Please wait while the video loads.
You will need Adobe's Flash Player plugin to view this page propertly.
Basic English
Pinned down by snipers, Us marines show their skills.
like a rambo movie all the enemies are cross eyed.
even snipers. and the "good guys"
can launch a grenade with no dedicated spin huge distances and hit the targetwith only one second to look up find him aim and fire.
while the sniper takes all the time in the world and misses 10 times.
(note: a real sniper only takes one shot then relocates)
1) Snipers do NOT take one shot then relocate. That's what HOLLYWOOD wants you to think. Congratulations on falling into the very deception that you claim this video is promoting.
2) Sniping just means firing from concealment at exposed or concealed enemies, usually at extended ranges. That's it. It doesn't mean you're a marksman. Most snipers are ALSO trained marksmen, but that's again a paradigm that you have been conditioned to accept as always true. It's not.
3)Who's saying the "bad guys" here couldn't shoot at all, and are incompetent ones like a hollywood movie? These marines were saying that rounds were landing right next to their heads! That's not bad at 300 meters, and could simply be the result of wind movement of the round while in flight. If the "bad guy's" scope (assuming he even had one) wasn't set to the correct windage, or if the wind was gusting, he could easily waste multiple shots trying to hit some Marines who were BEHIND COVER (makes me think he was actually shooting through the wall protecting the Marines, trying to get them with luck).
Go back to playing your video games, quit making assumptions and statements on stuff you haven't bothered to learn about in the real world.
Good on you... !
By True Blue1963 1181399365 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removedo u think that a terrorist that just happens to have a scope on his gun makes him a sniper...snipers do not relocate after every shot...read a book a bout it that do what is needed for the situation
By noidiots 1164301509 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveSnipers don't relocate after every shot. If they did that, they would spend most of their time relocating (rather than shooting). Most people know that snipers best aid is concealment, not relocation. However, most Metacafe folks seem to be kids that act like they know everything, including warfare. They are a bunch of "wanna be's"
I believe he got that fiction from the movie about a German sniper and a Russian sniper "duking" it out. I believe the German sniper was played by Ed Harris.
the title of the film was enemy at the gates and is based on a true strory the german officer was brought in specially to take out the russian sniper but alas the russian got him insteag. irrespective a sniper (properly trained) is a lethal killing machine
By babenewport 1189450124 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Remove1) Snipers do NOT take one shot then relocate. That's what HOLLYWOOD wants you to think. Congratulations on falling into the very deception that you claim this video is promoting.
2) Sniping just means firing from concealment at exposed or concealed enemies, usually at extended ranges. That's it. It doesn't mean you're a marksman. Most snipers are ALSO trained marksmen, but that's again a paradigm that you have been conditioned to accept as always true. It's not.
3)Who's saying the "bad guys" here couldn't shoot at all, and are incompetent ones like a hollywood movie? These marines were saying that rounds were landing right next to their heads! That's not bad at 300 meters, and could simply be the result of wind movement of the round while in flight. If the "bad guy's" scope (assuming he even had one) wasn't set to the correct windage, or if the wind was gusting, he could easily waste multiple shots trying to hit some Marines who were BEHIND COVER (makes me think he was actually shooting through the wall protecting the Marines, trying to get them with luck).
Go back to playing your video games, quit making assumptions and statements on stuff you haven't bothered to learn about in the real world.
a sniper is... to shoot at exposed individuals (as of an enemy's forces) from a usually concealed point of vantage...
doesnt say that have to be any good at it
If the US troops are so invincable, then why is there a double digit "expected" daily death toll in the first few months of city combat? Are they all got heart attack during gang rape?
By Dude_ 1163150669 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveDid you know that the average kill to death ratio for American soldiers in the history of the US is greater than 10 to 1? That is pretty invincable.
By Tyger_Soldier 1166872905 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Remove10, including women and children.
