Knot Lingerie

F**king judge woman needs to get kicked

They S**k They don't know a good invention if it hit them in the face. In this one, the ugly woman judge was "horrified" because she doesn't have that look anymore....old and cold. What about victoria's secret?

The judge is obviously hideously insecure about her own sexuality. This is a very marketable product, nothing worse than a string bikini you might see at beaches in FL or CA, in fact I think it probably covered more. She calls the inventor a fake... Fake what? Insults like that are blatantly made out of nothing more than spite, and have no bearing on the product itself. It's psychotic right-wing nutcases like that that are ruining this country. Just because she'd look like a sack of potatoes with a bow around it in that thing is no reason to take it out on those who can pull it off.

Perhaps she would have re-acted differently if it had been on a life size doll? She is the one that needs to get a LIFE! ... if she is married I pity her poor husband ... I am sure he would have loved it ... on the girl that is not the wicked witch from the North!!

The male judges handled the nudity with humor. The female judge over-reacted big-time. I believe she reacted this way because she is either: (1) without a man because she likes women and, upon seeing this hot and young woman in the nude, made her nipples erect which greatly embarrassed her or (2) she is with a man but is very, very frigid.

Think of crotchless and nippleless lingerie and it doesn't make this all that bad. I thought it was a good invention.

It was sort of justified because she's likely old fashioned or lost her husband (or two) for some younger, hornier, sluttier and prettier woman willing to give head. She just needs to get laid.

this girls got heads on their places ! they know how to do somethin' different and God bless them for this ! this fuckin' red-head bitch didn't know anything 'bout the fashion ! F**k HER ! " I don't like this invention".. so F**k yourself ! men know what's good :)

woihoo lovinn ..btw check out LiveDona.com for really hot girls

say PRUDE

Get paid for taking surveys at SURVEY4PROFIT dot NET

Or I should say, OVER reacton. She was far more offensive then the actual idea/product, and very insulting. She should be eliminated from that panel. Doh!

is it not a job for a judge,
just se and say yes or no to what they think about it not go of the chair....
are they not normaly not suppose to be moore in the middle on the way to show how they like it or no (if they can), but not go of the chair.
but its first time seen a clip from that show so i dont realy know if that has happen a lot on that kind of show
(sorry if it is bad english)

No invention was involved---- Nakedness was not invented by the lady!!
STUPID!!!!

judge is actress, inventor is actres etc.the need to make some show to catch people

dat judge S**ks

and it is not that i am a lady but i believe that a woman is more sexy in a 2 piece lingerie rather than rapped up like a xmas present with a knot !!! that was the most stupid invention i have ever seen. really go get a better job!!!!

stupid publicity stunt , its obvious they're acting

Wow, this judge was a huge bitch. This is what you call insecurity people. Get rid of that judge and replace her. I actually know someone like that in real life that reacts the same damn way. And bye the way, it goes out to all the guys here who have women. You'd kill to see that on your girl. I know I would. She didn't have to take it that far. Seriousley. No bitch. Its YOU who is the loser and needs to get a F**king life! I pity the man whos with her. If she even F**king has one.

she needs to get laided for sure most women dream of other women

that female judge was right to boot those two. the invention is fine, and i bet a lot of people would buy it. but the way it was marketed was what (rightfully) offended this judge.

the girl in the lingerie sold herself to promote the product. she stripped in public--without anyone's consent.

that judge had more respect for the girl (and for women in general) than that girl did.

Y pensar que en Espanha nos ponen un desnudo durante el telediario de la tarde y no nos escandalizamos ...

(Y sin censura, of course)

x

what amazes me is the way the men cave in to her demands, and tell the inventor to leave. Sit down bitch, and lets here about the product. She should of walked off got her coat and fucked off herself.

I like the fact she tells the model to get a life and a proper job, yet some models don't get out of bed for less than 20,000.

Actually, the function of such lingerie is not much different compare with those sexy fashionable underwear designed by GUCCI and other famous boutique.

If those stores with big brand name applied her idea to design their female underwear series (which i am quite sure they will), I will feel sorry for the inventor in this video clip that she can't bring it to the world due to the discouragement.

The "all strip off by one pull" idea is good IMO.
Usually when you buy clothings, it is designed to be dressed and undressed by the people who wear(One Party). Now this idea actively ENCOURAGE two parties (the girl and the BF/husband) to undress the clothing , this is a real mental value to human activity in whatever form, because it produce the sense of further mutual participation on the event. And this is the first point.

Secondly, either parties can pull off the clothing with an astonishing speed. Such speed from cover to uncovered (of sexual organs) will produce positive psychological impact to the opposite party and generate excitments.

