9\11 WTC Explosion

LONG LIVE IRAQ

to make me believe the official version of the American government. Either you must be blind, either you just don't wanna see what really happened. And yes, I'm European, I have a university degree in political science, and I'm more critical than the average American citizen, sometimes brainwashed by pro-republican media (f.e. Fox News). And yes, I think the re-election of Bush Jr. is one of the worst things that could happen to the USA, and to the world. One could only wonder what the world would be like now if Gore, who had more votes behind his name than Bush, were president now.

But NO, I do not hate Americans, because I think they are fine people, we have a lot in common and we owe the Americans too much. But let's all hope the next American president (and his/her loyals) won't think it's his 'Divine Mission' to bring democracy in the world, that he won't invent a 'war on terrorism' for economic (oil) and strategic (American military bases in all former Sovjet Republics) purposes, and that he won't mislead on purpose his 'fellow citizens', and the rest of the world.

are all dumbasses. It is an IMPOSSIBILITY for jet fuel to burn hot enough to melt the frame of this building which was made from concrete and reinforced steel. Even if the building had burned for severall days, the beams would not have been weakened enough to cause the building to collapse at free fall speed. If you want to argue about politics, that's one thing, but you can't argue science. Look up the compostion of jet fuel, and the melting point of steel, or just ask any scientist for that matter, and they will tell you that jet fuel DOES NOT burn hot enough to do this to a building you numbnuts. That's like trying to convince someone that you can freeze water in the summertime on the beaches of California, only in reverse. If fire could do this to a building, and colloapse it in place, there would be no need for remote demolition, they could just burn buildings down into one neat pile of rubble.As expensive as TNT is, there is a reason why they load up buildings full of it to bring them down, BECAUSE FIRE DOESN'T DO THIS TO BUILDINGS.

The Boeing 767 is capable of carrying up to 23,980 gallons of fuel and it is estimated that, at the time of impact, each aircraft had approximately 10,000 gallons of unused fuel on board (compiled from Government sources)

Assumimg that the entire amount in gallons of jet fuel was confined to just one floor of the World Trade Center, that the jet fuel burnt with perfect efficency, that no hot gases left this floor, that no heat escaped this floor by conduction and that the steel and concrete had an unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat.

Then it is impossible that the jet fuel, by itself, raised the temperature of this floor more than 257° C (495° F).

Now this temperature is nowhere near high enough to even begin explaining the World Trade Center Tower collapse.

It is not even close to the first critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F) where steel loses about half its strength and it is nowhere near the quotes of 1500° C that we constantly read about in our lying media.

"In the mid-1990s British Steel and the Building Research Establishment performed a series of six experiments at Cardington to investigate the behavior of steel frame buildings. These experiments were conducted in a simulated, eight-story building. Secondary steel beams were not protected. Despite the temperature of the steel beams reaching 800-900° C (1,500-1,700° F) in three of the tests (well above the traditionally assumed critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F), no collapse was observed in any of the six experiments."

that was not an explosion but an implosion of the towers.... if it was an explosion allmost all of the buildinf around them would be obliterated

I know i used to be a demolitionist for the the US Army. Its easy to see that the charges explode as each floor collapses, the towers fell CLEANLY, too clean, it was a controlled implosion dumbshitts

paranoid sons of bitches

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Please explain to me how this is evidence. Seriously. You see the puff of smoke and debris? That's air pressure. As the top of the building collapsed the pressure inside built up and burst the windows which happened to be the weakest point in the building (it's common sense, don't be ignorant. Ever popped a plastic bag? Same thing assholes).

The reason the buildings collapsed in the first place isn't because the steel in them was liquefied. It doesn't have to burn hot enough to liquefy the steel, just hot enough to weaken it. The insulation? The impact and explosion from the airliner weaken load-bearing beams and blew insulation off of the steel. Steel melts at 1525 Celsius, this is true. Steel is weakened to around 50% of it's normal strength when it reaches 648 Celsius. So, even though jet fuel only burns at 825 Celsius, that is still hot enough for it to weaken the already damaged beams (remember the massive jet that hit them, blowing off insulation as well as causing structural damage?) to a point where they could (and did) collapse.

"to make me believe the official version of the American government. Either you must be blind, either you just don't wanna see what really happened..." -thomas1983-

Thomas, you just lowered my respect for European's. You make them look bad. If I was European, I would be writing a waiver separating myself from you by as much as possible to let the world know I'm not as retarded as you.

As for me being brainwashed by fox news, don't worry about it, because I'm not. I hate fox. They can be as stupid as you, and stupid people are people I distance myself from. What’s really great is that in your two paragraphs you failed to present a single piece of evidence about this.

