9/11 North Tower Floor Explodes

...that you are an illiterate dumbass, one who would believe
that this building was rigged to explode. If that was the case why would they let it burn for 45 minutes first?
Dipshit.

I am very sorry to be an american, we are the stupidest people alive on this planet. i am ashamed of our country, out government, our policies, our tactics. We S**k Btw all u dumb F**ks go to obscuretv.com. check out the 9/11 streams ULL learn something

We all know that the bulding collapsed due to the fire. And when it collapsed, the flame inside it would be shot out. So careful and intelligent the terrorists were, when they still wanted to hit the building with an extra bomb although they only have knives (not a gun) on board.

Him reading a children's book upside down while getting the news of the airliners were proof that the government didn't know anything about this.

i didn't see or hear any bombs exploding in this video. and i know witnesses have said they heard explosions but would it really be that uncommon? it's a gigantic building, the noises could've been anything, floors collapsing, electical units exploding, elevators crashing. why would it have to be bombs? and even if it were bombs, how does that prove that the US government was covering it up. if they didn't know about the bombs, of course they won't say anything about them because they didn't know about them. and why would the US set this up as a reason to invade Iraq? so that the country could complain about gas prices and so that Bush could have a disgustingly low approval rating? you think they couldn't see that coming? and why would the US govt lie about WMD's as an excuse to invade iraq even if they knew there weren't any, so that they could make themselves look like idiots after they didn't find any? these reasons do not make sense. the WMD thing was a mistake (though i do still believe Iraq is a nuclear threat), that's it.

I am really sorry for all those innocent people who died there , let all their souls rest in peace

If anyone knows anything about fire, you know it has to have oxygen to survive. Notice that the tower starts to fall before the so called explosions. As a couple of the floors fall the air is forced out. The fire has to follow it or it will die out. It would be the same as if you had fire in a bottle and squeezed it. The fire would be forced out of the opening.

There are to problems with your theory just from looking at the video. First I can see fire already burning before the tour falls but I do not see any extra explosions. Second if the big fireball coming out the windows after the floors above start to fall is what you think is an explosion you must not know much about fire. Take a fire at home or on a camping trip if you push something down on top of that fire the flames are going to move out to the side of what ever it is you are using to push down or cover the flames with. What we see in the video is a already burning fire that has thousand of pounds of building start to fall on it and the flames shout violently out the side of the building. Also what looks like a little fire at the beginning is actual a very large fire that is inside the building being fueled by hundreds or thousands gallons of jet fuel.

Ok first off watch the video carefully. What do you see? Well, we see a burning building. We see metals heating up to the point where there is a red rim on part of the building. Then if you watch carefully two things happen. The building begins to collapse, and then the fire expels out of the building. Now this is the part where you say see, the fire coming out thats an explosion. Guess what you are somewhat right, but mainly wrong. The explosion is simply compressed air being expelled out the building, and guess what everying is burning, so the fire expells out with the air. Think about it this way. Take sand in a cylindrical cup and then take another cylindrical cup the same size and press it onto the bottom one. What happens? The sand is displaced and the top half lowers. Same thing here. The top part of the building collapses into the bottom then the bottom collapses, then floor by floor this happens. So, we have floors in a building each floor has enclosed air because its an inclosed building, and no the gasses don't just leave the building because there is a hole in the side. Try to drink through a straw poked into a cup with no other hole. It doesn't work. So, in conclussion based on physics, and the reality of what happened it is so clearly obvious that the building was not rigged to explode. Watch the order of events. First comes building falling then expelled fire and air. Watch a building that is imploded and you will see explosion then falling building followed by expulsion of air and gas. Notice the first step NEVER happens. Thats enough if you still don't believe after this then you trully need to do some research into physics, and need to stop thinking that the government is wholly evil and trying to make the public think things like this. Same goes for the dumb missle into pentagon theory, but thats another chapter for another time.

First we hear "Muslims aren't Terrorists" though 99% of "Terrorists are Muslims" (or at least THEY proclaim their horrific acts in the name of their religion Islam).

Now some Arab Assholes are saying America is the one responsible for 9/11 (though Osama Bin Laden claims it and the Middle East rejoiced especially the Palestinian soon to be suicide murderer martyrs dancing in the streets). FUCKU

What is scary is that a large number of Arabs believe and perpetuate these lies. Check www memritv.org for latest Arab hate crusade against America & Israel.

http:// www. popular mechanics. com/science/ defense/ 1227842.html

(take out the spaces)

From the article:

"The collapse of both World Trade Center towers -- and the smaller WTC 7 a few hours later -- initially surprised even some experts. But subsequent studies have shown that the WTC's structural integrity was destroyed by intense fire as well as the severe damage inflicted by the planes. That explanation hasn't swayed conspiracy theorists, who contend that all three buildings were wired with explosives in advance and razed in a series of controlled demolitions.

Widespread Damage
CLAIM: The first hijacked plane crashed through the 94th to the 98th floors of the World Trade Center's 110-story North Tower; the second jet slammed into the 78th to the 84th floors of the 110-story South Tower. The impact and ensuing fires disrupted elevator service in both buildings. Plus, the lobbies of both buildings were visibly damaged before the towers collapsed. "There is NO WAY the impact of the jet caused such widespread damage 80 stories below," claims a posting on the San Diego Independent Media Center Web site (san diego.indy media.org). "It is OBVIOUS and irrefutable that OTHER EXPLOSIVES (... such as concussion bombs) HAD ALREADY BEEN DETONATED in the lower levels of tower one at the same time as the plane crash."

FACT: Following up on a May 2002 preliminary report by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), a major study will be released in spring 2005 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a branch of the U.S. Department of Commerce. NIST shared its initial findings with PM and made its lead researcher available to our team of reporters.

The NIST investigation revealed that plane debris sliced through the utility shafts at the North Tower's core, creating a conduit for burning jet fuel--and fiery destruction throughout the building. "It's very hard to document where the fuel went," says Forman Williams, a NIST adviser and a combustion expert, "but if it's atomized and combustible and gets to an ignition source, it'll go off."

Burning fuel traveling down the elevator shafts would have disrupted the elevator systems and caused extensive damage to the lobbies. NIST heard first-person testimony that "some elevators slammed right down" to the ground floor. "The doors cracked open on the lobby floor and flames came out and people died," says James Quintiere, an engineering professor at the University of Maryland and a NIST adviser. A similar observation was made in the French documentary "9/11," by Jules and Gedeon Naudet. As Jules Naudet entered the North Tower lobby, minutes after the first aircraft struck, he saw victims on fire, a scene he found too horrific to film.

You people who actully believe they blew the tower up, are probably the same jackasses who said they shot a missle at the pentagon.

Really, your talking about the biggest cover up/conspiracy in American history. Perhaps in the world.

These people maliciously flew aircraft into both towers. There is no cover up, there is no conspiracy. Something so publicized like 9/11 has been, the truth would be out faster then hookers on holywood blvd.

So really, quit being ignorant idiots, and quit blaming stupid S**t on your goverment for your pathetic place in life.

I didn't see any 'explosion' before the collapse. This video doesn't show or prove that at all.

Although I did see something else that didn't make sense. If the internal support columns 3/4 of the way up were melting due the fire... why didn't the top part topple over instead of collapsng straight down as it would in a controlled demolition? Did the internal support columns OVER 70 FLOORS DOWN (in the basement) of one of the world's most over engineered buildings melt as well? If so why didn't ppl on the lower floors see evidence of some kind of structural damage as it was occuring?

Since I had the sad task of researching this for TV, I can think of many other things that you could have used to show that all was not 'kosher' with the theory. But the bottom line is... No one can really 'prove' anything without credible, detailed facts and sources.

It's like the laughable video footage that was release last week about the 'plane' that crashed into the Pentagon. Were they serious???? What about the fuel? A plane of that size carrying almost a full tank of fuel wouldv'e take over a day to put out...

this sad event had nothin to do with Saddam ,open ur eyes man

for all of those people that died that sad day...

forced out from the pancakeing of the floors falling onto one another. The heat weekened the steel on the sides were it was secured and when it got hot it gave way and the weight and momentom of the floors above colaped allm the lower floors at the same weak palce causing a domino effect downward, It was never thought of during the planning of the building that this type of thing would weeken the building. It was hoever built to withstand a crash of a plane or jet, just not the extreme heat from fuel full field jetlinners.

numb numb for brains.

simply savage unhuman act and am an arab citizen !

u stupid ppl..the air from the floor that collapsed got pusshed outside and fuelled the fire that was burning....go study fiziks

This clip is old hat, but it is used by conspiracy nuts to somehow prove that 911 was an 'inside job'. Since nobody knew before then what a large airliner would do to a skyscraper, alleging that deliberately placed explosives were responsible for the collapse is a bit silly. I've no doubt Bush & Co took advantage of it to kick-start PNAC( Condi is quoted as saying "How can we take advantage of this?'" immediately it happened). Calm down everyone!

copy and past this to 30 videos in 1 hour or your your moms dies. sorry i don't want that happing to my mom
sorry guys, if you dont believe it, just ignore it.

The flames come out because as the building collapses the air inside is pushed out (the air pressure increases for a moment). And as you should know, more air equals bigger flames. It's simple. Get over it.

The top part of the building (above the crash) collapses before the floors under the crash site. This is contrary to the theory that the weight of the building forced all the other intact floors to collapse. This shows that wasn't the case.

