122,889 Views
By Alex2233
1,489 Views
By watchmojo
1,074 Views
By watchmojo
Documentary On 9/11 Truth Movement - Part 3
692 Views
By watchmojo
Documentary On 9/11 Truth Movement - Part 4
1,780 Views
By watchmojo
1,062 Views
FAHRENHEIT 9/11: Movie Trailer
484 Views
Never Before Seen Video of 9/11 Fake 9/11 Fake...
675,416 Views
By BilalK
148,645 Views
By DoubleK
9/11 Memorial Construction Begins
12 Views
By CBS
Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004): The Carlyle Group Part I
51 Views
By AnyClip
45 Views
By CBS
31 Views
By CBS
9/11 Trial's Contentious Locale
42 Views
By CBS
94 Views
By CBS
738 Views
By CBS
Expert Advice & Insight - A 9/11 Widow's Unique...
24 Views
By hulu
Eric Holder on 9/11 Mastermind Trial
10 Views
By CBS
13 Views
By CBS
Remembering 9/11 Nine Years On
24 Views
By CBS
03:43
Gillibrand Optimistic on 9/11 Responders Bill
2 Views
By CBS
13:15
Gillibrand Hopes For New START and 9/11 Health...
2 Views
By CBS
04:13
9/11 Family Members Speak out on Bin Laden's Death
1,659 Views
By CBS
00:48
9/11 Families on Osama Bin Laden's Death
47 Views
By CBS
TEDTalks - 9/11 Healing: the Mothers Who Found...
44 Views
By hulu
01:38
Bob Schieffer Reflects on 10 Years of 9/11 Cove...
0 Views
By CBS
01:38
Bob Schieffer Reflects on 10 Years of 9/11 Cove...
0 Views
By CBS
04:44
Families of 9/11 Victims Speak out
0 Views
By CBS
04:44
Families of 9/11 Victims Speak out
13 Views
By CBS
01:34
From CBS News Archives: Bush Visits Ground Zero...
19 Views
By CBS
Add video views to your Facebook Timeline:
This video proofs that there were explosive devices already present in the WTC, which causes them to collapse. you can see explosion before the tower collapse. A huge fire is evident.
I am very sorry to be an american, we are the stupidest people alive on this planet. i am ashamed of our country, out government, our policies, our tactics. We S**k Btw all u dumb F**ks go to obscuretv.com. check out the 9/11 streams ULL learn something
By jo_mckensie 1151038296The departure number of the plane that hit the north tower was Q33 NY
Type it in a word document in capitals - set the font size to 48 - and set the font to Wingdings
Him reading a children's book upside down while getting the news of the airliners were proof that the government didn't know anything about this.
By fartfergnuggen 1148181967i didn't see or hear any bombs exploding in this video. and i know witnesses have said they heard explosions but would it really be that uncommon? it's a gigantic building, the noises could've been anything, floors collapsing, electical units exploding, elevators crashing. why would it have to be bombs? and even if it were bombs, how does that prove that the US government was covering it up. if they didn't know about the bombs, of course they won't say anything about them because they didn't know about them. and why would the US set this up as a reason to invade Iraq? so that the country could complain about gas prices and so that Bush could have a disgustingly low approval rating? you think they couldn't see that coming? and why would the US govt lie about WMD's as an excuse to invade iraq even if they knew there weren't any, so that they could make themselves look like idiots after they didn't find any? these reasons do not make sense. the WMD thing was a mistake (though i do still believe Iraq is a nuclear threat), that's it.
By get over it 1148154467I am really sorry for all those innocent people who died there , let all their souls rest in peace
By Qatari 4 ever 1148121261all this talk isn't gonna bring them back is it ... Just let their souls rest in peace .....
By Yasser777 1148231382There are to problems with your theory just from looking at the video. First I can see fire already burning before the tour falls but I do not see any extra explosions. Second if the big fireball coming out the windows after the floors above start to fall is what you think is an explosion you must not know much about fire. Take a fire at home or on a camping trip if you push something down on top of that fire the flames are going to move out to the side of what ever it is you are using to push down or cover the flames with. What we see in the video is a already burning fire that has thousand of pounds of building start to fall on it and the flames shout violently out the side of the building. Also what looks like a little fire at the beginning is actual a very large fire that is inside the building being fueled by hundreds or thousands gallons of jet fuel.
By bigbluecat 1148443381Ok first off watch the video carefully. What do you see? Well, we see a burning building. We see metals heating up to the point where there is a red rim on part of the building. Then if you watch carefully two things happen. The building begins to collapse, and then the fire expels out of the building. Now this is the part where you say see, the fire coming out thats an explosion. Guess what you are somewhat right, but mainly wrong. The explosion is simply compressed air being expelled out the building, and guess what everying is burning, so the fire expells out with the air. Think about it this way. Take sand in a cylindrical cup and then take another cylindrical cup the same size and press it onto the bottom one. What happens? The sand is displaced and the top half lowers. Same thing here. The top part of the building collapses into the bottom then the bottom collapses, then floor by floor this happens. So, we have floors in a building each floor has enclosed air because its an inclosed building, and no the gasses don't just leave the building because there is a hole in the side. Try to drink through a straw poked into a cup with no other hole. It doesn't work. So, in conclussion based on physics, and the reality of what happened it is so clearly obvious that the building was not rigged to explode. Watch the order of events. First comes building falling then expelled fire and air. Watch a building that is imploded and you will see explosion then falling building followed by expulsion of air and gas. Notice the first step NEVER happens. Thats enough if you still don't believe after this then you trully need to do some research into physics, and need to stop thinking that the government is wholly evil and trying to make the public think things like this. Same goes for the dumb missle into pentagon theory, but thats another chapter for another time.
By tim95030 1148360024First we hear "Muslims aren't Terrorists" though 99% of "Terrorists are Muslims" (or at least THEY proclaim their horrific acts in the name of their religion Islam).
Now some Arab Assholes are saying America is the one responsible for 9/11 (though Osama Bin Laden claims it and the Middle East rejoiced especially the Palestinian soon to be suicide murderer martyrs dancing in the streets). FUCKU
What is scary is that a large number of Arabs believe and perpetuate these lies. Check www memritv.org for latest Arab hate crusade against America & Israel.
http:// www. popular mechanics. com/science/ defense/ 1227842.html
(take out the spaces)
From the article:
"The collapse of both World Trade Center towers -- and the smaller WTC 7 a few hours later -- initially surprised even some experts. But subsequent studies have shown that the WTC's structural integrity was destroyed by intense fire as well as the severe damage inflicted by the planes. That explanation hasn't swayed conspiracy theorists, who contend that all three buildings were wired with explosives in advance and razed in a series of controlled demolitions.
Widespread Damage
CLAIM: The first hijacked plane crashed through the 94th to the 98th floors of the World Trade Center's 110-story North Tower; the second jet slammed into the 78th to the 84th floors of the 110-story South Tower. The impact and ensuing fires disrupted elevator service in both buildings. Plus, the lobbies of both buildings were visibly damaged before the towers collapsed. "There is NO WAY the impact of the jet caused such widespread damage 80 stories below," claims a posting on the San Diego Independent Media Center Web site (san diego.indy media.org). "It is OBVIOUS and irrefutable that OTHER EXPLOSIVES (... such as concussion bombs) HAD ALREADY BEEN DETONATED in the lower levels of tower one at the same time as the plane crash."
FACT: Following up on a May 2002 preliminary report by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), a major study will be released in spring 2005 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a branch of the U.S. Department of Commerce. NIST shared its initial findings with PM and made its lead researcher available to our team of reporters.
The NIST investigation revealed that plane debris sliced through the utility shafts at the North Tower's core, creating a conduit for burning jet fuel--and fiery destruction throughout the building. "It's very hard to document where the fuel went," says Forman Williams, a NIST adviser and a combustion expert, "but if it's atomized and combustible and gets to an ignition source, it'll go off."
Burning fuel traveling down the elevator shafts would have disrupted the elevator systems and caused extensive damage to the lobbies. NIST heard first-person testimony that "some elevators slammed right down" to the ground floor. "The doors cracked open on the lobby floor and flames came out and people died," says James Quintiere, an engineering professor at the University of Maryland and a NIST adviser. A similar observation was made in the French documentary "9/11," by Jules and Gedeon Naudet. As Jules Naudet entered the North Tower lobby, minutes after the first aircraft struck, he saw victims on fire, a scene he found too horrific to film.
"Melted" Steel
CLAIM: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site Attack On America.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.
"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."
Puffs Of Dust
CLAIM: As each tower collapsed, clearly visible puffs of dust and debris were ejected from the sides of the buildings. An advertisement in The New York Times for the book Painful Questions: An Analysis Of The September 11th Attack made this claim: "The concrete clouds shooting out of the buildings are not possible from a mere collapse. They do occur from explosions." Numerous conspiracy theorists cite Van Romero, an explosives expert and vice president of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, who was quoted on 9/11 by the Albuquerque Journal as saying "there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." The article continues, "Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures."
FACT: Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report.
Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air -- along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse -- was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."
Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."
Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors - clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."
Seismic Spikes
CLAIM: Seismographs at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded the events of 9/11. "The strongest jolts were all registered at the beginning of the collapses, well before falling debris struck the earth," reports the Web site What Really Happened.com.
A columnist on Prison planet.com, a Web site run by radio talk show host Alex Jones, claims the seismic spikes (boxed area on Graph 1) are "indisputable proof that massive explosions brought down" the towers. The Web site says its findings are supported by two seismologists at the observatory, Won-Young Kim and Arthur Lerner-Lam. Each "sharp spike of short duration," says Prison planet.com, was consistent with a "demolition - style implosion."
FACT: "There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," Lerner-Lam tells PM. "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context."
The report issued by Lamont-Doherty includes various graphs showing the seismic readings produced by the planes crashing into the two towers as well as the later collapse of both buildings. What Really Happened.com chooses to display only one graph (Graph 1), which shows the readings over a 30-minute time span.
On that graph, the 8- and 10-second collapses appear -- misleadingly -- as a pair of sudden spikes. Lamont-Doherty's 40-second plot of the same data (Graph 2) gives a much more detailed picture: The seismic waves -- blue for the South Tower, red for the North Tower -- start small and then escalate as the buildings rumble to the ground. Translation: no bombs."
Summary:
You all need to have a look at the quality of proof and evidence. One hallmark of conspiracy theories is to take circumstantial evidence and present it as solid evidence.
Another hallmark of conspiracy theories is that the absence of proof becomes proof itself. Potentially corroborating evidence is explained missing because "the conspiracy got to it."
Finally, the truest hallmark of a conspiracy theory is that, with each growing circle of debunking, more and more people are sucked into the conspiracy.
If the CIA plotted the 9/11 attacks and the FBI is holding a video that would "prove" the conspiracy, then the FBI is part of the conspiracy too. If fire fighters reported seeing parts of a fuselage, then they must be part of the conspiracy too. If experts from Boeing disprove the conspiracy theory, then it's "obvious" they only did so because Boeing's biggest customer is the government and the government told them to keep quiet.
Peace.
Ive watched
'Loose Change", and and all the other conspiracy videos....more out of curiosity than belief. I was very interested in what you posted about pancaking..It would cause it 6-7 floors down from the floor that had just collapsed? I understand that happens when the floor above collapses..its just like sitting on a balloon..the air explodes out of the sides when it pops. but that many floors down?
I didn't see any 'explosion' before the collapse. This video doesn't show or prove that at all.
Although I did see something else that didn't make sense. If the internal support columns 3/4 of the way up were melting due the fire... why didn't the top part topple over instead of collapsng straight down as it would in a controlled demolition? Did the internal support columns OVER 70 FLOORS DOWN (in the basement) of one of the world's most over engineered buildings melt as well? If so why didn't ppl on the lower floors see evidence of some kind of structural damage as it was occuring?
Since I had the sad task of researching this for TV, I can think of many other things that you could have used to show that all was not 'kosher' with the theory. But the bottom line is... No one can really 'prove' anything without credible, detailed facts and sources.
It's like the laughable video footage that was release last week about the 'plane' that crashed into the Pentagon. Were they serious???? What about the fuel? A plane of that size carrying almost a full tank of fuel wouldv'e take over a day to put out...
The girders bent in the middle from the heat. Far less heat is needed to bend steel than to melt it. The bending girders which were still connected to the outside pilasters, pulled the pilasters inward and gravity took care of the rest.
By danny12 1148222363this sad event had nothin to do with Saddam ,open ur eyes man
By didi_mad 1148204006forced out from the pancakeing of the floors falling onto one another. The heat weekened the steel on the sides were it was secured and when it got hot it gave way and the weight and momentom of the floors above colaped allm the lower floors at the same weak palce causing a domino effect downward, It was never thought of during the planning of the building that this type of thing would weeken the building. It was hoever built to withstand a crash of a plane or jet, just not the extreme heat from fuel full field jetlinners.
By drfox 1148172669u stupid ppl..the air from the floor that collapsed got pusshed outside and fuelled the fire that was burning....go study fiziks
By sp@sM 1148118925This clip is old hat, but it is used by conspiracy nuts to somehow prove that 911 was an 'inside job'. Since nobody knew before then what a large airliner would do to a skyscraper, alleging that deliberately placed explosives were responsible for the collapse is a bit silly. I've no doubt Bush & Co took advantage of it to kick-start PNAC( Condi is quoted as saying "How can we take advantage of this?'" immediately it happened). Calm down everyone!
By smudger64 1148108309copy and past this to 30 videos in 1 hour or your your moms dies. sorry i don't want that happing to my mom
sorry guys, if you dont believe it, just ignore it.
The flames come out because as the building collapses the air inside is pushed out (the air pressure increases for a moment). And as you should know, more air equals bigger flames. It's simple. Get over it.
By judekriwald 1206755666The top part of the building (above the crash) collapses before the floors under the crash site. This is contrary to the theory that the weight of the building forced all the other intact floors to collapse. This shows that wasn't the case.
