911- Controlled Demolition Or Structural Failure Due To Impact A [13+]

Tags:
911 Conspiracy Demolition Inside Jobs Terrorists Facist Murderers Bombs Explosives Towers World Trade Center Truth
jaxplane2
  • Submitter:
    jaxplane2
  • Visits: 4,491
  • Subscribers: 5
  • Comments: 13
  • Updated: 04-Apr-08
  • Videos: 4
  • United States Basic English
  • Comments: 15
  • Views: 3,849
  • Added: 25-Jan-08

WTC TWIN TOWERS AND 9/11/2001

No conspiracy, no controlled demolition,
No lies, no agenda, no paranoia, no fancy editing, no glitzy production, no irritating repetition of a one second clip over and over and

Just one thing, the only thing needed: THE TRUTH!

Please pause the video on text pages for easiest viewing

  1. Categories: News & Events
  2. Favorite On: guystone-13
Comments on

911- Controlled Demolition Or Structural Failure Due To Impact A

15 Comments | Add Comment
  • That doesn't prove anything!

    Sorry to say, but when you said that it couldnt be a controlled demolition you were wrong. As the building was hit by the supposid airplanes the blast could have covered smaller detonations that weakened the structures basic form; which in turn cause the building to as you say "pancake". Also if you look close you can see that the plane hits and goes in the building without shaking it. Also it blows up on impact and the airplane should have crushed upon impact. Lastly if you look through video and photos they have video of an supposid engine that was laying under SCAFOLDING! THINK ABOUT IT!

    By buzzkillington 1202548733 Reply Spam [+5] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • we need full sound

      Why is it that we never see and HEAR the sound of the collapsing Twin Towers and WTC 7 from BEFORE they start to go down? That's the time when the witnesses describe a series of very loud BOOMS - before the collapses

      By NothingHitMe 1210621473 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • simple

      because there are no loud booms before collapse. There may have been isolated booms but never a series of detonations required to bring a building down. The twin towers fell from top to bottom. Controlled demolitions blow out the supports and gravity brings it down.

      By jaxplane2 1210705489 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Glad to see that you skipped Building 7

    Otherwise you'd have to explain how it wasn't controlled demolition, despite the fact that it collapsed in a manner totally consistent with your "rules" for controlled demolition. And naturally, if Building 7 was destroyed with explosives everything that occurred on 9/11 should be questioned.

    By Ezlivin 1206992351 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Yes i skipped

      bldg 7. I didnt find good enough video to show a clear difference on that collapse. The officail word is that it was damaged enough by being damaged by debris from the other buildings and a fires that burned all day. I simply dont have enough information to classify bldg 7 demise.

      By jaxplane2 1207126137 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You will see

    I am going to back over you with my car, you may be hurt, but any one can then look at the front grill of the car and clearly see no damage.
    The towers fell at free-fall speed.

    You Mother and I regret bring you in to the world.

    By GORILLASWAMI 1201574591 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Just like

    Japan didn't really bomb Pearl Harbor, Canada did

    By jeepman6161 1201219139 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Are you saying

      the US hired Canada to provoke the public and enter the war? Cause that's dumb. Australia warned Roosevelt of a Japanese fleet headed towards Pearl Harbor before the attack, but for some reason, he did nothing about it. Would you like to argue?

      By Saint Crispy 1218054634 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • My post was for people

      Just like you who don't go for the facts just the conspiracy angle with zero proof because it sounds more fun. just like the ones who think we didn't go to the moon, alittle research will show not even hollywood had the video technology to fake it back then.

      By jeepsterdude 1218058632 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • May GOD comfort their heart.

    God you are right.

    By Geeth12 1225210664 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • HELLO ????

    We were attacked and still not living in a secure world. People died. This was an evacution or a test to see if the building would stand up against terrorist attacks, how many are? We thought we lived in a secure world. To point fingers as to how the WTC was built and not address the real problem is sad. I feel sorry for you all who don't "get it." Feel free to comment to me. Never under the power of ignorance.

    By NEWENGLANDHER 1223699033 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Focus

    Hey guys, stop wasting time in debating if the WTC was brough down with bombs. The fact is that regarless what brought them down, it killed thousands. Let's focus on finding ALL the responsibles ... all the truth and people behind it have not been uncovered yet. Watch this video and spread it: 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Video

    By jgmc987 1206458240 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Hey everyone...

    Doublk is a sex offender!!!

    By TheRemMan 1207450151 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
15 Comments | Add Comment
 
Family Filter Off