"Since when does having a college degree in political science give someone the expertise to evaluate an engineering failure..." -911Engineer-

He's saying the same thing as me, just worded differently. Shut up. If I have a question involving political science, rest assured that I would ask you (well, not you but someone else in that field since obviously you cannot be trusted).

If you want more, try this site:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

If you're a "loose change" fan, choke and then go to the following:

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

u liberal suns of bitches
gas prices this and conspircy that y dont you all shut the F**k up and move to fuckin canada were you belong go live with all the dam french F*gs u fuckin dikes

during all of the recent political campaigns, prior to November’s election, there was absolutely no mention by the Democrats (which, by the way, desperately needed to regain control of our government) of a conspiracy. Yes, there was plenty Bush bashing, but not one, zero, zilch, nada, not a single Democratic nominee mentioned a conspiracy. Doesn’t it seem odd that even though many politicians have been known to employ immoral schemes and do whatever it takes to get elected, there was no mention of a conspiracy by the Bush Administration? Every time I see one of these conspiracy videos I try to view them objectively, waiting for some indisputable evidence verifying a betrayal by our government but I have yet to see/hear the first piece of indisputable evidence. I would like to challenge anybody out there that believes this conspiracy crap to present me with ANY evidence that cannot be refuted.

I just read another comment and thought I would enlighten another poor soul. Who the hell would fly planes into the world trade center for the purposes of bettering the lives of the government???? We have proven suicide bombers all over the middle east killing themselves and yet the "loose change" (That I know all of you saw making this argument) states that these men are all still alive living happy lives with their families like before and after hollywood film.
"Bye Mom I just made a deal with the Government. Youll thank me one day. I love all of you guys!"

A once great mind stated that you should never argue with a fool because those who stand back and watch cannot tell who is who. In that same context, the bottom line is that those who believe the conspiracy theory are greatly disallusioned from reality and have the mind capacity to understand the circumstances of at most high school education. Every theory used to justify the Government's involvement is absurd, riduculous, and any college student can destroy those claims by a little research. If you are getting your information from the internet and using those facts to defend your claims, please do us a favor. Register for a course in Physics or attempt to justify your claims with facts, not theories.
The same people claiming conspiracy are the same ones believing 3 people shot and killed Kennedy. Give it a rest please, nobody believes you. Get a life, making somethin of yourself and find a hobby rather than try to convince intelligent and rational people that you and your committee on conspiracy have the true facts that the rest of America must have just been oblivious to. In other words, get a life.

What about WTC 7? It didn't have the structure of the towers for it to collapse by just a fire, and if it was the tremors from the towers, how come no other building was damaged?

which is the evidence in this video? that's not an explosion, that's just the dust that would normally come out when the builiding fell..come on, this is not how an explosion would be!!!

The building is only strong vertically. Once the upper piece began falling and released its potential energy, the lower section experienced enormous amounts of uneven force, which cut through it like butter. You may notice that a simple roll of paper can hold a big book if placed carefully, but if you drop the book at an angle and a few inches above the tube, the paper will crumple, and the book'll fall just as if the paper tube wasn't there - and yet, before it was able to support the book!

Well, the WTC towers demonstrated that on a much larger scale. It's not very difficult to understand.

You do not need to melt iron to weaken it. You may have seen blacksmiths place their horseshoes into the furnace, bring it out when it's glowing red, and hammer it. That horseshoe has lost far more than half of its strength, which makes it possible for the blacksmith to shape it. It's not really that hot - perhaps 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit. The jet fuel fire could easily burn that hot.

But the jet fuel was only a small part of the available fuel. There was paper, there was ceiling material, there were computers and other plastic items - there was, for all practical purposes, an endless supply. This fire was fed by air drawn up like a chimney from the elevator shafts. Inside the building, the flames were burning incredibly hot, as they had a lot of oxygen to feed them. At the edge, which is what we see in the videos, there was less oxygen, and the fuel burned black.

Isn't it kind of strange that the "explosions" occured after the building began falling? Those explosions were caused by massive air displacements as the upper section of the building fell. Have you ever clapped your hands? That clap is caused by an explosive release of pressure, which you build up by moving your hands together very fast.

Finally, the video doesn't seem to work.

I'll say it once and I'll say it again.

It amazes me that people think 9-11 was done by the gov. however this same gov can't plant a handful of WOMD's in Iraq to save face.

If one could be done then the other is certainly easier.

We have so many educated people.

I love it when people try to throw 'scientific data' in, even though their data is incorrect.

