International
Mercedes E class
2007-08 models
SIDE IMPACT TEST WITH STANDARD SIDE AIRBAGS
OVERALL EVALUATION: Acceptable
Injury measures Head protection Structure/safety cage
Head/neck Torso Pelvis/leg
Driver Good Marginal Acceptable Good Acceptable
Rear passenger Good Good Good Good
Important: Side impact crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type and weight categories.
Test details:
The Mercedes E class was re-engineered for the 2007 model year with an emphasis on improving occupant protection in side impact crashes. In the Institute's initial test of a 2007 model, the car was rated Acceptable, primarily because of high forces recorded on the driver dummy's torso.
Beginning with 2007 models manufactured after May 2007, changes to the front door trim panels were made to further improve occupant protection in side impact crashes, so a test of the improved design was conducted (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). This test showed some reduction of the forces on the driver dummy's torso, but not enough to change the torso injury rating or the overall rating. Therefore the ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests.
Injury measures:
Driver — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and a fracture of the pelvis would be possible in a crash of this severity. In the first test, internal organ injuries would also be possible.
Rear passenger — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Head protection:
Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat.
Rear passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the door.
Fine safety. Too much glass, though.
By GMminivans9968 [Affiliate User] 1219657263 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removetoo much glass for the driver, pelvis and fractures, also internal organ injuries. and the driver dummy kinematics could be better.
By alexkvaskov [Affiliate User] 1219639998 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveWoow.
By RCToThe3 [Affiliate User] 1219606462 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveRated 3.63 | 1,761 Views
By MyRideTV
Rated 3.66 | 886 Views
By wheelstv
Rated 4.37 | 272 Views
Affiliate Submitter: 28stieren
Rated 3.60 | 26 Views
By Babelgum
Rated 3.60 | 14 Views
By Babelgum
Rated 3.60 | 19 Views
By Babelgum
Rated 3.60 | 4 Views
By Babelgum
Rated 3.60 | 7 Views
By Babelgum
Testing the New Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG in N...ardo
Rated 3.45 | 22,165 Views
By SLS_AMG
The Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG - Race Test with...Bernd Schneider
Rated 3.37 | 4,919 Views
By SLS_AMG
Comparison Test: 2007 BMW 335i Vs. 2008 Me...rcedes-Benz C350 By Ed
Rated 3.54 | 5,138 Views
Mercedes-Benz SLK 55 AMG Black Series Test...Drive
Rated 4.17 | 1,217 Views
Affiliate Submitter: calfsee
Mercedes-Benz G500 Test Drive and Walkarou...nd from Chicago Cars Direct.
Rated 4.47 | 94 Views
Affiliate Submitter: chicagocarsdirect
Comparison Test - Lexus IS F, BMW M3, Merc...edes-Benz C63 AMG
Rated 5.00 | 197 Views
By auto123.com
Mercedes-Benz PRE-SAFE Brake System Video...- Kelley Blue Book
Rated 0.00 | 330 Views
2008 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Full Test
Rated 3.57 | 4,466 Views