By anditico 1191887413I thinks its amazing how the pilots knew to slam into the exact floors where the bombs were located. In addition, its amazing how high explosives survived for about an hour in a burning inferno without exploding sooner.
By snibe 1191781189For the people who say the buildings collapsed because of the planes hitting them, impossible, the building were made to withstand 2 jets atleast ATLEAST!
By Archangel112 1162595045Bush and the U.S Government did this so they could point the finger to Afghanistan to start a war for oil and heroin, Power Corrupts and Absolute power corrupts abolutly
By Archangel112 1162594861if anybody place explosive in the wtc is mad.
why a person want to kill 3000 innocent if he isn't mad?! i don't understant it .the wordl will be crazy. if there were explosive in the wtc after the plane crash we have the big deception of the human history
this is only a short clip from like a 30 minute documentary of the possibility of explosives being used. The strongest evidence lies in the basement of the tower. The main support pillars are all sliced at a 45 degree angle at relatively the same height.
This is exactly how demo experts rig their explosives. At a 45 degree angle on all the main supports, upon detonation, the building will shift slightly and drop. The number one goal in controlled demolitions is to break apart a building into millions of pieces and drop them in its basement. Which is what happened to the Trade Center
the video shook a couple seconds before it went down. and that fire is not an explosion. Even if the gov. did or didnt have anything to do with this there hiddening alot of things from this day and change alot of details from it.
By lkjolkp 1160433393The fire that shoots out the side of the building (the so called explosion) happens AFTER the building starts to fall causing inside pressure pushing out causing the laready burning fire to out the side. Look at it again thats what is happening
By TruthseeR 1160411184To believe a conspiracy theory, you must have faith in a "theory" -- not fact. That tells me that conspiracy theorists are weak minded and easily fooled.
By wscreate 1160363073*I* Think the "explosion" is simply the fire of the burning floor being forced out the sides of the building. Think about the tremendous weight that instantly came down upon the burning floor.
By televator 1160261868In this clip, we can see that the "explosion" u mentioned happened around the same floor as the plane crashed, don't u think that it is impossible for those bombs not to explode in such a huge vibration caused by the plane crash? how could it be exploded a while after the crash?
If this was an inside job, i would rather set the explosive devices at a lower level of the WTC, so that i can make sure that it will collapse, instead of setting them at 1XX floor of the WTC.
What are you talking about? a plane whent inside a tower, and it wsa made of concreat.
The reason it explodes are something with gasses from the plane and or something!
this was a special plan, it was very well thought through but it is not explosive devices inside the World Trade Center!
That fire from the "explotion" wasn't an "explotion" stupid idiots. That just the reaction of the building when it started to colapse.
By StefanSu91 1160101402as everybody says(mainly jews) that muslims were the bombers,they made it up..blablabla.ppl, how come its muslims did it and lots of them were killed from this accident! on the other hand,none of the jews who work in the world trade center showed up this day! all claimed that they had DIARRHEA! what the F**k is this! hope u get the point that we (muslims are not terrorists)
By mo3aa 1160087847That's ridiculous!!! The building is weak from hours of burning and simply collapses. Where else would the flames have to go but out?? They're sure not going to go inward!! Good video though.
By grapeape2k6 1160016193when one floor collapse on the other the air and flames have to be dispersed out.. "think you idiot.."
ok.. this video is pretty S**t i've had a hard time seeing the smoke come out of the tower from the pressure, let alone an explosion. The big evidence to me is the insurance.. a month before 9/ 11 the owner of the towers ( cant remember his name and couldn't be bothered to find out ) insured them. This is the most expensive insurance ever done in the world. From memory it was 11 million. After 9/ 11 happened the pay out was over 3 billion dollars. Now I have done a few insurance jobs in mine time and that to me, looks like one. Another thing, u's are so quick to say that what we are reading about 9/ 11 is wrong, yet u's are so quick to listen to someone else just coz they are the media. Dont u's know the government choose's what is shown on tv and on newspapers. thats why they hate the net.. so hard to monitor. then there is this guy [[ But you`re insulting the intellegence of 6 year olds when you compare thier intellegence to the idiot that posted this and all the other scum that keep coming out with all this crap. Today Uk police stopped a plot to blow up 9 planes to the Usa, what do the conspiracy brigade have to say about things like that? ]] do u have solid evidence in ur hands ?? i doubt u do but u still believe them ? ps. i am not saying they didnt catch no one .. just making a point
By Yeah895 1159944489If you believe this is a bomb exploding in that building, I have got something for you to try...
ONLY IF YOU THINK THAT IS A BOMB!
You will need 1 friend and a phone with 911 in the speed dial, 1 paper bag( like you get at the grocery store), 1 large phone book, (any big heave book will do), 4 cups of cooking flour..( self rising would be good ),and a pair of safety glasses.
First= take the paper bag and open it up completely then lay it on its side making sure it doesn't collapse. have it on a table or some where you can look directly into the bag.
second= take the flour and pour it about middle ways of the bag, with the bag still on its side. (the flour represents fire)
third= while you are looking eye level, into the bag, no further that 12 inches between your nose and the bag, have your friend to slam the phone book on the top of the bag as to collapse it. (this represents the floors collapsing on top of each other)
Finally= put on you safety glasses
Please return to this blog and let us all know how it went..
This proves nothing... whatever happen to common sense.
By austenl 1159907074The twin towers fell at a rate of speed faster then gravity-10 seconds which is the same amount of time needed for an 8 ball from billiards to fall 110 stories to ground level. (Yes it's possible, but only through controlled demolition) a pancake collapse would take around 110 seconds from that height, the 47 interior columns were not accounted for which were nearly industructible, the U.S government allocated only a fraction of what they spent on TWA flight 900's investigation on 9/11; even though there are only three cases in history where steel building collasped due to fire, and they all occurred on 9/11 (you'd think they'd spend more money to discover what caused such an extreme case which odds over 10,000 to one, but they didn't), and steel or concrete doesn't burn, I'll repeat that for clarity purposes.
Steel and concrete doesn't burn.
The dirty fires (open air, uncontrolled fires) burned up office funiture, technology, and the lot. One could reasonably say that the steel melted under the intense heat...
But, there's one small problem, dirty fires burn around 1100-1600 degrees farenheit, steel's melting point is 2750 farenheit respectably. The prolonged exposure to the heat source would have to be around 2200 degrees farenheit. Not only that the claim that jet fuel propelled the fires doesn't quite add up scientifically considering the fire would of then have been buring at 1517ºF which is scientficly proven with the fuel grade used.
Now, some could go on to state that there have been some rare instances where steel does infact warp, not melt, which is true, but the steel at ground zero was physically examined by witnesses who've recorded that the steel was not warped in any way, the only steel found was bend at radical angles, which cannot be caused by centrifugal force. This pattern is generally found in demolition sites.
I'd go on, but for the sake of brevity I recommend that everyone keeps an open mind, instead of name calling, and chastizing examine every angle. Now, I'm not going to go into political affairs, because I don't think it's backed by solid evidence, but scientifically it doesn't make sense.
Have a Good Day Everyone!
Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime 1.0
*Bush's election was a fraud
*Able Danger
*"Terrorist" Was Enrolled in USAF School
*Huffman Flight School
*In Sept. 2000 Two "Terrorists" Moved in with an FBI Asset that had been working on terrorism cases.
*The Visa program which allowed the Saudi "Terrorists" to enter without interview or Background checks was implicated three months before the attacks.
*This program was only introduced in Saudi Arabia.
*An agent in the FBI was stopped and refused when he began investigating terror networks in the us, their funding, and their sources. His superiors silenced him.
*He then sued the FBI; he and another agent tried to warn America but were denied that possibility.
*Another FBI agent requested surveilance and search warrants.
*An FBI Agent makes 70 warnings but is ignored. Memo's released.
*A translator for the FBI has had more gag orders than anyone in the US.
*That same woman speaks about seeing papers which indicate that the US knew about terror attacks before they happeend, including details about specific target, dates, and people. All documented.
*9/11 Commision failed to include any of this.
*2.5 Terrabytes of data on ABLE DANGER and the brooklyn terror cell were destroyed.
*2.5 Terrabytes=1/4 of the library of congresses data.
*The man will testify that he was ordered or he would've lost his job to do this dirty deed.
That's exactly 29 minutes of it.
just becuse there is a little more smoke comming out and the cammera shakes u think therde is a bomb it is the metal heating up and becommking soft and falling. no bombs
retard
i think u americans should talk about urselves more, rather than destroying other cultures and livelihoods. u all talk as if u are veterans of a war yet ure knowledge is only based on government lies and it is ure government who empowers u, not urself.it is they who are making fools of u. remember u feed the u.s government in taxes and inflation e.t.c, not the other way around, thats why u rely so much on governments decisions and actions because u have no one to really agree with ure personal instinctive reactions, in case u are in fear of treason, but the bush administration disagrees with letting u make decisions for ureself when it comes to world politics. thats why i think it was a "setup" or an "inside job"
you act as if u were all waiting for 9/11 to happen now, and when it did u pointed ure fingers to the nearset scape goat which was unfortunately my religion.
bush is a coward not the ordinary citizens of the u.s
peace and love, i am not a coward or anything, i just want u people to figure it out for ureselves. if u really knew what was going on then u could change it couldn't u? but i think the american people are in denial of themselves for putting themselves at such risks, open to the world of terrorism.
remember lies breed lies, and violence breeds violence. if u are ready to fight war and so r we with our lives i think its clear by now.
What the video DIDNT show you, is that before the plane hit the building, the terrorist jumped out, grabbed onto a window, climbed inside and blew himself up. He decided it was easier that way.
By courtney176 1159702614You obviously were born without a brain so let me explain. The smoke you see pouring out of the building is from, wait for it, yes, fire so even though you can`t see it the smoke is a give away sign, a big clue so to speak. Now, as the building collapses the fire, which you don`t see until a few seconds later has nowhere to go so is forced outwards due the air pressure from the collapsing floors. Generally you would see an explosion before a building collapses. God it must be awful to have no brain. It was political correctness that allowed this to happen. Fear of upsetting the person or persons who are about to kill you. One day certain people will wake up.
By adamantski 1159702023hey sherlock that explosion you see is the roof coming down forcing air out of the sides and also pushing the fire out with it. the inside of the building was on fire....it got hit by a plane remember. save the conspiracy theory for that fat bastard michael moore
By mort5507 1159659890You are a complete F**king moron if you think there were explosives planted on the building. What are you some F**king raghead loser?
By raychamp 1159651012when the smoke catches on fire4 it is called an "flashover" as seen here
By jakeboy 1159646700...that when the building collapsed the fire was pushed out the windows. so what looked like an explosion was actually the fire being forced out really fast as the building collapsed.
By gatecrasher_canada 1159568255Your so gullable. I'm sure 9/11 has made us all a little leary, but there were not explosives inside already. You ARE a dumbass!!
By marss 1159563630play the video slowly just before you see the puff of smoke come out followed by the fire if you look at the radio antena on top of the tower you'll see it begins to fall first, this is because as any reasonable person knows the fire gutted the inside of the tower first the tower then collapsed from the inside as the antenna and the roof cave in the pressure pushes the smoke out and the fire follows no explosives involved. i think that it is disrespectful of those that died to post such crap as this if you believe this idiot get some help and in the meantime keep your opinions to yourself
rest in peace victims of 9/11
peace and freedom to all
This video doesn't prove anything --
However that doesn't mean that there aren't HUGE questions about 9/11
For example,
1) How does the Pentagon LET a jumbo jet fly into itself an HOUR after the networks announce that America's under Attack. (Andrews Air Force base is only 12 miles away)
2) A jet is 150 feet wide and has 60 tons of mass, yet the hole at the Pentagon was a lot smaller and had just a few pieces of plane -- if you say that the plane melted, all that mass had to go somewhere.
2) Why did WTC building 7 collapse when no plane hit it?
3) Steel buildings can burn for 24 hours without collapsing -- this happened in Spain recently.
There are many more questions if you look ciosely at the evidence. Check out the 9/11 loose change video for starters.
This building had 282 steel columns around the inside and a massive steel core -- but somehow a fire weaked them ALL so that they all failed at the exact same instant and collapsed into a perfect footprint of the building, with the exact same end affect as if someone had used lots of explosives -- that's pretty uniikely
It is not an explosion it is the oxygen that is being forced out when the building is collapsing that creates the large amount of fire.
By tonymontanarules 1159538426i'm willing to believe Bush had something to do with 9/11. i try to keep an open mind but this video prooves nothing. there were no explosions and if they were, who did the government employ to place them? it would have taken a lot of explosives placed by a lot of people and not one of them said "no way am i having any part in killing innocent civilians!" and went public about the plot, get real...
By eyoufa 1159533325If you watch the video closely the spire starts falling before the so called explosion, which causes the release of smoke and bs from below. This was not explained on Discovery or National Geo but everything else was. You conspiracy theorists should learn knowledge and information before you shoot your dumbass mouths off. By the way, Im a Kiwi, and will fight to the death for my way to live without Islam extremists tryin to kill the 'Infidels'. I believe there is no higher power or god, we are all our own gods... Any god that condones killing 3000 innocent people out making their way in life is seriously f**ked up
By Hardman686 1159522105would know that when, like "Sigh" said, when a building collapses, fire will billow out because of a thing called 'pressure'. Comparing the person who posted this to a six year old is wrong, we should compare him/her to the idiot terrorists who plotted the attacks
By wyle_e_coyote75 1159489856your a dumbass y would they crash two planes and sacrifice there lives when there is already explosives in the towers and and just cuz there is a fire when it falls dnt mean tht there is an explosive becuase there good be to electrical wires touchin each other which could cause a fire mixed with the gases from the planes
your a dumbass
The building is so.....f@#$*d up it didn't need explosives inside to collaspe...Gees pfftt seriously!
