Top 10 Myths About Islam

Something different, but important to ponder. Religion or spirituality is not bad, it is the men who try to crash and break others with devastating misinterpretations.
$CIENTOLOGY KILL$

What censorship are you talking about? The whole NT is there for anyone to go through line by line. Please find where it advocates the kind of violence the Quran does (which is also available for us to go through line by line).

rebuttle for myth number 6 : Muhammad has exhorted the Muslims to kill infidels (Jews, Christians, and other non-muslims) wherever the Muslims find them and Imams of today have used these said verses during public prayers where Muslims are gathered together in Mosques -- Suras 2:190-193, 2:216, 4:76, 5:32-36, 7:96-99, 8:12-14, 8:39, 8:59, 8:65, 9:5, 9:14, 9:23-29, 9:38-41, 9:123, 47:4, 47:35, 61:4, and 66:9. NOTE: fight = kill in arabic in old translations.

rebuttle for myth number 2 yes muslims believe in Jesus, BUT! they do not accept him as the messiah, the Son of God! muslims cannot denie his existence, and his miracles, but they denie his words Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, the Christ! muslims are against the idea of Jesus being the Christ, and those against Christ! are filled with the spirit of Anitichrist!!! this is why they kill, behead,R**e , burn, and destroy things they do not agrre with. they are of there father the devil.

Love the censorship, I guess they practised that in the New Testament too.

I see you're unable to stay on topic. We are talking about the religious scripture that guides people. It's easy to see where muslims get their violence. It comes from the words of the Quran and of the hadiths.

Violence by so-called Christians is not at all supported in the New Testament, and you know it. The New Testament is diametrically opposed to the idea of violence, including the excuses people use to perpetrate it. Jesus says LOVE YOUR ENEMIES.

Discover honesty, please.

Look Islam does not have a monopoly on violence. Modern history Salem witch trials, and ancient the Crusades. Even more modern history fundamentalist Christians bombing A******n clinics or Waco, Texas...........It is so obvious that you have hatred and anger in your heart and on your mind. Why don't you really say what you feel......One man's terrorists is another man's freedom fighter. We all have blood on are hands and those with out sin cast the first stone...
$CIENTOLOGY KILL$

Excuses, excuses.

The relevent comparison is between Mohammed and Jesus, not Mohammed and a nation state (and even there, he looks hideous!).

Your inabiltiy to make the relevant comparison tells us exactly what Mohammed was all about. There was never anything holy about that primitive warlord.

As I hope you very well know, anonymousnasty, attempts to compare the Quran with the New Testament for instructions on killing people will show them to be diametrically opposed on the subject.

Jesus called himself the Prince of Peace, but he said, " Peace I do not bring to you."

If I was trying to prove Muhammad as a man of peace i could use attempt many things.

Well, there is a reason behind it. Abu Jahl, the man you are talking about was the leader of the Quraish and he enforced the boycott on the muslims and had planned to assassinate Muhammad a couple of times.

Wouldnt the U.S. be happy if they see that Bin Laden there worst enemy was dead?

Are you trying to say that men like Abu Jahl and Abu Lahab are innocent mens who hav done nothing against Muhammad?

And that's your best attempt at describing how Mohammad was a man of peace?

Boy do you need to reform your mind.

Wasn't it after the Battle of Badr that one of Mohammed's followers brought him the head of an enemy as a gift? Yes, that was it. I guess we should call him Mohammad the peaceful because he didn't kick that severed head across the floor. (or did he?)

No, rather you are assuming.

He was known to be Al-Amin amongst his enemines. Even tho they did hated him and his callthey still knew him has Al-Amin.

After the Battle of Badr, when Abu Sufyan son was taken as prisoner of war. Abu Sufyan was asked whether he would ransom his son rather he said he wouldnt because he knew Muhammad would not let harm touch his son.

Did Quraish even give him their money to secure even thought he was their enemies.

"Trustworthy" is a reference to loyalty, which is a reference to tribes, which is a reference to enemies, which is a reference to war.

My point exactly.

THey called Muhammad Al-Amin, The Trustworthy. He was even called that by his enemies at the time