I thinks its amazing how the pilots knew to slam into the exact floors where the bombs were located. In addition, its amazing how high explosives survived for about an hour in a burning inferno without exploding sooner.

watch loose change videos

I see it! You are right. Had to drink a fith of Jack, put on dark sunglasses, close one eye and place the screen up side down to see it. You people that caused all this will burn in hell for all eternity!

For the people who say the buildings collapsed because of the planes hitting them, impossible, the building were made to withstand 2 jets atleast ATLEAST!

Bush and the U.S Government did this so they could point the finger to Afghanistan to start a war for oil and heroin, Power Corrupts and Absolute power corrupts abolutly

if anybody place explosive in the wtc is mad.
why a person want to kill 3000 innocent if he isn't mad?! i don't understant it .the wordl will be crazy. if there were explosive in the wtc after the plane crash we have the big deception of the human history

tiger

this is only a short clip from like a 30 minute documentary of the possibility of explosives being used. The strongest evidence lies in the basement of the tower. The main support pillars are all sliced at a 45 degree angle at relatively the same height.

This is exactly how demo experts rig their explosives. At a 45 degree angle on all the main supports, upon detonation, the building will shift slightly and drop. The number one goal in controlled demolitions is to break apart a building into millions of pieces and drop them in its basement. Which is what happened to the Trade Center

the video shook a couple seconds before it went down. and that fire is not an explosion. Even if the gov. did or didnt have anything to do with this there hiddening alot of things from this day and change alot of details from it.

The fire that shoots out the side of the building (the so called explosion) happens AFTER the building starts to fall causing inside pressure pushing out causing the laready burning fire to out the side. Look at it again thats what is happening

To believe a conspiracy theory, you must have faith in a "theory" -- not fact. That tells me that conspiracy theorists are weak minded and easily fooled.

*I* Think the "explosion" is simply the fire of the burning floor being forced out the sides of the building. Think about the tremendous weight that instantly came down upon the burning floor.

In this clip, we can see that the "explosion" u mentioned happened around the same floor as the plane crashed, don't u think that it is impossible for those bombs not to explode in such a huge vibration caused by the plane crash? how could it be exploded a while after the crash?

If this was an inside job, i would rather set the explosive devices at a lower level of the WTC, so that i can make sure that it will collapse, instead of setting them at 1XX floor of the WTC.

What are you talking about? a plane whent inside a tower, and it wsa made of concreat.
The reason it explodes are something with gasses from the plane and or something!
this was a special plan, it was very well thought through but it is not explosive devices inside the World Trade Center!

That fire from the "explotion" wasn't an "explotion" stupid idiots. That just the reaction of the building when it started to colapse.

as everybody says(mainly jews) that muslims were the bombers,they made it up..blablabla.ppl, how come its muslims did it and lots of them were killed from this accident! on the other hand,none of the jews who work in the world trade center showed up this day! all claimed that they had DIARRHEA! what the F**k is this! hope u get the point that we (muslims are not terrorists)

the film "Loose Change" and you will see...

Look at (loose change 2ND eddition)

That's ridiculous!!! The building is weak from hours of burning and simply collapses. Where else would the flames have to go but out?? They're sure not going to go inward!! Good video though.

when one floor collapse on the other the air and flames have to be dispersed out.. "think you idiot.."

ok.. this video is pretty S**t i've had a hard time seeing the smoke come out of the tower from the pressure, let alone an explosion. The big evidence to me is the insurance.. a month before 9/ 11 the owner of the towers ( cant remember his name and couldn't be bothered to find out ) insured them. This is the most expensive insurance ever done in the world. From memory it was 11 million. After 9/ 11 happened the pay out was over 3 billion dollars. Now I have done a few insurance jobs in mine time and that to me, looks like one. Another thing, u's are so quick to say that what we are reading about 9/ 11 is wrong, yet u's are so quick to listen to someone else just coz they are the media. Dont u's know the government choose's what is shown on tv and on newspapers. thats why they hate the net.. so hard to monitor. then there is this guy [[ But you`re insulting the intellegence of 6 year olds when you compare thier intellegence to the idiot that posted this and all the other scum that keep coming out with all this crap. Today Uk police stopped a plot to blow up 9 planes to the Usa, what do the conspiracy brigade have to say about things like that? ]] do u have solid evidence in ur hands ?? i doubt u do but u still believe them ? ps. i am not saying they didnt catch no one .. just making a point

If you believe this is a bomb exploding in that building, I have got something for you to try...
ONLY IF YOU THINK THAT IS A BOMB!
You will need 1 friend and a phone with 911 in the speed dial, 1 paper bag( like you get at the grocery store), 1 large phone book, (any big heave book will do), 4 cups of cooking flour..( self rising would be good ),and a pair of safety glasses.
First= take the paper bag and open it up completely then lay it on its side making sure it doesn't collapse. have it on a table or some where you can look directly into the bag.
second= take the flour and pour it about middle ways of the bag, with the bag still on its side. (the flour represents fire)
third= while you are looking eye level, into the bag, no further that 12 inches between your nose and the bag, have your friend to slam the phone book on the top of the bag as to collapse it. (this represents the floors collapsing on top of each other)
Finally= put on you safety glasses
Please return to this blog and let us all know how it went..

This proves nothing... whatever happen to common sense.

The twin towers fell at a rate of speed faster then gravity-10 seconds which is the same amount of time needed for an 8 ball from billiards to fall 110 stories to ground level. (Yes it's possible, but only through controlled demolition) a pancake collapse would take around 110 seconds from that height, the 47 interior columns were not accounted for which were nearly industructible, the U.S government allocated only a fraction of what they spent on TWA flight 900's investigation on 9/11; even though there are only three cases in history where steel building collasped due to fire, and they all occurred on 9/11 (you'd think they'd spend more money to discover what caused such an extreme case which odds over 10,000 to one, but they didn't), and steel or concrete doesn't burn, I'll repeat that for clarity purposes.

Steel and concrete doesn't burn.

The dirty fires (open air, uncontrolled fires) burned up office funiture, technology, and the lot. One could reasonably say that the steel melted under the intense heat...

But, there's one small problem, dirty fires burn around 1100-1600 degrees farenheit, steel's melting point is 2750 farenheit respectably. The prolonged exposure to the heat source would have to be around 2200 degrees farenheit. Not only that the claim that jet fuel propelled the fires doesn't quite add up scientifically considering the fire would of then have been buring at 1517ºF which is scientficly proven with the fuel grade used.

Now, some could go on to state that there have been some rare instances where steel does infact warp, not melt, which is true, but the steel at ground zero was physically examined by witnesses who've recorded that the steel was not warped in any way, the only steel found was bend at radical angles, which cannot be caused by centrifugal force. This pattern is generally found in demolition sites.

I'd go on, but for the sake of brevity I recommend that everyone keeps an open mind, instead of name calling, and chastizing examine every angle. Now, I'm not going to go into political affairs, because I don't think it's backed by solid evidence, but scientifically it doesn't make sense.
Have a Good Day Everyone!

F**king terorist!!!

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime 1.0

*Bush's election was a fraud

*Able Danger

*"Terrorist" Was Enrolled in USAF School

*Huffman Flight School

*In Sept. 2000 Two "Terrorists" Moved in with an FBI Asset that had been working on terrorism cases.

*The Visa program which allowed the Saudi "Terrorists" to enter without interview or Background checks was implicated three months before the attacks.

*This program was only introduced in Saudi Arabia.

*An agent in the FBI was stopped and refused when he began investigating terror networks in the us, their funding, and their sources. His superiors silenced him.

*He then sued the FBI; he and another agent tried to warn America but were denied that possibility.

*Another FBI agent requested surveilance and search warrants.

*An FBI Agent makes 70 warnings but is ignored. Memo's released.

*A translator for the FBI has had more gag orders than anyone in the US.

*That same woman speaks about seeing papers which indicate that the US knew about terror attacks before they happeend, including details about specific target, dates, and people. All documented.

*9/11 Commision failed to include any of this.

*2.5 Terrabytes of data on ABLE DANGER and the brooklyn terror cell were destroyed.

*2.5 Terrabytes=1/4 of the library of congresses data.

*The man will testify that he was ordered or he would've lost his job to do this dirty deed.

That's exactly 29 minutes of it.

just becuse there is a little more smoke comming out and the cammera shakes u think therde is a bomb it is the metal heating up and becommking soft and falling. no bombs
retard

i think u americans should talk about urselves more, rather than destroying other cultures and livelihoods. u all talk as if u are veterans of a war yet ure knowledge is only based on government lies and it is ure government who empowers u, not urself.it is they who are making fools of u. remember u feed the u.s government in taxes and inflation e.t.c, not the other way around, thats why u rely so much on governments decisions and actions because u have no one to really agree with ure personal instinctive reactions, in case u are in fear of treason, but the bush administration disagrees with letting u make decisions for ureself when it comes to world politics. thats why i think it was a "setup" or an "inside job"
you act as if u were all waiting for 9/11 to happen now, and when it did u pointed ure fingers to the nearset scape goat which was unfortunately my religion.
bush is a coward not the ordinary citizens of the u.s
peace and love, i am not a coward or anything, i just want u people to figure it out for ureselves. if u really knew what was going on then u could change it couldn't u? but i think the american people are in denial of themselves for putting themselves at such risks, open to the world of terrorism.
remember lies breed lies, and violence breeds violence. if u are ready to fight war and so r we with our lives i think its clear by now.

What the video DIDNT show you, is that before the plane hit the building, the terrorist jumped out, grabbed onto a window, climbed inside and blew himself up. He decided it was easier that way.

