Free Energy Magnet Motor Pt-5

Thanks for the support

Indeed that keeps you going. Are you really trying something as you suggest here? I'd like to see that! It is just a matter of controlling the living energy of the universe you know. We never create it, we just are to harness it. Please watch my latest video about the IPMM MAN device and the discussions at the overunity forum if you care.

All in time, it is all in time....

Please check the discussion at the overunity forum. We are at phase three now. Phase one was the cakra plate with a fixed stator, phase two was a feedback loop. The challenge now of phase three is to find a way to control the forces in the feedbackloop. I think of a gravity controller countering two magnets pushed at the center of a ringmagnet. See also our latest post here of the IPMM MAN device for the proof of magnetic OU.

yes, could be, but we try for the mechanical way here, no coils and wire now.

There is also a further development to follow under IPMM MAN device for the proof of magnetic overunity: a feedbackloop has been achieved with the cakra. No selfrunner yet though. It is not that easy this holy grail.

Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.

There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.

Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.

There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.

For the record, John Hutchinson created what he believe to be a zero point batter, which is just a canister full of rocks, he's been using it for years and it hasn't run down yet. Although it might not be zero point, it is real, and it does produce energy without needing to be refilled. Theoretically, as long as the rocks in the canister exists in this plane, they will produce energy. Sounds like zero point, doesn't it?

Check also the most recent post of the Magnet Motor drive Update (under my name)!

That is not true, and you know it. There is ample proof of overunity energy in all kinds of experimental setups of many inventors. What you talk about is the paradigmatic conflict. You take sides therein. Others simply accept the conflict and wait until the new technology breaks through. Then people like you will be silent. But that can take 20 to 30 years more of research and development. That is how it goes with science. That is the normal routine, not?

Overunity is not proven so much by a self runner as by experiments proving a reactive power exceeding your input that is inherent in the dynamics of the physical universe. With magnets you see such a power. I demonstrate a so-called SMOT overunity from that reactive power, but harnessing it in a self-runner with torque requires engineering and materials know-how to catch the vibrations. So that is to the engineer. I am just a researcher finding clarity about this. SMOT OU was proven by Sprain.

The answer is simple... There is no Over-Unity... it is powered by his hand. take that away and the device stops... simple right. And don't offer anecdotal proof like "this guy's got a patent and this guy made it work, but I can't duplicate it on video for some reason" Duh!

All of your explanations about where the energy comes from is VERY theoretical and makes for good bafflegab to convince people who don't know advanced physics. This stuff about gravitons, zero-point, ether energy, is all theorized by quantum mechanics over the last 60 years. No one has proven anything yet, let alone tapped into it.

make sure the middle nob is non-magnetic, or it will hinder the stator field

If you gear it up with different flywheels it can develop considerable torque with a slight input. That is the theory, for you the practice to prove, show me!

I hope you are right, that would be the easiest form of mechanical feeback, another problem though is the jerking of the feedback in the stator arm, that is the mechanical back-EMF. The art of the thing is to utilize that properly engaging it in a vibration the spinning cakra can respond to. The snake has to bite its own tail... Probably that will be effective at a certain rpm dependingthe construction.

all you need to do to make it self run is put a slight bump on the arm once counter-clockwise from the orange arm

but id like to see how much friction it can stand up to when you try and get electricity out of that thing before it becomes useless

i like yours it looks very colorful that makes it appealing to watch

The blue or orange in the center is just color tape, just for reminding top and down of moons front and back. The neo's I ordered via the internet.

ok i'll go buy the magnets i checked at the hardware store, $1.19 Canadian per magnet. i'm gonna check at a craft store. i also can't find the neo though

You can leave a gap in the middle.The silver bycyle ring is just for discipline. I made a chakra wit eight arms with a dollar-size gap in the middle to move the neo in. Works also.

besides the bicycle ring there is the blue thing

right, but i need to know what the object in the center of the chakra is