Dr Zakir Naik Get Exposed - Allah Made VCR

Quran is full of contradictions and discrepancies. Each person can pick and choose what he wishes. A pious person will lead a pious life and will see the good things in Quran, while a terrorist can also find justification of his killings in that "holy" book.
During the 23 years of his prophetic life, the "Prophet" was catapulted from rags to riches. This dramatic change affected his mood and teachings. Once a forbearing preacher and a lonesome warner, turned into an intolerant despot. He was no more sermonizing or "speaking good to men" or being “patient with what they say, and part from them courteously" (73: 10), but was howling for killing and screaming for blood. He called his followers to “Murder those of the disbelievers and let them find harshness in” them (9: 123).

Is it good to be able to interpret a book of guidance that claims to be from God in different ways? What is the purpose of a book of guidance? Isn’t it to guide us definitely and without equivocations? Divine books are supposed to be roadmaps for humanity. They have to show you the way and be consistent. What if a map shows that your destination is to the right, and to the left, to the north and to the south and to all directions? Such a map is of no use at all. It is misguiding and pointless. The reason we consult a map is to get the clear idea which route to take. If we had to interpret it according to our own understanding, the map has failed to do what it purports.

I think you are not clearly looking at the whole map, you are just looking at the wrong maps(things) that show only hate, my advice for you is to do some research on the topic before stating so called facts, find the whole verses not the parts of it.
and ALLAH knows best

The only reason why I exclude the whole part of the movie clips after the Qur'an quotes in this video is simply because Metacafe prohibit me from showing any violence action to be included in the video.

Certainly, the cut out parts in this video when showing the verses of the qur'an is not dued to the purpose of eliminating the rest of the verses but those parts are borrowed from the movie "Fitna" and my intention is just to show the verses and not the movie clips. Fortunately, those verses are taken from the context of the Qur'an and are written as they are. Perhaps u should study ur books more (Qur'an & Haddithes)

all i can say is that people like u are hellbent against the religion of Islam. it gives everone the right to defend themselves if they are attacked upon, Islam gives you the right to live which is only common sense.

let me ask you one thing if somebody came into your house with a gun and started shooting at you, if you were also armed you would shoot him to stop him from killing you wouldn't you

as for 911 it was not done by Muslims we all know that. It was not done in defense.

may allah guide you to the straight path away from the worshipers and deceivers of the Antichrist (dajjal)
Ameen!!!

The Notion of Islam being a religion of peace & tolerance is just fictional. Let me give u example of what I'm saying.There is not much glory to attack an unarmed merchant caravan, kill innocent people and loot their belongings. What kind of god is this Allah that would order his followers to commit these crimes? Muhammad’s men surrendered the Banu Quraiza; they cut the water supply to the entire quarter for 14 days. The whole population with children, infants, elderly, sick and all kind of people suffered for 14 days and when they surrendered without any fight the "holy Prophet" killed all their men and sold as slaves their women and children. He kept Rayhana who was the most beautiful girl of that tribe as his own sex-slave. He never married her. Is there any glory in that? The Banu Quraiza never did anything against Muhammad. Their only fault was that they were artisans, goldsmiths and wealthy Jews. Muhammad needed their wealth.

the caravan was supplying wealth which was to be used against islam.

as for the jewish tribe they betrayed the prophet by leaking information to the attacking meccans, therefore all the men of fighting age were executed because there was evidence against them. The children women and elderly were spared. If muhammed PBUH wanted to kill them earlier he could of but he didnt he was forced to otherwise he, his family and the muslims would be finished. As for him keeping a sex slave that is a lame twist of the event

it was an excused for Muhammad to rob those men. Let say the caravan was doing like what u claimed. Is there any justification in killing an unarmed men before looting their wealth?
Next, what kind of a "prophet" was this Muhammad when he ordered to kill every men even after they surrendered without any fight? Moreover what better word is that to describe a captive woman being used only for sex (Since we know that Muhammad has NEVER married her)?
The hateful and violent message of the Qur'an is as clear as Mein Kampf . Qur'an 8:39.In or out of context, this is unequivocal. The Islamic war machine must continue to roll until every soul on earth "submits to the religion of Allah." There will be no understandings, no appeasements, no compromises, no treaties. It is surrender or die. And this verse cannot be misinterpreted, corrupted, or dismissed. The order is clear: "Fight until the whole world is in submission to Islam."

The condition of slavery is very different in Islam than the harsh conditions imposed by non-Muslims or disobedient Muslims. From the Sunnah, specifically in the study of the Sunnah called Sunan Abu-Dawud, we find:

[41:4957] Narrated AbuHurayrah: The Prophet (saw) said: None of you must say: "My slave" (abdi) and "My slave-woman" (amati), and a slave must not say: "My lord" (rabbi or rabbati). The master (of a slave) should say: "My young man" (fataya) and "My young woman" (fatati), and a slave should say "My master" (sayyidi) and "My mistress" (sayyidati), for you are all (Allah's) slave and the Lord is Allah, Most High.

