Leopard 2 Vs T-90

Why? No autoloader, no active protection systems like "shtora" and "arena", no passive protection - reactive armor, high profile, 4 man crew in t-90 3 man crew. Why this S**t better? OH yea this S**t have teplovisor!

maybe but the ak47 ammo is heavier than s*** and the m16 is much lighter.

Leopard II is the Polish primary MBT (Poland possesses over 100, and will end up with 216), and Polish made PT-91 is the secondary MBT (a few hundreds).

Yet, 40 of the export version of the Polish secondary MBT, PT-91 M, were bough by the Malaysian military, and such tanks as the Korean K-1 (still their primary MBT, since there are only two dozen K-2's so far), Russian T-90 S were rejected after tests by the Malaysians!
As to India?
They are facing Pakistan as the most likely adversary!

The advantage of russian weaponry, including tanks, is not that it's better, say leo might be better than T90, but the fact that it's a lot more practical, reliable, high survivability, and easier to mass produce and maintain. a good simple example of that is AK47. Simplicity, reliability, cheap production and maintanance are the key principles of russian weapons.

India make a test...T-90 were better than Leopard and the british Challenger...T-90 and M 1 Abrams are the perfect enemys ;) they absulutely the 2 best in the world! :)

dios que poderio :D

Please correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to remember that the T-90 has the same type of autoloader that the T-72. So just shoot a sabot (alikali) round between the tracks, or in the middle of the tracks down center from the side, and it's toast.

gogo leo 2

Every variant of Leopard 2 except for Leopard 2A6.

That was only because there were too many of them,but dont think it is something special