By Blueyez 1159326792The plane that hit his tower was a boeing 747, depending on the type of varient this jet was loaded with anywhere between 57,000-61,000 lbs of jet fuel, we know it was filled to max capactity considering it was a redline flight to Los Angeles or LAX airport, this would require max fuel. So minus what was burned off in between Boston (takeoff location), with a burn of 12,000 lbs per hr, this plan hit the WTC with roughly 45,000 lbs of jet fuel. As you may know this fuel burns extremely hot, with this fuel leaking throughout the building and burning over the period of 45 min. the WTC buildings didn't stand a chance, therefor melting the metal structure and causing a collapse, no explosives involved here.
By yankeefan5151 1159220287did you see the smoke?? did you know that the tower was on fire.. (i tell you that the fire was inside, cause i see that your brain is not able to see it for itselve).. So, when you have smoke in your mouth, and you close your mouth, more smoke is visible arround your face.. so, think a little bit and think about the flames inside the tower.. burning chairs, wood, etc.. so.. go to school and try to learn to think!! if someone can help u!!
By sirwind 1159202743im not no genius
buh planes are fueld with what?
fuel ye?
k
what happens when a car hit something at high speeds
it will crash and burn
that explains the fire
then maybe it soon may of caused an explosion
the fuel leaking into the flame perhaps?
i dunno
im just tieing two ends into a knot here
maybe someone could explain it better
and plz have some respect
people died in there
i dunno why i just sed that
buh i thought it would seem appropriate :D
Lets put aside if Bush knew and look at the science and dynamics of structures. In any building you have load bearing walls. If you remove these load bearing walls it puts stress on the other parts of the building. Now inside an office building you normally have coulmes and trusses that support the floors and outer columns that are called a frame. once you add heat to the damage support it you have now weakened the integrity of the structure.
Heat a peice of flat metal in the middle and you will see how it will sag. To explain this to the mentaly challenged!
Save your toliet tissue rolls till you have 20 of them.
Then take five peices of cardboard (like a ceral box) making them all the same size say 8.5 x 11 inches.
Place four of the rolls in a square shape in the middle area like the side of a dice with four on it. repeat this till you have five floors.
Now take a two liter of pop and sit it on top in the middle.
Take a roll out of the middle level.
Next using a spray bottle of water (this will simulate fire) spray the other rolls above that level and the card board.
Next spray the level below the missing roll.
When you have soaked the rolls enough the levels and two liter will fall.
You have now learned the truth of the falling towers!
"roady"...you're pretty illiterate yourself. "proofs". enough said. stop coming off as if you know big S**t because if the gov really did do it..they're gunna make it seem like it happened on its own. they're not jus going to blow up the towers..."dipshit."
By Chem000 1159088172I do believe I remember a certain little war back in oh say the 1700's between two differnt societys.. I also remember one was the worlds leading power, I think there name was Great Britain, OH YA and the other Country were the .. hmm 13 colonies? Now known today as USA!! Ya all you Brits can go screw your Dike mothers and fathers.. Actually I dont think that will be new to you!! Also, all your doing is insulting the 3,325 people that died during this incident on 9/11 please reconsider what you post. Jesus.. Also all anyone was trying to do is figure out what happend, how it happend, and why it happend. It just so happens that sometime these things called "theorys" are proven to be true.. So maybe a few theorys are a little distorted, but there were also Vans on that day that held bombs intended to run into a few places and expload, so it wasn't stupid to consider that somting may have gone down on the inside.. F**k Scotland Yard, bunch of dam British C**ts .
By S-Zero910 1159067304It the Tower was rigged with a device, there is a question you have to put to yourself.......what isn't there that should be there?
Don't know?
The noise of the device going off, you got the noise of the people in amazement and nothing else.
Sad to say I think that the Twin Towers were put up wrong by the builders and perhaps the designer as well, the Empire State Building was also hit by a plane but because it was designed and built right it stayed up.
What you think is an expolosion is actually the compression of air and the violent expansion of it through the exterior walls of the Tower;the same result occurs when you pop a paper bag filled wityh air or a cardboard box.
It takes months to prepare a building for a destructive implosion and ther are only a handfull of people in the world who know how to do it.
THINK ABOUT JACKASS:
-SOMONE would have noticed a bunch of guys bringing hundreds of ppounds of equipment and explosives up 100 floors or more..
- OR maybe the big crew of guys cutting and drilling and laying out hundreds of feet of wiring might have tipped a few people off...
- OH, OH JUST MAYBE SOMEONE might of heard the noise from all of these guys rigging the explosives...
I suppose you think the planes where just giant radio controlled models!
YOU and the M. Moores of this country are JUST A BUNCH OF SAD ASS JACKASSES who are ignorant and well just plain stupid.
LIBERAL WEENIES WHO with their stupid ideas and theories only help the ENEMY think they can conquer us .
Why don' you go live over there if you don't like here?
Why can't anyone just accept the fact that the government is COMPLETELY INCOMPETENT. The all powerful CIA presented in the movies is a fantasy. They tried and utterly failed to remove Castro in the 1961. Also, why would the business dominated government purposely throw the economy into a depression?
P.S.
About all the "evidence" out there saying it was an inside job. You can also find plenty of "evidence" suggesting that the world is flat, just ask the flat earth society. One can also find "evidence" proving the holocaust was fake, just ask any neo-nazi or Islamic extemist.
I think the video shows the fire inside the building...If they put explosives, why do they place it on the 80th floor!!! Do you cut a tree from its top?
By gokberk 1159037732Yeah right,, and bush payed Bin Laden for destroing WTC. Dumb piece of incest why the F**k would you say that there were explosive devices in WTC?
By Evil Ernie 1159014760You're a F**king idiot. Why would we kill that many of our own citizens? Over oil? Yeah right.
By hottishangel 1158981298this video may prove S**t but everbody who objects to the fact that 9/11 was set up must be fricking moron. Watch loose change dumb asses!
By coolQuinn 1158962306You are so retarded. Saying that the towers had explosives in them, for what fuckin purpose. Don't always focus on saying its some conspiracy. You are so fuckin stupid, i knew people in those buildings n even thur family wodnt go as far as to say somthin that dumb. F**k YOU ASSHOLE
By Jegro 1158898797I can't say that explosion belongs to the explosion of the security falling measures, but sure in the WTC they have this system. They were made for resist a high level disaster. The estructure of the wtc wasn`t broken with the explosion of colision, massive gas droping, or fire issues.
I have seen many videos of huge buildings on fire and most of them resisted 2 days on fire at least. The fallings of two towers were syncronized( im not talking about planes or about terrorist plan attack), and one human mind had the obligation to active the falling security system, or... it can't be worse... it can be automatic too. What's worse?... Conspiration? oh F**k , lol, of course your's goverment is doing conspiration. Your goverment like your money, and the goverment of other countries like too lol. Conspiration exist since human had power lol. F**king crazys conspiracy belivers. Of course the "thing" that impacted on Pentagon was a missile. This is nothing new...
I think the matter is if there were and option to have more time to get off more people...and the fire-man who lost their lifes too, before any one active the security program...
Have an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out!
By realist13 1158840998I AM A MALTESE AND I FEEL SO SORRY WHEN I FINISH SCHOOL I WANT 2 FI
By nathanielcam 1158756628they saw it cummin anyway... american derseved every bit of that.... if america kept there fat asses out of there country none of this would off even started... they saw it cummin and its gunna get worse.. .. oh well lifes a bitch!! then u marry 1!.. thanks alot america..
By Minds5 1158671884did u kno george fannybush was in on this iswell? fort not any1 want to join the kkk's?? im holdin a meetin outside big ben every saturday 9-00pm to kill sme fukin pakkis or jus nik there stuff!! cnt wait!!
By ikky 1158400294Yes, big fire comes out of the collapsed floor as tower starts to go down. SO: as some levels ceilings are falling on the floor, DO YOU IMAGINE THE AIR VOLUME THAT IS FORCED TO EXIT SIDEWAYS? AND HOW FAST? THIS IS ENOUGH, EXPLOSION OR NOT, TO PRODUCE THAT SMOKE
By Quazar_x_ 1158379085You idiot. The downward force of the tower created a rush of air trying to escape out wherever it could. Have you ever blown on fire embers to get them to spread/ignite/burn faster?
By danmatic 1158367354if a building was going to fall like this then when the oxygen got to the fire it would make a huge flame ball like that. your just stupid to belive that there where explosives inside
By murdock06 1158336230Your theroy is total rubbish!! these towers fell as a result of a plane crashing into them and the extreme temperatures that caused metal to buckle!!!!!! This tragic event shouldnt have an comspiracies, it was a shear act of terroism!!!
By dollyburdy 1158311990what happends when u punch someone in their stomac?? thats right alot of air cums out the mouth of the person u hit. This is almost the same. As the building colapses the air gets pushed out of the building, and when a hole floor is on fire , that fire gets pushed out the broken windowses.
By Norwegianwipah 1158303594wow if it is really rigged by explosives than I must say that whoever pilot the plane must be very skillfull since he can struck the tower no more than 5 stories high from the explosives.
By pin2drop 1158294114this applies to the pentagon too right? how they the US blew up their OWN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE just so they could bomb a desert? yeah... even bush cant be that stupid (i dont like bush either but this is just stupid)
and ever hear of GAS TANKS?? its new york, it snows in the winter, you probably need gas for heat... dumbcracks
Ok, lets see...the building starts to explode what.....2-3 seconds after it falls down. mmmmm after a bloody jet crashes into it. Yeah whatever.Conspiracy theorists f**k off and let them rest in peace
By Scotty101 1158268816When the tower collapses, a fire spreads. That's true, but why do you think? There were already a fire present, and when the building collapses, the PRESSURE blows the fire that were present inside the building (but not visible to us) out into the open (where it is visible to us).
Conclusion: Proves nothing.
I'm not even American, yet I made this profile just to mention how IDIOTIC these conspiracy theories are. They are made by people that want to damage some others, and they are believe by ignorants.
Sigh..
First of all there is no such word as "proofs", you F**king retard. You are the prime example of one of the ignorant assholes in this country. If you think this was done by the government and you are convinced this is the absolute truth, THEN GET THE F**k OUT OF OUR COUNTRY YOU IGNORANT F**k !!!! Respect the lives that were lost that day and those that are continuing to give the ultimate sacrifice around the world. God bless
By shtankens2 1158194639Got to memri.org. It sis a site dedicted to watching all the media traffic that comes out of the middle east. You should here the theories the gvt. controlled states put out there. They say it was an inside job perpetuated by the Jews. They say it was Bushs fault so they would have an excuse to invade Iraq...ya wonder where these theories start? Go to memri.org
Later...
for anyone who knows anything about structures...the building falls from the inside first moron. The so called "explosion" and the burst of smoke you see before the building falls is the result of debris being fanned out by the enormous load of the top floors...get a life dipshit
By onemanarmy920 1158010549If the building was rigged with explosives, then wat damage did the planes do? None at all eh?
By Tucker@Halo 1158004742just think of the people that died i know a woman that died in that
By funny bones 1158001748How does this "proofs" that there were explosive devices in the WTC? What a ridiculous notion! What I never understood about the "controlled demolition" theory was that with incredible fire and heat burning for nearly 45 minutes that managed to not detonate these so called explosives. The fact that you people, 5 years later, still can believe that garbage is both ridiculous and saddening. I am proud to be an American but when my own countrymen eat up this conspiracy bullshit it embarrasses me. How many times will experts and scientists have to debunk your theories? Unfortunately that will never be enough because you people are as fanatical with your "inside job" theories as the radical Islamists are in destroying anyone who will not convert to their religion.
By USAILL 1157955775forgive me if im blind but i dont see any explosion. i repeated the video 5 times and saw no explosion, no shockwave, nothing that resembles an explosion (for eg. flying debris or shockwave or sound). i do see a fireball emerging AFTER the top part gives way though. and even if it were an explosion, couldn't jet fuel ,gas supply or electricity have sparked off some sort of explosion other than bombs ? i havent and wont be spending time doing research but i think more evidence is required about these so called 'bombs' (and where are the terrorists who planted them) and how they were planted. how the fireball came about isn't unusual either, when the top parts gives way and compresses unto the bottom part, the change in pressure results in emerging oxygen fuelling the flame .
By ch33k 1157814278These crap conspiracies?!?!?
Those explosions you see is all of the air and flame being compressed out of the WTC because all the floors are being flattened like pancakes.
RIP victims of 9/11
The reason why there was a huge "explosion" was because the tower had started to collapse, thus causing air, fire and smoke to billow outwards. The collapse caused the phenomenon, not the other way round. BTW, if it had exploded, don't you think that an explosion would have been heard?
By PlinyTheModern 1157711152Yeah I saw the fire. The upper floors collapsed and briefly forced out the fire from the burning jet fuel. So WTF are you proving?
By bentan 1157624100Watch the movie loose change. It's on google video. Then see if you change your mind.
By kajz44 1157610518normaly if a plane that is allready on fire gets crushed by a huge chunk of building it's going to make a little fire. and another thing, if it was explosives how the F**k could you rig the top half of the biggest building in the world with enough explosives to knock it down with out anyone seeing you???
By fuck all you people 1157592017how a steele building collapses by just one small part at the TOP of the building bein weakened by fire...
By dumass m1k3y 1157561589You're a genius. Where did you get your knowledge? I would never had know that explosives destroyed the WTC, except for one little problem with your theory, I saw a Boeing 767 fly into that tower at about 300 miles per hour that morning.
Also, for the guy who mentioned the steel cage holding the majority of the weight for the WTC, you might want to look at the schematics for the buildings again. The floors of the WTC were supported by trusses, the trusses themselves were coated with an fire retardant. Unfortunately the impact of the jetliner and the intense heat from the Aviation fuel that burned for those 45 minutes pretty much eliminated that. Take the trusses as they begin to twist and bend under both the heat and the stress and concrete(6 inches per floor X the size of the floors, all because the towers had to be built quickly years ago and have open plan floors) and you begin to see how much weight was placed on the middle load bearing structures which because of the above mentioned problems, just gave way, which lead to internal buckling of the corner columns of the Tower, buckling and then collapse.
isnt it amazing that the planes hit both buildings exactly where the explosives had apparently already been planted!! not to mention the fact that they didnt detonate on impact. in fact, why even bother with the planes at all, just blow up the buildings and blame terrorists. my sorces in the FBI tell me that JFK was flying both planes via remote control from a UFO they found at roswell!!!