Amazing how it takes companies like "controlled Demolition" 3 months to prepare a building for explosive blow down. Including drilling lots of holes and cutting of metal. yet these people would have us belive that these explosives were placed in 15 minutes, or secretly placed in the building before hand. How did they hide tons of explosives and miles of cables ??

disgrace the firefighters, police officers, and civilians that lost their lives that day.

that is friggin scary... the one by the intersection at Church & Vesey Streets (the second collapse angle) is friggin creepy... all the dust kind of erupting over 5 WTC...

http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/911truth.html

Conspiracy this, you delusional children.

this vidoe showed nothing, but i liked reading the comments.I beleive it was the US behind it, i also believe that the family of Bin Laden did well getting out of the country that same day.Good forward thinking! Bush and his puppet controllers ruled that day for sure.
Excellent quote- "Hitler burned down his own Reichstag and blamed it on his enemies, then asked for complete power.
Pearl Harbor was not a surprise attack. The Pres. knew the exact date and time of the attack weeks before, but let it happen...then went to war."
Once again the american people have been told lies

ummm i still dont see an explosion????waiting o there isnt one if gore was president when it happened we would still be sitting around wondering who did it is bush perfect??no i dont think so but better than gore and if anyone who thinks that the fire couldnt take the building down you need to look into metalurgy and learn about the materials in steel and the traits of steel and you will learn the the temp of the fire of jet fuel is not high enough to melt steel but is however high enough to cause steel to lose over half of its strength ...now that you know that do some engineering and figure out how much the upper floors wiehged then how much steel is needed to hold the amount of weight up now subtract the steel beams that were destroyed on impact and then figure out what the strength of the remaining beams are at under half strength and to my understanding numbers have a very time lieing they arent poictical they have no motive .....did you figure it out yet....yes thats right the remaining steel could not in no way under circumstances support the upper floors....if you really want then continue on the impact effect of the weight colliding on lower floors the whole way down the math the physics all of it works i dont care how many times you do it they would have fallen no matter how much you try explosions are not needed theories arent needed just do some research then shut up about it the liberal(socialist, communist)ideas are way off anyways have a good day

CONSPIRACY THEORISTS LIVE IN A FANTASY WORLD.THEY ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ONES WHO CLAIM ALIENS HAVE ABDUCTED THEM!! IN THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES SHUT YOUR MOUTHS. YOUR ALL A WASTE OF OUR PRECIOUS OXYGEN.WHY DO YOU LIVE HERE IF YOU THINK YOUR GOVERNMENT DID THIS

IM SICK OF YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS WHO THINK THIS. YOU SHOULD BE SHOT ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN

after the attack on the Twin towers in the morning of 9/11, in the afternoon Building 7 was demolished thru controlled demolition. how did the demolition team setup up all the dynamites in a 35 story building in just a matters of hours when in normal circumstances it could take days for them setup all up? Just wondering. could it be planned ahead of 9/11?

It was a setup by The Government such as The CIA then someone should prove it with real evidence?

Like how many people did it take to setup, how much time did it take planning, how much did it all cost, why didn't people working in the building see so much going on or were they on it as well etc etc etc

Also there is another theory from someone who has lost the plot, said the planes hitting The WTC was a Hollywood trick and that there was no planes.

Another question for those who think this was a Government Setup, of those things that happened around The World how were also Government setups?

For example someone said The Boxing Day Tsunami was a setup by The USA Government and that Port Arthur massacre, was a setup By The Australia Government to bring in much needed gun laws.

In other words, how many things that happened in The World do some think they were Government Setups?

The conspiracy fools are the useful idiots that Vladimir Lenin was talking about. They see what they want to see and no amount of evidence or reasoning will show them the truth. Just keep your guns clean and you aim true in case they accidently get into power.

we can go on and on but there to much evidence uncovered for anyone to stand by and say it was just terror that happened

Please explain to me how this is evidence. Seriously. You see the puff of smoke and debris? That's air pressure. As the top of the building collapsed the pressure inside built up and burst the windows which happened to be the weakest point in the building (it's common sense, don't be ignorant. Ever popped a plastic bag? Same thing assholes).

The reason the buildings collapsed in the first place isn't because the steel in them was liquefied. It doesn't have to burn hot enough to liquefy the steel, just hot enough to weaken it. The insulation? The impact and explosion from the airliner weaken load-bearing beams and blew insulation off of the steel. Steel melts at 1525 Celsius, this is true. Steel is weakened to around 50% of it's normal strength when it reaches 648 Celsius. So, even though jet fuel only burns at 825 Celsius, that is still hot enough for it to weaken the already damaged beams (remember the massive jet that hit them, blowing off insulation as well as causing structural damage?) to a point where they could (and did) collapse.

