English
Nuclear War: Atomic Explosions. Hydrogen Bombs Hiroshima: World War III. "Many of the nuclear scenes from this film, including nuclear blasts that did not appear in this film, can also be seen in the spectacular film "Trinity and Beyond" directed by Peter Kuran. We highly recommend this film." By Rhawn Joseph, Ph.D.
wtf did they just show a bomb hitting mexico:S in 1:45
By xTJx117 [Affiliate User] 1215484114 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewhy...why have them why make them reason.....hahah no reason to make something like that...ya we all know people can make bombs WAY bigger then them so why not make them if you make theese...hell you might as well blow up the world....fukin retards....
By volgarski [Affiliate User] 1215449397 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe bible syas this will happend and all the christians will disapear and go to heaven to wtch this.
By marines1000000 [Affiliate User] 1215518795 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeevery one whos within 15 miles of the blast is disinagrated. (sorry for my spelling). every one from 16 miles - 22 miles is killed brutaly. ever one from 23miles - 40 miles is burnd. and ever one from 41 miles and farther to 50miles can only feel the shock wave. you would be better off to be vapourized than to feel you orgins turn inside out befor dieng
By zenthex1234 [Affiliate User] 1215518154 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveGlobal Warming :O!
By SniperRifle7 [Affiliate User] 1215506154 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveI know there are.
And we are keeping our eyes wide open. Because if that ever starts up, the US will probably simply annihilate the Middle East. A couple hundred 1 megaton weapons should make it unlivable for the next 100,000 years or so.
how do you know that there are not muslims and anti-americans all over America hiding in cells waiting for their orders? I gaurantee you walk next to the enemy on homelands.
By Smokie181 [Affiliate User] 1215503504 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removedo not get into the who-hit-who-first.. becuz it can get really nasty, ugly.
By dadasadaasdada [Affiliate User] 1215446563 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemovePeople this is sad. Very very sad. How is it that intelligent civilization ever sinks to self destruction. How is it that we cannot talk our differences out. Must we use violence to get our point across? How civilized are we that we cannot seem to destroy ourselves. Mankind's greatest weakness is his greatest strength: FREE WILL. For with FREE WILL we can choose to love or hate, to give or withhold, to accept and reason with others or to fight against others, to oppress others, or to be just.
By DarrellsTube [Affiliate User] 1215443874 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveCome on peopel...the Masons had this planned out for over 100 years. If they wanted alternative energy, they wouldnt have given Nicola Tesla such a hard time. He wanted to give you all free energy back in the early 20th century. We're all skeeeeerewed.
Prepare to meet your maker.
The illuminati will survive those silly blasts. Their bomb shelters are 20 miles under ground. lol They will set off the first nukes, I suspect, after they are secured in their underground cities. Its the Machievelian rule.
By SupraSovereign [Affiliate User] 1215381759 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removetruthseeker:
i suppose it would affect the economy a lot... the u.s. has more exports than people would expect
hmmm, didnt israel start its first war 8 years after it got established, and been waging war against all its bordering countries ever since?
By droleniacoc [Affiliate User] 1215367772 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveNot necessarily. With the US having some 6,000 active warheads, it really is a moot point though. We are a bigger country and could absorb more damage than, say, Europe. Or the Middle East. Rgardless, it would be a very bad day.
By Truthseekerfinder [Affiliate User] 1215364818 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removei think it would more so be over for the one who dealt the card
By evaengineer [Affiliate User] 1215363946 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeanybody here see the old movie by stanley kubrick: "Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb"?
Its great
Brilliant policy. Actually, it sounds more the rantings of a petulant child. But, this policy is a direct result of our other foolish foreign policies that encourage others to make war with us.
The days of massive standing armies engaging one another are over. 9/11/2001 proved that.
Nukes are the last-ditch trump card. If it ever gets dealt, it's all over for everyone.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm bombs
By squonkness [Affiliate User] 1215317374 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeyou can blow our world with nuclear weapons.
but its hard to do.
you need:
1. 50 russian atomic bombs
2. launch them on the same time.