By dissylic 1196178634 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeground combat especially a insurgency belittles the
efforts of trying to keep a 'body count'. The US tried
this Vietnam and it only distorted the truth of the
failure of the US to bring the insurgency to a decisive
battle. ( sound familiar?) Body counts become all consuming concerns for ground commanders. Next to this was counting of blood trails too give presumed dead 'body counts'. This is major fail.
Present Iraqi conflict is major fail because the Pentagon does'nt keep records of enemy or civilian
body counts? How do you fight a insurgency when you do'nt know the population let alone how many
people are getting greased?
hahahahahaha
this video is real is a movie
I AM AN SNIPER AND HAVE SHOT OVER 17 AMERICANS AND THEY HAVEN'T GOT ME YET SO FUCK YOU SOON TO BE DEAD AMERICANS! I WAS A DOCTOR BUT NOW FIGHT AS MY FAMILY INCLUDING MY 4 CHILDREN WERE SHOT BY AMERICAN SOLDIERS. I HEARD THE SOLDIERS LAUGHING WHEN THEY FOUND THE BODIES OF MY CHILDREN SAYINF THAT THEY WERE GLAD AND WANTED TO KILL ALL IRAQ PEOPLE CAUSE WE ARE ANIMALS!!!
By AUSTRALIAN 1189072104 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveIf you hate America so much.... and worse if your American! Why not head north to Canada... or France... You'd be right at home there with all your commie leftist scum friends! - Ray
By True Blue1963 1181399482 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveI PRAY TO GOD THAT HE ENABLES THE SLOW PAINFUL DEATH OF ALL AMERICANS IN IRAQ AND IN THEIR HOME COUNTRY! NO I AM NOT MUSLIM EXTREMIST, I AM AN AUSTRALIAN STUDENT OF MEDICINE! PLEASE GOD SEND ALL AMERICANS TO HELL TO BURN FOREVER IN MISERY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WORLDWIDE INC. IRAQ!!!
By AUSTRALIAN 1189071749 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewell now you have shown your ignorance. they relocate if they feel their cover has been compromised. any doubt about that? The longest confirmed kill by a sniper (canadian ppli ) missed with his first shot and nailed him with his second. 50 caliber american made rifle in afghanastan.
By megaouch 1174189234 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveDefinately Hollywood...but I'm sure the story that was being related actually happened a little differently when they were there. Being shot at tends to distort time and memory.
By socalmarine0311 1164218371 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveIf the shooter was really a sniper then every shot would have been a dead or wounded marine. "He was starting to land shots dangerously close" LOL that does not sound like a sniper. Take some shooting lessons or at least take some hints from Tom Berenger before you call yourself a "sniper" then go out and fight the good fight. Also, once you take 15 pot-shots from your concealed position you might consider getting up and finding a new place to shoot from.
By captain-amazing 1163199759 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveMy dad's an SF sniper, and you're an idiot. The insurgent's using an SV, a p.o.s., let alone a sniper rifle, and also, he's off by a lot, so his tatical knowledge is minimal.
And for the "You are so clear minded" guy. You're also an idiot, cuz you apparently don't know what's happening there. First of all, American Troops are not invincible (spell right), their human like us, except better prepared and armed. And also, we're fighting insurgents / guerrallas. People who don't show colors and show themselves usually when it's too late. Especially where there's other people.
And it is handing your pussy soldiers some gangstar justice, to the biggest gang in the world!!!!! Your war on Iraq is a crime and an act of terror by Bush, and you are paying the price, PELASE DO NOT LEAVE WE WANT YOU TO STAY
By iraqi boy AK 47 1164010333 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWell than Iraqi boy AK 47......i can't wait to see you there buddy! Go fight for your country you lil punk......go heads up with our pussy soldiers. Two in your chest and one in your face bitch. Real fucking hard ass aren't you.
By Br1emt 1175497090 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWay to stereotype you're own people and support what's happening in Iraq. Way to give reason to the torture of "elidged" terrorist in Gitmo and in Abu Graib.
