview with Oxford professor Richard Dawkins, who declares: 'Natural selection is a bewilderingly simple idea. And yet what it explains is the whole of life, the diversity of life, the complexity of life, the apparent design of life'--including human beings, who 'are fundamentally not exceptional because we came from the same evolutionary source as every other species.' Our existence was not planned, however, because natural selection is 'totally blind to the future'--the 'blind watchmaker.' For further reading, students are referred to Dawkins's book of that name, in which he writes: Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.' 22 *******www.evolutionnews****/2008/08/inherit_the_spin_the_ncse_answ.html#more The Truth About Human Origins: Excerpt: "It is practically impossible to determine which "family tree" (for human evolution) one should accept. Richard Leakey (of the famed fossil hunting family from Africa) has proposed one. His late mother, Mary Leakey, proposed another. Donald Johanson, former president of the Institute of Human Origins in Berkeley, California, has proposed yet another. And as late as 2001, Meave Leakey (Richard's wife) has proposed still another.,," *******books.google****/books?id=J9pON9yB8HkC&pg=PT28&lpg=PT28 “Dr. Leakey produced a biased reconstruction (of 1470/ Homo Rudolfensis) based on erroneous preconceived expectations of early human appearance that violated principles of craniofacial development,” Dr. Timothy Bromage *******www.nyu.edu/public.affairs/pdf/2007_BROMAGE_IADR_1470.pdf Stephen Meyer - Functional Proteins And Information For Body Plans - video *******www.metacafe****/watch/4050681/stephen_meyer_functional_proteins_and_information_for_body_plans/ The Unbearable Lightness of Chimp-Human Genome Similarity Excerpt: One can seriously call into question the statement that human and chimp genomes are 99% identical. For one thing, it has been noted in the literature that the exact degree of identity between the two genomes is as yet unknown (Cohen, J., 2007. Relative differences: The myth of 1% Science 316: 1836.). ,,, In short, the figure of identity that one wants to use is dependent on various methodological factors. *******www.evolutionnews****/2009/05/guy_walks_into_a_bar_and_think.html#more Eighty percent of proteins are different between humans and chimpanzees; Gene; Volume 346, 14 February 2005: The early genome comparison by DNA hybridization techniques suggested a nucleotide difference of 1-2%. Recently, direct nucleotide sequencing confirmed this estimate. These findings generated the common belief that the human is extremely close to the chimpanzee at the genetic level. However, if one looks at proteins, which are mainly responsible for phenotypic differences, the picture is quite different, and about 80% of proteins are different between the two species. *******www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15716009 Bottom Line? The supposed naturalistic evolution of man from apes is IMPOSSIBLE!!! Intelligent Design - The Anthropic Hypothesis *******lettherebelight-77.blogspot****/
20 Jul 2011
4122
Share Video

8:03
At the heart of the Circle of Love vision are the needs of those on the streets of our city and we seek to implement practical solutions that address those needs. We meet immediate needs by providing food, shelter and clothing. But we believe that a vital emphasis on spiritual values provides hope and results in changed lives. At the Circle of Love shelter, those without hope will find a safe place that provides a vision for people and the wisdom for living life. It is a place that allows power to be released enabling people to struggle well with life. It is a place where people are stirred by the study of God's word and learn to serve others. "Our purpose is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of god, namely Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:2-3 NIV). Visit http//circlelove****
7 Mar 2010
41
Share Video

8:13
At the heart of the Circle of Love vision are the needs of those on the streets of our city and we seek to implement practical solutions that address those needs. We meet immediate needs by providing food, shelter and clothing. But we believe that a vital emphasis on spiritual values provides hope and results in changed lives. At the Circle of Love shelter, those without hope will find a safe place that provides a vision for people and the wisdom for living life. It is a place that allows power to be released enabling people to struggle well with life. It is a place where people are stirred by the study of God's word and learn to serve others. "Our purpose is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of god, namely Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:2-3 NIV). Visit http//circlelove****
7 Mar 2010
67
Share Video

