Military Pass In Review Pentagon Defense Sec Old Guard

So, we have started are investigation at the first paragraph of PL 107-243 were Iraq's aggression against Kuwait commenced. I will retrieve the data that I read on the reasons for Iraq's agression and you retrieve your's, OK?

Yes, I HAVE seen that, may times Marly. Were you trying to make a point? UNSCRs condemned Saddam Hussein for a lack of cooperation with UN weapons inspectors in the months leading up to the 5-nation invasion of Iraq. One nation in the UNSC, France, vowed to veto ANY proposal for the use of military action against Iraq, regardless of any evidence presented. All it takes is one UNSC member to veto a proposed UNSCR, and its dead.

Have you ever seen how many times the world is wrong when it comes to the voting at the U.N.? The world is wrong there in the sense that the World votes against or for a good resolution and does nothing about it after a sole permanent member like the US, vetos it.

"Many documents from Iraq" show this? Really? So, they are right, and the rest of the world is wrong? Don't forget, the entire world was only too happy to buy oil from Iraq AND Kuwait before this happened. How about Khafji? Any insights on that? Why did Iraq invade Khafji? HOW did they invade Khafji if their role was only to stop oil theft?

As usual, you paint the "bigger picture" yourself, and get upset when others don't buy into your bullshit. As expected, you don't address PL 107-243. PL 107-243 is Congress AUTHORIZING Bush to have war powers, per the War Powers Act of 1973. Yes, that's right, I spelled "authorizing" with a z, as ANYBODY born in the US should. It is American English.

Yes, Iraq left Kuwait was rightfully belonging to them however that was not why they attacked. They attacked, as many documents from Iraq show, for economic reasons not sovereignty.

No, its because Kuwait rightfully belonged to Iraq, in Saddam's eyes. Was it really about oil? Do you really believe the bullshit you are peddling? Ever hear of a place called Khafji? Why would a nation so concerned about its "oil rights" invade Saudi Arabia?

Wow, actually, one of 3 of the biggest reasons was because Kuwait was side drilling for oil into Iraq. As usual you don't see the bigger picture. Please learn to read non-mainstream sources. Do you watch FOX news?

OK...I sense that you are feebly trying to make a point. So, go on, make the point.

LOL! That's funny, coming from someone who is only reading it now. You claimed earlier that President Bush didn't have Constitutional authority to go to war with Iraq...well PL107-243 proves that he did, with approval of the Congress. Oh...while you are reading, try looking at the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which is referenced in 107-243. Again...the proper procedures were followed.

What I just posted is the first paragraph of it.

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a
coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce
United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Iraq attacked Kuwait because they felt Kuwait rightfully belonged to them.

So you claim. I wonder why you mention September 11th, when references to such connections accounted for only 4 of the 23 charges made against Iraq in that same document.

ok, lets address the charges against Iraq. Would you be referring to the fake documents from Niger, or Colin Powell's lies about the mobile weapons stations in Iraq that turned out to be weather ballon machines.

I am waiting for you to address anything about PL 107-243.

I have to ask you if you have any ideas why Iraq attacked Kuwait?

Thanks for more canned bullshit, Marly. Now how about addressing the actual Public Law, AND its charges against Iraq? Are you incapable of commenting on the law itself? It is starting to look as though you are not capable of this.

I actually have PL 107-243 in front of me.

Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression to me is cause for negating AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002 as a result of a lack of Congressional due diligence.

We can discuss that silliness later. How about sticking to the subject? PL 107-243. I know you haven't read it yet, so, I'll give you more time to do so.

I already have, Marly. It is YOU who seems to be unable to discuss the subject that I picked weeks ago. Show me some facts now. Your self-professed superiority does not impress me. Facts only, please.

i remember when i first saw this film, i couldn't stop crying, and i watched it five times in a row. i still remember how much anger i felt when he married the girl from the Buddhist Temple

dude u r so stupid , movies are fake , they are for entertainment!!!!!!!! some stupid will cry!

So what if their fake? They get to you emotional you piece of S**t , if your calling them an idiot your calling like more than half the world an idiot.

this movie is very good