Guy Hit in Head with .50 Caliber Ricochet

Tags:
.50 Barrett Caliber Firearms Guns
teddymunteanu
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 58,737
  • Added: 29-Jun-07

This guy is quite lucky this round only connected with his earmuff.

[edit] 7/1/07

It has been pointed out to me that the source and creator of this video is MadOgre. Visit his blog at

http://www.madogre.com/News.html

And scroll down to "6-27-07: BOOM HEADSHOT!" for a first hand description of the ricochet displayed in this video.

  1. Categories: News & Events, People & Stories
Comments on

Guy Hit in Head with .50 Caliber Ricochet

15 Comments | Add Comment
  • in fact bullets do ...

    in fact bullets do fall right out of the sky. If you shot a gun horizontally and dropped a bullet from the same height, it would take the same amount of time for both bullets to hit the ground. The vertical components acting on the bullets are the same.

    By xzc426 [Affiliate User] 1229562844 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It is that source ...

    It is that source of push that I neglected to consider when thinking that bullets could simply fall at 9.8 m/s/s.

    By gnredbull [Affiliate User] 1229562199 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I know it's a bad ...

    I know it's a bad analogy =( you gotta think outside the box on this one. Here's the similairity I meant:

    Bullets don't simply fall out of flight because they are given a source of "push"... a source allowing sustained or extended periods of being air-born They are propelled.

    Planes, likewise, don't fall out of flight because they are given a source of "push" (whether it be the wings that allow it to glide or propellers).

    By gnredbull [Affiliate User] 1229562048 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • lol, the reason why ...

    lol, the reason why air planes don't fall out of the sky has nothing to do with bullets. The reason planes don't fall out of the sky is because of the lift created by the difference in the air pressure between the air on top of the wing and the bottom. The difference is created by the shape of the wing which forces air to travel a further distance on top, making it have less dense air (high pressure), and all objects move from low to high pressure.

    By xzc426 [Affiliate User] 1229561014 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ohh got ya yes ...

    ohh got ya

    yes he was super lucky

    By drummer987 [Affiliate User] 1229559244 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Umm no. It was the ...

    Umm no.
    It was the bullet.

    stupid.

    By TheEnlistedNun [Affiliate User] 1229557693 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • haha thats AWSOME

    haha thats AWSOME

    By ThEDirTBiKeKing1 [Affiliate User] 1229557546 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Dude, if you try to ...

    Dude, if you try to assassinate Chuck Norris you should get something more powerful then a .50, your lucky he didn't aim

    By n00bzta [Affiliate User] 1229557525 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • yeah yeah this is ...

    yeah yeah this is true, but I wasn't talking about the spin being the only thing that propells the bullet, but rather and additional force. The spin keeps the bullet accurate by helping it stay straigh (more aerodynamic) and thus in the air longer. Propelled I guess was a bad choice of words.

    But all this physics doesn't matter :P The point is this guy is lucky and it was a cool vid

    By gnredbull [Affiliate User] 1229554253 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • damn that has to ...

    damn that has to hut
    t

    By phonix032 [Affiliate User] 1229551471 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • acutally the bullet ...

    acutally the bullet is propelled by the force of the explosion inside the shell which creates energy and sends the bullet flying, the spin is for better accurecy.

    By drummer987 [Affiliate User] 1229551365 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No, Objects do fall ...

    No, Objects do fall at 9.8 meters a second (squared)

    But when yo take into account the kinetic energy applied to the bullet to make it move forward, air resitance, lift, all that good stuff, the 9.8 is fuzzed over.

    By xSabiaNx [Affiliate User] 1229550395 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • So say a .50 cal ...

    So say a .50 cal travels at about 2800 feet per second, which is equal to 853 meters per second. 3 cm every 100 meters is equal to 25.59 cm every 853 meters. So according to you, this is a quarter of a meter every second. Therefore, if you shoot at almost a kilometers distance away, the bullet will only fall a quarter meter. I think this is more realistic.

    By gnredbull [Affiliate User] 1229548172 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Yeah 9.8 seemed ...

    Yeah 9.8 seemed sorta high but I just remember hearing way back in physics class that everything falls at a rate of 9.8 meters a second squared.

    But I forgot to take into consideration that a bullet is being propelled by its vertical spin (ie. sorta why a plane doesn't fall out of the sky). And also the angle of elevation, or arc, must be considered.

    By gnredbull [Affiliate User] 1229548131 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • chuck norris trying ...

    chuck norris trying to scare us !

    By Jeflinguetout [Affiliate User] 1229543252 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
15 Comments | Add Comment