You obviously were born without a brain so let me explain. The smoke you see pouring out of the building is from, wait for it, yes, fire so even though you can`t see it the smoke is a give away sign, a big clue so to speak. Now, as the building collapses the fire, which you don`t see until a few seconds later has nowhere to go so is forced outwards due the air pressure from the collapsing floors. Generally you would see an explosion before a building collapses. God it must be awful to have no brain. It was political correctness that allowed this to happen. Fear of upsetting the person or persons who are about to kill you. One day certain people will wake up.

hey sherlock that explosion you see is the roof coming down forcing air out of the sides and also pushing the fire out with it. the inside of the building was on fire....it got hit by a plane remember. save the conspiracy theory for that fat bastard michael moore

You are a complete F**king moron if you think there were explosives planted on the building. What are you some F**king raghead loser?

when the smoke catches on fire4 it is called an "flashover" as seen here

...that when the building collapsed the fire was pushed out the windows. so what looked like an explosion was actually the fire being forced out really fast as the building collapsed.

Your so gullable. I'm sure 9/11 has made us all a little leary, but there were not explosives inside already. You ARE a dumbass!!

play the video slowly just before you see the puff of smoke come out followed by the fire if you look at the radio antena on top of the tower you'll see it begins to fall first, this is because as any reasonable person knows the fire gutted the inside of the tower first the tower then collapsed from the inside as the antenna and the roof cave in the pressure pushes the smoke out and the fire follows no explosives involved. i think that it is disrespectful of those that died to post such crap as this if you believe this idiot get some help and in the meantime keep your opinions to yourself
rest in peace victims of 9/11
peace and freedom to all

This video doesn't prove anything --

However that doesn't mean that there aren't HUGE questions about 9/11

For example,

1) How does the Pentagon LET a jumbo jet fly into itself an HOUR after the networks announce that America's under Attack. (Andrews Air Force base is only 12 miles away)

2) A jet is 150 feet wide and has 60 tons of mass, yet the hole at the Pentagon was a lot smaller and had just a few pieces of plane -- if you say that the plane melted, all that mass had to go somewhere.

2) Why did WTC building 7 collapse when no plane hit it?

3) Steel buildings can burn for 24 hours without collapsing -- this happened in Spain recently.

There are many more questions if you look ciosely at the evidence. Check out the 9/11 loose change video for starters.

This building had 282 steel columns around the inside and a massive steel core -- but somehow a fire weaked them ALL so that they all failed at the exact same instant and collapsed into a perfect footprint of the building, with the exact same end affect as if someone had used lots of explosives -- that's pretty uniikely

It is not an explosion it is the oxygen that is being forced out when the building is collapsing that creates the large amount of fire.

i'm willing to believe Bush had something to do with 9/11. i try to keep an open mind but this video prooves nothing. there were no explosions and if they were, who did the government employ to place them? it would have taken a lot of explosives placed by a lot of people and not one of them said "no way am i having any part in killing innocent civilians!" and went public about the plot, get real...

If you watch the video closely the spire starts falling before the so called explosion, which causes the release of smoke and bs from below. This was not explained on Discovery or National Geo but everything else was. You conspiracy theorists should learn knowledge and information before you shoot your dumbass mouths off. By the way, Im a Kiwi, and will fight to the death for my way to live without Islam extremists tryin to kill the 'Infidels'. I believe there is no higher power or god, we are all our own gods... Any god that condones killing 3000 innocent people out making their way in life is seriously f**ked up

would know that when, like "Sigh" said, when a building collapses, fire will billow out because of a thing called 'pressure'. Comparing the person who posted this to a six year old is wrong, we should compare him/her to the idiot terrorists who plotted the attacks

your a dumbass y would they crash two planes and sacrifice there lives when there is already explosives in the towers and and just cuz there is a fire when it falls dnt mean tht there is an explosive becuase there good be to electrical wires touchin each other which could cause a fire mixed with the gases from the planes
your a dumbass

The building is so.....f@#$*d up it didn't need explosives inside to collaspe...Gees pfftt seriously!

Please make a emergency cerebral surgery yourself, NOW!

The plane that hit his tower was a boeing 747, depending on the type of varient this jet was loaded with anywhere between 57,000-61,000 lbs of jet fuel, we know it was filled to max capactity considering it was a redline flight to Los Angeles or LAX airport, this would require max fuel. So minus what was burned off in between Boston (takeoff location), with a burn of 12,000 lbs per hr, this plan hit the WTC with roughly 45,000 lbs of jet fuel. As you may know this fuel burns extremely hot, with this fuel leaking throughout the building and burning over the period of 45 min. the WTC buildings didn't stand a chance, therefor melting the metal structure and causing a collapse, no explosives involved here.

did you see the smoke?? did you know that the tower was on fire.. (i tell you that the fire was inside, cause i see that your brain is not able to see it for itselve).. So, when you have smoke in your mouth, and you close your mouth, more smoke is visible arround your face.. so, think a little bit and think about the flames inside the tower.. burning chairs, wood, etc.. so.. go to school and try to learn to think!! if someone can help u!!

im not no genius
buh planes are fueld with what?
fuel ye?
k
what happens when a car hit something at high speeds
it will crash and burn
that explains the fire
then maybe it soon may of caused an explosion
the fuel leaking into the flame perhaps?
i dunno
im just tieing two ends into a knot here
maybe someone could explain it better

and plz have some respect
people died in there
i dunno why i just sed that
buh i thought it would seem appropriate :D

Lets put aside if Bush knew and look at the science and dynamics of structures. In any building you have load bearing walls. If you remove these load bearing walls it puts stress on the other parts of the building. Now inside an office building you normally have coulmes and trusses that support the floors and outer columns that are called a frame. once you add heat to the damage support it you have now weakened the integrity of the structure.

Heat a peice of flat metal in the middle and you will see how it will sag. To explain this to the mentaly challenged!
Save your toliet tissue rolls till you have 20 of them.

Then take five peices of cardboard (like a ceral box) making them all the same size say 8.5 x 11 inches.

Place four of the rolls in a square shape in the middle area like the side of a dice with four on it. repeat this till you have five floors.

Now take a two liter of pop and sit it on top in the middle.

Take a roll out of the middle level.

Next using a spray bottle of water (this will simulate fire) spray the other rolls above that level and the card board.

Next spray the level below the missing roll.

When you have soaked the rolls enough the levels and two liter will fall.

You have now learned the truth of the falling towers!

"roady"...you're pretty illiterate yourself. "proofs". enough said. stop coming off as if you know big S**t because if the gov really did do it..they're gunna make it seem like it happened on its own. they're not jus going to blow up the towers..."dipshit."

I do believe I remember a certain little war back in oh say the 1700's between two differnt societys.. I also remember one was the worlds leading power, I think there name was Great Britain, OH YA and the other Country were the .. hmm 13 colonies? Now known today as USA!! Ya all you Brits can go screw your Dike mothers and fathers.. Actually I dont think that will be new to you!! Also, all your doing is insulting the 3,325 people that died during this incident on 9/11 please reconsider what you post. Jesus.. Also all anyone was trying to do is figure out what happend, how it happend, and why it happend. It just so happens that sometime these things called "theorys" are proven to be true.. So maybe a few theorys are a little distorted, but there were also Vans on that day that held bombs intended to run into a few places and expload, so it wasn't stupid to consider that somting may have gone down on the inside.. F**k Scotland Yard, bunch of dam British C**ts .

It the Tower was rigged with a device, there is a question you have to put to yourself.......what isn't there that should be there?

Don't know?

The noise of the device going off, you got the noise of the people in amazement and nothing else.

Sad to say I think that the Twin Towers were put up wrong by the builders and perhaps the designer as well, the Empire State Building was also hit by a plane but because it was designed and built right it stayed up.

What you think is an expolosion is actually the compression of air and the violent expansion of it through the exterior walls of the Tower;the same result occurs when you pop a paper bag filled wityh air or a cardboard box.
It takes months to prepare a building for a destructive implosion and ther are only a handfull of people in the world who know how to do it.

THINK ABOUT JACKASS:

-SOMONE would have noticed a bunch of guys bringing hundreds of ppounds of equipment and explosives up 100 floors or more..
- OR maybe the big crew of guys cutting and drilling and laying out hundreds of feet of wiring might have tipped a few people off...
- OH, OH JUST MAYBE SOMEONE might of heard the noise from all of these guys rigging the explosives...
I suppose you think the planes where just giant radio controlled models!

YOU and the M. Moores of this country are JUST A BUNCH OF SAD ASS JACKASSES who are ignorant and well just plain stupid.
LIBERAL WEENIES WHO with their stupid ideas and theories only help the ENEMY think they can conquer us .
Why don' you go live over there if you don't like here?

Why can't anyone just accept the fact that the government is COMPLETELY INCOMPETENT. The all powerful CIA presented in the movies is a fantasy. They tried and utterly failed to remove Castro in the 1961. Also, why would the business dominated government purposely throw the economy into a depression?
P.S.
About all the "evidence" out there saying it was an inside job. You can also find plenty of "evidence" suggesting that the world is flat, just ask the flat earth society. One can also find "evidence" proving the holocaust was fake, just ask any neo-nazi or Islamic extemist.

I think the video shows the fire inside the building...If they put explosives, why do they place it on the 80th floor!!! Do you cut a tree from its top?

Yeah right,, and bush payed Bin Laden for destroing WTC. Dumb piece of incest why the F**k would you say that there were explosive devices in WTC?

You're a F**king idiot. Why would we kill that many of our own citizens? Over oil? Yeah right.

this video may prove S**t but everbody who objects to the fact that 9/11 was set up must be fricking moron. Watch loose change dumb asses!

