What Happened On The Moon

I find it always so amusing when some people actually think that the US gov. had 400.000 people working for 9.years on the project to put a man on the moon and then fake the whole thing in the end.
Let's face it the Apollo project was the biggest achievement of all time.

i hate these dumb ass conspiracy theorists
honestly spend your time working on something worthwhile instead of making yourself look like an idiot

what happens on the moon, STAYS ON THE MOON!

Buzz Armstrong is lookin for ya dude...and he's gonna kick your ass like he did that other freaking moron.

That was the response of the scientist who still work with some experiments on the surface of the moon till this day. There were some 30 experiments carried out on the surface of the moon that could not be duplicated in earths gravity or atmosphere.
on metacafe search for "men on the moon"

1) you shouldn't put on a toupe
2) you shouldn't wear your grandfathers suit to an interveiw
3) you shouldn't smoke crack while watching moon landing video's

Bah humbug, you mixed your phony staged footage with the real stuff.

The glint is a result of the near field multi-reflections within the moon camera as direct sunlight is reflected off the gold coated facemask into the camera lens assembly

You are just fooling some people all the time

.. was just a Blaine illusion... they're still there really...

The clip at the end that seems to show an awkward wire trick lifting a man off the moons surface from a kneeling position isn't a wire trick at all. If you look closely you'll see that he reaches his left hand out and is helped up by the other mans right arm.
There wasn't any wire tricks here. The people making this video need to go to an observatory and actually look where you can see the obejects on the moons surface that they left there.

It's totally fake.Really why US can't launch a mission to the moon again? One of The last mission to space failed.
Simply admit US couldn't succeed space programs in history even though they spent a lot of money on it.I'm not from Russia but I know the history well enough,and Soviet union was more succeesful.

I'm old enough to remember that clip. He fell.
The aother 'naught" says he'll give him a hand ..because ..... he fell
Theorists will even reverse the video to make a point. As for why they don't go now. The answers are blindingly obvious.

1) There is no point (there never really was) The crazy idea of using the moon as a "launch pad for nukes" has more holes in it than a loganberry tea-bag. It would (for a start) mean taking nuclear missiles up there, along with the control systems for them, probably entailing a permanent maned presence...cheaper (at the time) for the Russians to put them on Cuba don't you think.

2) It would cost TRILLIONS...and, without any good reason to do it who in their right mind is going to sanction that ?


Someone waffled about the Van Allen belt, and says they can't. Rather than just believe that, read up on how it was actually overcome by proper scientists. It could be done now... but why would anyone bother ?

Since when? Oh! You're referring to the Moon we see in the sky looking white and the Moon being so dark as compared to the astronauts suit's right? Guess what, moon rock is about the color of charcoal, kind of a dark grey. When you see it in full sunlight (as it is at night) it is the brightest thing in the sky and looks white by comparison. When compared to the astronaut's suits, which are actually white, the moon looks dark. What exactly is hard about this concept?

By the way, that's why you can't see stars. The cameras are adjusted for full daylight, which it was on the area of the moon during the landings, and the stars are simply not bright enough. As with the color of the rocks vs. spacesuits, it's all about contrast.

EXCEPT the clip when the astronaut gets up from his fall and is yanked up mysteriously before he can push himself!?!
There was a good reason to fake this if it was fake - the technological race between the soviets and the US at the time was one about which civilisation was superior. Lying in such circumstances seems staple reaction for the US - Iraq, WMD etc
This video convinced me that the jury's still out on the moon landing.

im not a conspiracy theorist er anything but how do you explain him putting himself on his feet in the Apollo 16 scene? He just stands up without pushing himelf up or getting the other person to help him up.

who wants to be famos!!! Moron. what about the dust , the objects, The gravity up there is 1/6 that of the planet !! what the F**k do you expact??!!!

It may be that a landing occurred but that the footage is fake. There are many more unexplained inconsistencies with the moon landing footage that paint a troublesome picture. I like the comment below stating the film may have been damaged, but I prefer to think there is some moon base already established that we should not be allowed to see, lest we wish to frighten the world populace.

try to think clearly, if the USA government was able to send man on the moon during the 1960's why CANT they send another mission on the MOON today? The technology today is more advanced than in the 1960's....

you americans are just too selfish, ur like Nazi's you want the world to acknowledge you as a great race or people.. which is sadly... NOT..

The only footage anyone has seen is this crappy relolution film It was broadcast on TV. It was a camera shooting the image as it played on a screen. That's how they got the frames per second to the higher speed necessary for TV broadcast. No good transcoders then I guess. But you lost quality. So now the wacho theorists want to view the original good quality film to analyze it.
Well folks after spending billions to get the moon to take the film, NASA freakin lost it. You decide if it was intentional or not. Considering the govt lies about everything no reason to believe they ever went to the moon. Wake the F Up!

many people think that "a small step for me.."
was filmed in the nabraska dessert

in the meantime i also doubt that all or most astronauts have been on the moon's surface!! the guy should also have pointed out the limited light on the moon's surface is somewhat strange (did the sun only brighten up a few meters of surface ? I don't think so!!) also: they didn't take that many camera's to the moon!! where do they get all those many shots from. all fake!!

Where did the money they spent on the project go?
Corruption !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

money laudering

we faked it to make it seem like we beat the russians to the moon..

one question..WHY are they not back there since..we are way more advanced but nope the farthest they can go now is to the space station ..lol... Stanley Kubrik helped them make the FAKE video..