How Wtc 2 Collapsed

Tags:
911 World Trade Center Collapse Terrorists Deniers Logic Conspiracy Theories 9/11
aussiestorm
  • By: aussiestorm
  • Subscribers: 12
  • Updated: 24-Jul-07
  • Videos: 48
  • International International
  • Comments: 61
  • Views: 105,273
  • Added: 12-Nov-06

how wtc 1 & 2 collapsed

  1. Categories: News & Events
  2. Favorite On: stanthetiger zabaiugah monsterjustin CjOwns
Comments on

How Wtc 2 Collapsed

61 Comments | Add Comment
  • It all makes sense, except

    the bit at the end when it shows the floors coming down... the middle section remains... why doesnt it include what happened to that in the animation?

    By England82 1163551151 Reply Spam [+11] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This makes a whole lot more sense ...

    ... than the nutjobs who think Bush & co planted bombs inside WTC.

    Of course, the only way to know for certain is to do a scientific experiment. Rebuild both towers to the exact specifications, detonate bombs inside one and fly a jet into the other and see which collapses first.

    Any takers?

    By q2w3e4r5 1163292846 Reply Spam [+6] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • lol the fact of the matter is

      this video itself rebukes its own claims. The floor on top hit the floors on bottom, and it creates a domino effect; i think thats what this video is trying to say. But can someone explain to me how it took the exact same time to come down as a marble ball would if it were dropped from the same height???
      fkin hilarious explanation in its own

      By FadyCordell 1167816395 Reply Spam [+9] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Simple....

      Controlled demolitions of the three buildings, WTC7 wasn't hit by plane and it fell down exactly the same way as the WTC's 1 an 2 - straight down into it's own footprint.

      99% of Americans aren't aware of WTC 7 and yet most Americans KNOW that their government had something to do with it, how much they don't know, but they can be assured it's pretty much near 100% with a margin of error of one percent, that is between 100% and 101%

      ...and I'm not joking.

      By Ken from Dublin 1171504014 Reply Spam [+9] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • You might be interested

      ...to learn that NIST has recently CHANGED their theory on how the towers collapsed. They now disavow the "Pancake Theory" because it didn't explain how the 47 central support columns would have fallen, so they now claim the floors stayed attached and pulled the columns down with them. Yeah, it doesn't make sense but what does? But that's the story they're sticking with. (for now)

      By octojofo 1165977070 Reply Spam [+5] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Pancake theroy is Bullshit

      Pancake idea.who the hell

      By Evagelio 1174860142 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • PNACake theory

      you mean Evagelio.

      By Ken from Dublin 1178315084 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • VERY FUNNY HAA! HAA! HAA!

      Then they wii say that there was some food poisioning and people farted so much that the floors wanted to get the hell out of there; they consequently (the floors) had no choice but to pull the central colums down with them
      Watch the videos closely
      The central towers were made to faile first because it was an implosion as against explosion watch the tv towers going down the centre of the building
      first then rhe buildings starts to colapse.

      By Tinchu 1172342433 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Hmm.

      I wish I had enough money to do such an experiment.

      By illuminated 1164955905 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • You might...

      want to ask Larry Silverstein, he got 7 billion USD out of the insurance. He might want to try it again!

      By funkaddikt 1171815724 Reply Spam [+8] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Well said

      Good post.

      By FiestyMom 1171740883 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I voted for Bush

    ...And regret it. For years I thought people who said that our government brought down those buildings were nuts. But I had some free time one day and watched a video. Blew my mind. I would recommend anyone interested to watch "911 Mysteries - Demolitions", "Loose Change", and "911 - Press for Truth". After you see these videos, just consider the evidence and decide for yourself. I will not try and tell someone else what to think...

    By uzernaam 1172284384 Reply Spam [+5] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Hydrocarbon fires don't melt steel.

    The building trusses were made out of steel weren't they, not plastic, wood, aluminum or fiberglass?

    By Deep Thinker 1163880113 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Hydrocarbon fires

      There were puddles of steel in the basements of all three buildings that fell. Five weeks later there was still red hot molten steel being pulled up by backhoes doing the cleanup. An uncontrolled fire can under the most ideal circumstances only reach 1700 degrees. Steel melts at 3000. Only explosives can cause that much heat. (Thermite, 4500 degrees) And WTC7 fell that day too. No plane hit it at all. All three buildings fell at the rate of free fall (no resistance) Typical of a controlled demolition ONLY!