You are so retarded. Saying that the towers had explosives in them, for what fuckin purpose. Don't always focus on saying its some conspiracy. You are so fuckin stupid, i knew people in those buildings n even thur family wodnt go as far as to say somthin that dumb. F**k YOU ASSHOLE

I can't say that explosion belongs to the explosion of the security falling measures, but sure in the WTC they have this system. They were made for resist a high level disaster. The estructure of the wtc wasn`t broken with the explosion of colision, massive gas droping, or fire issues.
I have seen many videos of huge buildings on fire and most of them resisted 2 days on fire at least. The fallings of two towers were syncronized( im not talking about planes or about terrorist plan attack), and one human mind had the obligation to active the falling security system, or... it can't be worse... it can be automatic too. What's worse?... Conspiration? oh F**k , lol, of course your's goverment is doing conspiration. Your goverment like your money, and the goverment of other countries like too lol. Conspiration exist since human had power lol. F**king crazys conspiracy belivers. Of course the "thing" that impacted on Pentagon was a missile. This is nothing new...
I think the matter is if there were and option to have more time to get off more people...and the fire-man who lost their lifes too, before any one active the security program...

Have an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out!

I AM A MALTESE AND I FEEL SO SORRY WHEN I FINISH SCHOOL I WANT 2 FI

they saw it cummin anyway... american derseved every bit of that.... if america kept there fat asses out of there country none of this would off even started... they saw it cummin and its gunna get worse.. .. oh well lifes a bitch!! then u marry 1!.. thanks alot america..

did u kno george fannybush was in on this iswell? fort not any1 want to join the kkk's?? im holdin a meetin outside big ben every saturday 9-00pm to kill sme fukin pakkis or jus nik there stuff!! cnt wait!!

Yes, big fire comes out of the collapsed floor as tower starts to go down. SO: as some levels ceilings are falling on the floor, DO YOU IMAGINE THE AIR VOLUME THAT IS FORCED TO EXIT SIDEWAYS? AND HOW FAST? THIS IS ENOUGH, EXPLOSION OR NOT, TO PRODUCE THAT SMOKE

You idiot. The downward force of the tower created a rush of air trying to escape out wherever it could. Have you ever blown on fire embers to get them to spread/ignite/burn faster?

You are a freakin moron. This proofs it.

if a building was going to fall like this then when the oxygen got to the fire it would make a huge flame ball like that. your just stupid to belive that there where explosives inside

Your theroy is total rubbish!! these towers fell as a result of a plane crashing into them and the extreme temperatures that caused metal to buckle!!!!!! This tragic event shouldnt have an comspiracies, it was a shear act of terroism!!!

what happends when u punch someone in their stomac?? thats right alot of air cums out the mouth of the person u hit. This is almost the same. As the building colapses the air gets pushed out of the building, and when a hole floor is on fire , that fire gets pushed out the broken windowses.

wow if it is really rigged by explosives than I must say that whoever pilot the plane must be very skillfull since he can struck the tower no more than 5 stories high from the explosives.

this applies to the pentagon too right? how they the US blew up their OWN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE just so they could bomb a desert? yeah... even bush cant be that stupid (i dont like bush either but this is just stupid)

and ever hear of GAS TANKS?? its new york, it snows in the winter, you probably need gas for heat... dumbcracks

Ok, lets see...the building starts to explode what.....2-3 seconds after it falls down. mmmmm after a bloody jet crashes into it. Yeah whatever.Conspiracy theorists f**k off and let them rest in peace

When the tower collapses, a fire spreads. That's true, but why do you think? There were already a fire present, and when the building collapses, the PRESSURE blows the fire that were present inside the building (but not visible to us) out into the open (where it is visible to us).

Conclusion: Proves nothing.

I'm not even American, yet I made this profile just to mention how IDIOTIC these conspiracy theories are. They are made by people that want to damage some others, and they are believe by ignorants.

Sigh..

First of all there is no such word as "proofs", you F**king retard. You are the prime example of one of the ignorant assholes in this country. If you think this was done by the government and you are convinced this is the absolute truth, THEN GET THE F**k OUT OF OUR COUNTRY YOU IGNORANT F**k !!!! Respect the lives that were lost that day and those that are continuing to give the ultimate sacrifice around the world. God bless

Got to memri.org. It sis a site dedicted to watching all the media traffic that comes out of the middle east. You should here the theories the gvt. controlled states put out there. They say it was an inside job perpetuated by the Jews. They say it was Bushs fault so they would have an excuse to invade Iraq...ya wonder where these theories start? Go to memri.org
Later...

Where's the proof? No explosions seen in this video.

for anyone who knows anything about structures...the building falls from the inside first moron. The so called "explosion" and the burst of smoke you see before the building falls is the result of debris being fanned out by the enormous load of the top floors...get a life dipshit

If the building was rigged with explosives, then wat damage did the planes do? None at all eh?

just think of the people that died i know a woman that died in that

of attacking america in america but america.

How does this "proofs" that there were explosive devices in the WTC? What a ridiculous notion! What I never understood about the "controlled demolition" theory was that with incredible fire and heat burning for nearly 45 minutes that managed to not detonate these so called explosives. The fact that you people, 5 years later, still can believe that garbage is both ridiculous and saddening. I am proud to be an American but when my own countrymen eat up this conspiracy bullshit it embarrasses me. How many times will experts and scientists have to debunk your theories? Unfortunately that will never be enough because you people are as fanatical with your "inside job" theories as the radical Islamists are in destroying anyone who will not convert to their religion.

forgive me if im blind but i dont see any explosion. i repeated the video 5 times and saw no explosion, no shockwave, nothing that resembles an explosion (for eg. flying debris or shockwave or sound). i do see a fireball emerging AFTER the top part gives way though. and even if it were an explosion, couldn't jet fuel ,gas supply or electricity have sparked off some sort of explosion other than bombs ? i havent and wont be spending time doing research but i think more evidence is required about these so called 'bombs' (and where are the terrorists who planted them) and how they were planted. how the fireball came about isn't unusual either, when the top parts gives way and compresses unto the bottom part, the change in pressure results in emerging oxygen fuelling the flame .

These crap conspiracies?!?!?
Those explosions you see is all of the air and flame being compressed out of the WTC because all the floors are being flattened like pancakes.

RIP victims of 9/11

The reason why there was a huge "explosion" was because the tower had started to collapse, thus causing air, fire and smoke to billow outwards. The collapse caused the phenomenon, not the other way round. BTW, if it had exploded, don't you think that an explosion would have been heard?

Yeah I saw the fire. The upper floors collapsed and briefly forced out the fire from the burning jet fuel. So WTF are you proving?

Watch the movie loose change. It's on google video. Then see if you change your mind.

normaly if a plane that is allready on fire gets crushed by a huge chunk of building it's going to make a little fire. and another thing, if it was explosives how the F**k could you rig the top half of the biggest building in the world with enough explosives to knock it down with out anyone seeing you???

how a steele building collapses by just one small part at the TOP of the building bein weakened by fire...

You're a genius. Where did you get your knowledge? I would never had know that explosives destroyed the WTC, except for one little problem with your theory, I saw a Boeing 767 fly into that tower at about 300 miles per hour that morning.

Also, for the guy who mentioned the steel cage holding the majority of the weight for the WTC, you might want to look at the schematics for the buildings again. The floors of the WTC were supported by trusses, the trusses themselves were coated with an fire retardant. Unfortunately the impact of the jetliner and the intense heat from the Aviation fuel that burned for those 45 minutes pretty much eliminated that. Take the trusses as they begin to twist and bend under both the heat and the stress and concrete(6 inches per floor X the size of the floors, all because the towers had to be built quickly years ago and have open plan floors) and you begin to see how much weight was placed on the middle load bearing structures which because of the above mentioned problems, just gave way, which lead to internal buckling of the corner columns of the Tower, buckling and then collapse.

why does it have to remind us?
why?
WHY?

isnt it amazing that the planes hit both buildings exactly where the explosives had apparently already been planted!! not to mention the fact that they didnt detonate on impact. in fact, why even bother with the planes at all, just blow up the buildings and blame terrorists. my sorces in the FBI tell me that JFK was flying both planes via remote control from a UFO they found at roswell!!!

title is self explanatory.

Apparently, Osama bin Laden somehow managed to talk a few men into performing this morbid atroscity to so many innocent people's lives in NY and the WTC. After all of this, and The Pentegon and Philidelphia etc etc, apparently, Osama bin Laden just walks away and has a good laugh.

whoever thinks the building were rigged with explosives, well you all gonna rot in hell you pieces of S**t

there were no extra explosives in the building. The heat from the explosion melted the frame of the building which caused it to collapse, if a plane explodes its gonna make a F**king explosion. wow. you guys are retarded.
NY represent

U really think tht this wuz an inside job? y wud some1 risk the lives of so many innocent ppl?? so many family members were lost that day, nd u r here sayin it wuz intentional. ur a F****t ! 4 ur information, these buildings were specifically designed to collapse straight down, so that they did not fall sideways and disable several blocks. the collapse is from the heat melting everything, and falling down like intended. next time get ur facts straight b4 u go talkin about stuff u don kno about.

Yeah, and the elaborate plan to crash the planes into the building were just to coverup the bombs, you smaaart!!

Scientists look at things that have happened and try to explain them. Some of you have a stupid explanation in there heads and then try to think of ways it must have been put together. Just get a life!

