Crying about FEW people killed in that FAKE attack ??? ...

Let's count how many people around the world were killed by the thing called US !!
In Japan, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Native people on thier own lands (the Indians)!! (enought?)

The list goes on

!!

More have been killed by other countries. by comparison, we have the least amount of blood on our hands.

not every american is responsible for deaths in all those countries.

fake attack it was real.

Although the U.S.A do jump at the chance for a war.

you are such a loser people like you should die

This article is excerpted from the summer 2006 issue of Ms. Magazine, available on newsstands now.

When the Taliban, the most anti-woman militia in Afghanistan's civil war, took over the country in 1996, it immediately forced women to leave their jobs, banned work outside the home, prohibited females from attending school and put women under house arrest, unable to go out in public unless accompanied by a close male relative and wearing a head-to-toe burqa. Women who violated Taliban decrees were beaten, imprisoned, even killed.

Despite this, the U.S. government was on the fast track to recognize this unelected, oppressive regime as Afghanistan's official government and to prop up the militia with millions of taxpayer dollars.

Why? In a word: oil.

Unocal Corp. of California (now part of Chevron), in partnership with a Saudi consortium, was competing with an Argentine company to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan to the coast of Pakistan. The U.S. government wanted to secure the project for Unocal.

The Clinton State Department announced that it would establish relations with the Taliban by sending a diplomat to Kabul, and several envoys were dispatched to woo the Taliban for the pipeline rights. State Department spokesperson Glyn Davies said the United States found "nothing objectionable" in the steps taken by the Taliban to impose Islamic law. Only a concentrated effort by the Feminist Majority, NOW and allied groups around the world prevented the Taliban from being recognized as the official government of Afghanistan, and kept the United States from sanctioning the abolishment of women's most basic human rights in service of the petroleum industry.

This is perhaps the starkest example of why the politics of oil is a feminist issue. Whether supporting gender apartheid abroad, or sacrificing feeding programs for U.S. women and children so that ExxonMobil can get a tax break, or simply standing by while the company reaps record profits at the expense of poor women who must drive to work and heat their houses, U.S. priorities are consistent: Oil wins over women's rights hands down.

Many believe oil was the principal, if not the only, reason for the Iraq war. A top-secret 2001 National Security Council document, written before 9/11 and two years prior to military action in Iraq, directed staff to cooperate fully with Vice President Cheney's secretive Energy Task Force as it considered the "melding" of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy: "the review of operational policies towards rogue states," such as Iraq, and "actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields." The State Department's "Oil and Energy Working Group" reached a consensus that Iraq's oil "should be opened to international oil companies as quickly as possible after the war."

Whether or not this blood-for-oil scenario is the whole story, the new Iraqi Constitution and laws already passed contain far stronger guarantees for ma

During the Cold War, American propaganda was a tool in an anti communist crusade; today, it is a facet of the U.S. “war on terrorism.” Now, as then, it is characterized as a remedy for anti- Americanism. Now as in the past, U.S. policy toward Palestine is the primary source of Arab and Muslim dislike for the U.S., generated as well by apparent American indifference to the suffering of Iraqi civilians under sanctions and the pervasive presence of U.S. military forces, viewed by many as protectors of autocratic and unpopular regimes rather than as defenders against external aggression.

Methods for disseminating propaganda are vastly more sophisticated today than in the past: there is now widespread access to radio and satellite television, videos, popular music, and the Internet. But the effectiveness of America's propaganda apparatus is limited by inadequate knowledge of Middle Eastern languages, culture, and social mores. The U.S. government seeks help from the private sector in targeting the region, but a predilection for cartoonish depictions of Middle Easterners and Middle East issues is likely to limit the appeal of products created by the American entertainment industry. For the foreseeable future, exchange- of- person programs will be hindered by visa restrictions, the inconvenience of travel for those from the region, hostility, and grass roots movements among Arabs and Muslims encouraging the rejection of U.S. influence.

