210 Views
By IGN
176 Views
By GamesRadar
25 Views
By GamesRadar
How To Run The Apple Hardware Test
26 Views
By VideoJug
Iran: We're Going to Test-fire Missiles
6 Views
By CBS
Mystery Missile, Not A Missile
30 Views
By CBS
New Approach On Missile Defense
27 Views
By CBS
Unplugged: Changing Missile Defense
7 Views
By CBS
Europe Missile Defense Dropped
53 Views
By CBS
Human Giant: Illusionators - Missile Stunt, Part 2
109 Views
By Funny-or-Die
Mystery Missile Launched Off Calif. Coast
25 Views
By CBS
David Letterman - Mystery Missile Top Ten - Sea...
12 Views
By CBS
Mystery Missile Caught on Tape
115 Views
By CBS
Officials Say "Mystery Missile" a Plane
52 Views
By CBS
Human Giant: Illusionators Missile Stunt, Part 1
26 Views
By Funny-or-Die
Navy's Record-Breaking Missile Launch
143 Views
By CBS
Martin: Missile Strike Intended to Take out Com...
15 Views
By CBS
Missile Defense Number One Issue for Obama at G8
6 Views
By CBS
Obama's Missile Defense Mission
5 Views
By CBS
Charlie Wilson's War (2007): Milan Anti-tank Mi...
185 Views
By AnyClip
00:30
Charlie Wilson's War (2007): Milan Anti-tank Mi...
80 Views
By AnyClip
00:35
Weird Science (1985): Missile Creation
22 Views
By AnyClip
03:14
On the Road: Home Sweet Missile Silo
7 Views
By CBS
01:49
33 Views
By AnyClip
71 Views
By hulu
SPEED Test Drive - 2011 Corvette
46 Views
By hulu
01:02
A Bronx Tale (1993): the Mario Test
50 Views
By AnyClip
02:00
El Método (2005): The First Test - Canditates I...
7 Views
By AnyClip
SPEED Test Drive - Buick Turbo
71 Views
By hulu
01:22
The Last Starfighter (1984): It Was a Test
27 Views
By AnyClip
Add video views to your Facebook Timeline:
These guys blow up a tank with a shoulder missile launcher.
yeeaeih ccoool..btw check out LiveDona.com for really hot girls
By alysonbrownb21 1272533793I've see this vid before & your version is short of footage a bunch. The complete version shows the unbelievable aftermath of the tank!
By izac49 1250113436Don't waste that missle on a tank...put it up some terrorist ass!!!!
By barneyfife 1147906978It's already on metacafe but without the red site-ad. Adding that ad also added 1+ MB to the filesize.
By Dustmite 1145179993the USA would use their brains behind war machines and weapons in something better... What a waste
By mushaakiss 1145084557War is certainly tragic, and man would probably be better off focusing resources to more positive ends. Then again, the implied notion that only the US has these sorts of weapons is absurd. The mainstay American man portable weapon Dragon was a joke by all other standards- the Europeans and Russians in contrast had much more capable weapons.
By Gunslinger-6 1146972732then people from other countries could just walk all over us...just a safety measure to keep the trash where it belongs
but yeah they shouldnt focus all the intellect on JUST weapons
the ones who hates the United Stated are just stupid ignorants who doesn't think of where their freedom comes from.. If we didn't had USA the world would be much more evil and much more bad to live in.. So from a Danish guy - THANK YOU AMERICA!
Niclas - Denmark
meant to be professional testing? coz they don't sound very professional lol. instead of statistical data "DID YOU SEE HOW HIGH IT WENT?" OOH OOH LET ME HAVE A GO!!! It sounds like they're MoD boys on their coffee break
By geordiedan 1144964156this missile is called a TOW ..... its a gaided missile the range is 4000m in 17 secs active ......
By Yoshi7 1144930090This is Javelin- there is no way a human operator could shoulder a heavy ATGM like TOW. Furthermore, that T-72 has been rigged with high explosives to achieve that sort of catastrophic effect; HEAT warheads do not atomize tanks like that, and certainly neither TOW nor Javelin is capable of that kind of behavior.
Chemical energy warheads use shaped charges which collapse a (typically copper) liner into into a penetrating jet of metal moving anywhere between 8- 14 km/s at the fastest point in the stream. At this stage, the material strength of homegenous rolled steel or its equivelant is simply ignored: as the HEAT jet drills into the target, material flowing out of the way spalls back into the fighting compartment as deadly incandescent flakes in a similar fashion to a grenade going off inside- ripping into vehicle crews, components, and quite possibly the ammunition magazine.
However, armored vehicles brew up like roman candles (and they will burn for hours) rather than simply vaporize- that looks like a tactical nuke in one huge bursting charge rather than ammunition and propellant charges cooking off.
This is a Javelin ATGM not a TOW. The Javelin is in top attack mode and is fire and forget unlike the SACLOS TOW.
By liberation01 1145011116The missile system shown is a shoulder fired Javelin. The TOW is a much larger vehicle mounted system. You would know this if you fired TOW missiles regulary.
By liberation01 1145102765No wonder why war is so expensive !
Keep spending our tax money wisely.
Because the missile is probably made to destroy tanks not cars? ; )
By Paul Walker 1144872117Again- they do not achieve their killing effects against armored fighting vehicles by blowing them up- tanks theroretically can survive high explosive hits from much larger artillery rounds and other AT systems, even if the crew inside were turned into mush. A top attack missile such as Javelin bypasses the the heaviest armor across the frontal arc and attacks the weak roof armor- a compact slug intitated by the explosive element drills straight down into the target armor , while the precursor charge deals with any reactive armor such as Russian Kontakt-5 arrays.
By Gunslinger-6 1146972451loose change, a movie all about the 9/11 attacks with a different perspective on what really happened, check it out (take out the spaces):
loosechange 911.com
pretty excited...
'did you see how high that turret went? GEEEZ!!'
cool vid.
i would blow up this S.O.B loser for the repeat!
By Great ME 1144887526