7:55
At the heart of the Circle of Love vision are the needs of those on the streets of our city and we seek to implement practical solutions that address those needs. We meet immediate needs by providing food, shelter and clothing. But we believe that a vital emphasis on spiritual values provides hope and results in changed lives. At the Circle of Love shelter, those without hope will find a safe place that provides a vision for people and the wisdom for living life. It is a place that allows power to be released enabling people to struggle well with life. It is a place where people are stirred by the study of God's word and learn to serve others. "Our purpose is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of god, namely Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:2-3 NIV). Visit http//circlelove****
7 Mar 2010
44
Share Video

6:16
At the heart of the Circle of Love vision are the needs of those on the streets of our city and we seek to implement practical solutions that address those needs. We meet immediate needs by providing food, shelter and clothing. But we believe that a vital emphasis on spiritual values provides hope and results in changed lives. At the Circle of Love shelter, those without hope will find a safe place that provides a vision for people and the wisdom for living life. It is a place that allows power to be released enabling people to struggle well with life. It is a place where people are stirred by the study of God's word and learn to serve others. "Our purpose is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of god, namely Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:2-3 NIV). Visit http//circlelove****
7 Mar 2010
75
Share Video

6:55
29 Mar 2010
78
Share Video

2:04
Nautiloids - Evidence for a Catatrophic Occurance - *******www.youtube****/watch?v=0RoUeWg5HLo&feature=PlayList&p=282CFC439E4A4C53&playnext_from=PL&index=98 C14, "Accepted Dates are Actually Selected Dates" - *******www.youtube****/watch?v=f2hACvYYMh8 Clam Index Fossil with Flesh- *******www.youtube****/watch?v=BPMWuZ5PXsU&feature=PlayList&p=282CFC439E4A4C53&playnext_from=PL&index=58 Evolutionists Find Rapid Magnetic Field Reversal (15 Days)! - *******www.youtube****/watch?v=fn6pfzjbGHc&feature=PlayList&p=282CFC439E4A4C53&playnext_from=PL&index=76 RATE (Radioisotopes And The Age of the Earth) - *******www.youtube****/watch?v=gPynJVPq74Q&feature=PlayList&p=282CFC439E4A4C53&playnext_from=PL&index=97 Global Flood: Evidence for Rocks and Fossils - *******www.youtube****/watch?v=PXH5lwMBNiE&feature=PlayList&p=648792ACAA789544&playnext_from=PL&index=15 Radioisotopes & the Age of the Earth - *******www.youtube****/watch?v=lGFZsdEVBEw&feature=PlayList&p=F26272964EA41770&playnext_from=PL&index=17 II Corinthians 11:3 But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. We have all heard evolutionists claim certain rocks and fossils to be millions of years old. They claim to arrive at these long ages using index fossils. Index fossils are creatures that supposedly lived during specific ages. We are told that these ages are independently verified using radiometric dating methods. But is all of this as neat and certain as evolutionists say it is? Recently, a rock formation in England yielded more than just rocks. This rock layer is said to be 189 million years old, based on its index fossils. The index fossils, ammonites and belemnites, were bottom living deep sea creatures. Along with these deep sea creatures, however, partially petrified wood was also found. One piece was found immediately adjacent to a deep sea fossil. Scientists who believe in young Earth creationism sent samples of the wood to three different radiocarbon dating laboratories. If the index fossil was really as old as evolutionists say, it is almost 4,000 times too old to give a radiocarbon date. Yet all the samples dated at the three laboratories showed consistent young dates. Adjusted by biblical considerations, they date to the time of Noah's Flood. We would expect to find land-based life mixed in with deep sea creatures in any rocks that are a result of the violence of the Flood. This find illustrates and supports the biblical account of a worldwide Flood. Prayer: Lord, the Earth witnesses Your Truth. Help me to do the same. Amen. References: Creation, 3-5/00, pp. 44-47, "Geological Conflict."
7 May 2010
188
Share Video

10:41
19 May 2010
133
Share Video