Lose weight fast the safe easy way. Appetite Down is the all natural appetite suppressant that aids in quick weight loss by helping you east less and stick to a healthy diet. Find out more at *******www.appetitedown****.
Bull Gets Tired Of Losing Bull Fights
Welcome to our newest segment "The Diet High Five" where we count down the top 5 diet mistakes and disasters. Is your new years resolution to lose weight? Here's why you wont. Learn what may be preventing you from reaching your goal weight this year.
A summary of the business book "When Your Customer Wins, You Can't Lose" by author Jack Collis
Let Suzanne reveal to you how to lose weight quickly and easily with PROVEN RESULTS!
Go To: *******snipurl****/1y2gy
Visit www.Neuro-VISION.us. Research proves people who use hypnosis lose 2 to 16.5 times more weight than those who don't. This FREE video series shows you how to use hypnosis to suppress your appetite. It's entertaining, and educational.
Research proves people who use hypnosis lose 2 to 16.5 times more weight than those who don't. This FREE video series shows you how to use hypnosis to suppress your appetite. It's entertaining, and educational.
Visit www.Neuro-VISION.us to see the whole series.
Water helps you lose weight. This video gives you 5 additional tips to help you loose weight fast. you can also find more information on losing weight and fat at *******www.wrapyourselfslim****
This quickly grabbed the attention of the weight loss, weight watchers, lose weight, quick weight loss and weight loss pills world!
Am I Going To Lose My Breast?
Follow Our Simple Step by Step Instructions That Enables
ALL Our Members to Make Money Monthly
BACKING HORSES to LOSE Even
if you HATE Horse racing!
A British writer struggles to fit in at a high-profile magazine in New York. Based on Toby Young's memoir "How to Lose Friends & Alienate People"
Trailerhits**** - Your Online Source For Movie News, Reviews And Previews.
Bill Belichick Cries After Losing the Super Bowl
Lose weight faster than traditional diet programs and overcome the reasons behind your eating.
Hillary Clinton's George Bush Connection
In the Clintons' pursuit of power, there is no such thing as a strange bedfellow. One recently exposed inamorata was Norman Hsu, the mysterious businessman from Hong Kong who brought in $850,000 to Hillary Clinton's campaign before being unmasked as a fugitive. Her campaign dismissed Hsu as someone who'd slipped through the cracks of an otherwise unimpeachable system for vetting donors, and perhaps he was. The same cannot be said for the notorious financier Alan Quasha, whose involvement with Clinton is at least as substantial--and still under wraps.
Political junkies will recall Quasha as the controversial figure who bailed out George W. Bush's failing oil company in 1986, folding Bush into his company, Harken Energy, thus setting him on the path to a lucrative and high-profile position as an owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, and the presidency. The persistently unprofitable Harken--many of whose board members, connected to powerful foreign interests and the intelligence community, nevertheless profited enormously--faced intense scrutiny in the early 1990s and again during Bush's first term.
Now Quasha is back--on the other side of the aisle. Operating below the radar, he entered Hillary Clinton's circle even before she declared her candidacy by quietly arranging for the hire of Clinton confidant and longtime Democratic Party money man Terry McAuliffe at one of his companies. During the interregnum between McAuliffe's chairmanship of the Democratic Party and the time he officially joined Clinton's campaign, Quasha's firm set McAuliffe up with a salary and opened a Washington office for him.
Just a few years earlier, McAuliffe had publicly criticized Bush for his financial dealings with Harken, disparaging the company's Enron-like accounting. Yet in 2005 McAuliffe accepted this cushy perch with Quasha's newly acquired investment firm, Carret Asset Management, and even brought along former Clinton White House business liaison Peter O'Keefe, who had been his senior aide at the Democratic National Committee. McAuliffe remained with the company until he became national chair of Hillary's presidential bid, and O'Keefe never left. McAuliffe's connection to Quasha has, until now, never been noted.
Another strong link between Quasha and Clinton is Quasha's business partner, Hassan Nemazee, a top Hillary fundraiser who was trotted out to defend her during the Hsu episode--in which the clothing manufacturer was unmasked as a swindler who seemingly funneled illegal contributions through "donors" of modest means.
In June, by liquidating a blind trust, the Clintons sought to distance themselves from any financial entanglements that might embarrass the campaign. Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson argued that the couple had gone "above and beyond" what was legally required "in order to avoid even the hint of a conflict of interest." But throughout their political careers, Bill and Hillary Clinton have repeatedly associated with people whose objectives seemed a million miles from "a place called Hope." Among these Alan Quasha and his menagerie--including Saudi frontmen, a foreign dictator, figures with intelligence ties and a maze of companies and offshore funds--stand out.
