Death Zone!

if u have a death wish

No bleep is what the cop said

FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE!

you are lol beacase it's camera not your eyes lol....

Wow you better hold on with that acceleration

the title says 320 kilometers per hour not miles per hour which may be posible....

I agree with above poster. This bike may be going close to about 170-180. My best guess would be he did what ALOT of enthusiasts do and interchange the wheel sprockets. If the speedo isn't calibrated after the change, it will show an incorrect mph.

Also, this is an OLD video I have seen many times, never mentioning ANYTHING about it being turbo. I think these guys just make up headings to suit their tastes. At any rate, take it for what it's worth; a bad video!

completely agree

speed is calibrated off of the FRONT tire and has nothing to do with sprocket changes. You can create the same effect if you change the front wheel size, but it would be a significant difference in indicated speed.

is that why the people with their 600 suntas n huge ass sprockets have a LOWER TOP SPEED?
seriously, how do so many people of you people have the gall to make a comment when you dont ride yourself? my r1 has ~160 hp and ive had it up to 170mph and it wasnt that close to the red line. what makes you think a 1300cc bike cant get to 200mph?

First of all, I've been riding for 30 years, which I figure started long before you were born. I currently ride a 1200 bandit and FZ1, so have SOME experience with performance.

Secondly, you completely missed my point. My comment was about how speed is measured, not created. Of course you can get 200 mph out of a bike. My comment was to the guy that said the speed was fake because the gearing was changed. Simple demonstration for those who don't get it:

Put your motorcyle on the center stand so the rear wheel is off the ground. Start the bike, put it in gear and let the rear whell spin. Look at the speedometer. Is it indicating any speed? NO!! Speed is taken from the front wheel, NOT the sprockets.

The other point is that just because your bike hasn't reached redline at a certain speed, doesn't mean it has the power to do it, either. If you've changed the gearing or sprockets, there is nothing that says you will have the horsepower to reach redline in top gear.

im really not trying to argue with you because ive never been on a fazer, but both my 2004 r6 and 2004 r1 idle at 6mph and 9mph when on the stand... and the previous comment i made wasnt particularly to your post but most of what i read before...sorry for randomly choosin yours to click ;)

I appreciate the feedback and the information. I have never seen or heard of a bike that doesn't measure speed off the front wheel, but I am going to take your word on it. AND, now that I watch it again, I see that in this video, the speed keeps climbing, while the front wheel is off the ground.

So, my humble apologies for my touting something I didn't know. So, tell me, where is the speed taken from? The rear wheel, or the sprocket shaft? What made me think I knew this information for sure was that I just watched a show on motorcycle racing and they were talking about analyzing all the infomation they gather from the bikes while they were on the track. One piece of information was wheel speed. They showed coming out of corners, the front wheel speed dropped because it was off the ground.....anyway, that's interesting info. Thanks for enlightening me.

if that was the case then when he does a wheelie the speed would drop according to the speedo

200mph is not that special for a busa

Put your motorcyle on the center stand so the rear wheel is off the ground. Start the bike, put it in gear and let the rear whell spin. Look at the speedometer. Is it indicating any speed? NO!! Speed is taken from the front wheel, NOT the sprockets

Yes, that IS what happens; the front wheel comes off the ground, and the tire speed slows, therefore displaying a slower speed on the speedometer

i sure didnt hear any blow off valve and it didnt rocket like the other real turbo busa's

thanks

i think video cameras and human eyes can catch images with speed of light
so no mattar how fast i think you won't see straight solid lines
unless you are like really really fast,
i think 220 mph won't dooo

so sad i don't have enough money to get one of those bike :((

i found this clip in some othr site and it is 354 km/h. That is confirmed

???????????????

The bike has 600HP and it weights only 200kilos! Cars and other big vehicles accelerate slow over 100kmh, but motorbikes have sutch a great power to weight ratio that they accelerate linear up to 200kmh (if the turbine is set propperly) -
believe me, I have been racing a Honda Fireblade 1000cc and I have raced motorbikes for 10 years and it's not fake!

are freggin idiots. I've been on a Busa @ 180+MPH It took 34 secs to get from dead stop to around 180. This bike that you are seeing is a turbo charged bike. The lines in the road are not solid at that speed, unless your brain only works at 10 frames-per- second. This bike is capable of over 200MPH stock.

Those white lane markings are a known length, with a known separation. Assuming your time capture sequencing is accurate and this video is shown in real time, recalculate. Please post your findings. The condescending language is not directed at you. Stephen.

i agree, and if u were going that fast the white dotted lines in the middle would look like 1 straight line.....4 sure!!

And thats only confirms that you know nothing about bikes and how video works. if the camera would be turned 90 degree - on the side, then you wont be able see any cross-roads nothing, only one colored patern. And if you cant see cross-roads at 220 mph then it means you cant see road signs either which means you need glasses...:P ;)