"to make me believe the official version of the American government. Either you must be blind, either you just don't wanna see what really happened..." -thomas1983-

Thomas, you just lowered my respect for European's. You make them look bad. If I was European, I would be writing a waiver separating myself from you by as much as possible to let the world know I'm not as retarded as you.

As for me being brainwashed by fox news, don't worry about it, because I'm not. I hate fox. They can be as stupid as you, and stupid people are people I distance myself from. What’s really great is that in your two paragraphs you failed to present a single piece of evidence about this.

"Since when does having a college degree in political science give someone the expertise to evaluate an engineering failure..." -911Engineer-

He's saying the same thing as me, just worded differently. Shut up. If I have a question involving political science, rest assured that I would ask you (well, not you but someone else in that field since obviously you cannot be trusted).

If you want more, try this site:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

If you're a "loose change" fan, choke and then go to the following:

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

Just a couple of question NO 9/11 tin foil hat boys have EVER answered.
(1) Regarding explosives....how did they get there and where would they have been? There was no 'outer wall' that provided the strength of the buildings so they could go there.
(2) If they were "planted" (ha ha ha) how is it (a) they were planted on the exact floors the planes hit; (b) how come the explosives did not go 'boom' when the planes hit; (c) how were they set off; and (d) why wait so long to set them off?

What was your thought process prior to posting this video? Something like this perhaps:
1. I believe there was a conspiracy
2. I want to share my opinion by posting a video
3. Oh dear I don't have ANY real video evidence
4. I'll just post random news coverage of the event with a controversial explanation about it, and start a substantial flame/essay war on metacafe... YAY!
5. Must buy more muffins...

Like thomas1983 here, I also am a European. I study economics at the Corvinus University of Budapest. I lived for 3 years in Los Angeles, I was there in California on 9/11. It is quiete hard to believe that the American intelligence, the CIA, who have the means to watch anyone of us anywhere from satellites, who have one of the most advanced intelligence webs on the planet, could not foresee this. Like Thomas said here: too many things went wrong on 9/11 to believe that it was a simple coincidence.

Here in the Old Europe, we have experienced almost everything during the centuries: war, oppression, tyranny... and we have learned from them, to form the most democratic alliance of nations that ever existed (the European Union). Polls show that 60% of Europeans believe the Bush-led America is the worst threat to the world today. Think about that! We are not your enemies, but we will not be dragged down with the US into anarchy and constand fear of terror, because we support the unjust oppression of other souvereign nations. Our patience is growing thin. Please open your eyes, and choose more worthy leaders, because you're fast approaching the point of no return...

i studied law (not engineering and not politics)
In the world of crime it's said that if u want to find the criminal look for who benefited from the crime... and if u look at the world after that black day u can easilly say that the only side benefited of these attacks is the united states government and that stupid head of bush..i like american people and i know that they are one of the best people in the world.. but unfortunatly their government is the worst..
anyway sooner or later the reality will reveal and we will know who did that attacks, then we will blame ourselves because we judged on binladin while he has nothing to do with that.. may peace be upon u all...

Anyone who doesnt realize that 9-11 was a planned demolishion is a moron. Way to "pull", guys.

but i don't believe in any of the conspiracy garbage. there is so much scientific evidence that explains how the towers came down WITH OUT bombs. the conspiracy theorists have like, 4 things in their favor. and sometimes coincidences happen, ans strange things occur, but its doesn't mean you are right. For instance, the 20 dollar bill happens to have the twin towers on it if you fold it right. Its pretty amazing, but no one in their right minds truly believes that the government put it there? Just accept that it was a horrible day, and what happened, happened. There was so conspiracy.

Hey alll of u A s s FFucks tht think the terrorists did this theres a whole ffucking video on how they didnt do it and how there were fuckin bombs in the world trade center u nnigers! and if u guys still dont ffucking believe me pause at 31 seconds and watch wat u see a ffuckin demolition explosive blowing out at the bottom of the trade center u ass FFucks!!!!!