People like you make me sick. To say that killing civilians is justifying for what Bush is doing? What you should do is look at MLK. Be peaceful and let the oppressors sufficate under their own conscience. (I'm not a pacifist, but in a time like this, pacifism on one side can work.) By supporting terrorism, and by terrorism the targeting of civilians or peacekeepers, you are only giving reason to support the slaughter. Way to go!!! You apparently lose (Yes you lose, you might take out some soldiers, but guess who is more technilogically advanced and has the bomb(s))
Not an issue if one is a bad sniper!!!
By iraqi boy AK 47 1164010214 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removethat you must worry about, not really
By funystuf 1164085539 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveUS go home!
By Kista 1180171496 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removethey are only luckers :D. Maybe they are now dead... a lot of them are dying there every day... go to home.. iraque was better with sadam as now
By mareceek 1162852053 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveI haven't lived under Saddam, but I could safely say that Iraq (which you can't spell, it's 4 letters) is better off without Saddam. Saddam in a single day killed over 300,000. It took about 3 years to kill twice that amount for us. Thus we are killing less than Saddam was.
By Monkeyfaqs 1163321705 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveHe's a Iraqie sniper.
By fotoman4u2 1161990332 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWashington conceals US casualties in Iraq
By David Walsh:The Bush administration is deliberately concealing from the American people the number and condition of US military personnel who have been wounded in Iraq. The efforts by those few politicians and media figures who have pursued the issue make this clear. Estimates on the number of US soldiers, sailors and Marines medically evacuated from Iraq by the end of 2003 because of battlefield wounds, illness or other reasons range from 11,000 to 22,000, a staggering figure by any standard. Thousands of these young men and women have been physically or psychologically damaged for life, in turn affecting the lives of tens of thousands of family members and others. And the war in Iraq is less than one year old. A recent piece by Daniel Zwerdling on National Public Radio (January 7) highlighted some of the difficulties in establishing the truth about US casualties. Zwerdling began by noting that few Americans seemed aware of the large number of US wounded in Iraq. He questioned a few dozen people on the street about the total number of American soldiers who had died in Iraq, and most answered more or less correctly. However, when the NPR correspondent asked about the number of US military personnel who have had to be evacuated with wounds, no one was close to the actual figure. The answers ranged from a few hundred to a thousand. Zwerdling set about finding the actual number by contacting the appropriate government and military offices. A spokesman for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld told him to call US Central Command in Tampa, Florida. A spokesman there informed him that only Rumsfeld’s office had such information. A spokesman for the Army provided with him the number of its personnel wounded seriously enough to be evacuated out of Iraq by the end of 2003 8,848 â€â€but he had no figures on Marines, Navy Seals or other forces. The United States Medical Command told Zwerdling they were still searching for the numbers. Zwerdling contacted Sen. Chuck Hagel (Republican - Nebraska), a Vietnam veteran and former deputy administrator of the Veterans Administration. Hagel explained that he had been trying to obtain certain information from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, including the “total number of American battlefield casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq. What is the official Pentagon definition of wounded in action? What is the procedure for releasing this information in a timely way to the public and the criteria for awarding a Purple Heart [awarded to those wounded in combat or posthumously to the next of kin of those killed or those who die of wounds received in action]?†MORE SHIT FOR YOU google that article and enjoy, meanwhile, I hope more of your marines die, or go home dickless
2,802 Americans have been killed during the three and a half years of war in Iraq. That's roughly the same number killed at Iwo Jima during the first three and a half days of fighting against the Japanese. Every life lost was precious and every loss grievous to those who loved them. Unfortunately, our media intends to use every one of those killed as political ponds to make their point. It's a lesson they learned in Vietnam. On Feb. 27,1968 after a month of brutal fighting and daily images of U.S. casualties on American television, Walter Cronkite, then the host of the CBS Evening News, proclaimed that the Tet Offensive had proven to him that the Vietnam War was no longer winnable... It didn't matter that Tet had been a decisive victory for the United States and South Vietnam. Today's potentates of the press are trying to deliver the same message: that Iraq, like Vietnam, is un-winnable. One television network has gone so far as to broadcast images of U.S. troops being killed by terrorists - making Iraq the first war where Americans get their news from the enemy. The war in Vietnam wasn't lost during 'Tet 68' no matter what Cronkite said. Rather, it was lost in the pages of America's newspapers, on our televisions, our college campuses - and eventually in the corridors of power in Washington. What we need to do is pray that this war isn't lost the same way.