      By Foznor 1165938565 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • With the right amount of oxygen anything...

      How do you think that a cutting torch works?

      By matbo 1168926382 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • no comparison with torch..

      The difference being the fires in the towers didn't have a giant bottle of pure oxygen being forced into it under pressure like a cutting torch. Take away the oxygen and see how hot that torch burns with only the gas and the air we breathe. It will still burn, but you're not going to be cutting anything other then a cube of butter with it.

      By DaveD71 1198184048 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Just Consider...

    Regardless of how you might assume world trade centers 1 and 2 collapsed, none of the explanations make much sense when you consider wtc building number 7. This building came down even though nothing hit it. A demolition company expert remarks when observing #7: "Beautiful. I don't think our company could have brought it down better. That was a work of art." If setting fires in buildings can bring them down like this, then demolition companies have been lying about how difficult it really is.

    By uzernaam 1172283832 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • PIGS

    these Islamics think they are smart .... dumb assholes .... keep on dreaming, ur image will never improve in our mind and heart. Stinking PIGS !!

    By aaaahhhhggggg !! 1165931061 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Hmm..

    If the core remained standing, then why did the top part leaned to the side? The core should haved kept it vertical while it was falling,and why cant you see the core pop through the roof of the tower, why can't you see the core?

    By illuminated 1164956275 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What a tissue of lies!

    Explains nothing to me, yeah right heat weakened the steel and building collapsed. WTF not one but both Towers COLLAPSED ALL THE WAY DOWN IN IDEAL VERTICAL DIRECTION just like it happens during the demolition? Why they had disintegrated so perfectly and evenly? Plane crushed into it from one direction only, not from all the way round right? Why neither the first nor the second tower tilt even a little bit in any direction while collapsing? Why so many other buildings near twin towers also 'collapsed' although nothing has fallen on them and there was no fire within them and they had steel structure too?
    WhyTF this movie does not say anything about the core structure but focuses only on ‘outer skeleton’?
    Don’t you ppl see that there are far too many coincidences in terms of WTC? Why no one from officials bothered to amply explain all the dodgy facts connected with WTC collapse theory? Does not look that weird to you?

    By StefanSomers 1163629381 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • One thing.

    In the computer model the center was left standing as the floors pancaked. Why didnt that happen in real life?

    By ip99 1163532749 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • hmmm

    i think it was the mormons, becuase heaven forbid it was actually the people who declared war on us and then were dancing on the streets after it suceeded.... nah, it couldnt have been the arabs. musta been the mormons.

    By rossimo159 1163378373 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Wrong

      I believe it was Jewish guys that were caught dancing on or around their van that day. Hmm is right! Why would they be doing this? Silverstein the owner of the lease is Jewish. Hmm. Wonder if he had aything to do with it?

      http://www.copwatch.net/forums/showthread.php?threadid=15714

      By shy_stir 1168843413 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • look closely at the END of this video

    Watch the end of the video. Whoever uploaded
    cut off the end showing the INNER FRAME still standing.

    Yes the floors can pancake down around the inner frame, but the inner frame frame would NOT collapse without controlled demolition... Go do some research on the matter, you will see what I am talking about.

    By obin 1176040871 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Controlled demolition isnt only plausabl...

    Even this video is showing the concrete outside the main 47 column structure do the pancaking and dropping - with the main columns remaining, because they do not have any concrete around them or in between, lift shafts etc etc, and we all know in reality that those columns were a pile of rubble with the rest of the buildings so this video is invalid. You can see the explosives going off and the story is quite believable that it was a wide scale job, carried out under a lot of peoples noses and obviously without suspicion. Why innocent people get involved in these sorts of things is hard to understand and this is why its a tradgedy.

