"Sorry, Mr. Darwin!"

Tags:
Churches Of England Appolgise To Charles Darwin Evolution Old Earth Literal Six Days Creation
JGB321
  • By: JGB321
  • Subscribers: 5
  • Updated: 02-Dec-09
  • Videos: 203
  • United Kingdom Basic English
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 93
  • Added: 20-Sep-08

Patrick & James talk about the Anglican church apologising to Charles Darwin!

Throughout this video, quotes are presented from leading scientists (nearly all are NOT Christians) expressing their honest views about evolution.

One point that we ommited on this video was the following four options as to how the earth got here:

The reader, therefore, is presented with four possible options concerning how the universe began, and only one can be correct:

1. The universe came from nothing naturally. This violates the 1st law of thermodynamics. (Please note you cannot create energy or matter.)

2. The universe came from nothing supernaturally. Theists believe this to be the only probable and plausible option.

3. The universe has always existed This violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It should be pointed out that had the earth been just a fraction of 4 billion years old, a date conveniently plucked out of thin air by certain scientists, it would have become mush over 35,000,000 years ago. We know this because everything is constantly breaking down. The heat from the sun is no longer as fierce as it used to be, nor is the glare from the moon or the stars as bright as they once were.

4. The universe is not real - it is simply an illusion. Only mentally insane people believe this to be so.

  1. Categories: Comedy, People & Stories
Comments on

"Sorry, Mr. Darwin!"

5 Comments | Add Comment
  • Great job.

    Great job.

    By edwardpf123 [Affiliate User] 1222431623 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This is not a video ...

    This is not a video on the Bible, there are many of them defending it. So, this is not poor reasoning. This is a video on why evolution is wrong, note the streaming comments along the video.

    By edwardpf123 [Affiliate User] 1222431609 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You make a case ...

    You make a case from the bible, but made no case for why we should reverence the bible over any other book, and certainly not why we should take those sections literally. This is very poor reasoning.

    By ReligiousFiction [Affiliate User] 1222281072 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Sorry about that, ...

    Sorry about that, my computer was still logged on to my friend's account when he was visiting. I didn't realize I wasn't logged on as cre8ivmind. Anyways, please check out my videos on faith and science.

    One more thing: the only way the Earth is young is if God created all the evidence for an old earth and evolution just to test our faith. Then there would be no point in trying to prove how old the earth is, because it's all an illusion.

    By cre8ivmind [Affiliate User] 1222274013 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I'm a theistic ...

    I'm a theistic evolution proponent and a Christian who majored in Zoology. I used to accept a literal reading of Genesis, but realized that there is no evidence of it when taken literally. Both the creation and flood stories are allegorical, and are meant to teach moral values, not to teach history or science. The earth is not young; it is billions of years old. Sorry guys. Check out my faith/science video series.

    By TexanDeist [Affiliate User] 1222273667 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
5 Comments | Add Comment