The fact that hes from Europe only adds water to his argument. To find the truth you have to find out the viewpoint on this nation from other countries. Because you would not know if you were brainwashed would you? So take a look at both side before you tear someone down. And there is no need of physical evidence...how many people believe in a god in this world despite the lack of any physical evidence?

how is this proof of a conspiracy and what does it prove that the world trade center was attacked wow great job there

does this video have anything to do with the whole 9/11 conspiracy?

you all need to watch loose change and itys cequil loose change part 2, i for one am a conspiracy beleiver watch this video and see for yourself

I agree with thomas George W. Bush has lied to his nation on iraq war by propagating that iraq has weapons of mass distruction and claimed that it is proved by a number of intelliegent agencies now it has been proved baseless . Again in Afghanistan he imposed war on poor people because bin ladin was hiding there, years have passed but bin ladin is not found and by the way what harm has taliban caused to america any way? or they have weapons of mass distruction like the iraqis. come on americans i thought u r smarter then that the fact is that W. Bush has f****d the whole American nation and consdiers them stupid that they will believe in him without any question.

and this video proves WHAT exactly?

good video but wht i can't understand why did taleban and osama confessed they did all this

lol at these third world idiots that sit and watch a tape and conclude that president Bush attacked his own nation. theres nothing respectful, nothing intelligent about it. you are a produict of liberal dumbing down to the point you arent even above an animal. there is actual brain washing going on in the world, there is actual murder and terrorism as was done in 911, there are actual warmongers...they are called isalmic facists, such as saddam, ladin, zawqawi.. two of which have had there heads handed to them by a great president. why dont u switch sides you terrorist sympathizing fools before u find yourself dead as well.

Did anybody investigate what happen with stock market right after the incident?

If it was osama, why hussein? - to free Iraque?

Thats what i call freedom of speach

I just saw a building falling and people screaming. Oh and I heard a man yell '''its them evil arabs'' aside from that this is about as factaul and convincing as that stupid theory that bush sent a missile at the pentagon becuase his wife was having an affair.

it was'nt my building

I think that the goverment did it. I saw the film Loose Change and I belvie that somebody know more than they wanna say, where are the third plane that crashed, where are the plane that crashed into The Pentagon? That was a missle... See the movie........

Understanding structrural archetecture tells me that the Twin Towers could not have fallen the way they did without additional help from outside resources beyond the colliding planes. It just doesn't happen like that.

The truth will be known eventually. Probably after Bush has departed his fiasco presidency.

I was arguing with people here and a lot of them talk about "loose change" as their only source of the conspiracy information. I would like to inform you that there are many other videos made that argue the official explanation using scientific facts and that there is so many evidence that it cannot be possibly all fitted in the loose change video. Go to google.com then click the video tab, and search for "9/11 conspiracy theory". You will find other videos similar to loose change that metacafe doesn't have and that present completely new and different evidence.

Seeing this still turns my stomach.

Explosion from charges? Could it be that jet fuel made down the elevator shaft as they said, and melting the metal support beams, acting like a furnace with the air circulation system? Then the combination of stress and heat on the cement case it to look like an explosion?

You ever see a cement block pop like a small explosion when you put it in fire. It’s caused by air trapped within the cement ,expanding from the heat.

A 4th-year architecture major (only one quarter from graduation) was working at our local Walgreen's that morning. When the store staff heard about the attack, they found a TV in the store and she (the architecture student) began watching, along with the rest of the staff. After watching for only a few minutes, her exact words were, "That building is coming down." After the second tower was hit, she predicted that one, too.

Additional observations:
1. (I'm a pilot.) If the fuel had been aviation gas instead of jet fuel, there would have been a large explosion, followed by a fire that would rapidly burn itself out, because that's the way gasoline burns. Jet fuel, on the other hand, is very similar to kerosene - it's oilier, less volatile than gasoline, and tends to puddle and burn far longer than gasoline and at a higher temperature. (Look at how long you often see fires lingering after a plane crash.)
2. There were many combustible materials inside the building that became soaked with jet fuel, providing additional burn time and fuel for the fire. Watch a horror or Indiana Jones movie sometime and note how long the torches burn - they're some sort of cloth wrapped around a pole and soaked on some oily liquid. It's the same thing when you have furniture, carpeting, etc. soaked in jet fuel - it will burn for a very long time.
3. A fire that burns very hot for any length of time will weaken steel. If you know anything at all about the effects of heat on metals (my father owned a heat-treating business), you would understand (in very basic terms) that heat, in this circumstance, weakend the structural steel that supported the building. It wasn't necessary for the steel to melt - it just had to get hot enough to lose its strength. Put that together with the impact damage from the crash and you have a recipe for disaster.
4. Watch footage sometime of a building implosion. Although there may be charges set throughout the building and the entire building may begin to move at once (depending on how the charges are set), even if the whole building begains to collapse, the initial collapse and destruction most often begins and becomes visible at the BOTTOM, not at the top. Now, watch the collapse of both towers - there's not a TRACE of building movement BELOW the impacted floors when the collapse begins. The collapse begins at the TOP of the buildings, ABOVE the impacted floors, because the structure below fails. Once the collapse begins, it's simply a basic mass x velocity and acceleration physics problem. Velocity increases as it continues to fall - the farther it falls, the faster it falls - acceleration due to gravity, as defined by Sir Isaac Newton. And, as the collapse continues, it picks up more material (mass...or think of it as weight). The result is that, once the building begins to collapse, the collapsing portion gets heavier and heavier and faster and faster...it's like a giant battering ram. There's your collapse.