    By garagesdotcodotnz 1171099265 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Crap

    The video does not show all the sequence of the towers collapsing. Looking at the uncut video, you can clearly see a set of internal explosions detonating at the same time, as if they were synchronized, just a half second before the collapsing. this is a CUT video sequence. There are also a lot of other proofs that 9/11 was planned by Bush & co. Check 'Farenheit 9/11' movie. it has been demonstrated how Bush family is in business with the Bin Laden's family, demonstrated by documents and press reportage. It has been demonstrated that while all the flights were canceled right after the attack, only a private flight was allowed to depart, the one with Bin Laden's family flying out of US, allowance given by the white house. There are also other kind of rumors, like the one saying that no jewish were inside the building that day, not one, but this is only a rumor, don't know if it's true. A lot of other infos, proven and not were unveiled in the said movie.

    By Kliff 1164221811 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ??????

    Just read this page and then think again if the WTC collapsed
    http://911physics.atspace.com/

    By 911physics 1163783509 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • How many stupid people can be in one pla...

    W.T.C. is the only building in the world that have colaps becouse of the fire.About 25 years ago a plane hit Empire State Building and in spite of structural damage and big fire it didn`t colaps.
    For once in your life use your brain and dont believe everything you see on TV

    By Zeljko 1 1163548692 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • WTC7?

    so wheres the part explaining how WTC7 fell down then?

    By fu_films 1163454942 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • the pancake effect

    every bit of science tv sounds so much more convincing with a very calm intelligent English narrator doesn't it? but wait a minute...? this is complete crap they're feeding us. no building melts from a fire, and no building falls into it's own footprint unless it's being demolished. no other building has ever done this, and, if you argue that the design of the towers was unique, then why did wtc7 fall in the same way, it was a completely different shaped building (ie. not a tower with a central column).

    By danielmcelhinney 1186624630 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Dumb ass

    BUll S**t !!!!!!!!!That idea of pancakes were fake

    By Evagelio 1174860052 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • heres simple proof..

    steel melts at a degree of 2500f, the black smoke coming out of the wtc shows that its oxygen starved and could not have reached the maximum temperature of 1800f.. the video is correct but steel melted by explosives like c4 that creates temperatures of 3000f..

    By Blue-_-Metal 1174640087 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Upper floor

    How do Explain the floors above the Colapse line Exploding to dust before it hits anything. In the animation also the top 5 to 4 fllors also floats down ward those should have colapsed when they hit the bottom isnt it?

    By jayantajayanta 1174415767 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Why wont this people deal with the fact ...

    The official story is crap ,and it dosnt make sence! but nomater what I say they will allways tell me Im wrong ! Its like That Richard Prior Joke about you wife catching you in bed with another woman ...he says just keep dening ,Tell her are you going to believe me or your lieing eyes...eventually she say's yes you must be right ! I wont buy this crap they pushing on the public , Bush lies thats a fact , and they are murdering a lot of people ! I hate Israel and I hate America , cant wait for the world to be free again ! I want to see the end of Israel , and a free Palestine ! Dam the yanks to hell !

    By shantikimba 1170376061 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Hit It Up Man

    There are few critiria that I have to consider b4 I do my comment:-
    1. None of my business
    2. Not my money
    3. I don't do crazy and stupid job
    4. I don't accused people
    5. I'm not hypocrate
    6. I don't like politics
    7. I know there are a lot of crazy people out there.

    My only comment is:
    >>I feel sad went people are victimised. I just can't imagine thier near death situation...can you imagine that my friend?:(

    By Aby Cool 1169182180 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Video

    Hey guys I recommend you to watch this awesome video I just saw. It is called 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Video and you can find it here on Metacafe

    By jgmc987 1206541788 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • conspericy theorist

    the real scary part about these ppl is they claim not to take drugs. as well as being reasonable and educated...maybe these turds could figure it out w/ drugs...

    By contact man 1205292933 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • thats not true

    watch the movie zeitgeist, to find out, the vertical supports should have been standing

    By simplelife 1203151599 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • the true raions of the war


    http://www.europe2020.org/spip.php?article402

    By essai75 1175345630 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • We never landed on the MOON! Pearl Harb...

    JFK assassination, Bobby Kennedy shot and killed, JFK Jr plane crashes, Hindenburg blimp burns up, Marilyn Monroe murdered, Waco disaster, Okalahoma federal building, Jimmy Hoffa, the list just GOES ON AND ON AND ON AND ON

    Wake up you dumbshitts! 9/11 just another conpiracy to add to the loooong, looong bloody list

    Start thinking on another level, what you read in the newspapers is CIA mind control on a scale that is unimagineable. Ask Joseph Goebbels, hitler's propoganda minister if you don't believe me

    Stupid ass fuks.. WAKE THE FUK UP!!!!