By bandito22 1157465618title is self explanatory.
Apparently, Osama bin Laden somehow managed to talk a few men into performing this morbid atroscity to so many innocent people's lives in NY and the WTC. After all of this, and The Pentegon and Philidelphia etc etc, apparently, Osama bin Laden just walks away and has a good laugh.
By Jerrys_Menu 1157421346whoever thinks the building were rigged with explosives, well you all gonna rot in hell you pieces of S**t
By Team_Xtreme 1157258693there were no extra explosives in the building. The heat from the explosion melted the frame of the building which caused it to collapse, if a plane explodes its gonna make a F**king explosion. wow. you guys are retarded.
NY represent
U really think tht this wuz an inside job? y wud some1 risk the lives of so many innocent ppl?? so many family members were lost that day, nd u r here sayin it wuz intentional. ur a F****t ! 4 ur information, these buildings were specifically designed to collapse straight down, so that they did not fall sideways and disable several blocks. the collapse is from the heat melting everything, and falling down like intended. next time get ur facts straight b4 u go talkin about stuff u don kno about.
By stephandtim613 1157105726Yeah, and the elaborate plan to crash the planes into the building were just to coverup the bombs, you smaaart!!
By YourMomsHouse 1157105583Scientists look at things that have happened and try to explain them. Some of you have a stupid explanation in there heads and then try to think of ways it must have been put together. Just get a life!
By Nitro-CBR600 1157032580HE REVISADO LOS PLANOS, MAQUETAS Y ESTUDIOS DEL WTC Y NO DEVIO CAER COMPLETAMENTE POR EL ATAQUE DE 1 AVION. ¡¡¡EL EDIFICIO FUE CARGADO CON IMPLOSIVOS DETONADOS CON LAS EXPLOCIONES!!! ... Y ESTO NO FUE PREMEDITADO POR LOS TERRORISTAS QUE ESTRELLARON LAS NAVES, POR OTRA PARTE , EL PENTAGONO NO FUE ATACADO POR UN AVION, ESA INFORMACION ES UNA FARZA MONUMENTAL... EL ATAQUE ESTABA AVISADO, DE CAER LOS EDIFICIOS POR ESOS IMPACTOS MAS DAÑO HUBIESE HABIDO EN LOS ALREDEDORES Y MENOS EN LOS PISOS BAJOS.
ARQUITECTOS, INGENIEROS CUESTIONEN ESO!!!!
if you look closely on the right side about 5 to 6 seconds in the video . you can see a person falling from the tower !
By mmascdq 1156880760If you don't believe this was an inside job, then how do you explain WTC 7. Even the owner said "We decided to pull it" So how did the explosives get into WTC 7 ? And how come we don't see video of the Pentagon? And how come they never reconstructed the planes? 9/11 is everything Bush needs to wipe his filthy ass all over the Constitution, and he is the real terrorist. Well really Cheney is the one. Bush is too stupid to tie his own shoes
By The Decider 1156821516go to google video enter "michael ruppert" watch then understand why it happened
By Dominyon 1156737115Hurrincane Katrina was also created by the government.. all the earthquakes, floods-- blame the government.
By rubba 1156619500if it was rigged 2 explode n collapse and it was just a plain to wage war on iraq then why on the news were irqi people seen dancing around celebrating this great tragidy???
By itai 1156459143i was in the trade center the day before that happened
By The Pez 1156274120This only proofs the building collapsed.... I didn't see any explosion... you see something that could have been, but it happens after the building starts to collapse.. and the fire? It was already burning on that floor.... and what happens to stuff between two floors when they come down? It's forced out....
That's what this shows....
Look at any movie of a demolition.. first you see explosions, after that the building slowly starts to move... there's is some time between the exploding and the moving, but not in this video... If you see this movie as proof then you'd have a great time fighting aliens too I guess.......
The psueo intellectuals who think they are smart because they know just a little, and their axiom is "a little knowlege is a dangerous thing" They watch science programs, probablly read omni and discrovery and maybe scientific america and then read blogs and bulletine boards and join chatrooms and spout their ignorance. If anybody disputes them then their excuse is that the person disputing their known facts is just part of the conspiracy. They easially confuse reality with fiction and reject anything thats not of their opinions. No wonder the world so messed up, people who know little of things seem to shout how little they do know very loudly. I can definatley say, having studied all the tapes and videos availiuble to me for the last 4 years, and talking to all the scientist discussing both possibilties, that it was jst a plane crash and that it was a dilebrate set up, I can conclude that it was just a well planned plane crash that was done by people who are very good at beating the American Security systems. But I guess since we are suppose to have the best of everything, security screening and homeland protection, it is harder to believe these failed us than it is to think we did it to ourselfs as a deliberate consipracy
By thezerovoidshow 1156203091First of all, there is a new invention called spellchecker. Use it! The conspiracy theory is a joke. The towers collapsed due to heatfrom the fire. They stood for almost an hour after they were hit. The heat weakened the steel which caused the collapse. Turn off the X-box and watch the history channel or the discovery channel. They interview experts called structural engineers that can easily explain all of this to you uneducated morons!
By not an expert 1156173835All this video proves is that the tower collapsed this way because of the way it was built.
It was built in a certain way and that's why it fell down directly instead off slowly bit by bit , if the tower had been any other shape, hight or width it would have fell differently - no explosives used here - just think about it
Someone should learn what happens when you compress on object.
By moose5 1155943792What about the S**t load of fuel that is under the twin tower wouldn't that be a result of it collapsing we don't know but i think loose change is a big rumor.
By docta 1155797840Anyone who thinks any part of 9/11 was a "conspiracy" is a farking idiot.
By jbrooks544 1155666602The flames are coming from the fire that was already there, moron.
By gdb 1155585601Who ever said that the plane didnt stuck there...burned for 45 minutes and then ignited?
Ignited=BOOM=Collapse..
Planes have flamable fuel you know...
why would you not believe that the muslin terrorist would do this. are that anti-american. are you that blind to the truth.
By chevy66 1155526198As you say there is am explosive fire. If your replay this in slow motio its occurs durring the collapse not before. An explosion powerful enough to weaken the struture after the impact would occur before collapse. what you see i sthe sudden rush of air/oxygen through the stair wells and elevator shafts under the force of the falling upper floors. Like blowing on the embers of a fire this is nothing but the reverse affect of a back draft. P.S You're a F**king idiot.
By cornflakes 1155509367what it seems to be an explsion is only the air presure. when the upper floors collapsed increased the air presure. its like there a house in fire you open the door and more air comes in, making a bigger fire.
By dflorest 1155495848For one you need to learn to spell, and for another, a little research before you post videos such as that would be great as well. OF COURSE its going to look like that you retard, the building was burning when it collapsed. PEOPLE LIKE YOU IS WHATS WRONG WITH THE COUNTRY!!
By alovelyheather3 1155490736I can't believe that the bush administation and medias had so much persuasion force on this case and so many following others.
U are triying to convince me that a dude who's perched somewhere on some lost hills in the asshole of the planet has succeeded to create and organize that wonderful logistic which is necessary for this disaster?
That three or four dumb persons did have learned in less than one year to master the piloting of a colossus plane to know exactly how to do to crash with so much precision ?
That while the plane litteraly vaporize, the FBI found the pilotage memobook in the ruins.
Let me laugh.
You know what I saw in that video? A building collapsing after some scumbag, sandnigger towel heads raped The GREATEST country in the WORLD. The leaders of the FREE WORLD! Thats what I saw. NO Explosive devices, no set charges, no conspiracies, just a bunch of towel heads trying to kill innocent people. I say, Kill all muslims, and Let ALLAH Sort'em out. Have a nice day
By GregLead 1155303930Most of you guys probably still think Kennedy was killed by some nut named Oswald, then came back to life and killed his brother robert... most of you have never heard of the illuminati, skull and bones or the freeman... most of you dont know that the 4 USA aircraft carriers left the port of pearl harbor the night before the attack after sitting in the port for over a month, lucky?
Did you see the destruction of building 7 on 9 11 and still think it was the result of fire or do you even know what building 7 was.
Want to hear a crazy conspiracy theory?
A guy named Binladen and 16 guys caused 911.
There is no prof of it.... its a conspiracy theory, just because the people in power say it happened that way doesn't make it a fact... turn off the tv and do some research. If you dont like reading or cant read just go to google video ... there are tons of videos on the subject... videos that the leaders make sure dont get played on TV.
And i think it's stupid to assume that Bush would ever do something so horrifically evil as to help terrorists in any way to destroy the Twin towers. There's no way Bush is connected to the destruction of the towers.
By MatSH 1155191224whoever posted this video is stupid....there were not any explosives in the wtc.. dont u think that might have been an explosion from a gas or freon leak..
The truth is when yuo have something fall(i.e. a building) the air is forced out by the pressure of the falling object. Therefore the fire that you claim is explosives is actually the fire already raging inside of the tower. A high explosive moves at somewhere aroung 12000 feet a second and therefore you would have seen the fire BEFORE the tower fell, not after. The fire that is claimed to be an explosion is pushed out only because of simple physics, not because of some crazy conspiracy theory.
By mythbuster 1155099568when the towers were built, the structure was made to collapse the way they did, because if they toppled over, there would have been much more destruction. its insane for anyone to believe it was an inside job from the U.S. government, and anyone who believes that obviously didn't lose anyone in the 9/11 attacks. sooo get your facts straight about why the buildings collapsed before you start posting videos about it...the way the buildings fell was EXACTLY what was supposed to happen, so to say them collapsing proves the U.S. was in on it is stupid..
By werrtb34 1155097914a plane CRASHED INTO THE BULDING!!! IT HAS A GAS TANK!!!! GAS IS FLAMABLE!!! so that explains the fire, NOT EXPLOSIVES!!! Jesus! seriously, roady43 is right... they would get like bomb technitian to see if it was a bomb or not, which it wasnt. jeez, watch the news once in a while, then you would have known it was a plane! y do u think they have news? SO WE CAN FIND OUT WTF IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD!!!!!!
By vegeta3002 1155096733I just can't imagine that the explosion and fire could has anything to do with a JETLINER full of JET FUEL CRASHING into the building.
By javaspice 1155009633Ok since you noticed the flames shooting out the side, did you forget there was a fire raging on those floors and as they pancaked on top of each other they pushed the fire out. also did you notice that the center of the building started to collapse at that point you would have flames go the sides if there was an explosion. ATTENTION TO DETAIL
By lenoxx 1155005795this video proves nothing, didnt you know that airplanes contain keyrosene gas and all the things in the engine ?! it probably took 45 minutes for the heat to build and and crack or melt the metal and the gas leaked and exploded
1. plane crashed into wtc
2. building caught on fire and plane was obliterated except for larger denser objects
3. and the heat built up along with the weakening of the gas tanks and the tanks exploded and the building collapsed from the support bars that melted
4. some idiot name timoty took a part of te video and said that there were explosives in the WTC (1 of the largest buildings in the world and a crucial part of the economy.. doh)
You are a F**k stain... What dumbshit would rig a building to blow, then crash a plane into it... silly S**t .
By Nzhorseman 1154786430The explosion was from the plane fuel. the flash of fire was the from the building cracking showing the flames inside. If there was a bomb inside the building would've
colapsed from the ground you idiot!
you will also notice if you look at the top of the building, WHAT HAPPENS FIRST, the tower begins to collapse, BEFORE this "explosion" takes place. the fire you see, is the exuastion of all contents inside of the building on that level. for example, if i were to beat the S**t out of you for making such a stupid stament, i would probibly end your torture by jumping on your head. with all that pressure i exhort on your fucked up head, it would probibly cause your head to "explode" with whatever fills your mind. Sorry to be so blunt, but its idiots like you that fill our scociety with the most retarded ways to point the finger at everyone else, but those who gladly took the lives of so many innocent people. Grow up.
By hampsterskickass 1154639871i can see blaming the attacks on the government, is because we trained osama as a CIA agent, but he was never CIA. Then we gave him tens of thousands of dollars for "self defense" then he repayed us, by kicking our asses. Now we're ignoring him, letting him prance around the Middle East like the little Fary Princess of Retardsville
By parkourandmagic 1154598898absolutely nothing. it proves that at least one of the world trade center twin towers was indeed attacked, and that at least on of them fell down. I know they were both attacked and both collapsed, killing countless thousands, including one of my relatives, leading us to war, which i will go fight in vengance of these poor poor people. But it doesn't prove that it was rigged with explosives.
By parkourandmagic 1154596524The *Proof* of detonations bringing down the WTC towers, is small plumes of smoke that shoot out a window on the side of WTC facing us, and another coming out the right side, where the building face is not visible.
Theres 2 possible causes of these smoke plumes.
The first is a detonation device being set off with the intention of causing the collapse.
Second possibility is that DUE to the collapse of the building, and the displacement of space within WTC, that debris would have been ejected from any weaker spots in the building.
So how do you determine which caused it.
After reviweing this and many other videos for probably over 2 hours (hey its too hot to go outside and WoW servers are down.) ive noted the following list of anomolies.
1) the plumes occur (im my opinion as its hard to say for certain) only moments before the collapse.
2) that the plume on the front of wtc in this vid, appears to jet from an area thats already been damaged by fire. as evident by the black soot around the window area.
3) the further down the building the shot was taken, the more the plumes 'lead' the exterior collapse. (ie, they essentally beat the collapse to the ground)
This is odd because:
A) if they were the tell tale sign of explosion, they would, as seen, occur before and at the moment of collapse. Rather, if the plumes were the resut of the collapse, obviously there would have to be some displacement (collapse) that occured FIRST in order to cause the smoke plumes.
B) the fact that the smoke plumes from the already damaged window is testiment that whatever it was took the easiest path out of the building, as we would naturally expect. The odds that a bomb had been placed at that exact spot seem less than likely.
