AntiGravity Physics Explained

Part 2:
This is created with electrolysis of water and a white powder builds up on the cathode that i assume is monatomic elements or ions (plasma) held stable in the powder form. I have also made a spoon lose weight by putting the negative from my battery charger on it and striking it 3 or 4 times with the positive on then leaving the negative on to drain electrons.

Part 3:
My work shows and in fact if you view all anti gravity info, even superconductors they all disrupt electron flow, so I think it may be the communication between electrons and other body's in the atoms that make gravity. In the case of a superconductor it would be slowing down the electrons in the atoms, in my weight loss case it is removing the electrons.

What do you think about my hypothesis?

Thank you.

Regarding the superfluidity...Would the ferrofluid be necessary to rotate it? I've read that the critical velocity of the superfluid just needs to be obtained, and then the fluid will also begin to gyrate. If one were to go faster, would the effect be lost, and thus why a ferrofluid is needed?

P.S. If you have an issue with my comments, please tell me, I'm willing to make concessions.

I recognized a ferrofluid in there... very cool. Not an example of anti-gravity, but still cool. Same thing with the levitating frog, that's not an example of a gravito-magnetic field as much as an electro-magnetic field. I guess you're not likely to have a picture of real levitation since scientists are "just beginning to understand" theoretical gravito-magnetism. Good explanation, though.

This is wonderfully done, and it really helps my own search. I'm wondering, though, if a superfluid would be necessary. I only know of helium as being liquid at those temps. I know that a supercondoctor would be necessary to produce the gravitomagnetic effect, but how would it be liquid? Perhaps you could do a collodial suspension in a mercury amalgam? Also, do we know how many rpms are necessary for an effect? I'd be very intersted to know the relation.

Thanks!

An intelligent being is the one that has no need for proving his quality to others!

An intelligent being only has a need to develop his/her life by searching the secrets of this world AND friendly commenting and discussing with a fellow searcher.

Only a childish mind would want to offend a researcher like yourself!

P.S.
This video goes right in the bookmark!
Thank you!

The condensed matter state is vital to antigravitation because the Fermions (matter particles) become Bosons (force particles) during Bose-Einstein condensation.

The reason they need to be rotated is so they conform to the topological spacetime manifold (a wide spiral) which gravity operates on. (5th dimension)

It's not magnetism, it's gravitomagnetism.

SuperFinGuy YOU are the shill, and are now BLOCKED from my channel for your idiotic comments! Over 400 former Military and Government employees all risking their credibility, lives, and carreers to come forward with the TRUTH and all you can do is call them "proofless"!?!

So you think all these people are making this stuff up as some kind of hoax? I'm sorry but are you F**king retarded?

PROOF I AM NOT A SHILL:
watch?v=X4LaWppkXxM

I am FOR THE TRUTH! Not GOV BULLSHIT!

if you guys are lost, then get LOST! check out the britney spears videos and such, your comments will be MUCH more appreciated there.

Great vid! Its nice to see a rough picture of scientific evidence explaining antigravity. Didn't Tesla get the ball rolling on antigravity?

AlienScientist you sound like a shill playing with half-truths and you referencing to the proofless 'disclosure project' make it very clear.

Continuation ...


Then why is it that you need a super-fluid to create antigravity? Why cant be any material? And why we dont see antigravity effects by just rotating stuff rapidly in a lossy way analogous to magnetism?

Hey there

I want you to explain something to me, this is a legit queastion.

A superconductor levitates matter due to a magnetic field generated in a lossless manner and that is why is interesting. It would appear that no energy is needed (ignoring energy used to freeze it) to create levitation.

But you can do the same thing in a lossy way, levitate something magnetically that is.

Continued...

agree

true