By Rifle dude 1163998077 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveIt's about time somebody with a bit of intelligence, has actually left a message that isn't full of nonsensical propaganda. Thank you ''Rifle Dude''
By Bodda 1164055706 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemovemAN YOU AINT FOOLING ANYONE, I am an Arab and a Muslim, and we know exactly how some of your marines pay bribes to kurds so they could run away from the service through northern Iraq, we know how they cry and how little they wnat to fight, they fight ONLY if there is 100% guarntee they are covered and under airial protection, we have seen that first hand, they are fighting for NO cause, only because they needed someone to pay for their college, while the Iraqi fighers are strong and want to die, see... I have an Iraqi freind, who did swear to God he has seen many marines crying, besides, just check this on Meta Cafe "Cowboys in Iraq" you will see you so called tough marines crying like pussies, if you are so strong why cannot u see how one little sniper was shooting at your pussy marines knowing he is going to die, while your tons of marines were hiding like pussies becuase they do NOT wanna die, you are pussies, and could only take it out on Iraq children, need a proof? Sure, the proof is that 140,000 of you CANNOT settle it with poorly-armed Iraqi fighters, anyway keep your arrogance, you will lose this war, and that is why YOUR EMBASSY IN BAGHDAD IS ALREADY NEGOTIATING WITH THE IRAQI FIGHTERS, CAUSE THEY HAVE FED YOU CRAP AND TAUGHT YOU A LESSON, and here is news, IT IS ISLAM YOU ARE FUCKING WITH NOW!!! ISLAM MEANS 1.3 BILLION MUSLIMS WILLING TO DIE FOR THEIR GOD AND KILL YOU IN THE PROCESS, WHILE YOU PUSSIES WANNA LIVE.... to make a Long Story short, Abi Zaid, spoke at Harvard Uiversity two days ago, he did warn that Islam was coming to rule!!1 A CIA Report issued in 2005 warned that a MUSLIM EMPIRE will be there in 2015... get ready for it baby-killing marine, we are coming, and we will make you pay the price for every dead muslim child.
By iraqi boy AK 47 1164009977 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWhere are you in all of this??? Acting like a computer hard ass is completely different from picking up an AK-47. You are an Arab/Muslim who hates the west because thats what you're clerics told you and your easily impressionable people after Friday prayers. Falluja???? Swept that city clean in November. Boy, it was full of lil punks like you. Guess what....we gave them the knowledge that there aren't 72 virgins waiting in heavan dickhead. You're a fanatic because its the trend, and you will die like one.
By Br1emt 1175497727 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeyou are going to take over the world you make me laugh. remember what a bunch of aussies and kiwis did to you muslims in ww1 on your own camels in your own deserts you ran ran like girls when you saw emu plumes and horses. you want to read some history books and see the might we can muster in a short time. i feel like we are 1 car bomb from really getting the shits. if we come in full strength you cant possibly be stupid enough to think you could win ,3 quaters of your population is uneducated ,blindly led by tic tacs like you.
By ihatetreehuggers 1172198701 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveYou know someone's argument is weak when they have to keep repeating themselves, shouting in all caps and being as hateful as they can be. He's just angry because his biological father is a camel who didn't stick around to raise him.
By do not post videos 1164188459 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removego slit you wrists right now, see if anyone cares, will not stop you, because I really couldn't care less. If you wanna be happy and die go right ahead, don't involve us though, thank you.
