Modern Russian Tanks. Best Tanks In 2007.

Tags:
Tank Tussia Russia Modern Military
akonus
  • By: akonus
  • Subscribers: 0
  • Updated: 24-Jul-07
  • Videos: 1
  • International International
  • Comments: 62
  • Views: 54,291
  • Added: 10-Nov-06

Modern Russian Tanks. Best tanks in 2007.

  1. Categories: News & Events
  2. Favorite On: valkoi nico50 osmanova Driftkid20 peukie
Comments on

Modern Russian Tanks. Best Tanks In 2007.

60 Comments | Add Comment
  • Black Eagle

    one of the tanks that was shown in the video. The tanks name is Black Eagle it is all black and very aerodynemic, so far it is the best tank in the world even better then Abrams. The construction of Abrams is so retarted. On the battlefield it is like a sitting duck. It is big, heavy and slow, so it's easy to see from distence and easy to take it out. In an open filed abrams stands no chance against Russian tanks(Wich are made exactly for the open battlefields, but can be easily used in urban missions). Russian tanks are small and fast so good luck catching them!

    By ArturB 1165959789 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • ABRAMS M1A2 vs ANY OTHER MBT

      No tank in the world has a chance, whatsoever, against a non-export US version ABRAMS M1A2 MBT. ABRAMS can shoot on the fly armor piercing rounds through any known armor (other than another ABRAMS). This is the absolute finest MBT anywhere. No 'modern' Russian tank, regardless of their 125mm smooth bore gun, can withstand being hit frontally by even one 120mm smooth bore gun round from ABRAMS. Disbelievers merely need to look at historical combat results to verify this fact... such as when ABRAMS was pitted against many Russian T-72 tanks in Kuwait (1992) when but a few ABRAMS M1A1 versions utterly annihilated the entire fleet of Russian T-72 tanks used by Iraq.
      America's enemies should hope to NEVER experience the devestatingly awsome firepower of an up-armored, up-gunned 120mm smoothbore ABRAMS M1A2... most especially when soon to be yet further up-armored and combined with a far more effective 155mm smooth bore gund that will shoot through the frontal armor of six Russian tanks when lined up end to end (or 20 side by side). No survivors... Period!!!

      M1A2 TANK COMMANDER

      By M1A2 MBT 1232751519 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • No. Simply no.

      No tank in the world? Yeah... right.

      The Leopard 2A6 has comparable armor, a more powerful and accurate main gun, comparable speed and comparable electronics. It's also cheaper, easier to maintain and less of a fuel hog.

      The Challenger 2 is BETTER armored, slightly slower and armed with a way more accurrate and only slightly less powerful main gun.

      And modern russian explosive reactive armor has a good chance of surviving a hit from an 120mm L/44.

      Iraq is a useless example. Not only were their tanks shoddy copies of the inferior export version of the T-72, they were also crewed by arabs, who rank up as the perhaps most incompetent tankers on planet earth. Oh, and most of that was done by Apaches and Bradleys, not the M1s.

      And 155mm? LOL, right. Not in that turret, boy. Not in that turret. Neither the turret size nor the hydraulics would be able to mount a 155.

      By Magni56 1257969955 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • check the facts

      I dont what you think you know but abrams are not slow they can shoot when moving dont you know how much money was put into them to make it into the best tank in the world and its been in more action they russian tanks you can see for your self so stop playing video games and really learn something

      By WTG1 1226554080 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Awesome

    The suspension in those things must be fantastic.

    By Bevis1 1163248409 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ha ha suuuuure

    cuz it can do donuts? those russians sure are keeping up with american tanks in the donut department

    By daaave 1163142064 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • lol

    america will blow them tanks to bits with advanced technology

    By evilchoc 1164352580 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • hello this are tanks not plains or

    ......lol do not compare tanks with plains

    By adti 1163158893 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Question:

    If that tank is the best than why doesn no one want to buy it? A lot of coutries want the German Leopard 2, and thats cause it beats every other tank.

    By Bugatti123 1178942862 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Bah...

    Can't hold a candle to our American M1A2 Abrams... nice try though. I'd still take one though... all Tanks are cool! Even ones that run on Vodka.

    By machine607 1174097791 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • dont hold ur breath..

      Im from russia and ive seen both go head to head.. the M1A1/2 although great tanks, cannot keep up with the T-80U Battle tank which is designed to be fast ergonomic and most of all quick to return fire specially while moving, jumping, turning etc.. the T-80U can also shoot from underwater which is extremely hard to accomplish due to liquid inertia versus uranium velocity. Not trying to burst any bubbles but the Russians think of everything and they make it bullet proof..