C) Yes i would assume the smoke plumes to move downward faster than the external collapse, because what we dont see is alot of stuff falling down in the center of the WTC. This mess of falling debris would create intese pressures which would result in Debris being blown out windows or cracks in the building.
I personally see too much corrolation of the events that transpired during and after the attacks. Why did the president do nothing when told the news.
He appeared not even disturbed by the news that his nation was under attack. Ive seen our president get pretty enthuastic and riled up but one thing for sure, is he aint no actor. For him to have no reaction at all is more telling than something. he infact didnt even seem to look at the agent when he was told the news that Our Nation Was Under Attack!
Perhaps its also interesting to note that a passport belonging to one of the suspected hijackers was recovered in the streets of new york city apparently it had fallen out of his pocket. A crash that vaporized an entire plane, including Both black boxs which were made from the strongest material Known to man, took out 2 of the most Advanced sky scrapers in the history of mankind, yet his paper passport survives. ok..
why out of 4000 jews working in the building only 4 died .....infact out of these 4 ....2 were in the plane so in tht whole freakin building in which people from number of nationalities died ...there were only 2 jews .......
why israel's prime minister cancels his visit to usa on the morning before the attack .....he was to flew tht day to USA ..and he canceled his trip ...due to a suspected terrorist threat ...who teh fuk told him before the attack tht sumthing is wrong ........
well this whole thing has more to do with MOSAD than bush ............
bush was asked after the attack by the reporters wat do u think about the attacks ...his reply was (wen i saw the first plane crashing in to the building ...on tv............) how the fuk he saw the first crash on tv .........BEFORE TEH 2ND ONE ...becasue there is 1 known video of teh 1st crash ...which was made by anonymous person ..whose camera was exactly in teh direction of plane like he knew ..tht sumthing is gonna come from there and the video of first crash was made available to tv 2 days after teh crash ....so bush might be watching SWAT CATS ...........but still it doesnt make him the culprit ..he is stupid person .. one shud expect stupidities like this from him........
One of the best doccumentaries supporting this video clip; "Loose Change"
Watch it. You can download it from Limewire. It will make you think. And I don't have anything against Bush. It will open your eyes even if you support the Bush administration. It really made me think for days wether this all was caused by terrorists. Just watch the movie and you will know what I am talking about. "Loose Change"
do you honestly believe this was rigged with explosives it cant be obvoisly because whats the point in leaving it to burn so long duh! i believe personally its all bush's fault o soma bin laden treated this as doing right to his religion some how i cant see blowing up a building is gonna get u extra brownie points when it comes to decide whether you go to heaven or not.
By jackcallum@meta 1154442994listen whoever F**king thinks that this video had explosives is a dumb ass because i live right acroos from th etwin towwers and i saw this event so if u F**king have a stupid ass thing to say well write it here
By pimp master dick 1154375539but that doesn't mean there were no explosives. do you live on all four sides of it and can see them simultaneously? Honestly you call other people assholes for thinking there are explosives, but you also assume that because you (claim) you saw it that there were none. How does that make sense?
By shlomp 1154833757Of course there were explosives planted. The aliens put them there when flying around the towers (see WTC UFO). It's all true, I'm sat here with Elvis and the gunman from the grassy knoll and they totally agree.
Get a life
you fool! the fire and smoke you see as it falls is due to the air pressure as the building collapse not explosive's.... get a life and stop being a fool please......
By squirre1 1154246763I am now ex-political having been staunch conservative until I realized there's a world behind the world. Listen to the words of this man although he doesn't know the why, I do. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001
By PlowTrA1n 1154217816This S**ks For A Human Being To have to see and deal with and this really S**ks for a american to have to deal with and its just plaing Hell for a new yorker like me to have to deal with :( A moment for the ones who didnt make it
By crshippee 1154209621You are a sorry sack of S**t for spewing this garbage. Thanks for pissing all over the memories of the people who died that day.
By crash92 1154190107it wasnt an inside job ... do u not think there was alot of macinary and fuel from the plane ... and there was no inside job ... stop making stuff up people it was a terrorist attck noting else. it was probably computers etc.
By dunsy06 1154189154...would tell you that when something is copmressed(as in the floors of the building) that the air is pushed out.hence the fire raging inside is also pushed out.Now some will say also that jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel.which is true.but it does burn hot enough to weaken it.and when it reaches that point there is s sudden collapse of the structure.common sense
By dexl 1154119285Have you ever fanned flames? Ever talk to a fireman about the nature and charastics of fire? If you were to watch this video, and by that I mean truely watch it. You would nitice that the building is burning in an area (throughout) but also in a visual area (on this video) from right to left in a thin line. Once the building starts to fall, the air trapped within the tower has to go somewhere once the floors start to collapse. The Rushing air FANS THE FLAMES! There is no Explosion in this video. Please don't make more of an uninformed ASS of yourself by claiming otherwise.
By AmericaFirst 1153959050It's the same effect as when eating a Bi Mac. If you take a bite, the stuff squirms out. Here the floors crash onto each other, air is blow out sideways along with the fire and smoke.
By oempa 11538677939/11 happerned , people died , towers crashed becuase of sad ass teroists and thata that
By madcow243_Realone 1153862435You are then asking people to believe that G.W.Bush is doing exactly that, plus numerous other people as well! So when you take everything into account and look at it logicallly, you are trusting people you don't know at odds of billions to one. If you are prepared to risk that you are either exremely lucky, extremely arrogant, extremely stupid or all three! Bush maybe all three, but he is not brain dead, which you would have to be to even think you could get away with it. But to end and probably fuel the theories even further remember this.
Whether a fact is true or not is irrelevant, what is believed becomes reality!!!!!!
Forget the Michael Moore film, that is about the Bush admin' and his dealings. Let me try to put things in simple terms. Assuming there was explosives in the building(s), the planes were remote controlled and that there was a cover-up. Firstly the explosives would probably detonate on impact, so then lets assume the explosives were of a different kind (they needed blast caps and to be detonated manually). The odds of the impact not damaging or dislodging any of the blast caps or the detonation wires are litteraly millions to one. If there was any disruption in the circuit they would ALL fail to detonate. Ask any miner who works with explosives or a demoliton expert. Lets now assume they used thermite, this is a compound that is highly flammable and easily made, the problem with this theory is that it is so flammable it burns through anything and everything, so from the initial impact the burning jet fuel would almost certainly have ignited the thermite. The themite, within 5 seconds, would start to burn through the lower floors, there is no evidence that there were significant fires on lower floors, with thermite there would be this evidence! What looks like an explosion is the upper floors collapsing and blasting flame outwards, again ask a demolition expert or even better a trainee civil/stuctural engineer. Then the explosives would have to be in exactly the right place for this theory to work. Is that possible? The answer of course is yes! BUT and it is a BIG BUT you only have one chance, again at very large odds. Then we come to the possibility of remote controlled planes and the strange silver objects on the underside of the planes. Firstly the silver objects, if these indeed were part of the remote devices would they really put them in such an obvious place? They would be spotted by any one of the ground crew or by the control tower. So they would in all probability put the remote units in the cockpit with easy access to the controls. Would the pilots not question these strange objects in the cockpit? Almost definitely! Try driving a remote controlled car round a basic course, easy enough, but then try it when you can't see all of the course, it becomes harder but is still possible, but you are only operating in a 2D environment. With something that flies you are now in a 3D environment, not only forward and left and right, but up and down. Even the most basic of remote controlled aviators will tell you, you need to be able to see the craft 99% of the time, flying through NY around many of its skyscrapers I doubt there is a postion where you would have that kind of visibility, remember this is real life, you can not pause the craft in mid-air to enable you to get a better vantage point! With all this to contend with you still have only ONE chance. So we come to the cover-up. Ask yourself one question, Would five of your closest friends risk their political lives and probably their life and liberty to protect you? Highly unlikely.
By UK intelligence 1153822945But that doesn't mean i blame him for what happened with 9/11. However, i do blame him for the titanic sinking, for obvious reasons I'm not going to explain.
By makexxwar 1153677467All I see is a little puff of smoke come out the right side, which is from the internal structure starting to collapse. When the outside of the building gives way and it starts to fall, it blows out air as the space inside gets smaller, air which happens to contain fire that's still burning from the plane fuel. There's nothing in this photo to indicate that any explosives were used.
By webgrunt 1153662012Can't even spell 'proves'! Good grief! A S**ker who will believe anything!
By neo969x 1153631708michael moore is not just anti-bush, he's a hollywood sell-out too
apache helicopters are equipped with cruise missiles
there are plenty of people in the world with money, power...who would hang this on the bush admin if they had a REASON to; meaning, people with money and power use bullshit like this as part of their politics of fear to keep you dumbasses pandering amongst each other, too scared to do anything about the fallacy that american government is and always has been
"and nowadays things changed, everyone's ashamed of the youth cause the truth look strange, and to me it's reversed we left them a world that's cursed and it hurts" -tupac amaru shakur
Apache hellicopters do not have the capacity to carry cruise missles. You are an idiot.
By mythbuster 1155102178Think they rule the world... lets start a reson for war.. blame others...
By ToeW 1153452723You idiot.
That's not an explosion. Several floors were on fire, and when they collapsed on each other, the air and debris PUSHED the fire OUT into the AIR.
For lack of a better analogy, you ever bake something and get your hands are covered in flour? What happens when you clap your hands? Your skin doesn't explode, you ignorant, illiterate, shouldn't own a computer conspiracy theorist.
Die in a fire.
After reading all the comments, as to who, what, where, when and why, and putting everyones personal BS(belif system) aside, it does look like an explosion.
If there were explosives in the building to start with, do you not think they would detonate on impact? YOU MORON!
By UK intelligence 1153399442As each tower collapsed, clearly visible puffs of dust and debris were ejected from the sides of the buildings. An advertisement in The New York Times for the book Painful Questions: An Analysis Of The September 11th Attack made this claim: "The concrete clouds shooting out of the buildings are not possible from a mere collapse. They do occur from explosions." Numerous conspiracy theorists cite Van Romero, an explosives expert and vice president of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, who was quoted on 9/11 by the Albuquerque Journal as saying "there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." The article continues, "Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures."
this is John lennons work man and Elvis too.. they were last seen at the north tower before the colapse.
By algoregore 1153385083that all of you 911 theories has no life.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
(PLEASE NOTE: COMMENT NOT AGAINST MUSLIMS BUT A tiny percentage of extremists using their religion as an excuse to murder)
the fire that comes out is a result of the upper building pushing down to push the fire out.
dont blame bush n blair.
all that area has been a powder keg for a LONG time.
and will be after we are all dead.
(which wont be long if some people get their way.)
9/11 was all caused by the SME's (stupid muslim extremists) that kill innocent people instead of military targets.
WHY... because they are cowards... its like me wanting to get at G,Bush or Tony Blair but instead driving my car into a group of school children crossing the road.
its an easy target.
i would be a coward and a murderer... SO ARE THE SME's
As the degraded steel support collumns buckle and collapse the floors come together and compression of the internal gasses by the reducing volume causes their ejection from the building; as they meet fresh oxygen in the external air, their oxydation becomes more rapid manifesting itself as the highly excited molecules of ionised gas that we call flames.
There is no mystery here; you need more logical analysis and less emotion!
Well, that could be because A PLANE CRASHED INTO IT. To demolish a building requires months of preparation. Non load bearing walls must be torn out, and hundreds (thousands for buildings the size of the towers)of holes must be drilled for explosives. Even if the people didn't notice the missing walls, or the holes in the remaining ones, I'm pretty sure they would have noticed the MILES of detonation cord that would be requred.
Anyone who actually believes this conspiracy hypothesis (theories are actually backed up by compelling evidence) is just announcing to the world thier extreme stupidity.
This video proves little, if anything... I agree that the video shaking phenomenon is a perplexing one. It has been observed on several tapes. But all it does is feed speculation, which is not the best fuel for a true investigator.
If you really want to investigate the idea that the story of 911 is less than genuine, start from established scientific fact, and examine the official reports.
The NIST report is so full of errors, omissions, and misdirections, that it is the perfect place to start. With a college level understanding of physics, you can literally rip many of the conclusions to shreds.
this link approximates my math: http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
note: i am not condoning any conclusions reached, merely pointing at the calculations.
If you look at this alone, it is easy to show that there was not enough heat to create a structural failure, nor the amount of weakening claimed in the official story.
An interesting fact:
The NIST report is not allowed to be used in litigation... yet somehow it is the best report the govt. can come up with to describe the crime of 911? The reason is simple... it would not hold up to cross-examination.
NIST's Metallurgical Results had attested to temps of less than 250c in Oct of 2004. The reason: the findings had contradicted their initial findings that the steel was adequate (representative) for the needs of the investigation (whole technical investigation), and more importantly, at the same time the findings had contradicted their "Fire Weakening" hypothesis.
So what did the NIST do?
The committed an act akin to magic!
They, with a slight of hand, had changed their "adequate steel sample" from being adequate for the investigation (whole), to it only being adequate in determining the quality of the steel (final report).
The NIST did this even though in June 2004, before the "Steel temperature results" the NIST had clearly stipulated..
http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/chapter2.pdf
If you are serious about why the official story is a lie, then have the courage to leave your politics at the door... and the patience to read the very long offical reports and learn some physics.
Don't trust any site: pro or con. I have dissected many from both sides and they all make bogus and politically fueled claims. Do your own research and draw your own conclusions.
all the ones that are for the conspiracy theory are biased as "bad" or "boring" and all the ones that are like NO IT WASNT THE USA WHO DID THIS are all "good" or "funny"
By Marcizzle 1152956186this is one of two conspiracy theories that are true. The second one being that man did not really land on the moon in 1969. The shuttle never left earth orbit, you guys should look into that. Anway, I'm drifting off topic. Yes there were explosives planted, it's obvious. You guys are just brainwashed Americans, I'm not brain-washed and I'm as American as you can be. I don't hate Bush, and if you will say to me"you only think that it's true because you hate Bush!" ...no. If you can recall, the United States faked bomb attacks from Cuba to get support to go in there and invade. I believe this is what happened with these attacks. After all, what's killing about 500 people out of the 250 mill. americans for support in a war against "terrorism". you guys are just too thick-skinned to even believe that this is true, but just deal with it- It will eventually come out, maybe not in the next 10 years, but eventually..