By funystuf 1164085359 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveNote: A real sniper is trained for years, while an insurgent picks up a gun and calls a Jihad.
Sniper 3rd World Country = Suck.
Wish the middle east would learn from Israel instead of trying to destroy it.
GROW A BRAIN YOU MONKEY! ISRAEL WILL PERISH AND AMERICA TOO! LETS HOPE THE CHINESE FUCK AMERICA RIGHT UP WHEN THEY TAKE OVER AS ABSOLUTE WORLD POWER VERY SOON!!! PLEASE GOD LET AMERICANS ROT IN HELL FOREVER AND EVER!!!
By AUSTRALIAN 1189072327 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWell? Because those boys there are in one. Thats how it happened, get over it.
By Sleepyjon 1160641959 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removehe killed more people then the 2 atomic bombs dropped on japan did
he started 2 wars, gassed women and children and was making 2 more wmd,
his damned 2 evil sons.
now about this video,whos side was god on ? the snipers who could see their targets thru a telescopic sites and not get a hit or the marines with the grenade launcher (he didnt even see who he was shooting at) and rocket launcher ?
now u talk about God ?????
its great when murderers say God is in our side all the time
That has got to be the most organized and smartest thought I have seen in a comment. I agree completly with the Saddam was a weapon of mass distruction.
By the truth2 1161227795 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removedont forget the USA over through the government and put Saddam in power.
They also funded Al'qeade and supplied them with weapons and terrorist training.
I am American and even if the Government had funded Al Queda in the past, the rest of the world seems to block out the fact that BUSH'S APPROVAL RATING IN THE U.S. IS STILL LOWER THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY!
Americans dont want these stories of Marines getting killed, or innocent Iraqis getting killed on the news ALL THE TIME. There is literally news EVERY DAY on a new car bombing, or new marines killed in Iraq.
I don't approve of Bush. I didn't vote for him. No one I know voted for him. No one I know approves of the War in Iraq.
Maybe Europe and other countries will get a wake up call one day and figure out that THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES DOESNT WANT TO FUCKING TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!! To me, I believe Bush went to Iraq to get oil. I wont deny it.
I am perfectly happy staying in suburban New Jersey for the rest of my life. All I want is the fucking conflict to STOP.
My brother-in-law was a marine sniper for 11 years in the US Marines. He disapproved of the War in Iraq, but what can he do? What can many of the soliders who are forced into duty (the duty they signed up to do) do?
We should stop bitching over Iraq and look at fucking NORTH KOREA. Well we sure know theres a few weapons-o-mass destruction over there dont we?
So everyone fuck off with the whole 'Americans funded Al Queda, 9/11 is their fault.' It's the governments fault. Sure you can say the officials are elected by the people but remember that the government doesnt like to fucking tell the public everything!
I personally feel that if Al Queda DID NOT attack WTC (meaning it was a conspiracy by US Gov't) then it was a propaganda move by Bush to his own people. Hell, it sure worked. Us Americans raised up our flags and said 'We are united.'
When Bush was re-elected people never seem to notice that all the hick states (Texas, Mississippi, ect.) voted for Georgie boy and the states AFFECTED by 9/11 went for Kerry! That would be New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maryland and more.
Yeah I'm done. Just stop being assholes. Please?
Screw Bush's approvel ratings, that's substantial. And no, the US didn't put Saddam in power, the Bathe Party did, he however sold weapons to him to get rid of the Iranians. That wasn't a problem, until he started using them for his own people. Then it got 2 out of control. And no we didn't fund Al Quada directly, probably indirectly. But most times, that money goes to other places than terrorist cells (like to try to establish bases or when some people buy heroin/morphine)
And North Korea, North Korea isn't going to do s**t. Here's why, they are a small nation with hardly no support. The only way they can have any support is if they play the sympathy card. (Basically if South Korea invades.) And even China will hesitate. Right now the WMD's there are a bargaining chip. Seeing how the economy there is so bad, Kim Jong probably thinks that their sure bet to get food is if they threaten to use them. Basically like if a nerd has blackmail over a bully. If he releases the blackmail around, the nerd would get beat up, but there's chance to stop the bully with semi-empty threats.
