Rabbi Shmuley Debates Richard Dawkins - Part 3

Tags:
Atheists Boteach Dawkins Debates Judaism Shmuley
JVNetwork
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    JVNetwork
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 347
  • Added: 16-Jun-08

www.Shmuley.com to purchase full video.
The 1996 debate at Oxford featuring four eminent participants, including noted biblical scholar Rabbi Shmuley Boteach and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins.

The panelists tackle the issue of whether or not God, and by extension, religion, is needed for there to be goodness in the world. Rabbi Boteach boldly asserts that the greatest tragedies of the 20th century were not only removed from religious motivations, but were responsible for more casualties than religious wars in all other times put together.

  1. Categories: People & Stories
Comments on

Rabbi Shmuley Debates Richard Dawkins - Part 3

13 Comments | Add Comment
  • Rabi is NUTS, ...

    Rabi is NUTS, really psychotic and mean.

    By ncuphabuchopho [Affiliate User] 1220536775 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • the only thing ...

    the only thing these comments have taught me is that if I become an atheist, I'm going to be sure to not be so self-righteous, arrogantly condescending and mean.

    By nagibson1 [Affiliate User] 1219665159 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • NOTE, this is from ...

    NOTE, this is from 1996. Science has GREATLY advanced in the past 10 years and has further piled on factual evidence against the ignorant religious people.

    By soldersucker [Affiliate User] 1218676389 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • stop shouting you ...

    stop shouting you prick

    By l3inaryl3urnout [Affiliate User] 1217404919 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This guy could ...

    This guy could easily be bi-polar.

    By whiff1962 [Affiliate User] 1215255943 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • well said. I think ...

    well said.

    I think that can be said of all religious figures.

    give up the difficult queries to the deep thinking and mature intellectuals that society has labeled atheists.

    By niginit [Affiliate User] 1214653347 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Quite right! I ...

    Quite right! I should have been more specific. Thanks for clarifying what I meant.

    By ColoradoMikeyS [Affiliate User] 1214434404 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • for retarded adults

    for retarded adults

    By mortemdei [Affiliate User] 1214428504 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • God is Santa Claus ...

    God is Santa Claus for adults.

    By ColoradoMikeyS [Affiliate User] 1213986999 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • To further add to ...

    To further add to my statement I made before, I think he yells to sound like an alpha-male, authoritarian and therefore correct. Dinesh D'Souza did the same thing when he debated Daniel Dennett.

    By RoDJ99 [Affiliate User] 1213862116 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Agree with you both ...

    Agree with you both. Poor Richard having to even be on the same stage as enfeebled huckster. Boteach's 'debate' with Hitchens was just as embarrassing. Maybe he should stick to writing self-help books and corny one-liners. Leave discussions of philosophy, science, and reality to the grown ups.

    By sleepcity [Affiliate User] 1213721727 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • and he's a complete ...

    and he's a complete moron.

    By niginit [Affiliate User] 1213697742 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Rabbi Shmuley yells ...

    Rabbi Shmuley yells too much.

    By RoDJ99 [Affiliate User] 1213620302 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
13 Comments | Add Comment