      By NY_Roc 1179971789 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Shooting underwater

      That is a very useful trait for a tank to posses. Can it's glacius plate be used as a hot plate. The Antenna's can be used to melt marshmellos for smores on those cold siberian nights. Hold on Hold on....can the snorkel kit be used as a beer bong? Which is hard to accomplish because of the head to ass terminal velocity ratio displayed by the Russian army.

      By The Action Figure 1254552928 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • you the man

      the guy who first reply to you should know that all russian do is try to sound good but when it comes to it how many country's has russian took down that was not the size of a small state (dont remind them but they got there ass kicked by Iraq)

      By WTG1 1226554471 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • yeah...

      the abrams S**ks compared to the T-series of tanks buddy... get a life

      By Rossiyskiy_Zhnets 1214795011 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • American Tanks

      You say the Abrams tanks S**k Take a look at First and Second Gulf War American tanks vs Russian made tanks. Who won?
      See Battle_of_73_Easting M1A! tanks took the turrent off Russian tanks with one shot at a distance of approx. 2K.
      Again who won?

      By rhsuggs 1218509987 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • lol

      it hlds up a fusion candle

      By biosurge5 1192725672 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Black Eagle?

    Uh the plant that was producing the Black Eagle went bankrupt and the Russians might be going the T-95 route. They aren't even sure what they are doing so if you think the Black Eagle is great. Your a little slow on the uptake bro......Gotta build it before it's "badass" tank.

    By The Action Figure 1254552420 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • weapon?

    modern weapon are just tools for the killers to do thier job? stronger or weaker weapon? no problem, it depend on what you are fighting for. If you use your modern weapon in an illegal way, you can kill and destroy your enemy all but you'll never be the winner

    By kaenguru 1230481579 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Each tank has its own advantages and dis...

    It depends on what your favourite features are. I would like to see the invisible tank the Americans have claimed to have developed. (not that you could really see an invisible tank) Also the Americans have retro fitted hydrogen engines to theirs so they run on water. A brilliant idea. You wouldnt have to worry so much about running out of fuel in battle. Just fill up on sea water.

    By noogiex 1211578194 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • cont...

    in the field, i would without a doubt, want to be in a leo2, or the russian t90.. ease of maintenance, firepower, range, etc

    By ssarss 1199681844 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • unproven

    being an experienced tanker, m1a1, the gas-turbine is its weak point.
    theirs no doubt russia has been the leader in tank technology since WWII. they've continued to build on what works, and keep costs low. BlackEagle is a wonderful machine, though currently, russia cannot afford to produce them. comparison would be hard, as russian tanks were made for being fast, the cold war was about a russian numbers advancing, with nato holding a defensive line, let the nato tanks pickoff what they could, combined with superior airpower. personally, i agree, the Leo2 is the worlds best MBT, though a BlackEagle ride would be awesome

    By ssarss 1199681654 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • wow!

    abit weaker than american ones, but way much faster ..

    By hm_3mmmmmm 1198974223 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Maybe best tank

    Perhaps by design...but the winner will be determined by its tank crew. America has more expierenced tank crews in actual combat.

    By Crohns 1174150522 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • It is not right

      America exist 200 years, and russian trained for more then 1500 years to be a good solders.

      By telenok 1175441220 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Great logic

      Given that logic the best soldiers in the world should be Egyptian or Chinese since they've been 'training' for over 2000 years.

      The issue I have with straight up tank comparisons is that they are part of a combat system and, as such, are not strictly comparable.

      By way of illustration the Roman Legionary was most likely not a match for a Gallic warrior in isolated one on one combat, being 5'2 to the average Gauls 6'. In formation, fighting as a unit however the Roman Legionary routinely owned the Gauls, even if the Gauls outnumbered them 10 - 1 (see Caesar's battle of Alesia).

      I believe the US is developing a smaller, lighter tank using ceramics.

      By Bill in DC 1218219588 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • 1500 years of tank warfare?

      thats pretty cool. I always thought they were invented in WWI

      clearly i was wrong all this time

      By rossimo159 1175446390 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • clearly...

      your retarded... because i see no place at all where the word "tanks" was even writen behind "1500"... he said soldiers... not tanks you F**king half a moron

      By Rossiyskiy_Zhnets 1215412446 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • lol

      u saying US hav tanksefore russia?

      By biosurge5 1192725826 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Hahaha...

    Lets see how it'd hold up against an A-10 Warthog, or an Apache Hellicopter??? No contest. Obsolete before it ever sees action. Sorry boys... USA still tops all!!!

    By machine607 1174097962 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • lol

      only until you wake up F****t XD...

      and for that matter... we can say the same dumbshit... try bringing your shitty piece of C**t Abrams over here... lets see it get passed an Su-25, or Su-24, and for that matter lets see it get passed an Mi-28, or Ka-50... you know what... i will raise you, i bet our Mi-28 would take out not only your abrams, but your A-10 and Crapache as well... dumbass just when i though americans couldent get any F**king stupider...