And to say that 9/11 was all the Government's fault is risky, do you have any proof to back that off (and saying that's it's a conspiracy is proof.) The only proof you have is the bases on Saudi land. Everything else is Al Quada.
And to say Bush went to Iraq for oil is another stupid statement. Hell, then we should take over Kuwait and Brunai. It's much much easier. Plus their pretty trusting, won't you say? You're an idiot if you can't see the big picture. It's a domino theory. If we take over Iraq, a nation that had the 4th largest army and one of the worlds most ruthless dictators, then lesser nations like Syria, Iran, and all the other Stans might not be so quick to kill off thousands of their own people.
And yes Saddam has WMDs. Read above, and plus, he didn't let inspestors in. That's enough proof for me. Do you think your child who's smoking reefer will let you in his room? No, so that alone is proof. And he used it on his own people, we have videos of nuclear weopons his armies have. Why do we have to catch him red handed? If you killed someone, do we have to catch you red handed or are you free to go? Fact of the matter is that he's guilty of WMD's, genocide, and being an overall asshole.
And the last paragraph makes no sense, your clearly pointing out a trend. A trend most American's know. Also, so what? So do you think that those voters votes should count more than anyone else's? That when sh*t happens to me in a national crisis, that suddenly I should directly choose the president? Your a moron. Also, your a fascist, and that last paragraph only proves it. When you think that the states in the North East are more important than the rest of the god damn US.
And your brother, well Good for him, he's doing his job. Look, just like how Firefighters don't choose the fire they're in, soldiers shouldn't choose the war they fight.
That's some pretty good research backing that comment up. It's nice to see someone that knows something about what they're talking about and has some hard info to back it up. Although a little crude in some places, good solid comments.
By Tyger_Soldier 1171967990 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWhy does everone believe 911 was a conspiracy. Don't follow the herd on this one,use your brain. Think about how big the conspiracy would be ok lets start
1 the airlines
2 airline crews and family members
3 FBI CIA every law enforcement agency out there and all the people on the planes AND IN THE BUILDINGS
4 All the staff at ATF after the building went down they were downsifting thru the building there I saw them with my own eyes.
5 Oh yeah the fact they tried too do it before I was in the building on that one.
SO ENOUGH WITH TH BULLS**T CONSPIRACY
even if kerry was president, there wouldve been all
republicans in congress, which wouldve made kerry a sitting duck or a lame duck, whatever that term is called. so if he wouldve made any decisions, congress would shut him down. yea i'm republican but i really dont like bush either.
oh and about north korea, they tested their bomb n it was a mere fizzle. they still got a lot of work to do before they have their bomb. and all the while theyr'e doin that, they're runnin down on their resources. so when or if they do get it, they'll be nothing left of em.
you really think Kerry could have done any better. what would Kerry have done, back down in Afganistan and piss off a bunch of 9/11 victim families. or would he have played pussy and asked Saddam nicely to stop killing his own people. and to all you Conspiracy Theory psychotics GET HELP this war wasnt about oil it was about human rights.
By GenerationX 1162355857 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removebody count in World War II
400,000 US soldiers
body count in Vietnam
58,000 US soldiers
body count in Korea
40,000
body count in Iraq
less than 5000 deaths
I dont know what everyone in America is complaining about. These days were kicking a lot more ass with a lot less causualties.
Americas doin pretty well this decade
thats very true.
By bigmothrtruckr87 1162576646 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removehow can u talk about human rights while Israel is destroying every thing that thjis word means in Lebanon
By bad-way 1163609319 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveHow can you possibly say Missisipi and all the other sothern states were'nt affected by 9/11? EVERYONE was affected by 9/11. The U.S. didn't go to Iraq for oil. Bush is a good idiot. He wanted to do something good, but his masters (I.E.: Chenney) wanted oil, so they pointed out Saddam Hussein. Stop Ragging on Bush, He's doing a good job for guy who can't say nuclear.