These elements are completely impossible to provide from the traditional design of either casual clothing or underwear. Although people'd argue that "Wow the bathing gawn or a large towel will do the same trick, one pull it's also off, why do I need this lingerie?" ======> The answer is that u can't combine both fashion and huge sexual appeal in the bathing gawn, but this lingerie can. The combination of both fashionable and sexy design has proved to increase attraction value to both parties, I don't believe much people will argue on this point.

A whore may just get a towel when they do business, but they won't buy a sets of expensive brand Lingerie to do business, it's way too much and too expensive for them. You need a valuable and respectable woman to dress this on in order to do the trick, and this distinguish gorgious sexy woman from a whore.

All the Inventor need to do is develop the design ahead so it looks more like an actual clothing with persuasive texture on design. The pull strap can be hidden by folding or shown by unfoldings (so the woman with it can decide the exact moment to be pulled). And the decide has to be more friendly for maintainence.

While the female judge find it disgusting, it is so weird that if a big brand invent something like this, nobody will blame on it and instead even put the idea to be so original. That's because they plan seriously on the public relation and marketing procedures to make sure people received the messages behind the ideas of their product. The invention was design to be dressed and undressed in residence and private areas. The situation is just like those big brand expensive underwears. Therefore the judge find it disgusting because the demostrator come up with a horny story and show a naked body, these two thing combined gives a very distorted impression to the judge. Sad.

what do you guys think?

Doesn't america have the biggest porn industry in the world and still they keep hypocrite about it.

Okay, that judge its a stupid ass C**t and them guy judges are prolly bangin the bitch so they went along with what the stuck up whore said - haha - i woulda been like - hey - sit the F**k down woman and shut your F**king mouth.

btw - that is a pretty original idea sorta - around christmas - S**t THAT WOULD SELL LIKE HELL - EVEN AT WALL MART FOR F**k SAKE

oh yeah, what the hell show is that anyways? i seen that it was on ABC or watever lol

I agree with the people that say she's only offended because she would get the same offended reaction from EVERYONE because she's old and gross. I'm sure she waits in lines to sign petitions to get adult stores removed from towns because she has no sex drive. HAHAH, great video though! :)

Honey buy a vibrator and get over yourself.

Mary Lou is a bitch, but the true sadness of this whole bit is that she can go pitch this to a "real" development company, get this patented and I'd buy one for my wife. She wanted one when we saw this episode. Oh, yeah btw the chick wearing the bow is a total hottie. :)

that product would sell and it is a nice, silly, sexy gift for women! i mean that would sell in adult stores, so she needed to market it in those stores and not that show. obviously that judge was just jealous that she couldn't pull something like that off, and besides her being born in the 1930's! lol "That just isn't lady like"

what do you expect?oin me and make fun of the women bodies, hell no. She represents women.

.. that is not an invention. who would actually buy that? how do they expect to get a profit from selling a bit of cloth which you could pick up from a fabric shop for a few pennies.

she said she put alot of effort into it but previous said she thought of it by accident in a couple of days, what tripe

No one person can be the judge
She did act offended.. but its the vote that counts
If the majority says it good.. then she becomes a minority
she was trying to control things by being forcefull and manipulative

The Woman Judge is just jelous of the fact that she wouldn't be able to wear that ever for fear that any man that would see her in it might lose their site due to eyeball disintigration . Their eyes will immediately turn to dust and the view of that ugly slime whore of a woman wearing next to nothing will be imprinted in their brain for the rest of their lives... actually, we should make Saddam see her in it! ULTIMATE TORTURE!

can any one tell me what show is this?

dumb ugly old b*tch

Lol the dumb old hag said "stupid naked girl." No such thing!

The only thing real about these shows is THEY ARE STAGED!! and very boring.

That lady judge ought to get a life, that was a sexy invention and a new take on lingerie. I'm sure that there are women out there that would buy that for themselves and or their partner. What guy wouldn't want to get home from a hard days work and be greeted by their wife in an outfit like that? I know I would.

How that stupid bitch would react in front of really SEXY underwear... you guys ever heard of wickeweasel australian swimwear? check their site and the customer contributors, which is girls from all the world sending pics of themselves in this bikinis, some are real hot!

That show is for inventions, not clothing designs.

That woman knew what was going to happen, and the people that produced the show knew what that Lady was going to do.

Compared with all the rest of the lingerie out there . . . I mean, she shouldn't have taken it off, I get that, but it's not a bad idea.
Rather, this was obviously written into the script. No one would overreact that strongly on television. I am willing to bet they paid the girl whose invention they showed to allow them to do that, then agreed to air it; the reaction they got would be beneficial to the woman selling the item and to the show (to boost their ratings).

God I hate television.

Really good simple idea ... im guessing that this is the american version of "Dragons Den" that we have in england... even one of the judges is the same ... and i dont say this much about american shows but ... we need sum of that action on ours

stupid judge lady needs to get a life herself and chill out

yeah i remember watching that on American Inventor. Very funny. lol

That judge was the ONLY one upset. I mean sure the guys don't mind soo much but come on. The female judge wears her feelings on her sleeve. I mean hell look at crotchless panties, and all the other Lingerie that sells, this idea is simple and it would sell like crazy. GREEN EYED MONSTER without a doubt, such a bitch. All the insults were SO uncalled for, the female judge "THINKS" she did the right thing but all she did was show the world shes a 1st class bitch.