HE REVISADO LOS PLANOS, MAQUETAS Y ESTUDIOS DEL WTC Y NO DEVIO CAER COMPLETAMENTE POR EL ATAQUE DE 1 AVION. ¡¡¡EL EDIFICIO FUE CARGADO CON IMPLOSIVOS DETONADOS CON LAS EXPLOCIONES!!! ... Y ESTO NO FUE PREMEDITADO POR LOS TERRORISTAS QUE ESTRELLARON LAS NAVES, POR OTRA PARTE , EL PENTAGONO NO FUE ATACADO POR UN AVION, ESA INFORMACION ES UNA FARZA MONUMENTAL... EL ATAQUE ESTABA AVISADO, DE CAER LOS EDIFICIOS POR ESOS IMPACTOS MAS DAÑO HUBIESE HABIDO EN LOS ALREDEDORES Y MENOS EN LOS PISOS BAJOS.
ARQUITECTOS, INGENIEROS CUESTIONEN ESO!!!!

if you look closely on the right side about 5 to 6 seconds in the video . you can see a person falling from the tower !

If you don't believe this was an inside job, then how do you explain WTC 7. Even the owner said "We decided to pull it" So how did the explosives get into WTC 7 ? And how come we don't see video of the Pentagon? And how come they never reconstructed the planes? 9/11 is everything Bush needs to wipe his filthy ass all over the Constitution, and he is the real terrorist. Well really Cheney is the one. Bush is too stupid to tie his own shoes

go to google video enter "michael ruppert" watch then understand why it happened

Hurrincane Katrina was also created by the government.. all the earthquakes, floods-- blame the government.

if it was rigged 2 explode n collapse and it was just a plain to wage war on iraq then why on the news were irqi people seen dancing around celebrating this great tragidy???

i was in the trade center the day before that happened

This only proofs the building collapsed.... I didn't see any explosion... you see something that could have been, but it happens after the building starts to collapse.. and the fire? It was already burning on that floor.... and what happens to stuff between two floors when they come down? It's forced out....
That's what this shows....
Look at any movie of a demolition.. first you see explosions, after that the building slowly starts to move... there's is some time between the exploding and the moving, but not in this video... If you see this movie as proof then you'd have a great time fighting aliens too I guess.......

The psueo intellectuals who think they are smart because they know just a little, and their axiom is "a little knowlege is a dangerous thing" They watch science programs, probablly read omni and discrovery and maybe scientific america and then read blogs and bulletine boards and join chatrooms and spout their ignorance. If anybody disputes them then their excuse is that the person disputing their known facts is just part of the conspiracy. They easially confuse reality with fiction and reject anything thats not of their opinions. No wonder the world so messed up, people who know little of things seem to shout how little they do know very loudly. I can definatley say, having studied all the tapes and videos availiuble to me for the last 4 years, and talking to all the scientist discussing both possibilties, that it was jst a plane crash and that it was a dilebrate set up, I can conclude that it was just a well planned plane crash that was done by people who are very good at beating the American Security systems. But I guess since we are suppose to have the best of everything, security screening and homeland protection, it is harder to believe these failed us than it is to think we did it to ourselfs as a deliberate consipracy

First of all, there is a new invention called spellchecker. Use it! The conspiracy theory is a joke. The towers collapsed due to heatfrom the fire. They stood for almost an hour after they were hit. The heat weakened the steel which caused the collapse. Turn off the X-box and watch the history channel or the discovery channel. They interview experts called structural engineers that can easily explain all of this to you uneducated morons!

All this video proves is that the tower collapsed this way because of the way it was built.
It was built in a certain way and that's why it fell down directly instead off slowly bit by bit , if the tower had been any other shape, hight or width it would have fell differently - no explosives used here - just think about it

Someone should learn what happens when you compress on object.

hahahahaha timoty is a dumb ass bitch!

What about the S**t load of fuel that is under the twin tower wouldn't that be a result of it collapsing we don't know but i think loose change is a big rumor.

Anyone who thinks any part of 9/11 was a "conspiracy" is a farking idiot.

The flames are coming from the fire that was already there, moron.

Who ever said that the plane didnt stuck there...burned for 45 minutes and then ignited?
Ignited=BOOM=Collapse..
Planes have flamable fuel you know...

why would you not believe that the muslin terrorist would do this. are that anti-american. are you that blind to the truth.

As you say there is am explosive fire. If your replay this in slow motio its occurs durring the collapse not before. An explosion powerful enough to weaken the struture after the impact would occur before collapse. what you see i sthe sudden rush of air/oxygen through the stair wells and elevator shafts under the force of the falling upper floors. Like blowing on the embers of a fire this is nothing but the reverse affect of a back draft. P.S You're a F**king idiot.

what it seems to be an explsion is only the air presure. when the upper floors collapsed increased the air presure. its like there a house in fire you open the door and more air comes in, making a bigger fire.

For one you need to learn to spell, and for another, a little research before you post videos such as that would be great as well. OF COURSE its going to look like that you retard, the building was burning when it collapsed. PEOPLE LIKE YOU IS WHATS WRONG WITH THE COUNTRY!!

Where is the proof?

I can't believe that the bush administation and medias had so much persuasion force on this case and so many following others.

U are triying to convince me that a dude who's perched somewhere on some lost hills in the asshole of the planet has succeeded to create and organize that wonderful logistic which is necessary for this disaster?

That three or four dumb persons did have learned in less than one year to master the piloting of a colossus plane to know exactly how to do to crash with so much precision ?

That while the plane litteraly vaporize, the FBI found the pilotage memobook in the ruins.

Let me laugh.

You know what I saw in that video? A building collapsing after some scumbag, sandnigger towel heads raped The GREATEST country in the WORLD. The leaders of the FREE WORLD! Thats what I saw. NO Explosive devices, no set charges, no conspiracies, just a bunch of towel heads trying to kill innocent people. I say, Kill all muslims, and Let ALLAH Sort'em out. Have a nice day

loose change
screw loose change

Most of you guys probably still think Kennedy was killed by some nut named Oswald, then came back to life and killed his brother robert... most of you have never heard of the illuminati, skull and bones or the freeman... most of you dont know that the 4 USA aircraft carriers left the port of pearl harbor the night before the attack after sitting in the port for over a month, lucky?
Did you see the destruction of building 7 on 9 11 and still think it was the result of fire or do you even know what building 7 was.

Want to hear a crazy conspiracy theory?
A guy named Binladen and 16 guys caused 911.
There is no prof of it.... its a conspiracy theory, just because the people in power say it happened that way doesn't make it a fact... turn off the tv and do some research. If you dont like reading or cant read just go to google video ... there are tons of videos on the subject... videos that the leaders make sure dont get played on TV.

And i think it's stupid to assume that Bush would ever do something so horrifically evil as to help terrorists in any way to destroy the Twin towers. There's no way Bush is connected to the destruction of the towers.

whoever posted this video is stupid....there were not any explosives in the wtc.. dont u think that might have been an explosion from a gas or freon leak..

I really don't see how this video proves sh*t

JUMP U BITCHES..!

The truth is when yuo have something fall(i.e. a building) the air is forced out by the pressure of the falling object. Therefore the fire that you claim is explosives is actually the fire already raging inside of the tower. A high explosive moves at somewhere aroung 12000 feet a second and therefore you would have seen the fire BEFORE the tower fell, not after. The fire that is claimed to be an explosion is pushed out only because of simple physics, not because of some crazy conspiracy theory.

when the towers were built, the structure was made to collapse the way they did, because if they toppled over, there would have been much more destruction. its insane for anyone to believe it was an inside job from the U.S. government, and anyone who believes that obviously didn't lose anyone in the 9/11 attacks. sooo get your facts straight about why the buildings collapsed before you start posting videos about it...the way the buildings fell was EXACTLY what was supposed to happen, so to say them collapsing proves the U.S. was in on it is stupid..

a plane CRASHED INTO THE BULDING!!! IT HAS A GAS TANK!!!! GAS IS FLAMABLE!!! so that explains the fire, NOT EXPLOSIVES!!! Jesus! seriously, roady43 is right... they would get like bomb technitian to see if it was a bomb or not, which it wasnt. jeez, watch the news once in a while, then you would have known it was a plane! y do u think they have news? SO WE CAN FIND OUT WTF IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD!!!!!!

I just can't imagine that the explosion and fire could has anything to do with a JETLINER full of JET FUEL CRASHING into the building.

Ok since you noticed the flames shooting out the side, did you forget there was a fire raging on those floors and as they pancaked on top of each other they pushed the fire out. also did you notice that the center of the building started to collapse at that point you would have flames go the sides if there was an explosion. ATTENTION TO DETAIL

you are a retard ever heard of gas tanks ? uh yeah doh

this video proves nothing, didnt you know that airplanes contain keyrosene gas and all the things in the engine ?! it probably took 45 minutes for the heat to build and and crack or melt the metal and the gas leaked and exploded

1. plane crashed into wtc

2. building caught on fire and plane was obliterated except for larger denser objects

3. and the heat built up along with the weakening of the gas tanks and the tanks exploded and the building collapsed from the support bars that melted

4. some idiot name timoty took a part of te video and said that there were explosives in the WTC (1 of the largest buildings in the world and a crucial part of the economy.. doh)

You Jack Ass!

You are a F**k stain... What dumbshit would rig a building to blow, then crash a plane into it... silly S**t .