3. the bombs have to explode on all sides of the world
and if no one is ever going to launch one!, then why the F**k do we have them around!! this is just going to lead to bad things.. our civilization is retarted!
By mmdaniels33 [Affiliate User] 1215306540 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removethis is F**king stupid to have this kind of power and S**t around!! why dont we actually put our knowledge to something useful, like getting us to another F**king planet before you blow this one the F**k up you stupid pieces of S**t governments!! F**k guns and all that, why do you need that to fight.. thats F**king P***y let humans fight humans.. and if you dont want humans to get hurt than get some F**king robots!! seriously this is ridic.. what ever happened to your fists and swords..
By mmdaniels33 [Affiliate User] 1215306441 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeand when I mention WW3 I have to make myself clear of course..Cuz I mean this in all seriousness..there is a difference between regional conflicts and global wars..What has started with 9/11..the terror attacks, the invasions of Afganistan, Iraq, the fights in the entire Middle East, in North Africa and Pakistan, and other parts of Asia..these cant be called regional wars..its all together the battlefield of the first stage of WW3.. radicalmuslims(with allied-support)against
US-Coalition etc.
to me there is 99percent chance of a war breaking out in the near future between Iran -Israel(VS)The only thing to avoid this..is that Iran doesnt bring its nuclearprogram to the criticalpoint of no return for Israel.Israel has said it doesn't accept a-with-nuclear-weapons-equiped Iran.The US has done the same.And a Iran-Israelwar will have the US and Russia automatically involved (and who knows which other countries in the world). Don't know who will start this next fase of WW3..but be warned.
By dadasadaasdada [Affiliate User] 1215303863 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removenor president Putin nor president Bush will imagine that they will Ever have to use the nuclear bombs..this is becuz of they know what these nukes can do..and becuz of when they fire One nuke first..even if the nuke doesnt reaches its target..this will give the enemies a green light to totally flatten the first-attacking-country..I account the US for
being able to use the nukes a bit earlier in war then Russia,China but..the new thing is though when suicidalmuslims get their hands on the nukes.
The US policy has been, since 1969: A germ is a Nuke is a gas.... ANY WMD used against America (ATOMIC,BIOLOGICAL or CHEMICAL) Is a NUKE, and will be replied with in kind.
Why should no one else feel the same way?
If we use nukes, why shouldn't they (Anyone) use ABC warfare themselves? Not defending them, but it's true..
Oh. and to the previous:
Groundburst (Damage and Fallout), Airburst (about 1000m)( mass damage from heat and blast, little fallout), and Ionishepheric (EMP attack).
Rated 3.66 | 29,732 Views
By love_son_1
Rated 4.85 | 254 Views
By raize
Rated 5.00 | 119 Views
By raize
Hiroshima. First Combat Use of a Nuclear W...eapon
Rated 4.64 | 295 Views
By raize
Rated 3.45 | 486 Views
Affiliate Submitter: ackpl
The Largest Nuclear Weapon Ever: Tsar Bomb...a 50 Megatons
Rated 4.05 | 8,881 Views
Affiliate Submitter: jpnovak
Nuclear Explosion in New York City
Rated 2.90 | 2,462 Views
By hunt007
Rated 3.69 | 3,300 Views
By Balkazar
December 21, 2012. World War III: Nuclear...War: Atomic Explosions
Rated 3.50 | 4,104 Views
Affiliate Submitter: Sarastarlight
Significance of Bombing of Hiroshima and N...agasaki: Nuclear Bomb
Rated 3.94 | 6,335 Views
Rated 3.29 | 5,124 Views
Affiliate Submitter: 222kenken
The King Of Bombs (Largest nuclear explosi...on ever)
Rated 4.65 | 32,899 Views
By Lord_Jacky
Rated 3.94 | 149,224 Views
By sonicbomb
Small Nuclear Explosion Effect
Rated 4.60 | 15,817 Views
By hotbeuty85
Rated 3.20 | 727 Views
By 11111918
GOOD Magazine – Nuclear Weapons
Rated 3.53 | 1,859 Views
By wiredset