That girl, Sylvie, walked away when she was told to by that bitch hahahahahha

We need to get the uncensored version...

Didn't the girl come onto the stage wearing a coat already? What happened to that coat?

Look as quite really good possible clients, the old lady doesnt knows what us guys like to see, thas obvious.

This has gotta be a set up. People who take on inventions are not interested in what is right or wrong. Only whether it is legal and will sell. They think about 1 thing:- money. I would love my girlfriend wearing that. They know that too. You will be able to buy it soon. I bet.

I didn't know Peter Jones was on the American version of Dragons Den.....hes British if you didnt know already.

q asco da la jueza!!! por dios! q puta celosa, se ofende y todo,yo la habria escupido

i think that was a great product, altho the designer could have demonstrated it better.

that invention make her a "loser" and a "fake"? The judge is obviously just jealous of the girls great bod

thats a realy good idea i dont care what that judge said that can make money.

I hate women who think they are businessmen with good ideas. Get back in the kitchen, beyach.

That was really great! Why is that old urgly bitch got offended? They just demonstrated the use of product. The girl was yummie!

It was wery nice! I want to my girlfriend one of those! Great Idea!

that old hag should get that huge stick out of her ass!

i thought it was great....

works as a judge on a reality show... you know like thats a decent job. Then she goes and tells this women that the way she goes about selling her product is disgusting. These show really make me sick

BEST INVETNION EVER ON THE SHOW BY A WOMEN AND THE STUPID BITCH HAD THE AUDASITY TO SAY IT WAS STUPID WAT IS WRONG WITH HER. JUST CAUSE UR UGLY ASS CANT WER IT DONT MEAN BEAUTIFUL WOMEN CANT WER THIS. U SHOULD BE HUNG IN PUBLIC DUMB BITCH.

Actually, the function of such lingerie is not much different compare with those sexy fashionable underwear designed by GUCCI and other famous boutique.

If those stores with big brand name applied her idea to design their female underwear series (which i am quite sure they will), I will feel sorry for the inventor in this video clip that she can't bring it to the world due to the discouragement.

The "all strip off by one pull" idea is good IMO.
Usually when you buy clothings, it is designed to be dressed and undressed by the people who wear(One Party). Now this idea actively ENCOURAGE two parties (the girl and the BF/husband) to undress the clothing , this is a real mental value to human activity in whatever form, because it produce the sense of further mutual participation on the event. And this is the first point.

Secondly, either parties can pull off the clothing with an astonishing speed. Such speed from cover to uncovered (of sexual organs) will produce positive psychological impact to the opposite party and generate excitments.

These elements are completely impossible to provide from the traditional design of either casual clothing or underwear. Although people'd argue that "Wow the bathing gawn or a large towel will do the same trick, one pull it's also off, why do I need this lingerie?" ======> The answer is that u can't combine both fashion and huge sexual appeal in the bathing gawn, but this lingerie can. The combination of both fashionable and sexy design has proved to increase attraction value to both parties, I don't believe much people will argue on this point.

A whore may just get a towel when they do business, but they won't buy a sets of expensive brand Lingerie to do business, it's way too much and too expensive for them. You need a valuable and respectable woman to dress this on in order to do the trick, and this distinguish gorgious sexy woman from a whore.

All the Inventor need to do is develop the design ahead so it looks more like an actual clothing with persuasive texture on design. The pull strap can be hidden by folding or shown by unfoldings (so the woman with it can decide the exact moment to be pulled). And the decide has to be more friendly for maintainence.

While the female judge find it disgusting, it is so weird that if a big brand invent something like this, nobody will blame on it and instead even put the idea to be so original. That's because they plan seriously on the public relation and marketing procedures to make sure people received the messages behind the ideas of their product. The invention was design to be dressed and undressed in residence and private areas. The situation is just like those big brand expensive underwears. Therefore the judge find it disgusting because the demostrator come up with a horny story and show a naked body, these two thing combined gives a very distorted impression to the judge. Sad.

what do you guys think?

firstly anyone could have invented that, secondly, that is not the kind of thing that would sell in victorias secret, its the kind of thing that would sell in shitty cheap sex store, thirdly you have to have a models body to look half decent in any lingerie and especially with that kind you need to be fit to have a positive reaction. Also some of you people say that the men were fine, firstly men are stupid, if there had been another woman she probably would have reacted in the same way, unless she were a lesbian and also, you can't strip naked on national tv, kids watch!

the presentation was maybe a little to loud :)
but the invetion was super

why not just patent nakedness?