Stan Meyer - Hydrogen Oxygen ( HHO ) - Zero Point Energy

Tags:
Alternative Energy HHO Hydrogen Meyer Oxygen Point Stan Zero
ensciro
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    ensciro
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 2,911
  • Added: 14-Oct-06

FULL VERSION of this movie available on http://www.thermo1.com

  1. Categories: How To
Comments on

Stan Meyer - Hydrogen Oxygen ( HHO ) - Zero Point Energy

25 Comments | Add Comment
  • What about cold ...

    What about cold weather? Do you include anti-freeze?

    By 3089280288 [Affiliate User] 1203706828 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • helo! hi im Richard ...

    helo! hi im Richard Z another source energy that u can find in the lake or river that u can use for energy source, this is like desame of gas and it realli burn this thing is a creatures "SNAIL LAKE" this thing is suddenly works to out experiment is a strong element but that snail is 1 ingredients to make this power like a gasoline but ther's more 2 ingredients u need i let u know in the nxt day..tcre.

    By bugatix2 [Affiliate User] 1203704703 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ok,....refer us to ...

    ok,....refer us to the published papers (not cheesy press releases) where it was proven to work

    By brospec [Affiliate User] 1203683090 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • (G:)"THE ENERGY NON ...

    (G:)"THE ENERGY NON CRISIS" with Lindsay Williams

    People who think they have all the answers are more dangerous than "conspiracy theorists" will ever be.

    By 1tonykirk [Affiliate User] 1203663377 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Fleischmann and ...

    Fleischmann and Pons were thoroughly wrong...it never worked....but eventually their sloppy science turned to outright fraud.
    Everyone wants cold fusion to work....it will start a huge new global industry with USA at forefront....keep your stupid conspiracy theories to yourself

    By brospec [Affiliate User] 1203633840 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • If it produces ...

    If it produces Tritium and ash, and it does, then by definition,
    it does work. It's now been repeated in numerous Universities.
    GW,l had John Huizenga discredit them, after all, they're just chemists. Why wouldn't they? Big Oil doesn't want it and neither do the Physicists who recieve millions in funding for playing with particle accelerators.
    Fleischmann and Ponz (?, not sure of spelling, never saw it in print) have done their fine tuning in Europe as a result.

    By 1tonykirk [Affiliate User] 1203628513 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Cold Fusion NEVER ...

    Cold Fusion NEVER worked. They were reading the neutron detector wrong and then went to the papers with their amazing results. People want it to work because it would be an easy solution to everyone's energy problem. they are the same people who buy pills to help them lose weight while they sleep. Always trying to get something for nothing. The world doesn't work that way.

    By Starcross42 [Affiliate User] 1203612589 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • john10lewis, where ...

    john10lewis,
    where can I find info on that statement regarding John McCain
    and his passion to go to 'Free Energy'?
    If he's carrying that card in his pocket, My friends and I would want to know about it.

    By 1tonykirk [Affiliate User] 1203275549 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It isn't energy ...

    It isn't energy FROM a vacuum.
    It's the ambient energy that still exists at ABSOLUTE ZERO.

    Some Noted Physicists are standing in the way of this Tesla
    theory as well as Cold Fusion, partly because they've been
    'discovered' by Chemists and Engineers by applying frequencies and amplitude, not physicists. And partly because the 'leaders' in these fields have ties to Government Agencies who've been running interference.

    By 1tonykirk [Affiliate User] 1203275180 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Now Im not saying ...

    Now Im not saying its possible or not, but we should keep an open mind, read up a bit on David Hudson's work and ORME , makes you realise theres so many possibilities , in this instance I suspect that the "frequency" used is somehow tuning into this free vacuum energy in the same manner a radio only receives avaialable signals when it is tuned to the right station, essentially theres no "free energy", but the question is can we tap Energy from vacuum?

    By WD2112 [Affiliate User] 1203154823 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • People that are ...

    People that are saying theres only so much energy in water, or that to break the water mollecules requires more energy are missing the point, the claim is that theres a lot of energy in the vacuum of space (and I wish I was smart enough to follow the physics/mathematics of it), and many sciences are showing it is possible, thats what they term ZERO POINT ENERGY, or Energy from the Vacuum,

    By WD2112 [Affiliate User] 1203154340 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No. That's not it ...

    No. That's not it at all.

    By 4strength4stamina [Affiliate User] 1203126459 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • page 5 of comments ...

    page 5 of comments the bit about more out than in...ok science dictates that u cant get more from less..with this device maybe meyers is using special alloys that make use of both exo-thermic and endo-thermic reactions in a step process, hence the water temperature does not rise and at some point exploits these reactions to create the extra energy needed to split hydrogen and oxygen...in simple terms u light a match to ignite a firework, and theres more energy in the firework than the match!

    By wilko120 [Affiliate User] 1203084540 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Listen to the ...

    Listen to the Skeptoid podcast - the most recent one is about water as a fuel

    By brospec [Affiliate User] 1202906220 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Check out the ...

    Check out the Atchison Candle to see how to burn water with less than 6 volts of direct current.

    By catchison [Affiliate User] 1202896157 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It says Stan?, ...

    It says Stan?,

    It should be celebrated, even if it "dosnt work"

    By DanielLeech [Affiliate User] 1202879962 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Perhaps if you did ...

    Perhaps if you did a little research on him you'd find that his name is Stan not Dan, he died of a cerebral aneurysm, and that his invention doesn't work.

    By 4strength4stamina [Affiliate User] 1202497499 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • That is exactly the ...

    That is exactly the point...this "invention" is an energy sink

    By brospec [Affiliate User] 1202495227 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Regardless of the ...

    Regardless of the exact Calorific values the average consumer is more concerned with the (mil. per dollar) not (mil. per gal.) With the difference in energy values between water and petroleum so large trying to compare them in (mil. per gal.) instead of (mil. per Dollar) is very misleading.

    By GSpotter63 [Affiliate User] 1202492042 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Diesel fuel 46 MJ ...

    Diesel fuel 46 MJ kg -1
    Petrol 44.8 -- 46.9 MJ kg -1
    The calorific value of water is 4.16 kilojoules

    By GSpotter63 [Affiliate User] 1202491433 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The calorific value ...

    The calorific value of a substance is the amount of heat energy released when the substance is burnt. As pure water does not burn it has no calorific value.

    By GSpotter63 [Affiliate User] 1202491094 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • So why dont you ...

    So why dont you calculate the calorific value of water & compare it with the calorific value of gas......then decide what is a reasonable price to pay for water as a fuel?? (Hint : its a nice round number, but not a prime number)

    By brospec [Affiliate User] 1202404450 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ...and then you get ...

    ...and then you get teams of angels to actually break the O-H bonds for no energy input

    By brospec [Affiliate User] 1202404284 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Even if water is 5 ...

    Even if water is 5 times less efficient than gasoline, five gallons of tap water costs 100 times less than 1 gallon of gasoline. That means $1.00 worth of tap water (several hundred gallons) will take your car 100 times farther than $1.00 worth of gasoline (about 1/3 of a gallon). I will gladly stop to fill the tank more often to go over 100 mi. for $0.10. worth of water instead of $10.00 worth of gas.

    By GSpotter63 [Affiliate User] 1202403945 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Yes, and with ...

    Yes, and with sufficient funds, and the right people, I could have even YOU discredited and put away as a convicted child molester for the rest of your life, and not one single person would ever listen to what you have to say ever again.

    By GSpotter63 [Affiliate User] 1202336278 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
25 Comments | Add Comment
 
Family Filter Off