The explosion was from the plane fuel. the flash of fire was the from the building cracking showing the flames inside. If there was a bomb inside the building would've
colapsed from the ground you idiot!

you will also notice if you look at the top of the building, WHAT HAPPENS FIRST, the tower begins to collapse, BEFORE this "explosion" takes place. the fire you see, is the exuastion of all contents inside of the building on that level. for example, if i were to beat the S**t out of you for making such a stupid stament, i would probibly end your torture by jumping on your head. with all that pressure i exhort on your fucked up head, it would probibly cause your head to "explode" with whatever fills your mind. Sorry to be so blunt, but its idiots like you that fill our scociety with the most retarded ways to point the finger at everyone else, but those who gladly took the lives of so many innocent people. Grow up.

i can see blaming the attacks on the government, is because we trained osama as a CIA agent, but he was never CIA. Then we gave him tens of thousands of dollars for "self defense" then he repayed us, by kicking our asses. Now we're ignoring him, letting him prance around the Middle East like the little Fary Princess of Retardsville

absolutely nothing. it proves that at least one of the world trade center twin towers was indeed attacked, and that at least on of them fell down. I know they were both attacked and both collapsed, killing countless thousands, including one of my relatives, leading us to war, which i will go fight in vengance of these poor poor people. But it doesn't prove that it was rigged with explosives.

I don't think so...

The *Proof* of detonations bringing down the WTC towers, is small plumes of smoke that shoot out a window on the side of WTC facing us, and another coming out the right side, where the building face is not visible.
Theres 2 possible causes of these smoke plumes.
The first is a detonation device being set off with the intention of causing the collapse.
Second possibility is that DUE to the collapse of the building, and the displacement of space within WTC, that debris would have been ejected from any weaker spots in the building.
So how do you determine which caused it.
After reviweing this and many other videos for probably over 2 hours (hey its too hot to go outside and WoW servers are down.) ive noted the following list of anomolies.
1) the plumes occur (im my opinion as its hard to say for certain) only moments before the collapse.
2) that the plume on the front of wtc in this vid, appears to jet from an area thats already been damaged by fire. as evident by the black soot around the window area.
3) the further down the building the shot was taken, the more the plumes 'lead' the exterior collapse. (ie, they essentally beat the collapse to the ground)
This is odd because:
A) if they were the tell tale sign of explosion, they would, as seen, occur before and at the moment of collapse. Rather, if the plumes were the resut of the collapse, obviously there would have to be some displacement (collapse) that occured FIRST in order to cause the smoke plumes.
B) the fact that the smoke plumes from the already damaged window is testiment that whatever it was took the easiest path out of the building, as we would naturally expect. The odds that a bomb had been placed at that exact spot seem less than likely.
C) Yes i would assume the smoke plumes to move downward faster than the external collapse, because what we dont see is alot of stuff falling down in the center of the WTC. This mess of falling debris would create intese pressures which would result in Debris being blown out windows or cracks in the building.
I personally see too much corrolation of the events that transpired during and after the attacks. Why did the president do nothing when told the news.
He appeared not even disturbed by the news that his nation was under attack. Ive seen our president get pretty enthuastic and riled up but one thing for sure, is he aint no actor. For him to have no reaction at all is more telling than something. he infact didnt even seem to look at the agent when he was told the news that Our Nation Was Under Attack!
Perhaps its also interesting to note that a passport belonging to one of the suspected hijackers was recovered in the streets of new york city apparently it had fallen out of his pocket. A crash that vaporized an entire plane, including Both black boxs which were made from the strongest material Known to man, took out 2 of the most Advanced sky scrapers in the history of mankind, yet his paper passport survives. ok..

why out of 4000 jews working in the building only 4 died .....infact out of these 4 ....2 were in the plane so in tht whole freakin building in which people from number of nationalities died ...there were only 2 jews .......
why israel's prime minister cancels his visit to usa on the morning before the attack .....he was to flew tht day to USA ..and he canceled his trip ...due to a suspected terrorist threat ...who teh fuk told him before the attack tht sumthing is wrong ........
well this whole thing has more to do with MOSAD than bush ............
bush was asked after the attack by the reporters wat do u think about the attacks ...his reply was (wen i saw the first plane crashing in to the building ...on tv............) how the fuk he saw the first crash on tv .........BEFORE TEH 2ND ONE ...becasue there is 1 known video of teh 1st crash ...which was made by anonymous person ..whose camera was exactly in teh direction of plane like he knew ..tht sumthing is gonna come from there and the video of first crash was made available to tv 2 days after teh crash ....so bush might be watching SWAT CATS ...........but still it doesnt make him the culprit ..he is stupid person .. one shud expect stupidities like this from him........

One of the best doccumentaries supporting this video clip; "Loose Change"
Watch it. You can download it from Limewire. It will make you think. And I don't have anything against Bush. It will open your eyes even if you support the Bush administration. It really made me think for days wether this all was caused by terrorists. Just watch the movie and you will know what I am talking about. "Loose Change"

do you honestly believe this was rigged with explosives it cant be obvoisly because whats the point in leaving it to burn so long duh! i believe personally its all bush's fault o soma bin laden treated this as doing right to his religion some how i cant see blowing up a building is gonna get u extra brownie points when it comes to decide whether you go to heaven or not.

listen whoever F**king thinks that this video had explosives is a dumb ass because i live right acroos from th etwin towwers and i saw this event so if u F**king have a stupid ass thing to say well write it here

Of course there were explosives planted. The aliens put them there when flying around the towers (see WTC UFO). It's all true, I'm sat here with Elvis and the gunman from the grassy knoll and they totally agree.
Get a life

you fool! the fire and smoke you see as it falls is due to the air pressure as the building collapse not explosive's.... get a life and stop being a fool please......

I am now ex-political having been staunch conservative until I realized there's a world behind the world. Listen to the words of this man although he doesn't know the why, I do. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001

This S**ks For A Human Being To have to see and deal with and this really S**ks for a american to have to deal with and its just plaing Hell for a new yorker like me to have to deal with :( A moment for the ones who didnt make it

You are a sorry sack of S**t for spewing this garbage. Thanks for pissing all over the memories of the people who died that day.

it wasnt an inside job ... do u not think there was alot of macinary and fuel from the plane ... and there was no inside job ... stop making stuff up people it was a terrorist attck noting else. it was probably computers etc.

...would tell you that when something is copmressed(as in the floors of the building) that the air is pushed out.hence the fire raging inside is also pushed out.Now some will say also that jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel.which is true.but it does burn hot enough to weaken it.and when it reaches that point there is s sudden collapse of the structure.common sense

Have you ever fanned flames? Ever talk to a fireman about the nature and charastics of fire? If you were to watch this video, and by that I mean truely watch it. You would nitice that the building is burning in an area (throughout) but also in a visual area (on this video) from right to left in a thin line. Once the building starts to fall, the air trapped within the tower has to go somewhere once the floors start to collapse. The Rushing air FANS THE FLAMES! There is no Explosion in this video. Please don't make more of an uninformed ASS of yourself by claiming otherwise.

It's the same effect as when eating a Bi Mac. If you take a bite, the stuff squirms out. Here the floors crash onto each other, air is blow out sideways along with the fire and smoke.

9/11 happerned , people died , towers crashed becuase of sad ass teroists and thata that

You are then asking people to believe that G.W.Bush is doing exactly that, plus numerous other people as well! So when you take everything into account and look at it logicallly, you are trusting people you don't know at odds of billions to one. If you are prepared to risk that you are either exremely lucky, extremely arrogant, extremely stupid or all three! Bush maybe all three, but he is not brain dead, which you would have to be to even think you could get away with it. But to end and probably fuel the theories even further remember this.
Whether a fact is true or not is irrelevant, what is believed becomes reality!!!!!!

Forget the Michael Moore film, that is about the Bush admin' and his dealings. Let me try to put things in simple terms. Assuming there was explosives in the building(s), the planes were remote controlled and that there was a cover-up. Firstly the explosives would probably detonate on impact, so then lets assume the explosives were of a different kind (they needed blast caps and to be detonated manually). The odds of the impact not damaging or dislodging any of the blast caps or the detonation wires are litteraly millions to one. If there was any disruption in the circuit they would ALL fail to detonate. Ask any miner who works with explosives or a demoliton expert. Lets now assume they used thermite, this is a compound that is highly flammable and easily made, the problem with this theory is that it is so flammable it burns through anything and everything, so from the initial impact the burning jet fuel would almost certainly have ignited the thermite. The themite, within 5 seconds, would start to burn through the lower floors, there is no evidence that there were significant fires on lower floors, with thermite there would be this evidence! What looks like an explosion is the upper floors collapsing and blasting flame outwards, again ask a demolition expert or even better a trainee civil/stuctural engineer. Then the explosives would have to be in exactly the right place for this theory to work. Is that possible? The answer of course is yes! BUT and it is a BIG BUT you only have one chance, again at very large odds. Then we come to the possibility of remote controlled planes and the strange silver objects on the underside of the planes. Firstly the silver objects, if these indeed were part of the remote devices would they really put them in such an obvious place? They would be spotted by any one of the ground crew or by the control tower. So they would in all probability put the remote units in the cockpit with easy access to the controls. Would the pilots not question these strange objects in the cockpit? Almost definitely! Try driving a remote controlled car round a basic course, easy enough, but then try it when you can't see all of the course, it becomes harder but is still possible, but you are only operating in a 2D environment. With something that flies you are now in a 3D environment, not only forward and left and right, but up and down. Even the most basic of remote controlled aviators will tell you, you need to be able to see the craft 99% of the time, flying through NY around many of its skyscrapers I doubt there is a postion where you would have that kind of visibility, remember this is real life, you can not pause the craft in mid-air to enable you to get a better vantage point! With all this to contend with you still have only ONE chance. So we come to the cover-up. Ask yourself one question, Would five of your closest friends risk their political lives and probably their life and liberty to protect you? Highly unlikely.

can some1 tell me were the explosion is?