Also from the Sunnah, specifically in the study of the Sunnah called Sahih Bukhari, we find:

[3:46:721] Narrated Al-Ma'rur bin Suwaid: I saw Abu Dhar Al-Ghifari wearing a cloak, and his slave, too, was wearing a cloak. We asked him about that (i.e. how both were wearing similar cloaks). He replied, "Once I abused a man and he complained of me to the Prophet. The Prophet asked me, `Did you abuse him by slighting his mother?' He added, `Your slaves are your brethren upon whom Allah has given you authority. So, if one has one's brethren under one's control, one should feed them with the like of what one eats and clothe them with the like of what one wears. You should not overburden them with what they cannot bear, and if you do so, help them (in their hard job)."

As a result of the teachings of Islam, slavery was almost completely eradicated from many areas of the Muslim world, peacefully and without bloodshed.

please read the whole comment to get my point.

the quran doesn' t say you can kill if they surrender, it says kill them if they ESCAPE, which you know is a completely different word, an escaped murderer can kill again.

as for your claimed massacre at the caraven. the quran says if they surrender lead them to safety.
muhammed ordered his men to take the goods from the caravan. Were the prophets men attacked god knows best. But you claim they were all killed fair enough.
How can you blame mohammed for this?
thats like saying American troops in iraq killed 10 innocent civillians today, lets blame bush. if there is anyone to blame its the troops.

likewise the jews were conspiring for medina to be overthrown and were helping the enemy to do so, fuelled by the promise of wealth the jews gave intelligence amongst other things.

Now you tell me will america let a terrorist go because he was unarmed, will they say "he was close to finishing his bomb but he didnt finish it as we caught him soo we will let him go"
that would be foolish as he will later cause damage. This was the exact situation the prophet was in with this particular tribe claiming to be jews who follow the divine torah, revealed by the prophet moses.

and the prophet did not have sex slaves thats craziness from the followers of the antichrist (dajjal)which is meant to mislead people

Do you read your books (both Qur'an & Haddithes) well enough? The Quraiza did surrender without any fights but still the facts of the matter says tht Muhammad accepted Sa'd's judgement on killing those civilians by saying Sa‘d had adjudged by the Command of Allâh
Secondly, you are comparing Terrorists to unarmed civilians. That's obviously a fallacy.

The man u call the Prophet, was full of hate. He thought of nothing but killing, brought nothing but death, taught nothing but vengeance. Muhammad was not a "mercy of God to mankind" but the curse of devil to humanity. Not only in his life he killed and banished all the Jews he could lay hand on, in his dead bed he instructed his followers to continue with the ethnic cleansing that he had initiated.

Let me remind you that Muhammad claimed to be a messenger of God. He is supposed to be the guidance to humanity.Muhammad said many good things but he did not follow his own advice and did very bad things. Your logic that we should look only the few good things the Muhammad said or did and forget about his crimes against humanity coming from an educated man is mind-boggling.

read the definition of a terrorist

"terrorist, one who uses terror to achieve political goals, saboteur "
Wow.. that sounds so much alike w/ what the Qur'an teaches.
Sura 8:12 "NQ -(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."
Sura 8:67 "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All- Mighty, All-Wise."
Sura 33:26 "And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives."
in other words both allah and his "prophet" are the terrorists then.

i never said we should only look at a few of the good things the prophet said.

if it was ethnic cleansing the prophet would have killed the children and women as well.

the tribes men and the men from the caravans were terrorists because they threatened to cause a series of events that will overthrow and kill the muslims, they were terrorisimg the muslims!. Why is it that the muslim are seen as terrorists, to iraqis the the americans soldiers are terrorists every day they kill innocent people including BABIES, they do this on the basis of 911 which we all know is a inside job. Now that is the evil

your understandimg of islam and the time the of the prophet is poor, let me tell it wasn't a walk in the park it was a arena of mischief, war and killings
HE BROUGHT PEACE! and i am grateful

the prophet could not let the tribes men go!
they would join the enemy to fight

thats like saying release all the criminals from jail and death row.

the tribes surrender was like a fat man saying "thats it i wont eat again." impossible.

That's what u ppl have. How do you know that their surrender was not real? Moreover, let say their surrender was not sincere, why kill them? Can't Muhammad imprisoned them instead of slaughtering them? You see the problem w/ this Muhammad is, he is a very vengeful guy and his heart is full of hatred towards those who disagree w/ him. Pure & simple.