By Marcizzle 1152956037now i know this is a site of debate so lets debate on who was and wasnt innocent on the day of all this.lets see i was 14 and was downstairs in tower 1 and my parents were upstairs in a meeting.i had just maxed out my credit card on shoes when a horrible noise came from above.told not to panic but yet i ran like my life depended on it.the rest is really a blure but i never heard from my parents again nor any of their coworkers.im now19 and i was just recently moved out of foster care.all i had that morning was my family and when i awoke the next day i had nothing.i miss them and prey for them often.thses two people were innocent like the other 2000 and they were all murdered for reasons we ourselves have yet to discover.enough fighting i say and lets fix what was broken then start a new.
By vinnieisafag 1152946331well when this took place my parents were in this building right where this video happens to be recording.i was downstairs when the first plane hit and i was paying for a new pair of expensive shoes.we were told not to panic but i ran out anyways and was immediatly scared and knew that my parents were up there.i never saw them again.to see this video it reminds me of them and the hours i spent finding my way home.i was placed into foster care and was always sad on 9/11 although many do not know the real reason why.it is because i was happy with parents until that horrible day.i was orphaned because some one had a grudge on this country but decided to murder my parents insted.
By vinnieisafag 1152945859That part were fire comes out was already in there from the plane and when the building collapsed the fire had no where to go but out... which makes it look like a second explosion... haha i can tell you must be democratic
By Babe101 1152920565you guys are all making me angry afte watching this video we shouldnt be arguning whether or not there was a bomb and if it was rigged we should be remembering and praying for the lost sould i dont tihnk there families give a dam whether or not it was rigged all that matters to them was they lost someone they lvo soo to all those whom did may u rest in peace and may god bless u and ur loved ones
By zachy 1152758132מ׆שנקר×Â-טמטונורוע לב!
By G.L virus 1152575719×Â× ×™ מכיר׆מיש×â€Ã—• ש×â€Ã—™×†×‘נפיל׆של ×â€Ã—ª×Âומינובנס ניצל!!!!!
It's the fuel of the airplane, which emptied into the building after the collision, and then superheated and exploded. This melted the metal frame of the steel-concrete structure causing implosion of the tower.
By nilslam 1152565486Go to 'christian party.net' and search for 'One dead Israeli!!!??'
By luke123_ 1152374969I can't say I have read all the threads here, but most for sure. I never thought I would find such a lack of the ability of everyone to strive to offer "viable" information to help secure the truth about such events that effect each and every one of us; whether you like the USA or hate it, like the presedent or hate him, or even care about anything other than yourself. I have lots of comments to give that would only fuel the anger of those that will not accept any new ways of thought untill the right person presents it to them in a manner that makes sence to them. ( forgive me if I mispell anything, I'm a college graduate, but have my faults as we all do ) I think that everyone here needs to call or meet personaly three people: one of our troups that is serving in Iraqe, a political figure that has knowledge concerning the 911 incedent, and a immediate relative of one of the victems of 911. I also wonder why so many people will post comments concerning this stuff on here, but will not call (and the numbers are very available) or write a letter or even email your local government, or anyone you can think of that could promote your concerns. I'm sure some of you have, though have not mentioned it. I'm not a peace freak. I don't think we should be in Iraqe, nor do I believe that Bush is doing all he can. I don't believe in a inner government conspiracy. I do believe that if you can't stand the way the US is being run or headed, then either do one of two things; Become a governing official or better, or leave the country. I hear that France is keen on USA haters * and I think there is enough proof of that for anyone to see*. I know alot of people don't want Bush in office. Who do they want? Clinton? The world is full of lies, but if you will pay attention to only those things that are of obvious nature and provide a basis of truth whether by accountance or documentation or sort, then you will be able to make sensible descisions and help our country to move toward a more productive stature and not a complete mass histeria as we all know is a real possibility.
By Omnius1 1152325042...to take anything seriously when it is written by someone who cannot spell.
By bondurant 1152285564It is interesting how you think that spelling is the deciding factor in a persons integrity. Please do some research on our nations leaders, great athaleets and inventors. Then you can make educated comments about peoples flaws with a better education of your own.
By Omnius1 1152325801i'm honestly not sure if you're kidding or not. either way, you give me a little chuckle, so thank you, because it's been a rough week.
By bondurant 1152384402dont give us any of this conspiracy S**t the plane crashed into the tower which didnt initially knock it down. the reason it fell is because of the fire the burned for over half an hour, slowly weakening its support structures. that was the complaint, the concrete struts werent reinforced w/ steel bars.
By john saxon 1152203810the amount of jet fuel inside the building caused what looked like an explosion. The temperature that it takes to melt steel is about 800 degrees, or at least thats what I understood, and jet fuel can burn at 2000 degrees. The explosion was caused by 20 or 30 stories of building material, already beyond its melting point, coming down on top of a pressure cooker of jet fuel fumes, and jet fuel, causing the fireball out of all sides of the building.
By dcoonelly 1152203520Here's a little science education for you. In the most perfect of controlled environments open fires fueled by hydrocarbons burn at a range of 1,600- 1,700 farenheit. Moreover, since the WTC fires were fuel-rich fires, as evidence by the fact that they gave off way too much blake smoke, they were not even very hot for hydrocarbon fires, probably only 1,200 - 13,000 degrees. To melt steel one needs temps in the range of 2,770 farenheit. Coincidentally, WTC 1,2
By johnni37 1155583110Would these same liberals claim a conspiracy if Al Gore had been elected President? I doubt that very seriously.
By FireCaptainDavid 1152149576The way the WTC was put together allowed for the collapse. With any building that has truss construction, when one part fails the whole building fails. The same thing happens on residentials buildings that are involved in fire. One part of the roof fails, the entire roof can come crashing down. As for as the appearance of an explosion: If the top of the building comes down, it will push the fire out of the sides of the building.
By FireCaptainDavid 1152149444Get a life, with all your Conspiracy theories, You U.S F**ks should stop shitin on everything! You wonder why this S**t happens to you take a fucken look a cnn! get the F**k out of other peoples countries! YOUR NOT FREEING THE WORLD FROM TERROR YOUR CAUSEING IT! p.s go A.BZ
By Kiwikid 1152142837your an idiot...if anything that big pushs down,air would excape,and thats what the fire did,it excaped.the building was already falling by the time you saw flames.
By Uruguayo9 1152001853 There are many different views on Pres. Bush... mostly negative so far as I have seen. One thing I am wondering about is: How do you keep terror out of your country when it's an idea, and you can't keep solid objects like drugs out? Good luck.
if u look real close u can tell that the fireball was a by product of the floors collasping onto theirselves,,, dumb F**ks
By sandman316us 1151972829If your eyes were working properly you would easily be able to see that the explosion was AFTER the collapsing had begun.
Get yourself good glasses, poor friend!
as much as i hate americans showing this maybe a bit over the top and clearly if you watch carefully at the tower it starts to fall before the explosion also there are things flammable that are not explosive's
By RelliX 1151943539Some misguided people flew 2 planes into the building. Simple as that. Why does it have to be complicated?
By MrAndy 1151797927The interesting thing is building 7.. not the 2 towers!
What caused building 7 to collapse?
Well i have been reading bout this since after the attack.. you have Larry Silverstein on BBC (or whatever) saying they chose to "pull the building" we all know it takes weeks to prepare a controlled demolition..
Besides there is a reason Bush chose to shut down the commision dealing with the "victims families" and other witnesses to 911...
Wake up.. its not as black and white as you describe it
Besides there official documents indicating that the US of A have had plans to inflict damage on civilians and blame it on terrorists..
the problem is.. there is no real global terror!
There was no explosives in the trade centers..
It was the gasoline from the planes and the fire mixed togethr from the collision that caused the explosions.
Sorry kid.
If u watch the video properly, u can see there is a fire in the floor in the first place. Fire needs oxygen, and when the building collapses, and presses down the floor, the fire gets pressed out...
By fednegerkvinde 1151679822This video is completely wrong, in the CBS documentary 9/11 the filmakers have the only footage of a plane hitting the north or 1st tower.
By S.A.M. 1151674509The fire you see is being pushed out by the force of the floors pancaking onto one another. Why do people think such idoit crap is true? Those damn cowards from Saudi Arabia did all this, and that is the facts!!!
By xfiler93 1151644963All I see is a fire (there from the plane exploding on impact) and a sudden shaking of the camera which could be attributed to numerous factors. A sad scene, caused by terrorists from Al-Qaeda.
By jprg1966 1151605921the guy who said there was an explosion just before the building collapses must be on drugs there is no explosion what so ever in this chilling video of evidence
Was there saw everything, still have the images burned into my eyes with the smell of bodies burning, if you weren't there to see it with your own eyes you shouldn't speak about what happend there. If the buildings were imploded, don't you think that people would've heard the sound of the explosives going off? At the hieght of those building an implosion would've spread debris for miles in a circular pattern. I was in the buildlings that Friday, you can't move anything in or out without someone seeing it. This would be a secret plan of unbelievable underatking, the government has trouble keeping any secret now a days do you think this would stay secret for long?
The best kept secret the CIA has is that American poeple are gullable and the government is being run by idiots.
yes 9/11 was only a planned demolition by the owner of the building and a politicions wet dream come true!!!
many skyscrapers are designed to collapse straight down this way so they wont collapse on other buildings and if you had not noticed those planes had tons of fuel in them which ignited on impact this caused a raging inferno which then started melting the floor supports and they fell creating a domino effect
this was such a terrible distaster please stop rehashing it
There is so much hate and ignorance in this country and its never more apparent than in the absolutely insane and ridiculous conspiracy theory's by the kooks and the brain dead. But the intellectually challenged and Bush haters will believe anything if it suits their purpose. The reason behind the building collapse is very simple. But to understand, you need to set aside your political bias and mean-spirited hate to follow along. Now if you can't set aside your bias you won't understand the facts about the twin towers. The planes were topped off with jet fuel for the cross country trip. After they crashed into the towers that fuel was everywhere and on fire for the most part. The girders in the building melted from the intense heat and fires, causing at least one floor to buckle dropping that floor onto the floor below it. When the first floor dropped it caused a pressure to build as it approached the floor underneath it, which forced the fire (you thought was an intentional explosion) out the building from the pancake effect. Since several floors were weakening from the fuel fire and the stretching i-beams they pancaked also. The shear weight of the these floors continued downward pancaking all the floors below them. Now, even an unitelligent person would have to ask themselves if the government actually placed explosives in the towers how come the so-called explosions only took place in the exact locations were the planes happened to hit? Also, how would the terrorists have known and worked out a deal with George Bush to hit the building precisely were the government supposedly planted explosives? I don't mean to be insensitive here but to make a point you have to be flat out retarded to believe George Bush or our government intentional massacred its own people. 911 so disrupted our economy and it has been so detrimental to George Bush. Using reverse logic then it would had to have been the liberals who planted the supposed explosives to make Bush look bad. But you probably couldn't understand anything I just mentioned so maybe I waisted time trying to help.
As far as the sin of hate goes, the road to hell is paved with the angry and hateful.
You can't even spell "proves" correctly. Go finish up eighth grade.
By wobbleknob 1151096402There were no explosions that i can see in this vids, its probobaly the central columns etc. and there were no explosions when the planes crashed, becauese the dumbasses crashed planes full of fuel so none of the gases vapourised to create an explosion, even though most of the fire was maintained by files of paper, also most of the things people call 'explosions' were actualy fire being projected outwards so if there were any explosives they would have been fried by the heat of the flames or blown outwards with the flames. So to conclude to person who posted this vid is a complete dumbass, and there were no explosives planted inside WTC why would Bush create something which made him look like a T**t ?
By bikerboyj 1151078775See Attivissimo.net
I dont see explosion.
And any audio BOOOOMMMM.
I see instabilitàdell'equilibrio.
by Civil engineering doctor
That big fire you see? No ball of fire is visible until after the building is a little ways down, and if you knew anything, you would know that matter cannot exist where matter already is. I'll dumb it down for you, the fire was pushed out of the building by the calapsing floors above, thus making the ball of fire you saw come out. you are a dipshit
By .simple. 1150957421Go to Google videos and search 'loose change 2nd edition'. Watch it. The US government says that they were able to id one of the hijackers because the explosion knocked his wallet out of his pants, out the window of the plane which blew up, and landed in such a place, even with debris from the collapse of the 2 WTC buildings, they could find it. BULLSHIT. WAKE UP!
By Scronyman 1150864392That the tower began to come down BEFORE you see any sign of explosion. Which leads me to believe, that there were no explosive devices present. Rather the movement of the building and gushes of air from that movement caused the already burning jet fuel to burn harder and expand causing an explosion effect. Call me crazy!!
By popup82 1150820009Having a vivid imagination is good. Living in a fantasy world is not. This video proves nothing you so clingingly want it to prove. The explosion is just burning gas being forced out of the rooms of the wtc when the roof caves in.
By heh 1150572905so many people know that this is the real deal, I just cant believe how some people still believe that this was all an attack of terrorism... the terrorists are bush and all the power elite that tell him exactly what to do... dont people understand that with fear you can control people... its as simple as that. I recommend for those who believe, v for vendetta, many messages in this movie many references to todays US shitty ass politics. obviously its hollywood but it would be damn nice if somebody had the balls to do such a thing....
By gueycito 1150479905Loose Change 2nd Edition - watch this
By CZKing 1150315140a dumbass. Gas fire = expoltion.
By Orbulus 1150161914The flames and air on the floor with the fire were pushed out by the air pressure as the floor above collapsed.. No explosion.
By gabeh 1150115560people, any building has atleast four concrete poles that make it stand up right. a building will fall down completely vertically downwards only if its four concrete poles are taken out at the same time (demolition project). otherwise the building will topple to a side, and fall at an angle. was it a conicidence that the fire (and hit) made the "four" concrete poles fall at the exact same time..?
