Metacafe Header Takeover

How Anti-Gravity Work? Nuclear Powered UFO TR-3B

Tags:
3b Alien Anti Ferro Fluid Gravity Nuclear Powered Technology Tr UFO
ellamcoy
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    ellamcoy
  • International International
  • Comments: 6
  • Views: 19,959
  • Added: 05-Oct-08

http://usanarichard.blogspot.com/2008/07/blog-post.html
Electro Magnetic Theory on Vector Field. This video open up doors of imagination to those who appreciate Science and exploration!

  1. Categories: Science & Tech
  2. Favorite On: sp4d3n00b GILR test123ok ocala bhornbuckle75
Comments on

How Anti-Gravity Work? Nuclear Powered UFO TR-3B

20 Comments | Add Comment
  • Anti-gravity

    lot or info. here. Thanx & a 'hat-tip'. I've had physics in college & loved it! Hope 2 follow-up, wil keep-up the initiative you've thrown out there.

    By mild michael 1248209806 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Reverse Engineering is very hard to do!

    There is a website called Smarttrix.com. The puzzles there are all basically reverse engineered puzzles, go and try to figure them out. Even though they are simple its quite hard to get the answers.

    By smarttrix 1233589542 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Anti-Gravity Creation

    Hi,
    I was met a couple of fellows once with significant experience in gravitational fields. I asked how do you create anti-gravity, jokingly, and they took me quite seriously. This was a couple of years ago, but this is the best I can do. "You have to accelerate an electromagnetic field at the speed of light. In other words, the electromatic field has to be travelling at the speed of light for maximum efficiency, and it also must be accelerating. You can accelerate a fixed speed electromagnetic field by forcing it to travel in a circle. The change in velocity direction results in the acceleration. Delta V = A. There are many ways to do this, but the problem is it takes enormous amounts of energy. You don't get anti-gravity forces for free. It's called conservation of engery. To make this technology practical for use, the question should be: How can we create an compact, mobile energy source that produces enormous amounts of energy to run an anti-gravity device. Creating a gravitational force is easy when plugged into the grid. That is the missing technology."

    I found your video interesting, because it showed a practical way to do this, and it also makes me think that these guys knew what they were talking about.

    Leonardo

    By LeonardoDeVinci 1232944341 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • At 21 seconds

    The guy farts I swear

    By heliarche 1232726875 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • the question is, is ...

    the question is, is time and space a thing or a simple measuremen? if it can bend can it be pulled or pushed

    By antimoron08 [Affiliate User] 1227148222 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Cr 15:40 [There ...

    Cr 15:40 [There are] also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial [is] one, and the [glory] of the terrestrial [is] another. [ the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s ( times 10 ) = 2997924580, in human allowed math, notice the numbers of original speed of light and when you times it by ten then a ZERO appears electromagnetic ]

    By iaunafilms [Affiliate User] 1227023211 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It isn't illogical ...

    It isn't illogical at all just think about it.
    If they excist: We don't know their history, and as you might know one invention might lead to another. What if they never stumbled onto electricity? So them not being ahead of us is possible. Don't get me wrong, if this vid is true then you can say they are ahead of us on that technology and probably more. We just asume they are ahead of us because we think it's logical that their history(scientifically) is similar to ours.

    By AndrasRD87 [Affiliate User] 1226670953 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Of course they ...

    Of course they would be ahead of us. How else could they get here? We can't even get to the nearest star (Alpha Centari). Also, science doesn't evolve in a vacuum. As our understand of the universe increases, so does technology. 'They' would be more advanced than us in every way. Your comment is illogical.

    By crazykb [Affiliate User] 1226515376 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • We don't know if ...

    We don't know if they would be ahead of us. It's likely, but simply said it's a whole other world. Maybe they're just ahead on that technology and the rest is still stone-age.
    We just don't know.

    By AndrasRD87 [Affiliate User] 1226499747 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You say that your ...

    You say that your friends (and you) aren't violent. However, we all have it within ourselves to be aggressive. It's biological. We know that violent tendencies are created by the Brain. As far as 'turning our backs' on leaders that would use violence. I agree. Perhaps, the new American President will be different. I mean, Bush was a fool. However, it would be nice if our leaders weren't religious. Religion has a way of polluting the mind.

    By crazykb [Affiliate User] 1226346320 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • My friends and I ...

    My friends and I are not violent and do not like war. The majority of people I acquant with do not think war is right unless it's in defence; i.e. you are not the agressor.

    I've watched stuff about DBS, using electrical jolts deep in the brain, to counter the effects of disease - interesting stuff.

