Magnum 140mm Vs Japanese Original Sword

Tags:
Funny Cool Movie Amazing Jokes Nice Watch Fun Kiss Effectively Style Humor Free Fighting
bruneto
  • Submitter:
    bruneto
  • Visits: 15,212
  • Subscribers: 16
  • Comments: 0
  • Updated: 24-Jul-07
  • Videos: 330
  • International Basic English
  • Comments: 21
  • Views: 57,291
  • Added: 25-Jan-07

Magnum 140mm vs Japanese original sword

  1. Categories: Comedy, Entertainment
  2. Favorite On: Kameleon
Comments on

Magnum 140mm Vs Japanese Original Sword

21 Comments | Add Comment
  • Buy steroids with no prescription from L

    By jessyprettymomb 1191522598 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • RINGTONESET dot NET

    Great ringtones visit RINGTONESET dot NET

    By nellesexymommama 1189567710 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • kids, don't fight bullets with swords

    see the next video, kevlar jacket squshes bullets!

    By shompol 1174271038 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • lol.... the machine gun might have broke...

    you can survive a bullet wound but one slice with that sword, your now in two pieces

    By tstewart 1174009453 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • katanas

    are still far the most impressive sword there is on earth... it took 7 bullets before it finally broke. you cant say that aint impressive

    By knuckz 1170468216 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Impresionante

    Ahora todos sabemos que esto demuestra que...


    QUE COÑO DEMUESTRA ESTO??


    a) si te disparan con una 140 mm debes enfrentarlos con tu espada y correr antes del tiro número 7

    b) siempre carga tu espada, aunque al conducir es un poco incomodo (no te vayas a clavar tu mismo)

    c) nunca te enfrentes a una bala sin una espada japonesa original

    d) quedo plenamente demostrado que...

    By BNY 004 1170433859 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • 140 mm?

    That's a .50 M2 mg. 140 mm= 5.5 inches.

    By azpiazu 1170369240 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • 12.7mm = .50 cal

      the 140mm is the overall length of the .50 BMG cartridge.

      And the caliber of the gun is .50 which is 12.7mm like stated above.

      By Turma 1174146631 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • be like japanese people

    never give up but i am not a japanese

    By IT warrior 1170108440 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • i have a question here

    the actual point of impact proves to of become worn out by the bullets casing, this leads me to beleve that if they shot one single bullet, at a series of swords, they would be unable to distroy the sword, the srap edge must have become dull after the first bullet hit, the few others weakened and dulled the bullet furthur increaseing surface tension and thus, alowing the bullet to become focusesed in one sp[ot made for the end of that beautifull sword, probably handmade, and worked on with true dedication and passion. as you saw the swords desinger standing next to his pride and joy, they took little proof that the bullets are better then the sword. infact the sword would of dispersed ober 60% of the bullets forward velocity have it been hit directly on the blade, this probably takers a lifetime to master, and we cannot devote such time to this stuff anymore, but the slahan methods if i speeledit right. are verry verry impresive and proven over 3000 years old :) i hope this helps, in closing, the bullet was hitting the more blunt side, because the sword was hit to many times to maintain srarp blade. it became dull after each bullet. id wager to say 1 bullet wouldof never distroyed it :P

    By laseramp 1169984636 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Ummm, lol

      Doesn't the video exactly prove that the sword is better than a .50 cal round.

      So everything you just tried to explain above was already proved in the video.

      The video doesn't tell gun wins, but that the sword wins. LOL

      And proper use of commas and periods would make your test much more comprehensible. :)

      But good that you agree the katana is better :)

      By Turma 1181491124 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • hmm

    saw it like 2 years ago maby more but still impresive

    By Vilolator 1169862370 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It's physics!

    It cut the first bullet because it was blunter and the sword had a smaller surface area than the bullet. the browning's bullets have a smaller surface area hitting the sword than the original bullet. Besides, in a fight 1000 times out of 10 I'd still take the original gun they used, against some one armed with the sword

    By Dogiez2 1169859979 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • but really...

      Those swords were used thousands of years ago, and the technology for those guns has only been around about 60 years. I mean, I'd sure as hell rather have the 50 cal in a fight, but it's just amazing to me that those swords were built that strong that long ago

      By evanthehallock 1169863096 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • not fair

    last time is a pistol with 1 bullet
    now is a machine gun with hundred bullet
    hate those soldier,bullying people!

    By Respect MAn!! 1169828352 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Nice

    too bad one authentic samurai sword costs $100,000.00,and thats the lowest it can get.

    By origin978 1169824403 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Still

    It performed amazingly well.

    By duncd 1169754164 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • wow

    that swords strong compared to the barrell they show and the browning is like one of the most powerful machine gun s

    By dj fat boy 1169674802 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Flesh only

    I guess the sword will have to go back to cutting flesh only..

    By malikah 1169880320 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • well yeah

    1 sword against so many bullets. Sure, sounds fair.

    By Jarisberg 1169644525 Reply Spam [-1] Moderate Up Moderate Down
21 Comments | Add Comment