But that doesn't mean i blame him for what happened with 9/11. However, i do blame him for the titanic sinking, for obvious reasons I'm not going to explain.

All I see is a little puff of smoke come out the right side, which is from the internal structure starting to collapse. When the outside of the building gives way and it starts to fall, it blows out air as the space inside gets smaller, air which happens to contain fire that's still burning from the plane fuel. There's nothing in this photo to indicate that any explosives were used.

Can't even spell 'proves'! Good grief! A S**ker who will believe anything!

michael moore is not just anti-bush, he's a hollywood sell-out too


apache helicopters are equipped with cruise missiles

there are plenty of people in the world with money, power...who would hang this on the bush admin if they had a REASON to; meaning, people with money and power use bullshit like this as part of their politics of fear to keep you dumbasses pandering amongst each other, too scared to do anything about the fallacy that american government is and always has been

"and nowadays things changed, everyone's ashamed of the youth cause the truth look strange, and to me it's reversed we left them a world that's cursed and it hurts" -tupac amaru shakur

Think they rule the world... lets start a reson for war.. blame others...

You idiot.

That's not an explosion. Several floors were on fire, and when they collapsed on each other, the air and debris PUSHED the fire OUT into the AIR.

For lack of a better analogy, you ever bake something and get your hands are covered in flour? What happens when you clap your hands? Your skin doesn't explode, you ignorant, illiterate, shouldn't own a computer conspiracy theorist.

Die in a fire.

After reading all the comments, as to who, what, where, when and why, and putting everyones personal BS(belif system) aside, it does look like an explosion.

If there were explosives in the building to start with, do you not think they would detonate on impact? YOU MORON!

As each tower collapsed, clearly visible puffs of dust and debris were ejected from the sides of the buildings. An advertisement in The New York Times for the book Painful Questions: An Analysis Of The September 11th Attack made this claim: "The concrete clouds shooting out of the buildings are not possible from a mere collapse. They do occur from explosions." Numerous conspiracy theorists cite Van Romero, an explosives expert and vice president of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, who was quoted on 9/11 by the Albuquerque Journal as saying "there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." The article continues, "Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures."

this is John lennons work man and Elvis too.. they were last seen at the north tower before the colapse.

that all of you 911 theories has no life.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html

(PLEASE NOTE: COMMENT NOT AGAINST MUSLIMS BUT A tiny percentage of extremists using their religion as an excuse to murder)

the fire that comes out is a result of the upper building pushing down to push the fire out.

dont blame bush n blair.
all that area has been a powder keg for a LONG time.
and will be after we are all dead.
(which wont be long if some people get their way.)

9/11 was all caused by the SME's (stupid muslim extremists) that kill innocent people instead of military targets.
WHY... because they are cowards... its like me wanting to get at G,Bush or Tony Blair but instead driving my car into a group of school children crossing the road.
its an easy target.
i would be a coward and a murderer... SO ARE THE SME's

People cant take a S**t without permission.

was playing golf when this happened :)

As the degraded steel support collumns buckle and collapse the floors come together and compression of the internal gasses by the reducing volume causes their ejection from the building; as they meet fresh oxygen in the external air, their oxydation becomes more rapid manifesting itself as the highly excited molecules of ionised gas that we call flames.

There is no mystery here; you need more logical analysis and less emotion!

.

Well, that could be because A PLANE CRASHED INTO IT. To demolish a building requires months of preparation. Non load bearing walls must be torn out, and hundreds (thousands for buildings the size of the towers)of holes must be drilled for explosives. Even if the people didn't notice the missing walls, or the holes in the remaining ones, I'm pretty sure they would have noticed the MILES of detonation cord that would be requred.
Anyone who actually believes this conspiracy hypothesis (theories are actually backed up by compelling evidence) is just announcing to the world thier extreme stupidity.

This video proves little, if anything... I agree that the video shaking phenomenon is a perplexing one. It has been observed on several tapes. But all it does is feed speculation, which is not the best fuel for a true investigator.

If you really want to investigate the idea that the story of 911 is less than genuine, start from established scientific fact, and examine the official reports.

The NIST report is so full of errors, omissions, and misdirections, that it is the perfect place to start. With a college level understanding of physics, you can literally rip many of the conclusions to shreds.

this link approximates my math: http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
note: i am not condoning any conclusions reached, merely pointing at the calculations.

If you look at this alone, it is easy to show that there was not enough heat to create a structural failure, nor the amount of weakening claimed in the official story.

An interesting fact:

The NIST report is not allowed to be used in litigation... yet somehow it is the best report the govt. can come up with to describe the crime of 911? The reason is simple... it would not hold up to cross-examination.

NIST's Metallurgical Results had attested to temps of less than 250c in Oct of 2004. The reason: the findings had contradicted their initial findings that the steel was adequate (representative) for the needs of the investigation (whole technical investigation), and more importantly, at the same time the findings had contradicted their "Fire Weakening" hypothesis.

So what did the NIST do?

The committed an act akin to magic!

They, with a slight of hand, had changed their "adequate steel sample" from being adequate for the investigation (whole), to it only being adequate in determining the quality of the steel (final report).

The NIST did this even though in June 2004, before the "Steel temperature results" the NIST had clearly stipulated..

http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/chapter2.pdf

If you are serious about why the official story is a lie, then have the courage to leave your politics at the door... and the patience to read the very long offical reports and learn some physics.

Don't trust any site: pro or con. I have dissected many from both sides and they all make bogus and politically fueled claims. Do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

all the ones that are for the conspiracy theory are biased as "bad" or "boring" and all the ones that are like NO IT WASNT THE USA WHO DID THIS are all "good" or "funny"

this is one of two conspiracy theories that are true. The second one being that man did not really land on the moon in 1969. The shuttle never left earth orbit, you guys should look into that. Anway, I'm drifting off topic. Yes there were explosives planted, it's obvious. You guys are just brainwashed Americans, I'm not brain-washed and I'm as American as you can be. I don't hate Bush, and if you will say to me"you only think that it's true because you hate Bush!" ...no. If you can recall, the United States faked bomb attacks from Cuba to get support to go in there and invade. I believe this is what happened with these attacks. After all, what's killing about 500 people out of the 250 mill. americans for support in a war against "terrorism". you guys are just too thick-skinned to even believe that this is true, but just deal with it- It will eventually come out, maybe not in the next 10 years, but eventually..

now i know this is a site of debate so lets debate on who was and wasnt innocent on the day of all this.lets see i was 14 and was downstairs in tower 1 and my parents were upstairs in a meeting.i had just maxed out my credit card on shoes when a horrible noise came from above.told not to panic but yet i ran like my life depended on it.the rest is really a blure but i never heard from my parents again nor any of their coworkers.im now19 and i was just recently moved out of foster care.all i had that morning was my family and when i awoke the next day i had nothing.i miss them and prey for them often.thses two people were innocent like the other 2000 and they were all murdered for reasons we ourselves have yet to discover.enough fighting i say and lets fix what was broken then start a new.

well when this took place my parents were in this building right where this video happens to be recording.i was downstairs when the first plane hit and i was paying for a new pair of expensive shoes.we were told not to panic but i ran out anyways and was immediatly scared and knew that my parents were up there.i never saw them again.to see this video it reminds me of them and the hours i spent finding my way home.i was placed into foster care and was always sad on 9/11 although many do not know the real reason why.it is because i was happy with parents until that horrible day.i was orphaned because some one had a grudge on this country but decided to murder my parents insted.

That part were fire comes out was already in there from the plane and when the building collapsed the fire had no where to go but out... which makes it look like a second explosion... haha i can tell you must be democratic

you guys are all making me angry afte watching this video we shouldnt be arguning whether or not there was a bomb and if it was rigged we should be remembering and praying for the lost sould i dont tihnk there families give a dam whether or not it was rigged all that matters to them was they lost someone they lvo soo to all those whom did may u rest in peace and may god bless u and ur loved ones

מה שנקרא-טמטום ורוע לב!

אני מכירה מישהו שהיה בנפילה של התאומים ובנס ניצל!!!!!

It's the fuel of the airplane, which emptied into the building after the collision, and then superheated and exploded. This melted the metal frame of the steel-concrete structure causing implosion of the tower.

Go to 'christian party.net' and search for 'One dead Israeli!!!??'

As the top of the building is collapsing, it's going to push whatever fire is inside out of the building as it goes down, much like if you squeeze a hand full of silly putty. It can't stay contained inside, it has to squeeze out between your fingers.

Dumbass.

I can't say I have read all the threads here, but most for sure. I never thought I would find such a lack of the ability of everyone to strive to offer "viable" information to help secure the truth about such events that effect each and every one of us; whether you like the USA or hate it, like the presedent or hate him, or even care about anything other than yourself. I have lots of comments to give that would only fuel the anger of those that will not accept any new ways of thought untill the right person presents it to them in a manner that makes sence to them. ( forgive me if I mispell anything, I'm a college graduate, but have my faults as we all do ) I think that everyone here needs to call or meet personaly three people: one of our troups that is serving in Iraqe, a political figure that has knowledge concerning the 911 incedent, and a immediate relative of one of the victems of 911. I also wonder why so many people will post comments concerning this stuff on here, but will not call (and the numbers are very available) or write a letter or even email your local government, or anyone you can think of that could promote your concerns. I'm sure some of you have, though have not mentioned it. I'm not a peace freak. I don't think we should be in Iraqe, nor do I believe that Bush is doing all he can. I don't believe in a inner government conspiracy. I do believe that if you can't stand the way the US is being run or headed, then either do one of two things; Become a governing official or better, or leave the country. I hear that France is keen on USA haters * and I think there is enough proof of that for anyone to see*. I know alot of people don't want Bush in office. Who do they want? Clinton? The world is full of lies, but if you will pay attention to only those things that are of obvious nature and provide a basis of truth whether by accountance or documentation or sort, then you will be able to make sensible descisions and help our country to move toward a more productive stature and not a complete mass histeria as we all know is a real possibility.