    By jetsonix 1163450571 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Not bad

      Some of what you said can be true. I support thinking outside the normal limits but also could be wrong. Also, I do not think the CIA can not do all that, there is other nations in the world you know.

      By JSRZX 1164096123 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • good

      smart thought... victims rest in peace but this guy makes a solid point... a part maybe for the moon... but still debatable... good comment

      By Ronniedobarca 1163485351 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • hey jetsonix

      you wake the F**k up, you sound like an eight year old who just watched some documentary about conspiracy theories and now believes every word. You are the stupid ass fuk who cannot provide any sort of evidence to back up those immature statements

      By marktheshark 1163465050 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • why not land on the MOON AGAIN?

      land ther once, then the job is done?
      how could the moon research and experiencing be done in one time deal?
      landing on the moon sounds a hollywood sh*t just give ppl illusion

      By ahshit 1163493820 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • If you must be a moron please don't show...

      We went to the moon ten times and landed there six times. There were only 13 missions planned and only the last three, Apollo 18, 19 and 20) were canceled. Please get your information from somewhere other than idiot conspiracy theory sights. The level of ignorance that it takes to read something on the internet, assume that it is fact and then repost that information as fact is astounding. How can you possibly have lived beyond the age of two without killing yourself, moron.

      Apollo 8: Orbitted the moon December 1968
      Apollo 9: Orbitted the moon March 1969
      Apollo 10: Orbitted the moon May 1969
      Apollo 11: Landed July 1969
      Apollo 12: Landed November 1969
      Apollo 13: Orbitted the moon April 1970... landing aborted.
      Apollo 14: Landed January 1971
      Apollo 15: Landed July 1971
      Apollo 16: Landed April 1972
      Apollo 17: Landed December 1972

      By Jingo232 1163813381 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • That's classic

      you refute the conspiracy theories with a conspiracy theory and for proof you want us to ask a dead guy. You are a fuckin genious. Where do I send the check?

      By <--ZIPPER--> 1163460584 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I know!

    They collapsed because jets flew into them. Come on guys. I guess there has to be those nerds who want to know why ELSE they collapsed and those of us who don't care we just want to kick some ass and do something about it.

    By matbo 1168926234 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Uhm excuse

      You are a Tool!

      "those of us who don't care we just want to kick some ass and do something about it"

      That is why it's so important to figure this whole thing out. Because there are ppl like you that can be led by the nose. And happily I might add.

      By rtwarman 1169966140 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Need full

    I guess there is more of the documentary. Can you post the full?

    By A_Hasnat 1167762158 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Nice...

    I'm making a film of 9/11 myself. Pretty nice piece of info here. Thanks for posting this!!

    By Working Films 1170371891 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • To aussiestorm

    Why are you filtering so many comments? Are you a some kind of fascist? What gives you the right to filter?
    If you are trying to protect me delicate sense stop. I want to know what others have to say. You filtering F**ks that up so please stop.

    By rtwarman 1169967307 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Hey

    I am I the only one who thinks that a plane with thousands of pounds of jet fuel is basically a low wieght to energy ration with a hell of a lot of mass to make it just as powerful and a bomb blast. Basically plane=bomb.

    By that dude 1163477623 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Uhm Excuse

      Where is the relevancy? How does the popularity of what you think lend itself to whether or not you are right?
      There is no question on whether the plane being full of jet fuel could be considered a bomb.
      The question is can a commercial jet liner do what those two planes did to those three structures.

      By rtwarman 1169966475 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • umm, NO

      Again jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel and the estimate for fuel burn off after the crash was 45 minutes. Even if the estimate is off by 50%, the heat it was exposed to decreased substancially long before they came down.

      Oh, cutting torches work by attaining a level higher than the heat threshold of the metal to be cut.
      Put Kerosene in your cutting torch and see how long it takes to cut through an iron I beam let alone steel.

      By Rendclaw 1170816219 Reply Spam [+4] Moderate Up Moderate Down
61 Comments | Add Comment