Moon Walk Goes Worng

Tags:
Moon Spoof Parody Walk Land

Please wait while the video loads.

 
'HELLBOY'
  • Submitter:
    'HELLBOY'
  • Visits: 2,308
  • Subscribers: 2
  • Comments: 0
  • Updated: 24-Jul-07
  • Videos: 6
  • Earnings: $0
  • International International
  • Comments: 44
  • Views: 58,517
  • Added: 27-Jul-06

Watch this funny video.as these guys try to fool us by showing the video of an astronaut landing on the moon.but too bad they failed to do so.

  1. Categories: Comedy
44 Comments | Add Comment
  • everybody knows that the moon doesnt not...

    ha ha

    By el sabeondo 1153978991 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Facts conspiracy theorists leave out

    How many people realise that it wasn't one moon landing but 6? Heres some history for you:
    Six of the missions -- Apollos 11 (1969), 12 (1969), 14 (1970), 15 (1971), 16 (1971) and 17 (1972) -- went on to land on the moon, studying soil mechanics, meteoroids, seismic, heat flow, lunar ranging, magnetic fields and solar wind. Apollos 7 and 9 tested spacecraft in Earth orbit; Apollo 10 orbited the moon as the dress rehearsal for the first landing. An oxygen tank explosion forced Apollo 13 to scrub its landing.

    If it was a hoax why repeat the event so many times?

    As for evidence of the many journeys, the conspiracy theorists are quick to point at the old technology of the early photos as proof, yet a lot less keen to view the hundreds of photos from the later missions. From the apollo 17 landing alone there are some 150 photos on NASA's website.

    The evidence is huge, photos, videos, the 12 people who have walked on the moon (2 people per moon landing), the tons of moon rock, the reflector that can still be targetted to this day, the hundreds of thousands of people involved and the tons of detailed information gathered. It is simply beyond belief to try and claim the moon landings were a hoax.

    By Wertbag 1159140794 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Same People call Holocaust a Hoax

      The same kind of people that call the Holocaust a hoax. The engineers planned the moonlanding for years. They deliberately planned the route and time of the journey to be completed where and when the Van Allen belt was too weak to cause any problem. Van Allen himself was involved in the planning.

      9/11 on the other hand may have not been a hoax but there is lack of evidence backing up the government's claims and tremendous evidence pointing to the neocons doing it. Right off the bat their carting away all the rubble and their performing very little investigation is enough to raise more than just NYPD and NYFD eyebrows who protested being thrown off the cleanup job.

      By Nationaldefense 1160509999 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • funny

    video without stars at outer space... huahuahua

    By cibakcibak 1207314111 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • hahaha

      too bad, could hv ful alot of ppl heheh

      By isabela 2010 1191292502 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
      • look

        this clip is funny as bush fucking a donkey.
        For any conspiraycy nuts, take a telescoop and have a look. You can see the crap they left behind. I would like someone to explane that one away.

        By harry888 1165064682 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
        • The only person that has ever landed on ...

          Michael Jackson. And he's been there eversince...

          By max_headroom 1154411182 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
        • MAN NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON

          its fake! we never landed there! there's evidence you fuckin retards we obviously never landed on the moon. Neil Armstrong my ass, 1969 my ass. There are parodies everywhere showing austronauts faking being on the moon and its hilarious because its true! its just another one of those brainwashing media mechanisms, like 9/11.

          By Marcizzle 1154067106 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
          • your wrong actually

            there is a station in the Australian outback which has a soul purpose of shooting up an infa red ray to a computorised mirror on the moon, which was put there by one of the apollo missions. The reason it is in the outback isn't because it is out of the way and near to impossible to determine if its real or not but its because this is the one of the least polluted areas in the world which means there is no light pollution to interfere with the ray.
            This ray is then deflected back from the moon to the station which, from this, can tell how far away the moon is from earth thus being able to predict tidal action etc.
            Perhaps you are thinking that this could of been put there by satellite?
            This is impossible because the position of this 'mirror' has to be absoulety perfect for this to work. Plus its likely it would have been damaged if it landed in a satellite.
            I am always open for ideas and if you still think this can be explained then please go ahead but i beleive that this is proof man landed on the moon.
            would also like to add how we have tons of Moon Rock if we never went on the moon?
            People think that the NASA scientists created them. However I think it is impossible to be able to age something millions upon millions of years seeing as they were some of the oldest substance man has ever tested.
            Once again please challenge me if you feel you can make a point, I obviosly think we landed there but apart from that i am stating fact.

