Metacafe Header Takeover

He Murdered 70 Million People

Tags:
Mao Zedong China Chinese Communist Parties Revolution Evolution Anita Dunn President Obama Marxism Left Wing Ideology Liberation Theology Controversial Titles
JGB321
  • By: JGB321
  • Subscribers: 5
  • Updated: 26-Nov-09
  • Videos: 197
  • United Kingdom Basic English
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 137
  • Added: 03-Nov-09

Patrick gives a brief review of an excellent book about one of Charles Darwin's greatest son, China's Mao Zedong.

Whilst we know much about the Nazis and their death camps, we seldom hear anything of the communist death cambers, whether in China or Russia.

Anyone who is contemplating becoming a communist, should see this video.

  1. Categories: Entertainment, People & Stories
Comments on

He Murdered 70 Million People

5 Comments | Add Comment
  • Where you go wrong ...

    Where you go wrong first is when you claim that natural selection "teaches" anything. By no means is it in an inherent part of the theory that we should be as cruel as natural selection, Richard Dawkins has said in that if any morality can be derived from evolution is only in the inverse.

    And in evolution nothing is "chosen" the best at reproducing reproduce, and that's it.

    And : Mao was not a "Darwinist" he believed in Lamarckian evolution which said nothing of the survival of the fittest.

    By JustNotConvinced [Affiliate User] 1257301332 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Part of the theory ...

    Part of the theory of evolution is natural selection, which teaches that certain races are chosen to survive. This theory is also called survival of the fittest. This is why these dictators treat these people this way.

    By Warners0 [Affiliate User] 1257300674 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thanks for this ...

    Thanks for this info...GB

    By FOBmuzungu [Affiliate User] 1257300599 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Well first of all ...

    Well first of all why is the theory of evolution responsible for providing morals? I've never once heard of someone rejecting general relativity because it offers no moral compass so why is evolution so different?

    And second: Mao was a Lamarckian evolutionist not a Darwinist.

    By JustNotConvinced [Affiliate User] 1257299027 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I would say because ...

    I would say because of Darwinism, there is no ultimate authority on morality. I've heard many times before, from Darwinist that they "Live by their own moral code." So, if that is the case, there is no final judgment on morals, no absolute authority, so Mao, being a Darwinist, believed that what he was doing was right, since BECAUSE of no moral authority but his own. So, the terror he caused was not done in the name of Darwinism, but because he was a Darwinist.

    By Lichtspielhaus234 [Affiliate User] 1257289803 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
5 Comments | Add Comment