International
london was lucky
.
By Pade 1167075929 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeyeah, in the form of water vapours...
By shikari_rock 1179935449 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeconstructing bomds is just making the world way much more INsecure... Iraq, US and other contries have nuclear weapons and now this... it's just destroying the world. it's not even making the world a safer place to live at all. why not just DON'T have any weapons? they are only made to kill and get people feeling unsafe instead of making them safe. just talk properly, if talking doens't work well then keep talking! swear at each other until one gives in or just leave it, not start a war... it's just taking another member of the family away...
By minus1990 1164633897 Reply Spam [+3] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeyou got a point, but I am afraid people are not like that...
By Saint_yeti 1166227962 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveYou can't just get rid of bombs and weapons or else some country like North Korea would make them again and then basically control the world with fear. You can't get rid of them, because bad guys WILL make them. And another thing, Iraq does not have nukes.
By KTrace 1169341750 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveYou do realize that mutually assured destruction ensures that nobody will ever start a nuclear war. humans just aren't dumb enough to knowingly destroy themselves and everyone else. whether we like it or not, nuclear weapons have made world wars a thing of the past. Never again will two powerful, industrialized nations go to war for fear of nuclear escalation.
By almightynerd 1168927848 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThat was one big bomb. My god. The blast wave was still strong enough to be measured on its THIRD trip around the globe? Likely, the seismic vibrations were picked up on the other side of the earth.
By theroguex 1166339992 Reply Spam [+2] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewe are only destroying our own world.!!!
By ssssssacrosanct 1164463242 Reply Spam [+1] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveNo-one seen the 1960's film Dr.Strangelove ?
Nothing's changed - (except it's NOW post-Cold -War time) - Moscow's still got lots of Warheads.
Time to disarm & put our efforts/money into sorting out
the Arab / Islamic problems
WELL SMACK MY ASS AND STRAP ME TO ONE OF THESE BABY'S AND DUMP ME OFF AT MY EX'S HOUSE..LOL
By poppyseeds 1171643195 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removedammit i thought brighton would be safe
By bigzee2000 1169494597 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewhats the diff. between n.korea's bomb and this bomb, their just destroying the nature!!
By espionage 1164461860 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removea little bit bigger than the a-bomb from nord corea I would say
the north koreans dont even have anything close to this, this is a 50 megaton nuclear device, the russians where considering testing a 100 megaton bomb but reconsidered due to the nuclear radiation (and the loss of a strategic bomberplane since the blast wave would be to large to escape). Now the US has some 15 megaton bombs but the north koreans tested a bomb wich barely even made it past 1 kiloton, wich makes it hard to believe that everything went right as they planned it. im one of those who believes their bomb misfired.
By The_corrector 1164484781 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removethe d-5 trident missile has 12 warheads each warheads yield is 475 megatons each 1 could destroy an area the size of wa. state
By dan68mopar1 1170396200 Reply Spam [-2] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeit has 8 and one has 100 Kt!
By :) AliaS :( 1176053185 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveRated 4.50 | 234 Views
Affiliate Submitter: UnknownWW2InColor
Rated 2.86 | 1,644 Views
By s20hibaku
Rated 3.60 | 23 Views
By Babelgum
Rated 3.60 | 334 Views
By Babelgum
Rated 4.28 | 4,822 Views
By Rashpel