            By sd2502 1158169752 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
        • WHERE DID THIS COME FROM??????

          What is the source for this clip. It looks from the hairstyles and dress of the techinicians that it goes back about 20-30 years.
          Check these out:
          http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6477886391235654973

          By DO THE RIGHT THING 1154062615 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
          • Is it possible that man didn't walk on t...

            Why not focus the Hubble telescope on the surface of the moon and look for a moon buggy or a golf ball?

            If it can see 10 billion years into the past, surely it can see a moon buggy or a golf ball on the moon.

            By karljt 1154045169 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
            • ther is the true!! lol

              amrica never land on the moon ^^^^

              By PUniSHer_47! 1154029211 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
            • Evidence if proof

              Sometime somewhere someone said that a large telescope will be built by 2008. If built it will be able to spot the US flag planted on the moon. Just can't wait! Or, why not have someone land a rover and look for foreign debri. Just my 2 cents worth.

              By Jneutron 1154021625 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
              • Fact and fiction

                Go and download a documentary called " A funny thing happened on the way to the moon "

                The moon landing was real, however.. theres a much more complex story behind the moon landing then people think or believe. Download the documentary ...you wont be disapointed!

                By gtirladdd 1154020476 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                • Now that's funny!!! They say they did n...

                  Funny film. The real landing on the moon is still very controversial, did or did it not happen? A tough one over the years.

                  By soundwave751 1154013524 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                  • Ha ha

                    Its pretty naive to think that keeping a secret like that for so long time, with so many people involved.
                    Anyway, the russians had radar too. Dont you guys think they would have mentioned it, if Apollo 11 just orbited the earth and returned......
                    They were there.

                    By Tim1976 1154013114 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                  • It was space racing between USA and Russ...

                    Then Hollywood made the movie that they step on the moon, with great words,
                    But the Russia knew that they can't reach the moon. And they made a lot of search on the moon, to find out the USA flag, but they didn't find it..

                    By not_to_bad 1153899393 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                    • big movie.

                      AA man it sucks to know that we haven't even land on moon.
                      We learned that we landed on moon since we were children and now it is proven that it was just a big lie, fake movie made in some Army explosive area.!
                      sucks. we've been living with a lie.! shit

                      By l-gee 1153883253 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                      • ha ha ha!!!

                        great!

                        By enrico e 1153727524 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                      • Moon Walk

                        This is the most realistic Video I have seen to date.

                        I dont dispute that they went into space But the fact that we cannot get close up pictures of the moon showing any debris on the surface

                        By floridaoddbod 1153690547 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                      • Van Allen Belt

                        Considering that the radiation in the Van Allen Belt would totally burn out film and make the video electronics of the sixties not work properly, it would appear that the whole moon landing footages that were beamed across the world were filmed on earth. See http://tinyurl.com/gh87t

                        By Vierotchka 1154171757 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                        • Moon??????? what is it.. LOL


                          LOL

                          By mafia_king 1154054313 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                          • Ignorance is bliss...

                            They say that "ignorance is bliss", so that proves that you kids must be VERY happy indeed!

                            I don't fault you for NOT being born in the 50's, or 60's, but calling the moon landing a "hoax" is pure ignorance! READ A BOOK!

                            There was this thing that happened in the 60's called "the space race". Every major country with cash did everything they could to make history in space. The Russians won that race. Americans acknowledge that cos they were watching (with the rest of the world).

                            HOWEVER... if the Americans DIDN'T land on the moon, wouldn't EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD have HARD CORE evidence that would damn the Yankees into global embarrassment? There ISN'T any, except for the rumblings of haters and doubters. NO PROOF... cos there ISN'T any!

                            The moon is IMPOSSIBLE to get to, you say? Damn. Well, I guess there won't be any rocket scientists in the near future! You kids are so plain-in-the-head, it isn't funny. But, then again, "ignorance is bliss"... and I laugh at your stupidity.

                            By Bouster 1154014702 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • yea but...

                              sure we "landed on the moon"

                              funny though, we haven't had much success with manned space travel since then...even with the advanced technology and all.
                              seriously kiddo, the "moon landing" was powered by a computer less advanced than what's in a GameBoy Color...I seriously doubt the ship made it to the moon. and I haven't seen any substantial proof SUPPORTING the "landing" either...like, I dunno, a picture of the friggin flag! we have telescopes powerful enough to see the until now undiscovered rings around Uranus, but still no pics of the US flag by the Sea of Tranquility.

