Please wait while the video loads.
You will need Adobe's Flash Player plugin to view this page properly.
International
Ron Paul on CNBC with former IRS agent who knows the Federal Income Tax is invalid. Great piece showing the Congressman's consistency and rationality.
show me proof that that the income tax we pay IS GOING to schools, military, police, fire, hospitals, roads to begin with. Once you do then i'll rethink about it
By 5blacksky8 [Affiliate User] 1223239065 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeshow me proof that that the income tax we pay IS GOING to schools, military, police, fire, hospitals, roads to begin with. Once you do then i'll rethink about it
By 5blacksky8 [Affiliate User] 1223239058 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveTell me about these indirect taxes?
By warriorprince1010 [Affiliate User] 1223140900 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removeu pay it through indirect taxes not direct tax like on your income this coutnry was meant for thepeople to be rich and not the government or 1 CEO torake in 100 million dollarsa every 6 months fuckin ridiculious
By pureadrenaline25 [Affiliate User] 1223112056 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Remove1. How do you pay for schools, military, police, fire, hospitals, roads without taxes?
If anyone can answer me that then we will be fine.
I just read subchapter A part 1 and, all of its section's and nowhere does it way what is or is not taxable income all it say's is "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of suchandsuch" So we need to look elsewhere to find that.
By BrakBL [Affiliate User] 1220872180 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe reason the court will not let people use section 861 in their defense is because it has nothing to do with domestic income tax. Domestic income tax is explained under TITLE 26, Subtitle A, CHAPTER 1, Subchapter A, PART I, section 1.
I have said it before, Tell me you don't like it, tell me you what to change it, but don't tell me that it dosen't exist.
If you want to change it, campaign to amend the constitution. It has been done before.
They are not interpreting the income tax in those cases, thus it has no holding on the income tax. In other words it tells us nothing about how the law of the tax works or should be applied. I think it more telling that the court has not addressed the issue directly. Lots of people appeal their cases and the supreme court could hear those cases if they so wished. That they do not tells us that they feel the law was applied correctly or that they feel that they have nothing to add.
By ColBrokov [Affiliate User] 1220674633 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveAlso I don't like arguing this by taking a standpoint from title 26 because in Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Subchapter N, Section 1, you will find section 861 section 861 is the section you use to determine taxable income yet this section only tells you you have to pay for certain foreign and international things, yet many times courts will not let people use this section for their defenses.
So as I said I don't like arguing it from that point cause I'll just get cited that the courts don't let you.
I brought this up before but I thought I would just clarify. In the case of Stanton v. Baltic Mining you brushed it off cause they did end up being taxed but they where not tax via the income tax cause the court found that it violated the 16 amendment, they where instead taxed on the property itself.
Plus do you think that these quotes from the supreme court and such just don't matter if they weren't brought up in a case, I'm pretty sure they are not lying to us.
What you or I or the Treasury has to say about it has no effect on the law. Convictions based on the law are interpretations that it is good law. To be unconstitutional as an indirect tax the Supreme court (as they alone interpret the law) needs to find it as such. They haven't. If they felt that an egregious breach of law was being perpetrated they have the authority to intervene, as they did in 2000 Bush V Gore. They haven't. Until they so act, or congress repeals the law it, it is the law.
By ColBrokov [Affiliate User] 1220668434 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveI feel that your argument ignores the legal process. Congress has passed an income tax. It's modern incarnation is title 26 of the US Code. Title 26 spells it out in all its complexity. People who have failed to pay the tax (Irwin Schiff, Kent Hovind, Wesley Snipes, et al) have been arrested, pleaded their cases, and jailed. The court, in these cases, interpreted title 26 as good law. Nobody so arrested has ever been released on the basis that title 26 is unconstitutional. Out of space. see next
By ColBrokov [Affiliate User] 1220668044 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe problem I have with these two quotes is that they are not good law. The treasury does not make law regarding the income tax and thus has nothing of value to say on the matter. Peck V Lowe was not a decision on the income tax and thus cannot be used to interpret that law.
see my above post.
Oh one last quote I guess, Research by the Congressional research service in 1980 found that
The Supreme Court, in a decision written by Chief Justice White, first noted that the Sixteenth Amendment did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution... Direct taxes were, notwithstanding the advent of the Sixteenth Amendment, still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect taxes were still subject to the rule of uniformity.
No, I'm not offended at all but I've given two quotes that say the 16th just restricted income tax to indirect tax;
Treasury decision 2303
And the quote from the supreme court in Peck v. Lowe.
Then I tried to break it down for you to show you how it says that, and you just stick to what you think and I just don't know where else I can take this to try to show you.
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Only On SPEED BIG...BLOCK THURSDAY 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
South-Western Fed...eral Taxation 2009: Individual Income Taxes (Book Review) 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Video - 2008 FREE...Federal Income Tax Software! 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
00:30
For 2008: Calcula...te Federal Income Tax and Relax! 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
03:21
NH: Ron Paul Hike...r Completes Coast-to-coast "Walk for Liberty" [13+] 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
00:50
Get Corporate Fed...eral or State Income Tax Rate Advice! 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
00:44
In 2008, File FRE...E: Federal and State Income Tax Software 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
01:06
Small Business Se...rvices: Income Tax Advice… Watch Video! 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
04:22
No Law for U.S. I...ncome Tax (2/2) 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
03:17
Ron Paul a Cappella 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
03:07
(Key to Cash) Exp...lode Your Income in 2009!! Just Launched 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
00:17
Ron Paul Defends...the Constitution 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Pop Champagne (Di...rty Version) (featuring Ron Browz and Juelz Santana) 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Ron Paul Vs. Ben...Bernanke (Federal Reserve) - Español 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
Ron Paul on Fox B...usiness News 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
05:53
Ron Paul on Iran...& Energy (C-SPAN 6/26) 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
09:56
Ron Paul Rally Fo...r The Republic Jesse Ventura 9/2/08 Part 1 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
10:47
YouTube BANNED In...credible Ron Paul Video 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
02:46
10 Year Old Girl...Battles Reporters to Interview Ron Paul 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
06:32
Ron Paul Agitates...Jim Baker over War Powers During Hearing 03/05/2009 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
09:37
Ron Paul Debates...Stephen Baldwin on Legalizing Marijuana on CNN Larry King 03/13/2009 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
09:52
Fractional Bankin...g and the Federal Reserve System Explained! 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
08:15
8/28/2006-Peter S...chiff Predicts The US Economic Collapse With Unbelievable Accuracy 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views
08:26
SADDAM HUSSEIN -...Assasinated for Dumping US Dollars. 1 min ago
Rated 0.0 0 Views