Card Check - Employment Free Choice Act - More Unionized Socialism. Call Congress!

Tags:
Act Ballot Boss Box Card Check Choice Closed Congress Democrats Employment Free Labor Liberals Obama Organized Pressure Privacy Strike Unions Vote
jbranstetter04
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    jbranstetter04
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 104
  • Added: 05-Feb-09

I agree with Glenn Beck on this one.

I am not anti-union, nor have I ever been anti-union, but I believe that unions need to come into existence on their own, not with unfair help from the government. If a union goes out on strike, I believe the company should be able to fire every single employee who refuses to work. If the workers have value to the company, then the company will deal with them. If they don't have value, then its hit the road time, go get a job where you will have value.

I have never been a union member, nor would I ever want to be one. I have always been a one man union. I make myself valuable to my boss by working hard and being honest. I have never had any of my bosses yell at me, even though I have had bosses who yell at other employees. I guess Ive never given any of them reason to. If one ever did yell at me, I would quit right on the spot. Maybe they sense that from me, and since I'm such a good worker, they don't want to risk losing me.

It all comes down to having worth. If you don't have worth because you're some kind of a loser, then you had better go out and get yourself a government job, where you can mess up all day long and the union will protect your sorry butt.
jbranstetter04



How the Employee Free Choice Act Takes Away Workers' Rights


Does a ballot cast in private or a card signed in pub¬lic better reveal a worker's true preference about whether to join a union? A private vote is the obvious answer, but organized labor has nonetheless made the misleadingly named Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA, H.R. 800) its highest legislative priority.
Recently, unions have switched the focus of their organizing operations from private balloting to publicly signed cards. These so-called card-check campaigns make it much easier for unions to orga¬nize workers, but most companies strongly resist the idea of denying their employees a vote. Unions now want the government to take away workers' right to vote and certify unions after only a card-check campaign. The Employee Free Choice Act would do this and more.
First, it requires the National Labor Relations Board to certify a union after a majority of a firm's workers has signed union cards, putting an end to almost all organizing elections: "if the [National Labor Relations] Board finds that a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for bargaining has signed valid authorizations...the Board shall not direct an election but shall certify the individual or labor organization."[1]
Second, the EFCA requires companies and newly certified unions to enter binding arbitration if they cannot reach agreement on an initial contract after 90 days of negotiations.[2] Neither companies nor employees could appeal the arbitrator's ruling, and the contract would last for two years.
Third, H.R. 800 would dramatically increase the penalties for unfair labor practices committed by employers, but not unions, during an organiz¬ing drive.[3]
Union activists contend that the act would pro¬tect workers' freedom to freely choose to join a union. However, workers' best defense against harassment and intimidation by either a union or an employer is a secret-ballot election in which nei¬ther knows how any individual worker voted.
To protect American workers, Congress should:
•Protect workers' privacy during organizing drives and guarantee every worker the right to vote in a private-ballot election;
•Ensure that workers hear from both sides dur¬ing an organizing drive and have time to reflect on their choice so they can make an informed and considered decision; and
•Protect the right of workers and employers to bargain collectively without having government officials unilaterally impose employment con¬tracts on them.
The Employee Free Choice Act would strip workers of their fundamental rights and leave them more vulnerable to pressure than before.
http://www.heritage.org/research/Labor/bg2027.cfm

  1. Categories: News & Events
Comments on

Card Check - Employment Free Choice Act - More Unionized Socialism. Call Congress!

15 Comments | Add Comment
  • Then move your ass ...

    Then move your ass to a socialist country, THIS is America!! We don''t need assholes like you F**king up this country anymore than you already have!! A NEW American revolution is coming soon to get rid of socialists/communists in this country!!

    By combatvetdoc [Affiliate User] 1233952593 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • If the company has ...

    If the company has to take a paycut in profit, then why shouldn't the employees?? Of course, they could be stupid and let the company go down and then they make NOTHING but welfare!!! get a grip! This is what's wrong in America today, the sense of ENTITLEMENT pervasive in the LEFT!!!

    By combatvetdoc [Affiliate User] 1233952382 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • RUSSIA WAS NEVER A ...

    RUSSIA WAS NEVER A SOCIALIST COUNTRY WHAT THEY HAD WAS A COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP COUNTRY LOOK IT UP AND DON'T FOLLOW THE REST LIKE A SHEEP.