Ok, I watched it too and they sound really convincing with all the evidence and so forth. Now I can't say to much about much of the evidence but to conclude the debate about the towers falling due to jet fuel burning at high temps. Think about the video "Loose Change" or whatever you saw. Did any of the videos include a 440 ton aircraft slamming into a building burning jet fuel to aid in the process! The fuel is not the main source of the buildings falling but did assist in it. No its not going to burn holes through this stuff but thing when you put a lighter to a thick plastic cup for a breif second or two the flame will make the cup mallable(soft and flexible) and distort the true structure. same thing applies here. 875,000 lbsflying at around 550mph Lots of Jet fuel will cause the buildings to fall. Its never happened before yes! But when was the last time an airliner slammed into a skyscraper?
So all of you people out there joining in this conspiracy must also be a conspiracy sent out by the goverment knowing that this argument would occur and the stupid quarrels that we will get into. Why would they make us argue like this??? It must have something to do with money or they want to tap our phone lines because they are so powerful that they get bored with nothing to do?!?!?
Yup must be it! Who wants to join me on this one. Ill make a video called "Loose and Strange"

Every great human tragedy that has befallen on America has always been haunted by conspiracy theories and those who try to convince the world that they have the "proof" that something other than what happened caused the tragedy. For anybody who believes that the American government set up the explosions of the World Trade Centers must have the education of at the most high school. You have to remember that many Americans have never been to college let alone out of their hometowns, many of them, small so their mis understanding of the world around them greatly influences their ability to think rationally.
Number 1: for those who continuously comment about the "tiny explosions" erupting underneath the falling towers, this is where common sense or a college education separates the elite from the ignorant. Those tiny explosions of air are nothing but windows getting blown out by the amount of air pressure being forced upon them as the floors are collapsing. What did you think that air does not exist or that because it is invisible it does not take up space?? Please leave that assumption to elementary school children.
Second, I keep hearing conspiracy theorists talk about the jet fuel could not be hot enough to melt the structural frames. Okay, once again a little common sense or a college education could solve that one. It does not matter whether jet fuel alone can melt a beam completely, there are other factors at work here. The planes themselves took out much of the support coulums on one side of the buildings. When that happened, those columns that were not harmed must now pick up the load of the damaged columns. This causes an enormous amount of strain on the columns and coupled with the fact that the structural columsn

You all are arguing a point that has been argued over by real experts. Theres an excuse for every possibilty. The slip up is building 7. Something went wrong and it didnt go down on its own. Larry Silverstein was dumb enough to give an interview where he admitted the order to "pull" the building was given from the FDNY. Someone below mentions that the towers couldnt have been rigged because of the time it takes to set it up. Well, do you think they had time to rig building 7 that day? No, it was done ahead of 9/11. Just like the other two. This is also the reason for the molten pools of steel in all 3 buildings weeks after 9/11. If you go to youtube.com, search "911 smoking gun!". You'll find news footage of a FDNY officer telling workers and the news crew to keep an eye on building 7 because its getting ready to blow up. Wonder how he knew? You people trying to defend this administrations bullshit version of what happened are simply finding something to find a possible and plausible argument against. If you look at the entire event, youd have to believe in 1000 coincidences. Im not likely to believe in just a few. Theres so much evidence to prove this was at least a cover up. You just have to open your eyes. Think the govt hasnt thought of doing a false flag operation before? Google Northwoods Operation. Sound familiar? Oh, and if opinions of net surfers arent enough to convince you somethings amiss, then go to patriots question911.com (<close gaps). Plenty of senators, congressmen, judges, engineers, physics, PHDs, republicans working under Bush himself. Anyone still buying the "19 cavedwellers with boxknives baffeled, eluded, and overthrew the greatest most advanced military in history" story has his/her head buried somewhere.

that the us would or need to destroy the wtc just to start a war just like those conspiracy theorists say. america can just make their own reason like your country has weapons of mass destructions and your at war.

was purely due to the planes hitting, or wether charges were needed to help bring them down. But I do believe that a certain person sitting in a certain house of no color would have no scruples about plotting this disaster for his own ends, however he pulled it off.

And even if he didn't plot it, he sure as hell exploited it ruthlessly and has used it as an excuse to decimate innocent civilians in the Middle East, and destroy this great country and our freedoms. All for personal gain.