P.S.: I also agree it was the u.s. goverment who is responsible for 9/11. I'm not against you, I agree with a lot of things you said. But i think your setting your mind to what the mainstream news and your friends are telling you and not forming your own opinion.
It should also be mentioned that he isnt the first president to mispronounce "nuclear". People just pick on him because they think it discredits his intelligence.
By GenerationX 1162356863 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewhy do you people have to diss things? they could still be there killing people risking their lives for who? yeah thats right you and this whole country they play a huge roll in our freedom and you would diss them and call this video fake? ok yeah well it's probably not the real thing but it's true thats the point. USA is the best place ever.
By lolzimawesome 1161641507 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemovePerhaps those terrorists thought CNN would save them.
By Christianmedia 1161187178 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveA bunch of cocky self righteous arrogant pieces of shit to ever occupy the White House! Support our troops and bring them home.
By Roush Racing 1161126253 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe terrorists are idiots for not relocating and allowing the enemy to find out their exact position.
The US soldiers are idiots for dropping the smokes after the snipers have been eliminated.
Brittish Troops Should Just Sniper Every "Not Brittish" Man In Iraq Including Yanks Loooool
By Jack234544 1217446048 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveTotally bull s**t, simply propaganda to lift amrican people moral... the reality is on the other hand opposite of it.
By Babershare 1207766658 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe guy who says he saw the first grenade go in "the window" is not the guy who knew where the target was. If it went into a window, it might have blown apart some Iraqi family, but not the sniper. If you think anyone can launch a grenade 300 yards and hit a target without looking at it, then you might be dumb enough to think that this war is in America's best interest.
By Stanky5000 1190412861 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveLOTS OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND ONE SNIPER.... THE SNIPER IS SHOOTING... THE AMERICANS ARE LYING DOWN HIDING LIKE SCARED LITTLE BABIES!!! WHAT A BUNCH OF WEAKLINGS!!! DO THEY HAVE ANY TRAINING AT ALL??? THE SNIPER IS KICKING THEIR ARSE!!! AND THE AMERICANS FIRE INDISCRIMINANTLY AT BUILDINGS HOPING THEY GET THE NEEDLE IN THE HAYSTACK... BUT VERY LIKELY THEY WILL KILL INNOCENT CIVILIANS!!! wHO I ASK YOU ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS???... AMERICANS ARE USELESS TERRORIST SCUM!!!
By AUSTRALIAN 1189072849 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeall of them, any soldier who has been in combat is a killer regaurdless of who they work for
By bullv45 1171615236 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveI am behind these poor warriors all the way, especially for having been sent on a fools errand; and they're trying to make the best of it. These guys need to get the hell out of there ASAP. And, no, the terrorists will not follow us home, Duh. But I WONDER how come the camera people standing up to take the dramatic pictures in this video didn't get shot or injured? I guess they are invisible. The soldiers are lying on the ground behind a little wall, bullets bouncing off around them, and some superman is standing up over him taking pictures. Please. Of course this was on a TV network, so that may have had something to do with it. The real pictures, where our guys and the children and their mothers in Iraq get shot in the streets, with real blood flowing, and real suffering, doesn't seem to make it to the news in this country. Too icky. Well, it makes it to the news in countries where they have the balls to show it. Most people here in the states think this war is some sort of video game, Nobody gets drafted, nobody has to sacrfice their cushy life style. Except the ones who don't have a cushy lifestyle are the ones who sacrifice their children who also can't get help even if they live through it and make it home. What a great country. It's happening far away and we have our government taking care of things for us. Boy, did we screw up on that trust. Hopefull this will change in '08 if we last that long. God Bless America, the way it was meant to be, and the way it used to be.
By hausgo 1170284700 Reply Spam [+0]