    Ultimately I think we need to turn our backs and not permit power to those who would start wars, marginalise them and regard them as mentally ill, their actions threatening us all.

    By ArtificialCleverenAI [Affiliate User] 1226322436 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Humans are violent ...

    Humans are violent because we evolved from predators. It's in our nature to be violent. It's the same impulse behind the reason we like fast cars, action movies, sports, ect. Not to mention war itself.The only way humans will get rid of their violent tendencies is to 'engineer it'out of us.I believe that we will'fuse'computer technology with the human brain.Humans of the future won't be like anything they are today. Even today we have 'fused' a micro chip with the brain of a stroke victim.

    By crazykb [Affiliate User] 1226293090 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
    • Human evolution

      Its more accurate to say that we have evolved from omnivores, which is what most primates are. Omnivores are only predators if they need to be, as they can live off of plants instead of just meat. Although primates will occasionall kill and eat meat (they have even been shown to be canabalistic in rare cases) they spend most of their time eating plant matter. I dont think that it is correct to assume that humans are genetically predisposed to violence. Instead it would be more accurate to say that humans are genetically predisposed to having the cappacity for violence if need be. In fact we could not be more perfectly genetically predisposed toward free will. We are composed of a genetic balance between predator(primarily only eats meat) and herbavor (primarily only eats plants). It has been sugested that our genetic predescesors needed protein and fatty tissue in meat in order to help us evolve our big brains, so it may be unlikely that we could have developed from a pure herbavore background. I wonder however how much different we might have turned out if we had developed from scavengers. Although technically they eat meat, they do not kill there food but rather eat only those that are already dead.
      One point I also thought Id make is that self made herbavores (vegetarians) do not seem to be any less violent than the rest of us, after all Hitler was reportedly a vegatarian.

      By bhornbuckle75 1233016990 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Oh, I dunno. Look ...

    Oh, I dunno. Look at the birds in the Galapagos - they have no fear of people. Give it a few 100 thousand years without violence, you might forget what it is.

    By ArtificialCleverenAI [Affiliate User] 1226277631 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I don't think that ...

    I don't think that Alien space craft have either crashed or been shot down. Also, I don't think that we would have the 'know how' to reverse engineer their technology. I mean, their technology maybe based on Scientific principles that we don't yet know about. As far as violence is concerned, it's highly likely that they evolved from predators (like we did). So, they would understand violence (this would also be the case if they evolved from 'pray species').

    By crazykb [Affiliate User] 1226276842 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I understand and ...

    I understand and respect what you're saying - I personally just think it's more credible than them crashing. My personal feeling is that humanity is still in its infancy and has a long way to go before it evolves to understand the futility of violence, division and hostility. A more highly evolved species may not have expected to be killed by way of greeting.

    I guess I'm still just believing that we have UFO tech on earth, despite seeing no credible evidence for it - irrational, really!

    By ArtificialCleverenAI [Affiliate User] 1226274759 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I don't believe ...

    I don't believe that any UFOs were 'shot down'. Think about that. I Aliens came here from somewhere outside our Solar System they would have to be hunderds, Thousands or perhaps millions of years ahead of us. It would be like saying that a Hunter-Gather tribe in Africa 'shot down' an F-16 with a spear. Their technology would be so much greater than ours, that I doubt we could effect them in any way.

    By crazykb [Affiliate User] 1226273640 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thanks for the book ...

    Thanks for the book tip. I also believe there is something in this, and enjoy the very few videos such as this one which have good science, not the nuts and fraudulent stuff from people like John Hutchinson.

    watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
    watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU

    If they do have UFO debris, they probably shot the craft down. There must be billions of other civilisations, and if they have a million years on us, who knows what they could achieve? Look at our own progress over just the last few decades.

    By ArtificialCleverenAI [Affiliate User] 1226259929 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "right-angle turns ...

    "right-angle turns at those velocities not get out of the way?". Bingo!


    The more I've looked into the UFO subject the LESS is makes sense. If you're interested in the subject, purchase books by Dr. Jacques Vallee. I personally believe that there is something to the subject. I also believe that the Government(s) 'may' have very good data on it (photos for example). However, I think they are as clueless to what they are, as you or I. It's a fun subject though.

    By crazykb [Affiliate User] 1226259126 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I've wondered about ...

    I've wondered about that, too. I saw one vid on youtube where it was claimed a UFo travelling at 3,000MPH or something like was on a crash course with a simple single-prop plane. The radar showed they crashed. Could a craft capable of right-angle turns at those velocities not get out of the way? It's pretty hard to believe.

    By ArtificialCleverenAI [Affiliate User] 1226246042 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
20 Comments | Add Comment