Real Lion VS. Tiger Fight

If you still believe the tiger would win you are either a fanatic or gullible and no facts or logic will convince you.

This is Korean propagand sent to tiger fanatics. Anything Korean should be suspect as i have it from the horses(the korean zookeepers) mouths themselves that the lion is always at a disadvantage either tamed, old, juvenile or drugged. As the Romans stated and this is the real statement the tiger often retreatd and if forced to fight was usually killed. As the Koreans state the lion was found very hard to beat because of aggression and chiefly the maneand it was proven in the 59 pit fights with 1 lion killed and 4 tigers killed. Anyone that doubts my word on the real Roman statement think of this the barbary lion was kept as pets by all emporers and it was the coat of arms symbolising bravery funny that they would back the loser anyone not a fanatic can see this. The Barbary lion was the dominant cat in the Roman gladitator arena as they said. Also there are only 2 fair fights in existense of a wild male asian lion and a wild male bengal and the tiger came out 2nd best both times and was killed. Also I personally saw the video of a tame male lion fight for 30 minutes with 2 recently captured tigers and it ended in a draw as the keepers seperated them. The lion done an awesome job, dont be fooled and gullible and become a fanatic on koreans films they are propaganda toold fed to gullible americans and this could very well be trick photography.