Bollywood Love Song ---- Tujhe Na Dekhon To ... Kumar Sanu

Tags:
Bollywood Kumar Sanu
sajidmahmood
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    sajidmahmood
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 106
  • Added: 10-Apr-08

Tujhe Na Dekhon To Chan Mujhe Aata Nahi Hai
Ek Tere Siwa Koi Aur Mujhay Bhaata Nahi Hal
Kahin Mujhay Pyar Hua To Nahi Hai ...
Kumar Sanu Alka Yagnik
Bollywood Songs

  1. Categories: Music & Dance
Comments on

Bollywood Love Song ---- Tujhe Na Dekhon To ... Kumar Sanu

26 Comments | Add Comment
  • Ok, so you are ...

    Ok, so you are using the PL 107-243 and its creators as your source document and material?

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214743805 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • President George W. ...

    President George W. Bush complied with all provisions in that law, which included references to requirements of The President of the United States in relation to the War Powers Act of 1973. Our President was required to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing to military action. He did so, since on 3-13-2003 our intention to invade Iraq was announced, publicly.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214743708 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The reasons for ...

    The reasons for their aggression, whether you and I agree or not, are documented by the UN. PL 107-243 was based on UN resolutions against Iraq. What I have been TRYING to point out in all of this is that Congress VOTED to give President George W. Bush the power to commence preparations and mobilization for the invasion of Iraq. They did so, based on 19 of 23 resolutions that didn't have a damn thing to do with 9-11...contrary to your obsession with the subject.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214743402 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It is not necessary ...

    It is not necessary to provide them at this moment. Just gather them, please, and I will do the same. Do you want to start here?

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214743366 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I need to see your ...

    I need to see your sources and balance my arguments by reading your source material.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214743236 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • So, we have started ...

    So, we have started are investigation at the first paragraph of PL 107-243 were Iraq's aggression against Kuwait commenced. I will retrieve the data that I read on the reasons for Iraq's agression and you retrieve your's, OK?

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214743088 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Yes, I HAVE seen ...

    Yes, I HAVE seen that, may times Marly. Were you trying to make a point? UNSCRs condemned Saddam Hussein for a lack of cooperation with UN weapons inspectors in the months leading up to the 5-nation invasion of Iraq. One nation in the UNSC, France, vowed to veto ANY proposal for the use of military action against Iraq, regardless of any evidence presented. All it takes is one UNSC member to veto a proposed UNSCR, and its dead.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214743044 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Have you ever seen ...

    Have you ever seen how many times the world is wrong when it comes to the voting at the U.N.? The world is wrong there in the sense that the World votes against or for a good resolution and does nothing about it after a sole permanent member like the US, vetos it.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214742737 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "Many documents ...

    "Many documents from Iraq" show this? Really? So, they are right, and the rest of the world is wrong? Don't forget, the entire world was only too happy to buy oil from Iraq AND Kuwait before this happened. How about Khafji? Any insights on that? Why did Iraq invade Khafji? HOW did they invade Khafji if their role was only to stop oil theft?

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214742444 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • As usual, you paint ...

    As usual, you paint the "bigger picture" yourself, and get upset when others don't buy into your bullshit. As expected, you don't address PL 107-243. PL 107-243 is Congress AUTHORIZING Bush to have war powers, per the War Powers Act of 1973. Yes, that's right, I spelled "authorizing" with a z, as ANYBODY born in the US should. It is American English.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214742250 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Yes, Iraq left ...

    Yes, Iraq left Kuwait was rightfully belonging to them however that was not why they attacked. They attacked, as many documents from Iraq show, for economic reasons not sovereignty.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214742237 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No, its because ...

    No, its because Kuwait rightfully belonged to Iraq, in Saddam's eyes. Was it really about oil? Do you really believe the bullshit you are peddling? Ever hear of a place called Khafji? Why would a nation so concerned about its "oil rights" invade Saudi Arabia?

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214741958 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Wow, actually, one ...

    Wow, actually, one of 3 of the biggest reasons was because Kuwait was side drilling for oil into Iraq. As usual you don't see the bigger picture. Please learn to read non-mainstream sources. Do you watch FOX news?

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214741670 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • OK...I sense that ...

    OK...I sense that you are feebly trying to make a point. So, go on, make the point.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214741645 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • LOL! That's funny, ...

    LOL! That's funny, coming from someone who is only reading it now. You claimed earlier that President Bush didn't have Constitutional authority to go to war with Iraq...well PL107-243 proves that he did, with approval of the Congress. Oh...while you are reading, try looking at the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which is referenced in 107-243. Again...the proper procedures were followed.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214741552 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What I just posted ...

    What I just posted is the first paragraph of it.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214741451 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Whereas in 1990 in ...

    Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a
    coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce
    United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214741407 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Iraq attacked ...

    Iraq attacked Kuwait because they felt Kuwait rightfully belonged to them.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214741381 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • So you claim. I ...

    So you claim. I wonder why you mention September 11th, when references to such connections accounted for only 4 of the 23 charges made against Iraq in that same document.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214741302 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ok, lets address ...

    ok, lets address the charges against Iraq. Would you be referring to the fake documents from Niger, or Colin Powell's lies about the mobile weapons stations in Iraq that turned out to be weather ballon machines.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214741285 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I am waiting for ...

    I am waiting for you to address anything about PL 107-243.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214741164 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I have to ask you ...

    I have to ask you if you have any ideas why Iraq attacked Kuwait?

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214741086 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thanks for more ...

    Thanks for more canned bullshit, Marly. Now how about addressing the actual Public Law, AND its charges against Iraq? Are you incapable of commenting on the law itself? It is starting to look as though you are not capable of this.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214741059 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I actually have PL ...

    I actually have PL 107-243 in front of me.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214740963 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Falsely, ...

    Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression to me is cause for negating AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002 as a result of a lack of Congressional due diligence.

    By Marly61 [Affiliate User] 1214740803 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • We can discuss that ...

    We can discuss that silliness later. How about sticking to the subject? PL 107-243. I know you haven't read it yet, so, I'll give you more time to do so.

    By A2ZNP1971K [Affiliate User] 1214740734 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
26 Comments | Add Comment
 
Family Filter Off