                              Face it...the landing was staged as a morale booster for the Americans. don't worry, we'll get there someday...but we gotta work on getting off the ground and STAYING off the ground first.

                              please, prove me wrong...and, no, mudslinging and calling me an "F'ing loser" won't help your case

                              p.s. very funny video. good work, Hellboy ^_^

                              By Aesof 1154035441 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • Why can't the Hubble telescope point at ...

                              and show us a picture of a Moon Buggy or a golf ball that they were playing with, or the american flag?

                              Where were the stars in space during the moon landing?

                              Why were there shadows on the moon surface.

                              why has Neil Armstrong never Given interviews or press conferences or wrote an autobiography?

                              By karljt 1154045560 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • well the reason...

                              If you google for your question i got this answer

                              "Unfortunately the answer to this question is no. Not even the most powerful telescopes ever made are able to see these objects. The flag on the moon is 125cm (4 feet) long. You would require a telescope around 200 meters in diameter to see it. The largest telescope now is the Keck Telescope in Hawaii at 10meters in diameter. Even the Hubble Space telescope is only 2.4 meters in diameter. Resolving the lunar rover, which is 3.1 meters in length, would require a telescope 75 meters in diameter. So our backyard 6 inch and 8 inch telescopes are not even going to come close!"

                              Hope it helps, and btw we did land on the moon!

                              By Magua 1154076633 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • Foil on the equipment

                              you should still see the sunlight relection with the hubble.

                              With today knowledge of the van allen radation belt it will take a lot of led to shield man from the radation. no one ever built a rocket that can lift up that much weight.

                              By screechs 1157932641 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • Well my eyeball is 1.5 inches across

                              and on a good night in winter can Identify most of the specific craters on the moon with ease. That is without even binoculars let alonbe a telescope.

                              You are talking absolute crap

                              By karljt 1154122884 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • All about the detail

                              A telescope is designed to see objects at great distances, not to focus on tiny details. Its like trying to use a pair of binoculars to view bacteria, wrong tool for the job.

                              Why don't NASA go back and have a look and prove the point? Apart from the huge cost and no benefit, they've got much better things to be doing with their time than returning to the giant rock.

                              By Wertbag 1159138034 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • Dude!....Relax

                              Well you might have superman eyesightWell you might have superman’s eyesight but the rest of us mortals we need the aid of something call telescopes to be able to see detailed features on the moon.
                              But then again not even the Hubble is able to see the flag in the moon for what I gather. Anyways don’t take my word for it, just go to http://telescopes.com/faq/Can-you-see-objects-left-behind-on-the-Moon.html and make up your mind yourself.

                              Peace out!

                              By Magua 1154440614 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • THERE IS A WEBSITE THAT MAY BE RELEVANT

                              www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html

                              By karljt 1154124127 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • Why not point the hubble space telescope...

                              adjust the focus, show us either a moon buggy, a golf ball, or an american flag?

                              The hubble telescope can see billions of light years but can't show us proof of the moon landing?

                              Why has Neil Armstrong never talked to the press, why is he so guarded,

                              why were there no stars in the sky on the moon

                              What about the shadows?

                              By karljt 1154045849 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • and TV is the truth?

                              What is your proof besides seeing it on TV? Don't call doubters stupid just because they don't believe everthing "as seen on TV". Doing so is truly ignorant.

                              I laugh at YOUR stupidity cos your post is just a waste of disk space.

                              By nsfw 1154042280 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                            • No, but a little common sesen usually is...

                              Well I do think not believing in the moon landing is stupidity, the same as not believing in evolution, it just plain ignorance (this is not an insult; mind you that we are all born ignorant).
                              It’s not just because it “says so” on the TV, which is just one of many different ways of gathering information today. It makes me wonder what kind of “proof” do you required. Like going to the Moon yourself, unfortunately I can’t deliver that you, and those few who could won’t. So it is up to you to gather information and raise yourself from your state of ignorance by applying a methodology to your research using common sense. You will then see there are a lot of proofs from geology (they did bring moon rocks, you know) to a historical/political (the Russians did have and have the means to disprove the moon landing, but that never happen, I wonder why?).
                              In my case I have done some googleling in the net, I read about the conspiracy theories and their so call “proofs” from the most ridiculous ones to the most creative ones but none of them could withstand the scrutiny of common sense.

                              By Magua 1154080381 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
                          44 Comments | Add Comment