866.610.7895 *******lancasterinsuranceav****/ With federal standards and guidance, each state has a role in everything from expanding and streamlining its Medicaid programs, to setting up the new exchanges which will provide a new, regulated market for consumers to purchase coverage. In essence, the bill spurs fifty different health reforms.
Lancaster Insurance strives to offer our customers competitive pricing, a broad choice of products, and fantastic customer service
BY CHRISTY LEWIS
The United States Preventive Services Task Force sparked controversy after giving women in their 40s some words of wisdom: Don’t get an annual mammogram.
And that panel is at the center of controversy again. This time, with a suggestion for men.
Fox has more.
“A key government health panel is now advising that healthy men should no longer receive those PSA blood tests that test for prostate cancer because the test may be more harm than good.”
According to the American Cancer Society--studies have shown no evidence that PSA, or protein-specific-antigen tests, are lifesavers. If anything, they are the exact opposite. The New York Times explains.
“From 1986 through 2005, one million men received surgery, radiation therapy or both who would not have been treated without a P.S.A. test... Among them, at least 5,000 died soon after surgery and 10,000 to 70,000 suffered serious complications. … As a result of these complications, the man who developed the test … has called its widespread use a ‘public health disaster.’”
Health officials say 1 in 6 men will get prostate cancer, a normally slow-growing illness. And aside from death, a survivor could end up impotent and incontinent from testing and treatment. A CNN reporter says it’s those factors that could have the majority of men staying away from the test.
“Prostate cancers are usually really slow growing and they’re not really going to hurt you. So you might find this slow-growing prostate cancer when you go to look for it and then you can make a man impotent and incontinent with the treatment when the cancer was not going to hurt him.”
On the other end of the controversy is the group of people who argue in the end, the PSA tests are worth it.
DR. SAMADI: “PSA has shown that over the last 10-15 years that there is a decrease in deaths and mortality.”
DR. LOWE: “Because PSA isn’t 100% accurate, doesn’t mean we should not do it. I mean it has still made a major impact on people we are testing for cancer that we are detecting at a much earlier stage..one that can be treated successfully.”
Adding to the controversy is the cash. A blogger for the New America Foundation says the task force is more concerned with saving the government money.
And the real problem is that medical personnel are pushing the test too much.
“The marketing departments of many hospitals openly admit that they offer free PSA testing as ... a means of bringing in new (paying) customers. …According to … [the] chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, some physicians have openly complained that any criticism of PSA testing could hurt their wallets by cutting down on the number of patients diagnosed.”
Adding to that, the recommendations have an effect on the government. A Washington Post Health Editor featured on PBS News Hour says...
“Insurance companies look to this panel to decide what they should pay for. In fact, under the health care--the federal health reform legislation that passed this panel has actually become more influential because some of the basic benefits that the federal government will require under the health reform legislation will be influenced by this panels recommendations.”
The panel sought to make it clear that this is just a proposal draft. The recommendations are open for public comment and the final report will be released next week.
BY CHRISTIAN BRYANT
You're watching multisource business news analysis from Newsy.
A new report by the journal Health Affairs says poorly performing hospitals could face the risk of financial failure under the health reform law. U.S. News & World Report reports:
“The United States’ so-called ‘worst’ hospitals are home to a significantly larger pool of elderly, poor and minority patients than are the nation’s better quality/lower cost institutions... While elderly black Americans constitute nearly 7 percent of the patients in the country’s 122 ‘best’ hospitals, they make up 15 percent of patients among the nation’s 178 ‘worst’ health care facilities”
The Washington Post’s Sarah Kliff explains that a provision in the law acts as a double-edged sword. It’s an incentive program that could help well-performing hospitals but hurt those that aren’t doing so well. She writes:
“The health reform law has a number of mechanisms to try to make bad hospitals better. Chief among them is a new incentive payment system that starts next year, which will give bonuses to hospitals that improve outcomes. Meanwhile, those that don’t will take a pay cut…”
The report shows that the nation’s worst hospitals are mostly in the South and service mostly elderly, poor and minority patients. This highlights an unintended effect of the health reform law: the risk these hospitals might close due to financial pressures and worsen socioeconomic disparities in health care. NPR’s health blog outlines:
“Whether poor-performing hospitals will lose part of their reimbursement — possibly even going out of business as a result — or institute new and effective quality improvement efforts is unclear.”
Meanwhile, Republican are still fighting to repeal the health care reform law they’ve branded “ObamaCare” -- They presented a petition Wednesday calling for reform. It had 1.6 million signatures.
But the chances they find success before the 2012 election are unlikely. Here’s CNN’s John King.
“You remember, of course, that repeal ‘ObamaCare’ was a signature slogan of the Tea Party as it helped Republicans to giant successes in last year’s midterm elections. That repeal effort now though has zero chance of short term success. Democrats control the senate. President Obama, of course, has 15 more months at the White House...”
The health reform law changes would take place in 2014 but the Supreme Court could rule on the constitutionality of all or part of it as early as next year.
Transcript by Newsy
In a shock turnaround Tiger Woods has given up Golf for Hip Hop! He will now be known as "T Diddy" President Obama's Health Reform Bill applauded by Illegal Immigrants Of America Spokesperson.
*******uselectionnews**** Former Massachusett’s Governor Mitt Romney took the first step in fighting down some of the potential criticism he could draw from the state of Massachusett’s health care plan if he decides to run for President in a speech over the weekend highlighting his wish to repeal the massive health care reform bill that was passed last summer, aka “Obamacare”, bringing to light his support of state’s individual rights, and declaring that the healthcare plan that he authored for his state was “not perfect”. His words to that effect may have helped him earn back at least some of the support that he has lost in recent months as President Obama and his aides have repeatedly credited him and his state for the “ideas” behind the Obamacare health reform bill.
