Maxwell Render Test

I havn't played around with it that much it dosn't seem to take up much ram. It scales very nicley with the number of cores so if your serious I'd invest in a 4 socket 45nm 2.66Ghz quad nehalem later this year or if your buying later 32nm octo-core nehalem.

shame about the watermark get a crack

download maxwell 1.5 or later as it supports multi-cores.

The demo version I used for this rendering uses multiple cores as well, and the watermark in the middle of the rendering can be edited out easily, though a full version is obviously more capable.

maxwell can only use one core by default, you have to buy multiple licenses to use more than one core. look up multy core licenses for maxwell.
if you are not using maxwell you may need to enable multi threading in the renderer options.

That is correct, only one CPU core is in use. While Windows will automatically use multiple CPUs/cores when running several programs, a single program by itself must explicitly use multiple CPUs/cores to benefit from them. My guess is that you have overlooked a setting which enables your 3D software to use multiple cores. It is possible, but less likely, that your software simply is not written to utilize multiple cores.

When rendering on my PC, My PC only uses one of my cpu, i have Core2 Duo, so when i go to my windows task manager it only uses 50% and the rest is doing nothing?

Anyone can help me out?

300 frames at 640x480, average 1 min 30 sec per frame with sample level 10 on a Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4Ghz.

i want to know how long u render, because 1 image to render in maxwell takes long and u have 9x25=225 images.
at wich sample u stop?

can you tell me what your render time per frame was (and if possible what proc/ram you were using?) many thanks!

cool!nice one.

verry nice!!!

amazing!

VERY GOOD!