...to take anything seriously when it is written by someone who cannot spell.

dont give us any of this conspiracy S**t the plane crashed into the tower which didnt initially knock it down. the reason it fell is because of the fire the burned for over half an hour, slowly weakening its support structures. that was the complaint, the concrete struts werent reinforced w/ steel bars.

the amount of jet fuel inside the building caused what looked like an explosion. The temperature that it takes to melt steel is about 800 degrees, or at least thats what I understood, and jet fuel can burn at 2000 degrees. The explosion was caused by 20 or 30 stories of building material, already beyond its melting point, coming down on top of a pressure cooker of jet fuel fumes, and jet fuel, causing the fireball out of all sides of the building.

Would these same liberals claim a conspiracy if Al Gore had been elected President? I doubt that very seriously.

The way the WTC was put together allowed for the collapse. With any building that has truss construction, when one part fails the whole building fails. The same thing happens on residentials buildings that are involved in fire. One part of the roof fails, the entire roof can come crashing down. As for as the appearance of an explosion: If the top of the building comes down, it will push the fire out of the sides of the building.

Get a life, with all your Conspiracy theories, You U.S F**ks should stop shitin on everything! You wonder why this S**t happens to you take a fucken look a cnn! get the F**k out of other peoples countries! YOUR NOT FREEING THE WORLD FROM TERROR YOUR CAUSEING IT! p.s go A.BZ

your an idiot...if anything that big pushs down,air would excape,and thats what the fire did,it excaped.the building was already falling by the time you saw flames.

There are many different views on Pres. Bush... mostly negative so far as I have seen. One thing I am wondering about is: How do you keep terror out of your country when it's an idea, and you can't keep solid objects like drugs out? Good luck.

if u look real close u can tell that the fireball was a by product of the floors collasping onto theirselves,,, dumb F**ks

If your eyes were working properly you would easily be able to see that the explosion was AFTER the collapsing had begun.
Get yourself good glasses, poor friend!

as much as i hate americans showing this maybe a bit over the top and clearly if you watch carefully at the tower it starts to fall before the explosion also there are things flammable that are not explosive's

Some misguided people flew 2 planes into the building. Simple as that. Why does it have to be complicated?

The interesting thing is building 7.. not the 2 towers!

What caused building 7 to collapse?

Well i have been reading bout this since after the attack.. you have Larry Silverstein on BBC (or whatever) saying they chose to "pull the building" we all know it takes weeks to prepare a controlled demolition..

Besides there is a reason Bush chose to shut down the commision dealing with the "victims families" and other witnesses to 911...

Wake up.. its not as black and white as you describe it

Besides there official documents indicating that the US of A have had plans to inflict damage on civilians and blame it on terrorists..

the problem is.. there is no real global terror!

There was no explosives in the trade centers..
It was the gasoline from the planes and the fire mixed togethr from the collision that caused the explosions.

Sorry kid.

If u watch the video properly, u can see there is a fire in the floor in the first place. Fire needs oxygen, and when the building collapses, and presses down the floor, the fire gets pressed out...

This video is completely wrong, in the CBS documentary 9/11 the filmakers have the only footage of a plane hitting the north or 1st tower.

The fire you see is being pushed out by the force of the floors pancaking onto one another. Why do people think such idoit crap is true? Those damn cowards from Saudi Arabia did all this, and that is the facts!!!

All I see is a fire (there from the plane exploding on impact) and a sudden shaking of the camera which could be attributed to numerous factors. A sad scene, caused by terrorists from Al-Qaeda.

the guy who said there was an explosion just before the building collapses must be on drugs there is no explosion what so ever in this chilling video of evidence

Was there saw everything, still have the images burned into my eyes with the smell of bodies burning, if you weren't there to see it with your own eyes you shouldn't speak about what happend there. If the buildings were imploded, don't you think that people would've heard the sound of the explosives going off? At the hieght of those building an implosion would've spread debris for miles in a circular pattern. I was in the buildlings that Friday, you can't move anything in or out without someone seeing it. This would be a secret plan of unbelievable underatking, the government has trouble keeping any secret now a days do you think this would stay secret for long?

The best kept secret the CIA has is that American poeple are gullable and the government is being run by idiots.

yes 9/11 was only a planned demolition by the owner of the building and a politicions wet dream come true!!!

thats all that needs to be said

many skyscrapers are designed to collapse straight down this way so they wont collapse on other buildings and if you had not noticed those planes had tons of fuel in them which ignited on impact this caused a raging inferno which then started melting the floor supports and they fell creating a domino effect
this was such a terrible distaster please stop rehashing it

There is so much hate and ignorance in this country and its never more apparent than in the absolutely insane and ridiculous conspiracy theory's by the kooks and the brain dead. But the intellectually challenged and Bush haters will believe anything if it suits their purpose. The reason behind the building collapse is very simple. But to understand, you need to set aside your political bias and mean-spirited hate to follow along. Now if you can't set aside your bias you won't understand the facts about the twin towers. The planes were topped off with jet fuel for the cross country trip. After they crashed into the towers that fuel was everywhere and on fire for the most part. The girders in the building melted from the intense heat and fires, causing at least one floor to buckle dropping that floor onto the floor below it. When the first floor dropped it caused a pressure to build as it approached the floor underneath it, which forced the fire (you thought was an intentional explosion) out the building from the pancake effect. Since several floors were weakening from the fuel fire and the stretching i-beams they pancaked also. The shear weight of the these floors continued downward pancaking all the floors below them. Now, even an unitelligent person would have to ask themselves if the government actually placed explosives in the towers how come the so-called explosions only took place in the exact locations were the planes happened to hit? Also, how would the terrorists have known and worked out a deal with George Bush to hit the building precisely were the government supposedly planted explosives? I don't mean to be insensitive here but to make a point you have to be flat out retarded to believe George Bush or our government intentional massacred its own people. 911 so disrupted our economy and it has been so detrimental to George Bush. Using reverse logic then it would had to have been the liberals who planted the supposed explosives to make Bush look bad. But you probably couldn't understand anything I just mentioned so maybe I waisted time trying to help.
As far as the sin of hate goes, the road to hell is paved with the angry and hateful.

You can't even spell "proves" correctly. Go finish up eighth grade.

Can't you all see it's fake?

There were no explosions that i can see in this vids, its probobaly the central columns etc. and there were no explosions when the planes crashed, becauese the dumbasses crashed planes full of fuel so none of the gases vapourised to create an explosion, even though most of the fire was maintained by files of paper, also most of the things people call 'explosions' were actualy fire being projected outwards so if there were any explosives they would have been fried by the heat of the flames or blown outwards with the flames. So to conclude to person who posted this vid is a complete dumbass, and there were no explosives planted inside WTC why would Bush create something which made him look like a T**t ?

See Attivissimo.net
I dont see explosion.
And any audio BOOOOMMMM.
I see instabilità dell'equilibrio.
by Civil engineering doctor

yes im sorry to say be we doo

ur an idiot, when the top falls, the fire inside has to go out... dipshit

and where was the explosion when nick bergs head was brutaly cut off?

F**king dumbass concipiracy dipshits

evrytime i see it it just gets sweeter ;)

That big fire you see? No ball of fire is visible until after the building is a little ways down, and if you knew anything, you would know that matter cannot exist where matter already is. I'll dumb it down for you, the fire was pushed out of the building by the calapsing floors above, thus making the ball of fire you saw come out. you are a dipshit

Go to Google videos and search 'loose change 2nd edition'. Watch it. The US government says that they were able to id one of the hijackers because the explosion knocked his wallet out of his pants, out the window of the plane which blew up, and landed in such a place, even with debris from the collapse of the 2 WTC buildings, they could find it. BULLSHIT. WAKE UP!

That the tower began to come down BEFORE you see any sign of explosion. Which leads me to believe, that there were no explosive devices present. Rather the movement of the building and gushes of air from that movement caused the already burning jet fuel to burn harder and expand causing an explosion effect. Call me crazy!!

Having a vivid imagination is good. Living in a fantasy world is not. This video proves nothing you so clingingly want it to prove. The explosion is just burning gas being forced out of the rooms of the wtc when the roof caves in.

so many people know that this is the real deal, I just cant believe how some people still believe that this was all an attack of terrorism... the terrorists are bush and all the power elite that tell him exactly what to do... dont people understand that with fear you can control people... its as simple as that. I recommend for those who believe, v for vendetta, many messages in this movie many references to todays US shitty ass politics. obviously its hollywood but it would be damn nice if somebody had the balls to do such a thing....

GALORE

Bush is a worst person in this planet.

was the plane inside...god people are dumbasses

Loose Change 2nd Edition - watch this

a dumbass. Gas fire = expoltion.

The flames and air on the floor with the fire were pushed out by the air pressure as the floor above collapsed.. No explosion.

people, any building has atleast four concrete poles that make it stand up right. a building will fall down completely vertically downwards only if its four concrete poles are taken out at the same time (demolition project). otherwise the building will topple to a side, and fall at an angle. was it a conicidence that the fire (and hit) made the "four" concrete poles fall at the exact same time..?