BY MALLORY PERRYMAN
Transcript by Newsy****
You're watching multisource politics news analysis from Newsy
A federal judge says the government can’t force you to buy health insurance. Judge Henry Hudson heard arguments on both sides of the issue from U.S. attorneys and the Virginia Attorney General.
MSNBC’s Pete Williams sums up Virginia’s argument.
PETE WILLIAMS: “The argument of the state of Virginia was that that’s unconstitutional. That it would be one thing to require people who are already in the health care system, that they had to buy a certain kind of insurance. What the state said is if you aren’t part of that stream of commerce, then Congress can’t reach out and grab you into it and say you have to buy insurance.”
It’s important to point out Judge Henry Hudson’s ruling is not against the entire health reform bill - just Section 1501 - the part that penalizes people for not having insurance. The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein says, the specific nature of Hudson’s ruling really limits the scope of the court’s action.
“Go to the text of the health-care law and run a search for ‘1501.’ It appears exactly twice in the bill…There do not appear to be other sections that make ‘specific reference’ to the provision, even if you could argue that they are ‘directly dependent’ on the provision.”
The Virginia lawsuit is separate from a Florida lawsuit, which 19 other states have joined in to argue the law is unconstitutional. CNN reports, Virginia’s case hinged on the argument of whether the insurance clause is a tax or a penalty.
ELIZABETH COHEN: “Now it’s interesting that the penalty - or tax - depending on which one you want to use, that you would pay if you don’t get insurance is actually cheaper than getting insurance.
ALI VELSHI: “You make a good point. This is actually about what would happen if you didn’t buy insurance. It’s not that you can’t impose the insurance it’s that you can’t impose the penalty for not doing it.”
Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren explains the tax versus penalty language is critical because Virginia argued - Congress has the right to tax, but not to force people into the market.
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: “The legislators didn’t want to call it a tax because they didn’t want to tell the American people they were raising their taxes. But then the lawyers went into court and they suddenly wanted to call it a tax because if it were a tax then it couldn’t be argued now on the tax clause.”
A blogger for TPM says- Judge Hudson is a George W. Bush appointee- calling the ruling...
“…an example that decades of Republicans packing the federal judiciary with activist judges has finally paid off.”
But a blogger for Insurance & Financial Advisor says- no one in the media seemed to care the two judges who upheld the health care law in previous lawsuits were appointed by Democratic presidents.
“It appears that the ‘mainstream’ media is already setting the stage for arguing that rulings against the law are for political purposes, and not based on law. Regardless, the law IS unconstitutional… in a word, they are ‘wrong.’”
Judge Hudson refused to issue an injunction to stop the legislation from taking effect. It’s pretty much a sure thing that the Supreme Court will make the final call on this one.
Get more multisource video news analysis from Newsy
www.ncpssm**** - How will the recently passed health reform legislation impact seniors in Medicare? There are literally hundreds of provisions that seniors should know about. In this video, the National Committee details the key provisions of the health reform bill affecting Medicare beneficiaries. Get the facts about healthcare reform and how it will touch your life.
Health Reform A Year in Photos, fantastic photo slideshow on different meeting held by President Barack Obama, see who was involved
Found footage from the week following the passage of Health Reform.
(*******www.GooFine**** Information About Health and Life. Insurance information and better opportunities. Concepts HMO, PPO definition of Medical Plans. Since we are involved and benefit us HEALTH REFORM IN USA. Low-cost Health Insurance unrestricted preexisting health conditions. Myths and realities about what people say about Health Insurance
Advantages of Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Preferring Medical Benefits Plan. (HMO) Information about United American Insurance Company. Vista Health Benefits Plan. What is Medicare. What is Medicaid. Personalized advices.)
*******www.GooFine**** Información Sobre Salud y Vida. Información sobre Seguros Médicos y la mejores oportunidades .Conceptos de HMO, definición de PPO, de Planes Médicos. Como nos afecta y nos beneficia la REFORMA DE SALUD EN USA. Seguros Médicos a bajo costo sin restricciones para Condiciones de Salud Prexistentes. Mitos Y Realidades de lo que se dice de los Seguros Médicos
Ventajas de Blue Cross and Blue Shield .Beneficios de Prefered Medical Plan. (HMO)Información sobre United American Insurance Company. Beneficios de Vista Health Plan. Que es el Medicare. Que es el Medicaid. Asesoramiento Personalizado.
In a flip-flop decision, Rep. Dennis Kucinich announced he’ll vote in favor of proposed health care legislation. Will sitting Democrats follow suit?
www.ncpssm**** - Medicare simply won't be affordable for either beneficiaries or the federal government if we don't do something soon. And the answer is not just to cut Medicare. Medicare is part of the whole health care system.
Democratic leaders in Congress have hinted they might turn to budget reconciliation to move health reform forward.
For more info visit www.newsinfusion****
Everyone has a right to affordable health care. On this, we all agree. But, after months of committee hearings, backdoor meetings and debate, debate, debate, the long-awaited Senate vote is fast approaching and as poll numbers show, many of us are still asking, “will health reform end up costing us more?"
In fact, according to a Washington Post poll out last Wednesday, few Americans actually believe that government action is needed to control health-care costs and expand coverage to those without insurance. More than half of those polled, 53 percent, see higher costs for themselves as a result of health reform measures, than if the current system remains intact.
And they are right. The Senate bill contains many provisions that could indeed cause sticker shock for most of us.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska has compiled research that shows less then promising results for Nebraskans, should current health reform bills make it through Congress and onto the President's desk.
Sardonic humor and political message merge in this song parody with a powerful point, from the South Florida branch of activist group, Raging Grannies. Distributed by Tubemogul.