    I actually prefer Democratic Socialism, than Capitalism.

    By tannersanta [Affiliate User] 1233910742 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • And there isn't ...

    And there isn't S**t he can do about it, except pray that his fatcat bosses don't lay him off and bail out in golden parachutes (their former CEO already did).

    When times are tough for these companies, it's the people at the bottom who are forced to make the sacrifices, not the leaders of the company. They're all cashing in on this.

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233898633 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "The did good a ...

    "The did good a LONG time ago but they need to go the way of the dinosaurs!"

    Then everything they accomplished will be rolled back. My dad just got a 10% pay cut. He is a computer administrator, which is skilled labor. He and his fellow programmers got the pay cut when the company does tough, not the managers who make an ungodly amount more than he does.

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233898566 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Workers created ...

    Workers created unions to protect their own interests from those of the employers, whose interests are diametrically opposed to theirs. They had to fight to get the government to force a minimum wage, for one thing.

    Employers want to pay employees as little as possible. Employees want the employer to pay them as much as possible. Thus the battle ensues. Unions are used to enforce solidarity among the workers. If the workers don't bargain collectively, they are too easy to push over.

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233898291 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "That's what they ...

    "That's what they did until unions came about."

    Question: Did the government create Unions?
    Answer: No.
    Question: Then why do they need the support of the government to survive?

    By jbranstetter04 [Affiliate User] 1233883964 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • MOST of the country ...

    MOST of the country works just fine WITHOUT the greedy unions!! Unions are part of the reason companies are going out of business! Hope the BIG 3 automakers will move their businesses to non union states and we won't have to pay 30K for a damn truck!

    By combatvetdoc [Affiliate User] 1233879809 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • SCREW the unions!! ...

    SCREW the unions!! They helped cause this problem just as much as the greedy companies! We need to OUTLAW these overpaid and underworked asshole unions!! The did good a LONG time ago but they need to go the way of the dinosaurs! the BIG 3 need to do what republic windows did and tell the unions to go F**k themselves!!

    By combatvetdoc [Affiliate User] 1233879614 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It's the value of ...

    It's the value of the employee's labor. Employee labor in sweatshops has been determined to be very, very low. But it is not worth so little...The wages have been driven down further and further by the employer's constant search for the most destitute, desperate sap to hire so he can exploit them for cheap labor. If he remains free to do that, across the board, wages will spiral down until everyone is living in serfdom.

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233846820 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ...say it isn't ...

    ...say it isn't worth very much, since anyone can do it, and so be inclined to hire whoever is willing to do it for the lowest amount possible. But his business will plummet if the bathrooms are left unclean and the floors left dirty. That labor is fairly valuable to the employer, but he goes by what the market determines its value is. He is of value, and he is of more value than his employer will admit. That's why unions exist.

    The issue is not merely the freedom of the employer.

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233846619 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • If the employer ...

    If the employer could get away with it, they would pay all workers as little as possible. That's what they did until unions came about.

    The reason he should be prohibited from hiring them is that it will cause wages to plummet across the market if all employers are allowed to fire their unionized employees in order to maximize their own personal gain.

    The value of labor is an interesting question. How much is sweeping floors worth? How much is cleaning bathrooms worth? An employer might...

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233846372 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • My husband "has" to ...

    My husband "has" to be in a union. The union "assesses" his pay and fines him for not picketing. Then, they use the money to lobby Washington and build marble halled union headquarters. Then, they shake down job sites and take pay-offs. Unions are just another corrupt layer of government.

    By backtotheday [Affiliate User] 1233839980 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Their power is in ...

    Their power is in their worth. If an employer can find people who will do the same work for less money, then why should he be prohibited from hiring them? Is that not freedom.

    Like I explained in my description, the power of an employee is his worth; he needs to be valuable to his employer. If he is not of value, then why is he there?

    These union issues strike at the heart of what freedom is all about. We don't need the government interfering were there is no wrong being done.

    By jbranstetter04 [Affiliate User] 1233813175 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "If a union goes ...

    "If a union goes out on strike, I believe the company should be able to fire every single employee who refuses to work"

    So what you're saying, then, is that unions should bu utterly and completely useless and powerless? Because that is the implication of that view. Unions would have no bargaining power if the company could just fire all the strikers.

    By Zomnificent [Affiliate User] 1233809989 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
15 Comments | Add Comment