"Why dont you conspiracy unbelievers just look at the evidence?"
Cause it is complete BULLSHIT! :)

Bush is the real terrorist

True Bush is a world class buffoon but its not him nor the federal governent that is trying to cover anything up. The REAL culprit for 9/11 is CORPORATE America, the REAL power behind the federal government, I KNOW this to be a fact.

Watch the movie Loose Change, Its a google video, the building fell at free fall speed indicating that there was no resistance. There where 47 supporting columns going up the center of the WTC that were not struck in the impact. The black smoke indicates oxegen starved fires in which the steal melting point could not be reached, especially in 105 minutes.

In the meantime, someone voted for the man to be re-elected...aliens, maybe? How come, if you are so "enlightened"? Didn't you see or hear him talk? Or did he just started sounding completely dumb after beeing re-elected? Of course, i have nothing against the american people, but you do sound like the Cubans...They hate Castro, but they sit still, doing nothing..Don't tell me that if you could gather 2 or 3 million people on the streets at one time to impeach him, he would send the army to wipe out anyone against his internal and foreign policies? and by the way, since before the re-election you had musicians, actors, movie directors and all other well-known people showing their disapproval to mr. Bush, warning about the ways he would screw up the world in his Divine Crusade to impose "the so called DEMOCRACY" onto other countries..Were you deaf in those days? I cannot believe in a President ruled by a Constitution that, amongst other things, defends the "right to bear arms"!And i can't also allow someone to act like GOD of the World, doing what he pleases (actually, the money guys behind him), and treating others like little children.It's quite interesting to see that, most Presidents wo really did something good - Kennedy, Clinton and so forth - had strangely been, either shot dead by someone who was never found, or involved into some idiotic scam to make them resign..And to "reign" the country, there shows up one guy who wants to "go and play with our toys in the sand"...Totally agree with thomas1983, w'ere outside, we can see better, and at least we still have some free speech and newspapers to read about..keep on sitting, boys!

i have read the futile conversation between the two of you and it seems modena's plan is the same as the soon to be former(thank GOD) presidents'. To distract the citizens of the United States Of America from the real problems that we are faced with today. A.I.D.S, homelessness, racism, global warming, child education and WORLD PEACE to name a few. To say the job that bush did during his term was even some what productive is idiotic. Our task in the future is to never let ourselves be bullied again, by anyone. Let us put our pride aside and try as brothers and sisters for the same cause to fight the real fight. May peace of mind and heart be gifts for you both on this holiday season!!!!!

you F**king u.s, citizens are paying for all your crimes hahahahahahah.

don't doubt that terrorists attacked the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. The issue is that there is so much evidence pointing to numerous agencies and individuals being aware in advance of the attack that a different question is being asked. Ask not: did the American government carry out an 'Own Goal' attack on its civilian population? I have seen nothing to suggest this is the case, unless we are now meant to believe that Al-Qaeda are just ex-CIA jocks in turbans with great tans. I doubt that.
A more pertinent question is: How much did the American government know and did any agency or individual knowingly allow a terrorist attack to occur on home soil for some political, strategic or other end?
It is hard to believe and unlikely, but there is too much out there to say otherwise and so the question may never be resolved to anyone's complete satisfaction.
A recent Zogby poll indicates that over 40% of Americans believe the government has covered up facts surrounding 9/11 and would like to see some sort of inquiry into what the government did or did not know. I doubt that will happen anytime soon, if at all, and unfortunately many will see this as somehow adding weight to the argument that the government was at best negligent in handling its intelligence, at worst complicit in the attacks.

American, american, american......

i lived in tampa bay fla at the time of 9/11, and for at least 2 weeks prior to 9/11 we knew bush was comming to the elementary school, and they (the hijackers)trained in the next city down, why didnt they try to take out the prez? i am sure the secret service have shoulder launched misseles but the could have tried and they didnt that is one thing that makes me suspucious the 2nd is just prior to 9/11 a small plane kept buzzing the apt building where my mother lived in north tampa near bush gardens, we called the cops and no one would do anything about it, and then the supposed execution of tim mcvey was bs, there has never been nor will there ever be anyone on death row for that short ammount of time, he is sitting on a beach somewhere drinking mai tai's. plus no one ever saw his body after the execution, you know as well as i do we can be brought back to life for up to 5 or more minutes.

so said

vaa ra mama videoa !

