Union Pacific 844 Steam Engine

Tags:
Engines Pacific Steam Trains Union
eomaha
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    eomaha
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 1,463
  • Added: 15-Aug-06

Union Pacific's 844 steam engine (the 'Living Legend') comes to Council Bluffs, IA

  1. Categories: Wheels & Wings
Comments on

Union Pacific 844 Steam Engine

15 Comments | Add Comment
  • Maintenance and ...

    Maintenance and water, your right, steam can't compare. However if we were to ask N&W's, South African Rail, and in the near future China's operating dept's. Bet you'd get a few opposing views. Especially with the price of oil these day's, and it's only going to get better!

    By 1961sd [Affiliate User] 1203755726 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Power charts are ...

    Power charts are not everything. So inefficient no comparison, wasteful, polluting, enormous BTUs just to raise water temperature to working steam. Need to haul water and too many water stops. Breakdowns required SO MUCH maintenence, overhaul, etc. I love, and my great uncle loved his steam locomotives, but if not for Diesels, railroads would go bankrupt.

    By robertgift [Affiliate User] 1203592402 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • One of my best ...

    One of my best friends ever was a steam locomotive engineer from the 1920s til 1950s and he said: "A diesel engine is an electric motor mounted on a flatcar, but a steam locomotive is an Iron Horse." During these days of $100 bbl oil it may not be a bad idea to go back to steam in some cases.

    By 2speakfreely [Affiliate User] 1203578812 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Robertgift,not ...

    Robertgift,not quite right, look at a power chart sometime, internal combustion flatlines fairly quick, steam combustion expands BIG time with added heat. Why do you suppose Navy vessels are (nuclear) actually steam boats, just a different fuel to boil water. Diesels could never do the job.

    By 1961sd [Affiliate User] 1200247095 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • My Great Uncle was ...

    My Great Uncle was a PRR locomotive engineer.
    He loved going to work. Said his huge 4-8-4 locomotive had a "personality" like a mule.
    He loved it. He learned to operate a diesel, but said some engineers refused and retired. They "did not want to drive a car."

    By robertgift [Affiliate User] 1194869390 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You're right, there ...

    You're right, there is NO comparison to a steam locomotive, not by a long shot. LLS!

    By hollywood1340 [Affiliate User] 1194865507 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Late whistle and ...

    Late whistle and gates late getting down in first view.
    Try to photograph from the SUNNY side!
    Diesel engines are so much more efficient and reliable, there is no comparison to steam engines which require frequent repair and overhaul.

    By robertgift [Affiliate User] 1192748298 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • @ ferroequistrian: ...

    @ ferroequistrian: Diesels were made BECAUSE of steamers. Nobody likes shoveling coal from the tender to the firebox, or the pollution it puts out. And what's more, a steamer takes hours to start because it needs heat.

    A diesel engine avoids all of those problems.

    But steamers are better looking. XP

    By princenoah21 [Affiliate User] 1192605682 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • So I ask you..At ...

    So I ask you..At the price of diesel...wouldn't steam be the way to go? I say bring back the Big black Beauties.

    By ferroequistrian [Affiliate User] 1189477958 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • and besides that, ...

    and besides that, the 844 has NEVER EVER been retired so take that :p

    By Deathsaurer778 [Affiliate User] 1188256105 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • THE 844 is the 2nd ...

    THE 844 is the 2nd largest steamer in the world.

    By Deathsaurer778 [Affiliate User] 1188255329 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This engine has ...

    This engine has boiler psi of 300. the GWR only gits about 160 tops. This could pull a 22 car train without deisel help. it is the stupid rail way regulations that require deisels.

    By Deathsaurer778 [Affiliate User] 1188255030 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • they should of kept ...

    they should of kept the steam engines

    By vegasfutbol [Affiliate User] 1187290106 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Bring back the ...

    Bring back the steamers!! Especially with todays HIGH fuel prices. :-) I wish I was around to see them when they ruled the rails! :-D

    By Landaux [Affiliate User] 1185181453 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This monster puts ...

    This monster puts the Gp-38 to shame... I like the Gp-38 too...

    By TheGoldenKnifefish [Affiliate User] 1183913279 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
15 Comments | Add Comment