...Propaganda strategies developed in tandem with war plans will include those arguments explaining and defending U.S. actions that have the widest popular appeal. As has become the rule for U.S. military operations, information will be controlled and filtered by the Pentagon. In Iraq, some will welcome an overthrow of the present repressive government, even if brought about by a foreign invasion; the U.S. government will do what it can to ensure that this reaction monopolizes news coverage. The administration has reason to be confident that a passive opposition party, a pro-war mainstream press, all the apparatus of news manipulation available to the government, and a public and mass media predisposed to view the motives of their country in a favorable light, and to hope that their sense of insecurity will be lessened by an attack on a designated enemy, are likely to ensure that a U.S. invasion of Iraq will be judged a success - at least in the short term.

— Joyce Battle, U.S. Propaganda in the Middle East - The Early Cold War Version, National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 78, December 13, 2002
http: //http://www. globalissues. org/ Geopolitics/ WarOn Terror / Media.asp

WHOEVER DOES THAT, AND DID 9-11, WILL ROT IN HELL ACCORIDNG TO ISLAM, ISLAM ALLOWS YOU ONLY TO FIGHT SOLDIERS, AND IN COMBAT, NOT WHILE THEY ARE AT HOME, IT ALSO SAYS ANYONE KILLING WOMEN, CHILDREN, OR A MAN WHO HAS NOTHING WITH WAR IS "AS BAS IF HE HAS KILLED EVERY SOUL ON EARTH", 9-11 WAS A CRIME AND A LOW-POINT IN ISLAMIC HISTORY, AS A MUSLIM I APOLOGIZE FOR IT AND EXPRESS SHAME, AND ANGER THAT THOSE TALIBAN FUCKS CLAIM IT WAS DONE IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, YET ON THE OTHER HAND ISLAM OBLIGATES US TO FIGHT AND KILL YOUR SOLDIERS IN IRAQ AS THEY ARE OCCUPIERS, SEE... THE SAME SOLDIER KILLING HIM IN IRAQ IS SOMETHING OUR GOD BLESSES US FOR, KILLING HIM WHILE HE IS AT HIS HOME COUNTRY IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD SEND US TO HELL FOR ETERNITY

In fact islam is one of the most peaceful religions, but the weatern media has diversed that.

When the CIA was busy doling out an estimated $2 billion to support the Afghan mujahadeen in the 1980s, Osama bin Laden and his colleagues were hailed as anti-communist freedom fighters. During the cold war, U.S. national security strategists, many of whom are riding top saddle once again in your administration, didn't view bin Laden's fanatical religious beliefs as diametrically opposed to western civilization. But now bin Laden and his ilk are unabashed terrorists.

Definitions of what constitutes terror and terrorism seem to change with the times. Before he became vice president, Dick Cheney and the U.S. State Department denounced Nelson Mandela, leader of the African National Congress, as a terrorist. Today Mandela, South Africa's president emeritus, is considered a great and dignified statesman. And what about Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, who bears significant responsibility for the 1982 massacre of 1,800 innocents at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon. What role will Sharon play in your crusade against international terrorism?
http: //www .globalissues .org/ Geopolitics /MiddleEast /TerrorInUSA /13QA.asp

You are FINE with America as she gives Afganistan ,money,food ,water and helps them train to fight the over taking comunist russians for 10 years!, PLUS, when America supports Afganistan with weapons to HELP them protect their homeland and families from the occupiers! YES THEN AMERICA IS GREAT!!! WE LOVE AMERICA!!
But when they retaliate to a terrorist attac in which Afganistan is harbouring, Al Quaida and the Taliban murderers terrorist, then and only then America is the terrorist one!!
Hahaha hahaha ! You must FIRST get the head out of your a s s e s and see the reality of the situation! IGNORANT f u c k s !

America is a terrorist organisations and has suppoted terrorism in the past.

Look at the wars they have fought just to kill innocent civilians. And the murderes, rapings they do where ever their dicks land.

Their interest only count, these selfish bastards

Your saying it's alright to help someone out, but when they attack you for no reason, and after aiding them your not supposed to touch them...You got issues pal!!!

