Concorde Taking off

Tags:
Airplanes Concorde Takeoff
jawed
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    jawed
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 2,262
  • Added: 11-Jun-05

Notice how quickly it takes off.

  1. Categories: Wheels & Wings
Comments on

Concorde Taking off

25 Comments | Add Comment
  • haha amen.... i ...

    haha amen.... i couldnt agree more!!!! Im glad u guys built it before us.. urs is better than any of them... it's still sad though... i wish she was still flying.

    By JonBellew12 [Affiliate User] 1203515398 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It was sour grapes ...

    It was sour grapes mate! They (your government) didn't like the idea that we'd built one before them!

    By CelticSaxon [Affiliate User] 1203512451 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • True. She was more ...

    True. She was more efficient supersonic than subsonic, but severely restricted by regulations and could only go supersonic over water.

    She also came in just before ll the digital systems. A modern Y2K Concorde would have a very different flight deck.

    By Tiggs62 [Affiliate User] 1203491869 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • She was retired for ...

    She was retired for a combination of factors. Costs were rising, but so were tickets - plenty of people willing to pay. She was profitable ( once development costs were written off) and was paying her own way. The AF crash was caused by debris due to a lack of deflectors - these were recommended, but not fitted, to AF Concordes. BA Concordes had them.

    The nail was that Aerospatiale had decided not to make any more spares, severely limiting the future life.

    Oh, my father was a Captain on her.

    By Tiggs62 [Affiliate User] 1203491720 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • its so noisy ;l

    its so noisy ;l

    By mcr6612 [Affiliate User] 1203446955 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This is not true. ...

    This is not true. TU-144 was a bit faster.

    By tortoiseturtle [Affiliate User] 1203321069 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Fastest taking off ...

    Fastest taking off passenger aircraft in the world. :D

    By eclipseairforce [Affiliate User] 1203270154 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I rode on the last ...

    I rode on the last flight it was nothing really.:0

    By qazchaz [Affiliate User] 1203248596 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It's pretty ...

    It's pretty pathetic that the US Government wouldn't let her fly over US Airspace. She only came to Dallas-Ft. Worth twice I think?

    By JonBellew12 [Affiliate User] 1203190176 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You could almost ...

    You could almost say it's a STOL aircraft ;)

    By Klajnepojken [Affiliate User] 1203154685 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Really!? how much ...

    Really!? how much did you pay for a ticket when it was in service ??

    By Inboundbogie [Affiliate User] 1202738876 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • it only fits 100

    it only fits 100

    By sgcsc [Affiliate User] 1202607287 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • thank god ive flewn ...

    thank god ive flewn on it.

    By cafesoluble [Affiliate User] 1202551986 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I think subsonic ...

    I think subsonic passenger jet is around 80 to 100 mpg per passenger

    By mayavania [Affiliate User] 1202512256 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • get your facts ...

    get your facts right before u slander someone.
    Concorde was a tolally anologue controlled plane.

    By Glenforbes60 [Affiliate User] 1202261042 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • no, you might have ...

    no, you might have taken that the wrong way, why i said that is because Bobbiec224 thought that A320 was the first with Digital Fly-by-wire, but it was concorde, i said concorde was made in the 60's because A320's were made in the 80's. I miss concorde :(

    By larry141094 [Affiliate User] 1201904879 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Why should that ...

    Why should that make any difference? It's a marvel of engineering, truly magnificent.

    By thomash31 [Affiliate User] 1201785982 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • qrong, concorde got ...

    qrong, concorde got better fuel efeciency, at 17 miles per gallon per passenger.

    By Polybun [Affiliate User] 1201047245 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • dude concorde was ...

    dude concorde was made in the frigen 60's

    By larry141094 [Affiliate User] 1200498603 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Where do you see a ...

    Where do you see a S**t , l'Anglo-ricain?

    By hasftalav [Affiliate User] 1200224755 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • are u F**king ...

    are u F**king stupid - concorde was one of the first fly by wire planes

    By ScuderiaZeus [Affiliate User] 1200140193 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Correct- sorry- the ...

    Correct- sorry- the A320 was the first with Digital Fly-by-wire (Because of the sidestick control)

    By bobbiec224 [Affiliate User] 1200062669 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No, it definitely ...

    No, it definitely wasn't. :-)

    From wikipedia (not the best resource, but it is correct):

    ... Concorde was the first civil airliner to have an analogue fly-by-wire flight control system...

    By escon [Affiliate User] 1200005968 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • correct me if i'm ...

    correct me if i'm wrong but is concorde taking off from bournemouth airport?

    By rattmolph [Affiliate User] 1199980715 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No it wasn't- it ...

    No it wasn't- it was the Airbus A320!

    By bobbiec224 [Affiliate User] 1199963357 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
25 Comments | Add Comment