"That Hillary Clinton's campaign is involved with this particular cast of characters should give people pause," says John Moscow, a former Manhattan prosecutor. In the late 1980s and early '90s he led the investigation of the corrupt Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) global financial empire--a bank whose prominent shareholders included members of the Harken board. "Too many of the same names from earlier troubling circumstances suggests a lack of control over who she is dealing with," says Moscow, "or a policy of dealing with anyone who can pay."
Keywords: Hillary Clinton, loses, pledged delegates, superdelegates, Barack Obama, wins, Bill Clinton, ME, VA, Washington DC, MD, WA, LA, NE, Demcratic Convention
Analysis: Barack Obama has advantage over Hillary Clinton in head-to-head with John McCain
Sen. John McCain became the likely Republican nominee after Mitt Romney decided to suspend his campaign Thursday. Now, the Democrats are debating who would do better against the Arizona Republican.
Two polls this month have asked registered voters nationwide how they would vote if the choice were between McCain and Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton.
A CNN poll, conducted by the Opinion Research Corporation February 1-3, shows Clinton three points ahead of McCain, 50 percent to 47 percent. That's within the poll's margin of error of 3 percentage points, meaning that the race is statistically tied..
A Time magazine poll, conducted February 1-4, also shows a dead heat between Clinton and McCain. Each was backed by 46 percent of those polled.
In the CNN poll, Obama leads McCain by 8 points, 52 percent to 44 percent. That's outside the margin of error, meaning that Obama has the lead.
And in the Time poll, Obama leads McCain by 7 points, 48 percent to 41 percent -- a lead also outside of the poll's margin of error of 3 percentage points.
In both polls, Obama looks stronger than Clinton. Why?
Obama's explanation: "I think there is no doubt that she has higher negatives than any of the remaining Democratic candidates. That's just a fact, and there are some who will not vote for her."
That was three weeks ago. Now, only two Democratic candidates remain.
Clinton does have higher negatives than Obama -- and McCain. Forty-four percent of the public say they don't like Clinton, compared with 36 percent who don't like McCain and 31 percent who don't like Obama, according to the CNN poll conducted February 1-3.
Why does Obama do better against McCain than Clinton? Obama does do a little better than Clinton with independents and Republicans.
But the big difference is men: Men give McCain an 18-point lead over Clinton, 57 percent to 39 percent, according to the CNN poll.
But if McCain and Obama went head to head, McCain's lead among men shrinks to three, 49 percent to 46 percent -- statistically a tie.
Women, on the other hand, vote for either Clinton or Obama by similar margins.
Some Democrats may be worried about how Obama will fare with white voters. Whites give McCain a 15-point lead over Clinton, (56 percent for McCain, 41 percent for Clinton).
But Obama actually fares better than Clinton with white voters. McCain still leads, but by a smaller margin, (52 to 43 percent).
Obama argues that he can reach across party lines. And he does do a little better than Clinton with Independents and Republicans, at least in these polls.
But the big difference is that Clinton doesn't draw very well with men. Obama does.
Keywords: Hillary Clinton, loses, presidential election, John McCain, Barack Obama, beats, wins, head-to-head, Democratic candidate, November, Mark Penn
Poll Date Sample McCain (R) Obama (D) Spread
RCP Average 01/29 to 02/10 - 43.7% 47.4% Obama +3.7%
AP-Ipsos 02/07 - 02/10 1,029 A 42% 48% Obama +6%
USA Today/Gallup 02/08 - 02/09 1016 A 46% 50% Obama +4%
Time 02/01 - 02/04 958 LV 41% 48% Obama +7%
CNN 02/01 - 02/03 974 RV 44% 52% Obama +8%
Cook/RT Strategies 01/31 - 02/02 855 RV 43% 45% Obama +2%
ABC/Wash Post 01/30 - 02/01 1249 A 46% 49% Obama +3%
FOX News 01/30 - 01/31 900 RV 43% 44% Obama +1%
NPR 01/29 - 01/31 1000 LV 48% 47% McCain +1%
Rasmussen (Mon) 4 Day Tracking 1700 LV 40% 44% Obama +4%
Poll Date Sample McCain (R) Clinton (D) Spread
RCP Average 01/29 to 02/10 - 46.6% 45.4% McCain +1.2%
AP-Ipsos 02/07 - 02/10 1,029 A 45% 46% Clinton +1%
USA Today/Gallup 02/08 - 02/09 1016 A 49% 48% McCain +1%
Time 02/01 - 02/04 958 LV 46% 46% Tie
CNN 02/01 - 02/03 974 RV 47% 50% Clinton +3%
Cook/RT Strategies 01/31 - 02/02 855 RV 45% 41% McCain +4%
ABC/Wash Post 01/30 - 02/01 1249 A 49% 46% McCain +3%
FOX News 01/30 - 01/31 900 RV 45% 44% McCain +1%
NPR 01/29 - 01/31 1000 LV 48% 45% McCain +3%
Rasmussen (Mon) 4 Day Tracking 1700 LV 45% 43% McCain +2%