Most peacful? who are you kidding. It's a hate preaching book of the damned.
Show me the last time you heard of a pack of Budhist's going on a civilian killing rampage, or blowing up planes.
Cutting of heads.

The whole religion was disigned in hell for the sole purpose of destroying man.

forgotten srilanka's buddhist? in th recent times

Come on americans make a scene from everything us is the most pwerful country in the whole world imagine if u were the most powerful guy in the universtiy u wood have beaten everybody else thats what the us do,being attacked is a tremendous thing that happened thats way she used all the pwerfull influences like the media in order to turn the world against islam so islam people will calm down a lil to give the opposite image of what the stated said about islam....us pls 4get this incident and thank its was not u or one of ur parents who died 4give and forget....in iraq + palestine israel and us stated that they killed over 2.7 million ppl isnt that enough for them to feel powerfull

all three monotheistic religions ( jewish,christianity and last but not least ISLAM ) were created in the same region !!! THE MIDDLE EAST ! they have the same origin ,culturally ánd historicly !! so if one of them is evil and bad , what does make out of the other two ?! the way religion is missused for the benefits of themselves for people like your whiny ass , doesn´t make a difference to me with the others like osama or saddam ! you are right those are evil man , but your people supported them and then used them as arguements to go and kill innocent people ,FOR FUCKING OIL !!!!

Islam states that it is RIGHT to KILL??... that there are times when it is OKAY to KILL another human being??
So, whats the difference in the followers of Islam being declared enemies of human kind and therfore should be eliminated too??

/

it explains a good bit...
it gives a cause for the 9/11 conspiracy theorys (i havn't found one i believe but im sure there is a conspiracy none the less)
and it explains why the american government took over iraq but not congo.. which needed it alot more.

this whole thing is a bit to like the panama invasion where the us conveniently left the country which they illegally invaded with control of the very profitable panama canal.

Now, I start not to like them anymore. Even if they say the Conspiracy theory, starting from the Apollo 11 down to the 9/11 has no enough proof, logically thinking they are true. And one thing I believe was the reason america send their troops to Afghanistan and Iraq - OIL, this is common to both countries and not in Congo. One thing I observe, everytime a BUSH is a president he declares war with Iraq. Does it have something to do with Oil?

Well over a year ago Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health released a report documenting 100,000 Iraqi dead as a consequence of the US invasion and occupation. At the time, they did not include the thousands of deaths in Falluja as part of their study because they did not want to skew the results upwards. Now, more than a year after the study, there are undoubtedly many thousands more Iraqi deaths. A recent article on CounterPunch by Andrew Cockburn argues that the real death figure may approach 500,000

http://http://w... socialist worker .co. uk/ article .php4? article_id =6271
http://www .alternet .org/ waroniraq /20352/
http://www .alternet. org/waroniraq /27353/
http://www .counterpunch .org /chretien 03142006 .html

Thursday December 20, 2001

The price in blood that has already been paid for America's war against terror is only now starting to become clear. Not by Britain or the US, nor even so far by the al-Qaida and Taliban leaders held responsible for the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington. It has instead been paid by ordinary Afghans , who had nothing whatever to do with the atrocities, didn't elect the Taliban theocrats who ruled over them and had no say in the decision to give house room to Bin Laden and his friends.

The Pentagon has been character istically coy about how many people it believes have died under the missiles it has showered on Afghanistan. Acutely sensitive to the impact on international support for the war, spokespeople have usually batted away reports of civilian casualties with a casual "these cannot be independently confirmed", or sometimes simply denied the deaths occurred at all. The US media have been particularly helpful. Seven weeks into the bombing campaign, the Los Angeles Times only felt able to hazard the guess that "at least dozens of civilians" had been killed.

Now, for the first time, a systematic independent study has been carried out into civilian casualties in Afghanistan by Marc Herold, a US economics professor at the University of New Hampshire. Based on corroborated reports from aid agencies, the UN, eyewitnesses, TV stations, newspapers and news agencies around the world, Herold estimates that at least 3,767 civilians were killed by US bombs between October 7 and December 10. That is an average of 62 innocent deaths a day - and an even higher figure than the 3,234 now thought to have been killed in New York and Washington on September 11.