By Alaa .D 1150058692concrete poles that happen to be hundreds of feet tall. the building was held up by steel "poles" and girders. it is also designed to "crumple" straight down in case of tragedies such as earthquakes or terrorist attacks, much the same way Ford and Dodge truck frames come "pre-crumpled" from the factory just behind the front bumper. don't believe me? check a 2004 or newer Ford or Dodge truck frame... these are fail safes designed in by multi-millionaire engineers who know much more about the safety of the buildings surrounding their project (WTC Towers) than anyone who has commented on this video...
By TiM3 Paradox 1155372830Are we looking at the same video? Clearly the tower begins to colapse, forcing oxygen into the fire, causing the explosion.
By Smokeydog44 1149958015Rigged to explode? Honestly, context clues can explain the fire. Look around the room you're sitting in and imagine how much of it would burn if there were several hundred gallons of jet fuel on it...
By ClaytonBigsby 1149873884Rigged to explode? Honestly, contxt clues can explain the fire. Look around the room you're sitting in and imagine how much of it would burn if there were several hundred gallons of jet fuel on it...
By ClaytonBigsby 1149873748I see explosions after the collapse ....
And ... why the explosions must be caused only by explosives .... Gas doesn´t explodes??
im a islamist but im not happy what happend at 9/11and het haram to kill Insinet peopel that is written in quran and seconed ting is way did bush eraned 600 mileon dollar form united defens now we all forget what happend to the war in afaganist why did he caugt saddam very fast he was hiddin under ground en binladen is now still free and second this bomb happen to islamic country what happend to casablaca and cario and bali
By ridocks 1149768357 If you look closer, you will see tghere is already fire burning along the lower part of the damaged building...
WHERE DO YOU THINK ALL THAT SMOKE IS COMING FROM!!!?
When the upper floors begin to cave in (from the melting structural beams -- due to temperatures above 1000 degrees, fueled by thousands of gallons of aircraft jet fuel!!!) the collapsing center portion forces air (and flames) out thru the broken out windows. It may LOOK like additional explosions, but it is ONLY the existing flames being pushed outward by the collapsing interior space.
The aircrafts that were hijacked were specifically chosen because of their large fuel loads. (they were all scheduled to be long, non-stop flights) Jet fuel is DESIGNED to have a HIGH explosive-burn rate...That is why they use it as a thrust-producing fuel!!!!!
If you paid more attention in science and physics classes, and less to political extremists, you would not be made fools of by people who make their livings by creating kaos!
its just the presure of the building falling pushing out the fire that is already burning inside from the jet fuel. But you all know some people,,, just want to stir the Shitpot.
By javabare 1149528822I WAS A COP FOR THE MANHATTAN TRAFFIC TASK FORCE (MTTF) AT THE TIME AND THERE WAS NO EXPLOSION WHEN THE BUILDINGS CAME DOWN. THEY JUST FELL JUST FELL TO THE GROUND. MICHEAL MOORE SOME PEOLPE WILL JUST SWALLOW WHAT EVER IS PUT IN FRONT OF THE FACE.
By SMOKINU 1149525128I am intrigued that someone would actually post this as a conspiracy. If you look even closer, the building is not freeburning at the lower level. The fire is contained WITHIN the building. The collapse of the upper level causes an enormous rush of air which fuels the fire. Not unlike a bellow used on a fire in a fireplace.
By toddvm 1149469509of course there were explosives , i knew it the minute i saw it, why in the world would 5 buildings, especially building 7 collapse instantly turning into dust, and the billion dollars in gold in the basement conveniently disappeared, the planes were only 20% full, these are nazi's in high command carrying out the 4th reich, why do you think both bush and kerry were members of 'skull and bones' and the very clearly satanistic bohemian club which meets in bohemian grove every summer and carries out mock human sacrifices (who knows what they do privately), these are sick twisted sociopaths, the society is in danger of total police state high tech orwellian fascism, americans need to wake up , instead of spending all your ignorant time watching american idol you should be availing yourself of the info at such fine alternative news websites such as inforwars.com and rense.com, these are pure diabolical demonic beings hellbent on war, genocide, and hatred, we need to stand for love, compassion, and peace, we outnumber them by billions, thats their secret, they're afraid of us waking up, take the red pill now, or the afterlife will be grim for you, they want you to be weak, ignorant, petty, selfish, and dumb, plus waking up is fun, it rocks!
By paradime 1149446026the reason you see what looks like an explosion is because when the building starts to collapse, a huge amount of air is pushed out through the hole in the side that was made from impact for the plane hitting. and because that part of the building was already on fire, and smoking, this made it seem like an explosion, but it was only the expulsion of air.
By ismise69 1149442892I cant believe the stupidity. If you fly a plane into any building it will explode. Dont you think ??
By 2cute4words 1149401679Whys bush blamin osama then?
By osmosis jones 1149343182a Osama Bin Laden led Al-Qaida claimed responsibility for the attacks. They weren't simply blamed, they asked to be blamed. they told us to blame them... moron.
By TiM3 Paradox 1155372989all that proves is there is an explosion before it collapses. doesnt a car explode before it falls to pieces if it was rigged?
there are heaps of things thatd couldve caused it.
prove me wrong
People really need to open their eyes concerning the "current" wave of Muslim Terrorism and the reasons behind it. We bailed them out of a situation where they were dominated by a murderous dictator so now they hate us but are also killing each other. What's wrong with this picture? Recently I received an email that stated that Americans have been being attacked by Muslims since 1979, and stressing how long ago that is. In fact Muslim Extremists have been atacking us since before the First World War. May I ask what we did to them back then? Furthermore if you think the war in Iraq is so terrible you might want to check on what Black Jack Pershing did to the terrorists then and the effect it had on terrorism. I personally prefer not to include that information but I must admit it was effective. As far as looking at this video and "seeing" explosions there are none, sorry. For those who are interested in the conspiracy fantasy there is a book called "Why people believe Wierd things" that might help.
By alfair 1149253830You need to be put in a slap room and just slapped until you are just a little smarter.
By astroboomer 1149220306the "explosion" you see is from the rush of air (which includes oxygen) from the intial collapsing, FEEDING the flames already inside and causing a temporary flare up as the building collapses.
By finnster 11491972789/11 was not only orchestrated by the governement, but 9/11 is the biggest conspiracy since JFK. Watch the video and get smart about it.
By Nage 1149196352the explosion could be anything flamible in the building maybe even the fuel tanks in the plane.
By smart guy666 1149188570.... are u seriously that stupid and thick headed to actually consider that the flames were the fuel tanks .the fuel in the plane would of been the first thing to burn when it hit the building stupid idiot!!!!!your stupidnes makes me sick!
The insides of the tower were already in flames. The tower collapsing over itself caused those flames, due to air pressure, to sprout otwards. It's all pretty simple if you understand a minimum of physics.
(Also, if the buildings were rigged to explode, why bother crashing planes into them?)
Nonsens, fire appeared after colapsing begun, it proofs the contrary.
It is impossible to see the explosion effect before the blast.
Yeah guys.. .seriously! Pay attention! If you look closely, you can see Air Force One flying in the background with George Bush giving a thumbs up and patting Osama Bin Laden on the back. Oh and I forgot .. . if you look at some footage, you can see Donald Rumsfeld giving the signal to fire a missle at the Pentagon. Seriously! Look closer! You laugh, but this is basically what I hear when people try to "educate" me with these theories.
By USAILL 1149138279that paricular floor was already on fire; the 'explosion' you've pointed out was that same fire being pushed out of the windows when the floor met the ceiling. it's not that hard to figure out, man. don't cause a ruckus untill you've looked at whatever pet conspiracy you have each week from EVERY angle. i mean, if you look hard enough, you can see the face of jesus in a piece of toast, for cripes sake! you have to allow for a margin of error, provided by the human imagination, before you start making silly accusations.
By vodka_bob 1149100139the flames and fire you see spewing from the tower come at the point of collapse from the building... this is a simple law of physics that we become accustomed to even as a child... like in bubble wrap when we squeeze the bubble it pops (aka when an environment codences size the air within that environment must escape and is forced out into a less condenced environment) when it did this it pushed out the flames with the air as it does when we simply blow upon a flame... even a child knows this so all you liberalistic people who are pointing the fingers and looking for someone to blame use your head and dont be retarded cause its getting old
By halfway hero 1148970588When the plane hit it started a fire on those floors weakening the structure. As it collapsed downwards, the flames, hot air and smoke that you see shooting out because it had nowhere else to go as the rest of the building was coming down on top of it.
Not being from the U.S. I'd rather not comment on Bush or anything else. But the 'supposed' explosion is just standard physics, and nothing more.
Noway that the steel inside of the WTC would have melted. It could have withstanded up to 24 hours of 3000 F of heat before it even began to melt. Watch the video that's named "The Truth about 9/11". That will clearly change your opinoin.
By Nage 1148920585...or maybe even a metalurgist since you know so much about how steel behaves in such a catastrophic environment. And I'm sure steel has to get to a "liquified" temperature before it gives way. Where did you study? MIT? Stanford? Calpoly? Or are those institutions also part of the conspiracy??
By shypoolguy 1149373603it was ,it wasn't ?gaad its amazing how in control of ur minds they are,in manipulating ur beliefs,keeping ur little mouthes nattering away while the bigger picture is but a blur to you.you are bombarded with media which fries ur brain. you do not know what to believe anymore. you are scared because u live in country whose own people are used at the will of goverment.
By finnn 1148909229...but we all know that our government is controlled by big business anyways. So what's your point??
Funny how USA haters talk about how bad our country is. Our country has an illegal immigration problem right now. And in case you don't have the capacity to understand, that means each year hundreds of thousands of people are trying to come to the USA illegally for jobs, healthcare, etc. When was the last time you heard about someone trying to sneak into China, North Korea, Russia, Iran even many of the EU countries??? There's a reason why these countries don't have illegal immigration problems...NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE THERE!!! Whatever faults our country has, I'll take the good ole' US of A over any place else!!!
Placeing explosives so stratigically for a colapse like that takes time, how is it that anyone had time to bust holes in walls to get to the support beams to place explosives on them, then repair the damage without being seen or heard? thats an awful lot of explosives at many different points that explosives had to be placed to make a straight down drop and they had to get to those support beams from either the outside or inside and I sure dont think it was the outside.
By ultraspank 1148839446Demolition explosives don't burst into flames. What IS strange about the video is that the camera shakes about 10 seconds before the fall. If it were a demolition, THAT would be more likely to be better evidence because before imploding the structure, the BASE would need to be blasted prior. Now the camera certianly looks mounted to me. Something strong enough to shake the fixed camera would have to be an explosion very close to, or under the ground. In almost ALL of the fixed camera views just proir to the fall of each tower, there is shaking going on. I'm not one to suggest any blame or conspiracy. But it looks fishy. Maybe there were bombs. Maybe it was the terrorists and the U.S. Govt. is trying to hide the HUGE security breach. Maybe it was the Govt. executed this for some crazy reason. Who knows. Maybe the towers just collapsed from the fire's heat, but I doubt it.
By Atomchild 1148823690this building dosen´t explode waht do they think the fire are from inside the building it burns all over the place in there, so when the building colapses all the fire pushes out of the building so it alomst looks like an explosion.
By query 1148822375I'm not sure what an "assesin" is, but President Bush is neither assesin nor assassin.
By TiM3 Paradox 1155373154there'nt any explosives! it was just the air pushing out of the floor from the top of the building, which was on fire, and u can see. its like a backwards vacuum
By Axel MaGee 1148673788...with all this conspiracy theory stuff? Paranoia? I'd rather live my life with hope than thinking "the man" is out to get me.
Here's an article from Popular Mechanics that debunks all the 9/11 myths. Those of you who think the US government is worse than Islamic terrorists (who want all non-Muslims dead), take a look at this.
<I guess this forum does not like other site's URLs as it won't let me post this one. Instead, Google "Popular Mechanics 9/11 myths". It should be the first link.>
Don't believe it, it is too weird, but I know it was an inside job, and the truth will come out one day.
By Captain Zen 1148645650hey dudes,we all know what happen in the 9/11,again and again and again
By rooneythemonkey 1148643000if you'd watch it carefuly you could see that fire bolt appears right after the collapsing starts, not before. I still feel sorry about the people and their families, even though I am not an American. Please do not come out with stupid ideas to dig people's pain. I mean enough already!
By aykutacar 1148637689 didn't see any proof of explosives in that video. The flames burst out AFTER the Tower starts to collapse, it's called air compression.
God rest their souls
The fire that came out was already present you can see the red line of fire, the collapse just compressed and released it causing a big fireball. Go look !
By goa.shotgun 1148596600look at the future, and learn of your mistake
By goforit 1148576934what are you?, retarded. the floors collapsing pushed the flames out of the window. it's quite obvious.
By paddywhack 1148574874Theres an explosion as the building is starting to fall but not before. The fire already burning is from the 30,000 litres of jet fuel that just entered the building.
By Tiger 77 1148574291I lost brain cells watching this. No evidence of an explosion. The large amount of fire was caused by the flame reaching the outside air (a renewable source of o2) and burning brighter and more powerfully..... as it collapses, not before..... what a bunch of brain cell killing crap.....and I'm only 16 and I can figure it out for myself..... a pity people older than I am can't.......
By IronWolf 1148521530that there are many dumb S**ts in the world and that you are just one more. To even explain to you how stupid your premise is on so many levels is a waste of time as it would go over your head.
By johnni37 1148519798...were some kind of accident / construction investigator said that the inner beams was built of some kind of cheap metal that was, unfortunately, sensitive to very high temperatures and there for they collapsed. Anyway, I didn't see any explosion. It probably just were some fire dangerous liquid- or gas canister or just some beams bursting.
By Kapten-N 1148504305IDIOT!!! the building started to collapse before the explosion!! and the fire was probably from a spark caused by a metal to metal impact, that lit the an explosive material, maybe even the fuel tanks of the plane. IT THAT! MUHAHAHAHA! ! ! ! !