      By Rossiyskiy_Zhnets 1215412589 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • own the air,

      own the war

      By rossimo159 1175446195 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • XA - XA

      Try to say let see how it hold up against Atom-Bomb

      By telenok 1175440627 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • which one of ours?

      the ones we launch from our subs? our ship? or the ones from our stealth bombers? how about the ones from our silos?

      We've aleady had the soviet/USA nuke war standoff. Sorry buddy. We won.

      By rossimo159 1175446254 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • ones?

      russians only use one.
      splits into 500 in space and obliterates all US cities.

      By biosurge5 1192725945 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • absolute bollocks

    line up a t80 against the British Challenger 2 and watch slaughter. a russian shell cannont penetrate the 2nd generation chobam armour of the Challenger. meanwhile the Challenger will be picking off the russian tanks at a range of 5.4 miles.

    t-80? no show

    By TrooperLFC 1168695101 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • 'cept

      there's not that many places that have 5.4 miles of clear open terrain.

      The question is can you hit them on the run, in the dark?

      By djconklin 1169885445 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • the desert my friend.

      plenty of wide open space. And yes, we can hit them on the move in the dark. I give you Desert storm as an example. The iraqis thought the were being bombed.

      By rossimo159 1175446630 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • and while still on the topic

      you lot cant handle a bunch of sandal footed, rag headed, slingshot-hurling chechen peasants. what will you do if you face the British or the Americans? and dont tell me "nuke" cos we got nukes too.

      cheers

      By TrooperLFC 1168695400 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • ha - "chechen peasants"

      The soldier must fight against an enemy army. That is not nice but in the nature. And use planes, tanks etc. for it. But infections, viruses, S**t , guck, beasts, freaks, child-killers, bandits and "chechen peasants" - all it should not be his business and profession. One can not combat against inhuman, just nullify…

      By serg_music 1179711208 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • awesome!!

    awesome !!!!... thts why we import russian tanks!!

    By wakydevil 1167542666 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • it is not the weapon it's the man behind...

    America might have good technology, but it certeinly doesn't have the best soldier. You put an american soldier against a Russian one and the american is going to lose no question about it. i have many Ukrainian friends that served in the military and each one of them said that American soldiers are a joke, and i believe them because i studied in the american military and lived with American soldiers, those guys are retarted. In ex-soviet countries soldiers are trained much harder then americans and that is why they are stronger.

    By ArturB 1165958172 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • PEOPLE PEOPLE...

    ...ALLOW ME TO SAY SOMETHING... It doesn't matter how good technology you own since you don't know how to use it!!! So in my opinion RUSSIA has the _BEST_ tanks and _CAN_ use them and GREECE has s300 and airplanes AND _CAN_ use them at 1000000%

    So if you want my advice... STAY OUT OF RUSSIA'S AND GREECE'S BUSSINESS ;O)

    By MiXaLioS 1163483870 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • unless of course...

      you are america and tend to own EVERYONE militarily.

      Army of one, bitches!

      By rossimo159 1165991105 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • LMFAO XD

      its funny how americans seem to think the US army can whip anyones ass... yet when you ask the stupid americans such as you something about other said army... they cant tell you S**t about them... i bet your dont even know what Russia's main battle tank is... what a F**king moron... Russia would wipe the floor with the US military F****t !

      ARMY OF COMRADES MOTHER F**kER !

      By Rossiyskiy_Zhnets 1215412216 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Get paid to be online

    Get paid for taking surveys at SURVEY4PROFIT dot NET

    By ellyncutedolltp 1191422990 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You guys are all wrong...

    The worlds best tanks are being maid in Ukraine with French Technology... go do some research..

    By ygalanana 1163837927 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • t-80 is not

    the best tank in 2007 by far

    By narboza22 1163485856 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • you think that russian army do not have ...

    whel think again.Dont mess with rusia and this is fir all of the cauntries aut there

    By adti 1163158809 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Armor is good.....for a taget....

    Ahh yes the all mighty tank. Big, fast and has a big gun. One thing people are forgetting is that in the confines of that can your vision is limited and you can't use your sense. This is from a former airborne and now stryker infantryman. Give me a platoon of light infantry andI will show you how effective ANY tank really....or in reality isn't in todays battle field.

    By TowleHDslayer 1169885686 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • damn

    those tanks are worse than 4x4's! they're jumping slopes and landing as if they were totally made of suspension, and those underwater tanks are nice too!

    By hsnzzz 1163186829 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
60 Comments | Add Comment