Of course, Herold's total is only an estimate. But what is impressive about his work is not only the meticulous cross-checking, but the conservative assumptions he applies to each reported incident. The figure does not include those who died later of bomb injuries; nor those killed in the past 10 days; nor those who have died from cold and hunger because of the interruption of aid supplies or because they were forced to become refugees by the bombardment. It does not include military deaths (estimated by some analysts, partly on the basis of previous experience of the effects of carpet-bombing, to be upwards of 10,000), or those prisoners who were slaughtered in Mazar-i-Sharif, Qala-i-Janghi, Kandahar airport and elsewhere

stop wining

The real but unspoken reasons for the IRAQ war
Summary

Although completely suppressed in the U.S. media, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking - it an oil CURRENCY war. The Real Reason for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further OPEC momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves. This lengthy essay will discuss the macroeconomics of the "petro-dollar" and the unpublicized but real threat to U.S. economic hegemony from the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency.

The whole text you can read it in
http://www .rense.com /general34/ realre.htm

...it was three buildings - the twin towers and the pentagon - and they're still finding the remains of people who were killed in the attack. i'm sure you'd be over it if your mother had been in one of the towers and they found her body last week, you callous prick.

It was 4 Buildings, the WTC center had just had a new Insurance policy put on it for an estimated 38 billion dollars. WTC 7 the building across the street, fell and for no reason. It was not struck by a plane.That building fell in a perfectly executed demo fashion. I ask this. Do you really think George Bush is sooo innocent...I have worked for that prick for 3 years. I spent 2 of those years in the middle east. The people of the middle east are pretty damn cool in my book. I dont beleive in control and fear programs like Religion. But I can say this it seems that the politicians have problems with each other and when does something another does not like, they each go get there friends to help back them up, and then sit carelessly by the sidelines and watch others get hurt for there own agendas

Only whiners want to keep reliving this

So, we Americans have killed quite a few people. Every country has either more blood on their hands than us or have been to afraid to fight--ever, or were basically ran over by other countries.

France- when they did fight, they went overboard. Look up the French Revoultion.
Britain- We weren't the only ones who killed Native Americans. Remember where we came from. I never heard them apologizing for that.
Russia, Germany, Italy- Let's remember Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini. Enough said.

Oh, and let's not forget what happened to India and Africa because of Imperialism.

The US may have killed quite a few people, but we are nowhere near the most. If you don't like America, get out. Oh, wait. You're not leaving? I wonder why..

Actually...it was two buildings. Yes, it was long ago, and sure everyone hates movies like this, but before you attack someone, do your homework.

u sick jerk how can u say that families were ripped apart it wasnt jus one buildin it was 2 that killed thousands of people that had done nothing wrong, yeah theres alot goin on in other countries doesnt mean this shud jus be forgotten, people who lost loved ones from this cant jus forget it! wake up and realise that jus cos there are other problems in the world doesnt mean a discraceful event like that shud jus be forgotten, get ur facts strate!!

you posted "This was over 5 years ago, it was one building. Let's stop wearing our hearts on our sleave and just get over it." Actually it was two buildings.... thats why they were called the "Twin Towers". Also its very easy for you to say get over it but thousands of people died and as you said, its been 5 years.. thats not very long ago. I do however agree that these clips should stop being posted of metacafe and alike websites. If people want to see these horrific videos they can google it.

worthless piece of shit, shut the hell up

It does get boring for you though, wouldnt get boring if you lost someone there... I lost respect for the human kind instead of relative. So dont say that when you know what happened. In the name of those who died and those who live with the pain after.

have you forgot we are U.S people think befor you talk

...on 1 term, BUT you do sound as if you do not care, we need to remember all those lives that were lost, then again we cannot let it dominate our lives. Another thing is that the poorer countries DO need help, although some countries problems is the govrenment spending their riches on troops and riches while their population die of hunger.