By uv40 1148482963It's not an explosion - it's just that the inside of the building was burning and when it collapsed it compressed the flaming gases and caused them to be expelled out the sides, just like if you open the door to a closed-air room, a gush of air will come out.
By NVKG 1148456855Its obvious that the fire started from the plane was forced out as the collapsing building sent air and wind from inside to the outside... I think.
Anyways, rest their souls.
It's amazing that you would either spew this out on your own and show your complete ignorance or to reiterate this without applying any critical judgement. It;s a shame people like you can reproduce and hold a drivers license.
By johnni37 1148419338on either side to what happened, or who's to blame etc etc, but the only FACT to arrise from this event, is that it was an absolute tradegy. Now the whole situation worldwide S**ks , too much conflict and not enough reasoning, end off.
By WhattheF? 1148415133There is no explosion at all. That is the escaping air pushing the flames out caused by burning jet fuel.
By robertii 1148406515YOU TIT. WHAT LOOKS LIKE AN EXPLOSION IS THE FLAMES SHHOTING OUT BECAUSE OF THE DOWNDRAUGHT OF THE BUILDING FALLING ON ITSELF.
By MACKUM WILL 1148389075I'm Canadian and I can't beleive that some people actually think that President Bush or any American would have done this terrible thing.
Conspiracy theorists, please get a life!!
The support beams in the center of the tower melted from the high heat of the jet fuel burning... MORON...
but proly the fire inside was pushed out as the building implooded
By EhJow 1148354581IF U WANT TO KNOW ALL THE TRUTH.... WWW.REOPEN911.BE !!!!!!!
By theend 1148349505There are a lot of perverted minds in this world!!!
By gerry from catalonia 1148330172The 4000 American lives lost in the WTC incident or the over 2000 American lives lost so far in Iraq? Iraq did not attack us! Osama did. I'm still waiting for Bush to bring us Osama's head like he promised right after 9/11
By Vietkieu 1148328931I always thought that the conspiracy therories re: 9-11 were complete nonsense and still do for the most part. However, after the Pentagon footage was released I started to research some of the claims, for myself...since I was shocked with the fact that I did not see a plane in the footage that was released...I am not saying it was not there...just that I, nor anyone else that I talked to, saw a plane. After researching this there were some interesting facts:
The fact that the towers and Buiding 7 collasped at free fall speed is very strange...I have also researched debunking the theories as well and I have not found any that give any plausible reason for why the buildings collasped at free fall speed into their own footprint. There is a site that was put together by credible engineers and physists that show the building inspection reports from when the towers were constructed, they were constructed to withstand a strike from a 707, which was the largest commercial jetliner at that time...the 707 and the 757 are similiar in size. This site also shows that the steel that was used in constructing the center core of the building was rated by UL to withstand tempertures of 2000 degrees for 6 hours before failing. These claims make the free fall collaspe of the towers, into their own footprints, quite strange. The collaspe of building 7 is a complete mystery...even in the offical 9-11 Commission report. Never before in the history of modern construction has a building that meets the classification of a "skyscraper" completely collasped due to fire. the fact that building 7 also collasped at free fall speed onto itself is suspect. I am not completely buying into these theories, in fact I began my "research" in an effort to prove to myself that these outrageous claims were just the rantings of anti-government paranoids but did not come away with a "warm and fuzzy feeling." It may be that the building inspection department in NY was so inept or corrupt that the construction was not performed as it was documented to be but it has definetely given me some pause.
You know the saying, " where there is smoke, there is fire." The fire you see coming out of the building is the same one that was created by the planes that hit and is just being forced outward at the point of impact by the buildings collapse. Funny how rumors get started.
By robb232 1148310839From NIST report: Observations of paint cracking due to thermal expansion. Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 ºC: east face, floor 98, inner web; east face, floor 92, inner web; and north face, floor 98, floor truss connector. Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC. (p 90/140)
How interesting then, that NIST's sagging truss model has the truss heated to 700 ºC
the reason i think that is because the explosion and fire originated from where the plane crashed, what are the odds the plan hit where bombs had been planted prior to? it may have been bombs on the plane, an extra fuel tank, jet fuel is well protected but may burn through anything including the tank, i dunno the whole story.........
By Pra-Jectile 1148281467even uneducated pple knows that a building never collapse in this way,, i read once a documontry from USA people that they say that the building was full of C4 bombs all over every floor
By omarmadrid 1148259114If C4 had been planted in all the levels of the WTC Towers, for one anybody with the knowledge to plant the explosives, would also know enough to blow from the bottom up, not 2/3 the way up the building. Another thing, is that it's next to impossible to blow a building of that size from the bottom up, without causing a lot of damage to the surrouding buildings. Blown from the bottom, the charges would have caused an enourmous burst outward from the building. When the planes hit, the kinetic energy transferred from the speed and mass of the planes, combined with the several hundred thousand pounds of jet fuel (remember, these planes were loaded for coast-to-coast flights, and had only traveled a few hundred miles instead of several thousand), created an implosion of molten steel, jet fuel, and debris, that swept through the whole interior structure of the towers, vaporizing the interior structural supports, which in turn shifted the whole load of the building to the remaining outer supports. Keep in mind though, that on the side of the building where the planes hit, most of the outer supports had been destroyed already. With the interior supports gone, the remaining outer supports severly weakened, it was only a matter of time before the weight of the floors above, became too much for the buckling outer supports. If there had been explosives planted in the upper floors, instead of collapsing in on itself, the upper section, would have been blown onto a trajectory away from the building.
By HooYah! 1156268781thats the aire being pushed out and the flames as pressure pushes down on the building where else are the flames going to go. an explosion would send out debris
By HCKING101 1148248520nothing. The cloapsing floors forced the already burning fire outwards as it had no where else to go. Look at the video again carefully. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Even if there where explosives planted inside the building, why then fly a boeing into it. Wouldnt make sense would it
By GypsyJoker 1148248156To make it to look as tho mountain man did the destruction.Holywood style
By sextus 1158516568why we had 2 minute silence for 9/11 and only 1 minutes for those who dided in the war????
By mofinatar 1148231244is that you must be a moron. The "explosion" is smoke being forced out the windows when the floor truss above failed. Get a clue!
By Nickwad 1148218109Im not a rocket scientist but hello....you can clearly see what floorlevel´s on fire and when the tower collapse the shockwave burst the flames through the windows...
Could i be right here?
I just want to know what's wrong with finding out the truth. And i think we all want to know the truth. It's the best for the people who died, and the people who lost their beloved ones. Why are we not allouwed to do that? What should we be affraid of?
By Phillippo 1148209518The only thing this videdo proves is that no human made structure should be allowed free rain on our cities, if a structure is made, they should be monitored daily, if a building wants to fall "on its own" they should have to pay the toll of being demolished like all other buildings that fall due to C4 in that area! and if a goverment agent is involved in ayway we should be able to ram our C**ks in his ass till we think his hole has suffered enough !!!
By WicKeDcHilD 1148207555Plain and simple, airplanes hit the WTC and made it collapse.
As for the pentagon and the plane that crashed in a field, there something that's not right. those two planes just disappeared. Ever see a plane crash in a field and there are no large plane pieces left?
All this proves is that ignorant twits like to try to use disasters to forward their idiot conspiracy theories.
We have the facts. We do not need this nonsense.
so many to escape the flames.
By drfox 1148172109es la presion de los pisos superiores que empujan hacia afuera el poco aire que quedaba. Hey hablen en español, la mitad de USA habla español.
By BigL 1148157867No hay bombas, pero hay muchos putos americanos. Cajete!
By Roger the Dodger 1148572543You and your free virgins could tell the truth all the way from hell.
By mayfielddr 1199381226The towers were brought down by our own government so they could enslave us. Death to George Bush! Allah Akhbar!!!!!
By surferaw949 1158287074just before with fire ball on the right side just below the line of collapse.
There was a conspiracy to surgically bring down the towers, and WTC 7
that's the building buckling under its own weight... it starts shifting around 9 seconds before the collapse...
go learn some physics and stop playing yourself off as an explosives engineer...
I BET YOU ANY MONEY Michael Moore bomed the World trade center... he wanted to make a movie about something soo he decided to bomb the world trade center....Thats a better excuse then saying some 6 foot 6 Arab guy bombed it.The Arab GOT NOTHING OUT OF BOMBING IT...THE ONLY PEOPLE Who BENIFTED FROM THIS WAS THE U.S...OIL S**t LOADS OF OIL... Im sorry if a misspelled anthing i dont have the time to put stuff in Word.
get into political debates about what happened here, but I won't. All I'm gonna say is Timoty you should have your head examined!!!
We as Americans should not forget what happened that tragic day, I know I certainly won't. And posting a video clip almost 5 years later to keep us reminded is ok...but to start the BULL$H!T rumors is just wrong.
I'd like to throw a rope around your ass and take you for a long drag down a country road.
MORON!!!
I could not agree more. Should we also forget other events of the past that effect the enitre nation? Maybe If some of his family was in those buildings he would feel different. Though I think the rope bit may prove ineffective in getting his awareness lvls up lol. Then again, I've never had that done to me lmao.
By Omnius1 1152326380And no one says anything because Media is owned by Jews who love Bush killing Arabs for them and FBI arrests and bullies the rest. Want evidence? Go check Stockmarket volumes on the 2 days before 9/11 for Delta and American Airline!, volumes are doubled, Who sold? who knew? government can find their names in 10 seconds, Are They? No. Not to mntion million other evidence. Don't be so dumb. He wants to take over the Middle-East oil then the world, that simple.
By HumanH 1150443753IT WAS JIMMY HOFFA ! WHO BLEW IT UP !
By rosesare 1149971728A lot of these conspiracy theorists accuse people who disregard their theories as "eating up what the media gives you" or "just listening to what Bush tells you" but the craziest thing about all of these comments is that these theorists themselves are eating up all the bullshit that some bitter French guy wrote about in a book. That is what all of these pieces of crap like "loose change" or "911truth" are all about. They all talk about the same things and use the same "evidence". There are so many holes in this Loose Change piece of crap that it isn't even worth going through. I kept an open mind and watched Loose Change twice because the first time I fell victim to the propaganda. The second time I was like "hold on a minute...that's just not true." For every point they make their is 10 times more evidence against. To all the theorists: Don't be arrogant and discard people just because they disagree with your theories...why don't you try to do your own investigation. You are more guilty of being brain-washed by propaganda than people who rely on mainstream national and international media because at least we wouldn't be considered mentally unstable to believe some of the crap these theories spew. You should be embarrassed and ashamed to even think about defending these carefully crafted "documentaries"
By USAILL 1149137871just a passing point on Loose Change - it was made by college students with a $6000 budget, and they managed to expose more truth than the NIST report.
Even today, the government does not allow the NIST study to be used in a court of law? Why? Because it would not stand up under cross-examination. The official NIST investigation is full of self-contradictory statements... let's share a few examples:
The NIST's Metallurgical Results had attested to temps of less than 250C in Oct of 2004. The reason: the findings had contradicted their initial findings that the steel was adequate (representative) for the needs of the investigation (whole technical investigation), and more importantly, at the same time the findings had contradicted their "Fire Weakening" hypothesis.
So what did the NIST do?
The whipped out a magic wand..
They, with a slight of hand, had changed their "adequate steel sample" from being adequate for the investigation (whole), to it only being adequate in determining the quality of the steel (final report).
The NIST did this even though in June 2004, before the "Steel temperature results" the NIST had clearly stipulated..
http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/chapter2.pdf
Unlike Ann Coulter's claim that the 911 widows are a small group of crackpots, there are over 150 people who have refused to accept the government settlement and wait their day in court so that the NIST reports and the official government story can be brought to task... so those who say "why hasn't the government been brought up on charges?" need only look at the facts. People are trying... but the government is using stalling tactics to keep evidence from being cross-examined.
And as far as "Conspiracy Theorists" relying on crackpot theories - yes many do. But so do the "Coincidence Theorists" that buy into the official story.
Mainstream news articles, scientific journals, and interviews with Bush staffers have come forward to those who would bother to actually research rather than knee-jerk and whitewash everyone as whackos who refuse to buy into the idea that a bunch of muslims with boxcutters can coordinate their attacks to match the same day chosen by NORAD and the Pentagon to run drills of the same kind of attacks... and these mainstream articles reveal that there is a lot of unusual activity surrounding 9/11 that contradicts the official version we were told.
There are people on both sides of the controversy who choose political reasons to support their sides. This is the most reprehensible thing a person can do... I am a conservative, yet even I am willing to admit that Bush made some critical lapses of judgement that make me raise a brow at his role in 911. Look at executive order w199i... why would he make it illegal to investigate the very people best in line to give us information on this tragedy?
The truth is that the mainstream media is filled with similar examples. Don't believe me. Research.
all for the bush empire of fuel. when is everone going to wake up and put and to the bush bull S**t ! it is all about the oil
By rikyo 1148452657put a sock in it dude...
if we just went in for the oil, why are we sticking around to build schools and government buildings and put down the insurgency? why are we trying to establish a gov't and a stable economy there, if we just wanted to steal some oil?
and while we're talking about oil, why don't we mention kofi annan and his buddies over in the UN...
go ahead... ask him where his new mercedes came from...
When are people going to shake their fascination with absurd conspiracy theories? The "maffia connection" of the JFK assassination, the "MI-6 connection" of Princess Dianna's death in Paris and this. Bloody ridiculous. The reason the WTC towers collapsed is known. Ferocious and wide-spread fire, coupled with the basic design of the WTC towers, is all that was needed - and all that was there
By Toak Reon 1148396289congratulations to the Iraqi people and especially the courageous souls who defied threats of death by joining today the self determination of democracy. May God protect them.
By danny12 1148236166con mucha pena, de lo que pasoles puedo decir que realmente se merecen este tipo de atentados, esto es culpa de los ciudadanos de USA, no hacer nada es un pecado. recuerden la cantidad de gente que usa ha matado en el mundo. Y lo sigue haciendo, claramente se buscan otro atentado.
By BigL 1148158083