Why Planting Trees Won't Save the World from Global Warming

Tags:
Global Warming Trees Planting Answer Forests Research Carbon Trading Offsets Sequestration Woodland
pdixon
  • By: pdixon
  • Subscribers: 10
  • Updated: 18-Apr-09
  • Videos: 220
  • International International
  • Comments: 1
  • Views: 294
  • Added: 08-Mar-08

http://www.globalchange.com Planting trees is not the answer to global warming -- much as I love trees. Trees fall over and die -- even if they live for 100 years and fix a ton of carbon dioxide into carbon (wood) as they grow. All the carbon is later released as carbon dioxide as the tree falls down and decays on the forest floor. The answer is to capture "old" carbon -- from burning oil, gas, coal, for example with carbon sequestration technology in chimneys of coal fired power stations. Vattenfall in Norway has such a system, capturing 90% of carbon emissions, which are sent back in a pipe under the North Sea for permanent storage. This power storage provides more than 50% of Norway compliance with the Kyoto treaty. Comment by Dr Patrick Dixon, futurist, leading authority on global trends and conference speaker. (more)

  1. Categories: Science & Tech
Comments on

Why Planting Trees Won't Save the World from Global Warming

1 Comment | Add Comment
  • Wrong

    Annual carbon emissions throughout the world: 27,245,758 tons, according to information from the UN

    Annual carbon sequestration by organisms if forest were planted on 1% of the world that currently does not support forests or natural grasslands: 1,840,244,803.27 tons, according to information from the UN.

    So, planting trees could sequester 67.54 times as much carbon annually as we produce in the same amount of time.

    I post this in the interest of fact-checking, and to allow people to see the other side of the issue that pdixon raises. Look at the numbers, then form you own opinion.

    By arbela47000 1222453567 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
1 Comment | Add Comment