Results for: logical-fallacies Search Results
Family Filter:
7:29
Though debating is a great way to ascertain truth, most people are not honest enough to properly debate. I explain.
30 Jun 2019
10
Share Video

7:44
In pointing out the flaw of the bad design argument, I would also like to point out that many materialists have always made many false presumptions in the face of unknown facts. This following site has a excellent, and fairly comprehensive, list of the consistent failed predictions of Darwinism. Darwin’s Predictions - Cornelius Hunter *******www.darwinspredictions****/ Along these lines, for many years materialists predicted much of human anatomy was vestigial. Yet once again, they were proven completely wrong in this prediction. “The thyroid gland, pituitary gland, thymus, pineal gland, and coccyx, … once considered useless by evolutionists, are now known to have important functions. The list of 180 “vestigial” structures is practically down to zero. Unfortunately, earlier Darwinists assumed that if they were ignorant of an organ’s function, then it had no function.” "Tornado in a Junkyard" - book - by former atheist James Perloff For a prime example of evolution's failed predictions of vestigial organs, recently in October 2007, the appendix has been found to have essential purpose in the human body: Appendix has purpose: Excerpt: "The appendix acts as a good safe house for bacteria," said Duke surgery professor Bill Parker. *******en.wikinews****/wiki/Scientists:_appendix_has_purpose Moreover, the vestigial organ argument, like the "Junk DNA argument, is basically the "Bad Design" argument which is used by evolutionists. A argument that quickly leaves the field of empirical science and enters squarely into the field of Philosophical debate. Refuting The Myth Of "Bad Design" vs. Intelligent Design - William Lane Craig - video *******www.youtube****/watch?v=uIzdieauxZg Evolution vs The Eye - Miracle Or Mistake? - article *******docs.google****/Doc?docid=0AYmaSrBPNEmGZGM4ejY3d3pfMThmd25mdjRocQ As well, the "predicted" plasticity of embryonic stem cells vs. adult stem cells, in curing diseases, is turning out to be a huge bust for the materialist. Umbilical cord, & Adult Stem Cells v. Embryonic Stem Cells: So which is better: embryonic stem cells or adult stem cells? Thus far, embryonic stem cells can't currently treat any diseases, while adult stem cells have helped patients with 72 conditions. *******www.stemcellresearch****/facts/treatments.htm Who Needs Embryonic Stem Cells? “New techniques circumvent a roadblock to the production of embryonic-stem-cell-like lines from adult tissue. Such reprogrammed cell lines should be much safer to use for therapy.” *******www.creationsafaris****/crev200905.htm#20090503a Stem Cell News: Jan. 2010 Excerpt: Dr. Gregory Brent (UCLA) told an audience Saturday night that embryonic stem cells have yet to produce one treatment, while adult stem cells are currently treating millions. *******www.creationsafaris****/crev201001.htm#20100118a Intelligent Design - The Anthropic Hypothesis *******lettherebelight-77.blogspot****/
4 Feb 2010
1407
Share Video

0:25
hhhh
14 Jan 2018
119
Share Video

6:18
I explain the possible reasons that people think the way they do.
13 May 2019
52
Share Video

3:00
Logical Fallacies Project
3 Apr 2008
373
Share Video

4:35
From my online CSET English study guide and course, covering persuasion in media and the use of the logical fallacy the straw man. For more FREE educational videos for your CSET, go to *******www.acethecset****
4 Jul 2009
443
Share Video

0:17
Download for free here: *******bit.ly/bpN7rB Browse and download other ebooks for free here: *******freeebookworm.blogspot****/ or *******freefulldownload.site88****/ "Title: How to Win Every Argument - "The Use and Abuse of Logic" Writer: Madsen Pirie Language: English Type: PDF Sound reasoning is the basis of winning at argument. Logical fallacies undermine arguments. They are a source of enduring fascination, and have been studied for at least two-and-a-half millennia. Knowledge of them is useful, both to avoid those used inadvertently by others and even to use a few with intent to deceive. The fascination and the usefulness which they impart, however, should not be allowed to conceal the pleasure which identifying them can give. I take a very broad view of fallacies. Any trick of logic or language which allows a statement or a claim to be passed off as something it is not has an admission card to the enclosure reserved for fallacies. Very often it is the case that what appears to be a supporting argument for a particular contention does not support it at all. Sometimes it might be a deduction drawn from evidence which does not sustain it. Many of the fallacies are committed by people genuinely ignorant of logical reasoning, the nature of evidence, or what counts as relevant material. Others, however, might be committed by persons bent on deception. If there is insufficient force behind the argument and the evidence, fallacies can add enough weight to carry them through. This book is intended as a practical guide for those who wish to win arguments. It also teaches how to perpetrate fallacies withmischief at heart and malice aforethought. I have described each X How to Win Every Argument fallacy, given examples of it, and shown why it is fallacious. After any points of general interest concerning the history or occurrence of the fallacy, I have given the reader recommendations on how and where the fallacy may be used to deceive with maximum effect." How to Win Every Argument - The Use and Abuse of Logic by Madsen Pirie free ebook download
17 May 2010
1595
Share Video

Loading...