conspiracion porque un dia antes el presidente bush recibio un reporte de las actividades del mes de agosto y principios deseptiembre y como tenia sueño no le importo

this is for the wholle people here in the comment , your never asked himself why the JFK its dead?? why hide about UFO ??? ah either why everybody think that apollo 11 never landed in the moon??? i think so many questions but one its F**king true, that all yours doesnt know for ignorants , its not the gas,its because the money and conquist countrys and make war for make money, that F**king building its was one inplosion never that building shouldn't fallen over that it's the true, think about that.(cyberhawk)

This topic is very hot everyone has their opions on what happened and what didn't and no matter what anyone thinks or says it won't change their minds about it. Look at the facts documents, questions ur left with and what people have said........its all there plain and simple and bush always sticking his nose into someone else's business when he can't even take care of his own country. I beleive the government did blamed on someone else and left to many whole to cover it up. I am an American. Wouldn't be the first time our government has f**ked us over and it won't be the last. U decided and believe what u want just get the facts first.

No, f#cktard, don't move. I'm sure we'd all like to see what happened next. Brave dude, but still a f#cktard.

All of you conspiracy theorists should eat a dick! Iraq was not the only ones responsible, we are just finishing business that we should have taken care of in Desert Storm. And Sept 11 was just the catalyst that made us remember we have unsolved problems. Also Saddam was providing the terrorists with finances so that they can buy weapons. I agree we should have gone in there and kicked ass then left Iraq! But because of people like you and the fuckin media we have to stay there and act like the nice guys. Screw being nice, just handle business and protect your country! Instead of coming up with excuses of what happened that day, stand by your damn country and be proud to be an AMERICAN!! If not go over there, grab a koran book, And I'll see you on the battlefield.

Fact is, believe what you want, dont bother sharing it with other people because they'll just believe what they want to. Who cares what other people think, its a free world and we are free to believe what we want. I guess we'll only have an answer in the end, right?

Mine only plays for a second in extreme fast forward. Whats goin on here. The government must not want me to see this cause im a badass

all you that think there is an explosion have no respect for what happened there, why do you want to argue about idiotic things like that when the simple fact was that hundreds of AMERICANS died! have some heart, spirit, pride, and respect!

I finally find myself agreeing with jetsonix.

who'da thunk it?

this doesnt show anything...

tragic how this is as closest as we can get to the wtc

Okay, really now. Does it matter? What if it was a conspiracy? Is it that shocking. There is not such thing as a non-corrupt government. What if it wasn't a conspiracy? Oh wow, is it that hard to believe that a terrorist group that members were brainwashed practically since birth to hate Americans would do such a thing as this? Not really. Whether it was a conspiracy or not it doesn't really matter. There isn't anything you can do about it. And how do you know things would have been better if Ketchup Boy was elected as president in 2004? Just give up. Conspiracy theories are a waste of time. Like all the fools who believe the Lunar landing was filmed in a studio on earth and still believe it today. What kind of pointless life does one lead to waste their time with conspiracies. Especially on things that happened in the past and can't be changed. Besides the fact that I don't see any sort of evidence in this video that points to it being a conspiracy. I mean the guy says he was taken downstairs by police that knew he had the video tape. Never does it say why or anything, therefore, what, exactly, does it prove besides the fact that some people are too easy to assume things. And by trying to convince people that something is a conspiracy, than you, too, are trying to brainwash. Give up. Who cares if it was, or if it wasn't, a conspiracy. Find something better to waste your time with.

what happend happend. thats it. we're at war. and we will be for a while. deal with it.

The CIA wont bomb their own damn people it was the F**king arabs if you belive this S**t your a F**king tratior and should be shot on sight!!!!!

Who cares about who knocked down the towers? It won't make any difference.

Y'all really believe the crap you write? yeah the Arabs are not really arabs, its Jews and CIA agents dressing up as Arabs and killing us. ROFL you poor shielded naive bastards, when an AK bullet crashes into your mommas head would you still believe that conspiracy theory garbage then?

It's just a bunch of clips on the first tower going down.
Most conspiracy belivers post clips that show an explosion when the plane hit the building (which acctually is created when the plane hit the building and not an explosive placed in the tower before the crash). If there was an explosive placed anywhere it would be in the plane.
I don't belive in any conspiracy about 9/11 but I do think that you should get over it. It was a long time ago and nobody cares wheter it was a conspiration or not anymore. So stop posting all these 9/11 clips and get over it.

if u notice, the PLANE EXPLODES BEFORE IT HITS, an on a gasoline station les than a quarter mile away, u see a tomahawk missle hit the pentagon, how could a al qiada hijacker hijack a milatary plane. watch loose change buddy, and how does a commercial plane pull off a 90 degree angle, a fighter jet cant do that, the u.s government is BULLSHIT!