Metal Gun

hahahahaha

He hit me in the face with his balls!

well your rightthe energie used to make t first ball hit the magnet is much smaller then the energie the ball which goes away has. But to cut the first bal off from the magnet you need as much (or more) energie, as has been set free with the ball. So it is still imposible to creat energie.

sorry for the bad english, its not my first languag

right the, create, language, energy

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

why not

It's not free energy, it's a magnet with conservation of momentum. If you look it pushes the last ball forward really fast, but the other balls and the magnet are pushed back, so momentum is conserved.

Thanks dude, much apprecated, Pysics or not, I'm just saying if when the first ball rolls to the magnets so slow and the end ball excellerates so quickly, surely someone can mofify this principle and use the power that comes off that end ball. Perhaps like a TYPE OF APPLIFICATION of momentum? We have got so many brainy person in this world surely someone could modify or incorporate this principle (Much bigger scale with bigger super magnets of course) into a turbine or crank system to at least assist a motor like a hyprid.

Thanks for responding.

Not enough energy is provided even with the acceleration. That wouldn't work.

test

I know, it looks like a toy i used to get in gum ball machines that would shoot marbles!

You have to be joking...if you ever start off an insulting comment with "dya all hear urselves," you are officially a shithead. Murray, let me be the first to tell you that you probably will be a failure in life.

murray is definately a winner with an IQ in the high 200's

no one knows how to take sarsacm here

wow. you just said" My IQ is a bazillion!" but longer

You don't sound like you have an IQ of one hundred. You don't even grasp how this trick works and you want to try to use the idea to make other things.

Yes you can make coil and rail guns and they involve electro magnets, sort of for the rail gun, but they are completely different.

There is no way that this current set up would be an effective weapon. I don't care how big or small, or how powerfull the magnets...it won't kill anyone. The maximum velocity you could get outta this is = to the velosity of the "trigger" ball. The only way to get the "bullet" to break the sound barrier is to supply the "trigger" with enough velocity to break the sound barrier, and then you have to question why use the magnets and other balls at all if your gonna do that. It's a neat little trick, but not a gun.
This being said. Their are magnetic "pulse" weapons in developement that use a track and a pusher arm that is propeled by magnetic field. It is quite fast and has broken the sound barrier I believe. The same theory as the bullet trains on superconductors. Just scalled down on some parts and scalled up on others. Thiers even talk of using such a system to launch a maned probe to mars from the space station.

sorry but the 2nd link to the balls doesnt work.. can u tell me which steel balls i should get if im trying to make this "gun" too. there are plenty of such steel balls(they have chromium steel balls, stainless steel balls etc) on amazon and i dun wanna buy the wrong ones..

NOWAY THATS GONNA KILL SOMEONE

OH REALLY!!!!11 DO YOU THINK SO!!!!12?!"!!1!

i gree. if they had bigge magnets then maybe. by the looks of what was on he video i dont think it would even bruise someone.

In scale you could make a very formidable firearm form this model.

where would the energy come from. in this it comes from the potental change in the last ball as it get in the magentic field. but to make something more powerfull that isn't huge just wouln't work. crazy

I think they're trying to imply the simlicity and size of this so called gun. To make it a weapon, which all guns are, it would need to be a lot bigger or have ever more super duper magnents. It's a cool idea, I'm just saying that I wouldn't call it a gun. Watch out small bugs, this was made for you!

A-M-A-Z-I-N-G... or A-M-U-S-I-N-G

Shouldn't the i be a capital in i'm to start a sentence

I implying one's self should always be capitalized no matter where it is, since you choose to be technical.

If it is at the start of a sentence it should doubly be capitalized. I mean not doing it breaks 2 rules not just one. It is crazy go nuts, or at least that guy was not a good perfectionist.

You are correct. I had taken for granted that everyone knew that any letter at the beginning of a sentence is always capitalized. Its hard to think in a lesser format :p.

,,,you mean "it's hard to think...."

...but even in that context you would capitalize the i because it's the start of a sentence, but not implying one's self.

:D

I ONCE Put My Balls In Big Vaccuum Here On Earth And I Tell Ya, They Got So Big I Didn't Think Anything Could Stop Them

Think About It!

You said cock.

Ugh

Think of the dammage you could do.

Likely wrong but that's my guess.

Slily me wit mi tipos.

16vmax wrote: "Didn't understand a thing... too bad"
and I wrote: " You don't have to understand.. it was no good anyway.."
Wow, this was in January ! Ya got some catching up to do there BH ! lol

Swanie

Stop spamming this site

You realise of course that before anything usefull can ever be designed somone has to do this kind of thing to make sure it works in theory.

The idea is for a very tiny initial push you get a very fast resulting object. I might not do anything in that particular case but imagine those balls were 10x bigger, and you have a pretty good way of tranporting them.