The Gullibility Of Atheists / Video

Username AgApE010 claims that it is a logic that sense things "seem" so complex to our eyes means that there must be a creator behind it? How so... Now, I DO BELIEVE IN AN INTELIGENT DESIGNER. However I will not be as ignorant as most people and state that "it's obvious that god exisit based on the 'complexities' "Incorrect!!

What argument?! By stating a theory that sub atomic particles may have a will, you imply that I am turning them into a god? Does that make any sense? Why is that theory so off base when in fact animals, bacteria, and WE(humans) have a will. How exactly did I make sub atomic particles into a god? Let me ask you something.. Do you take your time when you read something?

DNA and cells, for instance, don't "seem" complex, they are complex, with the mathematical probability of them forming by any kind of chance scenario being impossible. Complexity throughout the created order is evidence of an intelligence behind it all. It's only logical.

"Another theory is that sub-atomic particles have a will"

So then you make sub-atomic particles into a god by making them into conscious beings that apparently, as your argument implies, are responsible for creation.

Yes we can. Why do people believe in gravity? It is accepted as fact, but why do we all believe in it? Because we can experience it.

You can experience God to my friend. But it takes effort, work, dedication, open mindedness, and such attributes are hard to find in the stubborn hearts of humans.

Gravity is easy to experience and only takes two seconds, so we love it because it comes easy. Knowledge doesn't come easy.

Is there something wrong with dawkins wanting to believe that? Creationalists would which people would understand that there beliefs be respected and understood, yet you slander dawkins because he is more interested in a theory HE deems as plasible over the theory you believe.