Black Bottom Dance

Tags:
Black Blues Bottom Dance Shout
motorthings
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    motorthings
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 1,030
  • Added: 28-Feb-07

http://www.blues-dance.com
Excerpt of blues era black bottom dancing and history from "America Dances", a compilation of jazz and blues dance history.
AMERICA DANCES! 1897-1948: A Collector's Edition of Social Dance in Film
Actors: Various
Run Time: 75 minutes

  1. Categories: Entertainment
Comments on

Black Bottom Dance

15 Comments | Add Comment
  • This is so much fun ...

    This is so much fun. As per Jazz - it was "created" by the peoples of America - African, Native and European. Its formation would not have happened without the contributions of all involved. And let me tell you - the dancer at about 1:20 is Rubdy Keeler!

    By 3investigators [Affiliate User] 1215737880 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I used to do this ...

    I used to do this dance all the time when I was kid, except we called it the "Scraping Dog S**t off the Bottom of Your Shoe" dance! Ah, what memories!

    By heeter71 [Affiliate User] 1215522596 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Oh, so THAT'S why ...

    Oh, so THAT'S why they call it "Black Bottom"... of course, the cow's bottom was probably already black before it got stuck in the mud... YIKES!!!

    By heeter71 [Affiliate User] 1215522099 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • And heavily the ...

    And heavily the heavily orchestrated stuff. XÞ

    I am willing to give credit where credit is due. My initial response was to people claiming that white America had stolen their entire cultural history.

    America thrives off of such 'stealing'. Mainstream Ami culture is a quiltwork of borrowed and self-constructed ideas - most of them taken completely out of context. :7

    I prefer hot j~ & always have, but cannot deny the fact that jazz has significantly/legitimately permeated our country's culture.

    By Ilmatar7 [Affiliate User] 1215313994 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I say adopted ...

    I say adopted because it changed in the process of being assimilated. Which is somewhere between perfect replication (which clearly was not the case) and mimicry, which has in-built negative connotations, and does not follow the two separate-but-mutually-constructive paths that developed.

    It never would have crossed my mind that people who know anything at all about dancing would not be aware of swing's Harlem/Southside origins.

    By Ilmatar7 [Affiliate User] 1215312581 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The major players ...

    The major players in jazz were Black. The true innovators and creators were black. The issue is that many still do not what to give this credit to these giants. "Cool" jazz was mostly white musicians playing a, for lack of a better word, watered down version of bebop.

    By luvureally [Affiliate User] 1215201122 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • (Also, I am not ...

    (Also, I am not denying that there were two fairly distinctive and separate courses that jazz took. That is much of the reason that we have Cali versus Savoy styles in most swing dances. That is also why the terms 'hot' and 'cool' jazz are used. . . .

    That is part of the history of jazz as a music. But it does not make 'white jazz' an 'inauthentic' art form for the ENTIRE period between 1914 and 1941. . . .

    By Ilmatar7 [Affiliate User] 1215200185 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "Adopted", great ...

    "Adopted", great euphemism. The fact is so much of Black American culture has been "borrowed" that the public does not know the truth about the origins. And jazz was created by Black musicians who brought rhythms from the old world and "borrowed" influences from the new world. This resulted in an entirely new form of music. When others have "borrowed" they have simply tried to take credit for an entire genre w/o creating anything new.

    By luvureally [Affiliate User] 1215200129 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • In early years, ...

    In early years, they almost certainly were. However, as time went on, it was 'adopted' in a relatively legitimate fashion. We are talking about Jazz, the first great 'mutt music' (my father's term, and it is not meant to be derogatory). I can see how a specific dance or certain style of jazz can be deemed inauthentic, but I don't quite take to saying that a notably freeform musical style, for which borrowing and innovation are basic staples, can be said to be 'inauthentic' as a whole. Just me.

    By Ilmatar7 [Affiliate User] 1215199568 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • IImatar7 they were ...

    IImatar7 they were inauthentic.

    By luvureally [Affiliate User] 1215129413 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • uhhhh

    uhhhh

    By EmmzieLT [Affiliate User] 1213900176 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It gave the ...

    It gave the jitterbug of my WWII generation with skirt up when the girls jump overhead in Paris St-Germain-des Pres "caves". May be the last surviving is "Caveau de la Huchette" in the 50s

    By slomoschon2000 [Affiliate User] 1212614891 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Keep in mind, I was ...

    Keep in mind, I was writing about Jolie Jr. and Ruby Keeler waving hello in Ed Sullivan's audience at the time Keeler was in "Nanette," so we're talking about the early 70s, and the resemblence was so amazing, I thought it was odd he was known as an adopted son. I don't know when you saw him, betteroff, but when I saw him, it was eerie.

    By defundthewar [Affiliate User] 1210880458 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • a clone of joley? ...

    a clone of joley? Don't think so. Not saying anything bad about the fellow but I met him in Nashville when he lived there shortly. He had a studio or possibly publishing company. By the time I met him he was sporting a beard so perhaps that's why I saw no likeness to Jolson Sr.

    By betteroffsingle [Affiliate User] 1210878846 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It was still ...

    It was still negative; it was just tolerated back then...just like it is still negative to say "people of color" now. People still tolerate it, though.

    By alesbica [Affiliate User] 1210525817 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
15 Comments | Add Comment
 
kpins