I think your use of words is digusting the way you feel it is a video to be viewed at will and recieve exitment. POOR very poor.

Oh and for your information it was 2 buildings.

it was 4 buildings. The Pentagram and the 2 towers and a building not mentioned in the media...WTC 7

is definitely not long for the family members of the thousands who have perished in the attacks. Boring it may be this video but still be considerate when posting the comments as we are not talking about merely buildings but also of the lives of thousands.

5 years is definitely not long enough for family of the thousands who have perished. It is not only a building. It is the innocent lives of those unfortunate thousands and the lives of their family members. Boring it may be, I agreed but should be considerate when posting the comment.

u need to shut the fuck up stupid bitch, maybe if you lost someone you knew on that day you would think differently.

hey dick wort, ur da lame one man da world has had enough of ppl like u,,, those are ppls life man nt jus one building,, i aint got the right to stop u frm drooling shit but dude u gota learn to shut the fuck up..

America should never ever ever forget!
People that forget history will make the same mistakes in the future!
Plus how do you tell familys that lost loved ones.. sons , mothers, fathers etc etc .. Just get over them! Forget them!
MORONIC COMMENT!

after reading your above post about the crimes of the church being in the past and that making all the difference. I think I smell a hypocrite. But if you belong to a church, that could go without saying.

ok you cant say that how many times has the US helped the world i know bush isnt a good president but seriosly we help so many contrys and never get any help back so if your from Europe or somewhere you really need to think

You are the complete opposite of a patriotic american

This was one of, if not the most tragic day in U.S. history! If you don't like it, don't watch it!!!

Screw you! This is one of the most tragic days in American history! If you don't like it, don't watch it.

Its obvious u have no fucking clue what ur talking about. It wasnt 1 building... what are u retarded? are u saying to just forget the past? Cuz its pretty clear ur just blatantly blocking it out... one building..., its only from remembering the past that u can fix the future. Grow some brains u fuckhead.

Come to NYC and say that to any New Yorker's face. You'll find some action then. You will not be bored any longer.

And yea, we just need to stop whining like little babies and get over it.

different than most other countries problems. Can you give an example of such an cruel act against innocent people, (performed in the last decade), and where the goal is killing civilianz and spread fear to an entire nation, or actually the whole world?

How about when an American company Dow Chemical killed 50,000 people in Bophal India from an insectiside spill and then fought not to have to compensate the families. That's a slightly bigger deal than 9/11.

"where the GOAL is killing civilianz and spread fear to an entire nation, or actually the whole world?"

Did Dow Chemical plan to kill those people?

It's tragic, don't get me wrong.But you can't compare those examples.

Official
http:// video.google.nl/ videoplay? docid=-6923 42867 71074849 36

none of this should have happened. it's good to remind us what mistake we have made as a human being.

you have no idea. if you dont like it go live in iraq im sure they will all agree with you

They were buidlings with 2,000 humans in them.
The problems in the US are only begining and it's retards like you that will make them worse with your lack of reality.
Just remember when the shit hits the fan here that you said our problems are not that important.
The best part is people like you will be the first to go.
The rest of us that have a clue will be able to fight our way through it.

you idiot it wasen't 0ne building it was 2!

You're the idiot, it seems...

I Posted this here but hmm...
http:// video.google.nl/ videoplay? docid=-477 29106734 9314800

the only safety they had was the belt bucket.

It's not boring. It's pain... *cry*

FUCK YOU AMERICANS HAHAHA ALL OF YOUS DIE AHHAHA PUSSYS HAHAHAH

DIE PUSSYS DIE

for showing the people of Metacafe how ignorant you are. "DIE AMERICAN DIE" what is that shit, you dont see most Americans on here saying DIE MUSLIM DIE, and for a good reason. The American people are not to blame for the tyranny of our broken Governemnt!!!

I, personally, know people who were warned of this attack IN ADVANCE!

Besides, a building cannot "fall" faster than the rate of acceleration due to gravity without help.