CNN 9/11/01 - World Trade Center Part 5

Tags:
9/11 9/11/01 CNN News World Trade Center
emscrazy001
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    emscrazy001
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 2,984
  • Added: 22-Nov-07

Finally, as requested, CNN's live coverage from September 11, 2001.

  1. Categories: News & Events
  2. Favorite On: Vladimir Derguti
Comments on

CNN 9/11/01 - World Trade Center Part 5

25 Comments | Add Comment
  • for oil? Is that ...

    for oil? Is that why gas is 5 dollars a gallon for me? Where the F**ks my oil? Rot in hell you towel head

    By ZomgZintos [Affiliate User] 1213738910 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • wow they shut down ...

    wow they shut down the stock market. I wonder how far the DOW would of gone to after the towers collapsed

    By ZomgZintos [Affiliate User] 1213738590 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • He did a better job ...

    He did a better job on 9/11 than Gore every would of.

    By ZomgZintos [Affiliate User] 1213738388 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • So, what do you ...

    So, what do you guys have to say about President Bush?

    By williamsharifie [Affiliate User] 1212531672 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Very interesting to ...

    Very interesting to watch this again!
    Thank you CNN

    By kyduz5 [Affiliate User] 1210422908 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Maybe 1 hour linger ...

    Maybe 1 hour linger??? would do it!!! You Americans deserve this for Second World War Bombing Japan!!! Every act now is paid off tomorrow.

    By BrokenRichie2006 [Affiliate User] 1210025176 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Because they were ...

    Because they were at war 40 minutes after the crashes. He comments on war 40 mins after the event - you accuse him of being too quick.
    If he commented 2 days after the event you would accuse him of taking to long.
    Its obvious no matter what he does you will some how find a link between it and an inside job. Retard.

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1209337531 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No stupidity would ...

    No stupidity would be believing that the US government would attack itself with the most intricate, precise hoax in history when they cant handle a war in Iraq.
    Believing that a controlled demoliton brought down the Towers dispite NO evidence to support it.
    Believing there are no people in the world who want to destroy the US and even saying Osama is innocent, dispite Al-Qaeda admitting to it. Don't you know they take pride in committing 9/11???
    That is stupitity.

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1209337269 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • And the the "Truth ...

    And the the "Truth Movement" clearly need you to sound paranoid to get in.

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1209336989 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The 9/11 commission ...

    The 9/11 commission report need you to say that.

    By Shesobelle [Affiliate User] 1209324722 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • We just see what ...

    We just see what happened next : war in Iraq for oil and make terrorism with an "American mood".

    By Shesobelle [Affiliate User] 1209324634 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No, it's called ...

    No, it's called stupidity.

    By Shesobelle [Affiliate User] 1209324493 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • yes, it's called ...

    yes, it's called freedom of speech.

    By whyudoddat [Affiliate User] 1207674548 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • yes, it's called ...

    yes, it's called freedom of speech.

    By whyudoddat [Affiliate User] 1207674548 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You don't have to ...

    You don't have to be a F**king architect to work that out, are you a complete douchebag or something? What happens when metal is heated by insanely hot temperatures? At the very least it will weaken. And what happens when that metal is supporting a massive amount of weight? Well I think we all saw what happened next......

    By ohdynamo [Affiliate User] 1207454387 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • how do you know? ...

    how do you know? just because someone said that?

    By BrokenRichie2006 [Affiliate User] 1206094040 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Is this the freedom ...

    Is this the freedom you bring around?
    I just expressed my thought, and you reply insulting?
    Great human being.

    By fabmic [Affiliate User] 1205456742 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Is this the freedom ...

    Is this the freedom you bring around?
    I just expressed my thought, and you reply insulting?
    Great human being.

    By fabmic [Affiliate User] 1205456742 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • And you are clearly ...

    And you are clearly not the only dickhead

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1205431828 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Acctually no. The ...

    Acctually no. The reason is in the building design. If you acctually did some reaserch into the structure of the WTC you would leard how a collapse was imminent. Most high-rise buildings have a concrete inner core or concrete encased outer collums. WTC had neither. There are numerous examples of STEEL FRAMED structures (like the WTC) collapsing. THE TOP 11 FLOORS OF THE WINDSOR BUILDING MINUS THE CONCRETE CORE COLLAPSED. Steel framed structes collapse. The combination of a plane makes it worse.

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1205200872 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Are u an architect ...

    Are u an architect or something like that? What de hell do you know aboud buildings? Nothing??Why did the windsor buildind in madrid not collapse which was burning too? Dont say crap. Theres somewhere an interview with the wtc´s architect and he sais the building would never collapse because of the fire

    By 4zer0 [Affiliate User] 1205059624 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The extream heat ...

    The extream heat caused by the fires, heated up the building so much that the steel support beams weakened and snapped.

    If you look at the design of the building, the impact and the fires you will see that a collapse was inevidable. Because the 2nd plane hit lower the tower had more weight to bare on the impact zone and so the 2nd impacted tower collapsed 1st.

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1205001217 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The extream heat ...

    The extream heat caused by the fires, heated up the building so much that the steel support beams weakened and snapped.

    If you look at the design of the building, the impact and the fires you will see that a collapse was inevidable. Because the 2nd plane hit lower the tower had more weight to bare on the impact zone and so the 2nd impacted tower collapsed 1st.

    By Pawluk44 [Affiliate User] 1205001210 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • what caused the ...

    what caused the buildings to just fall after standing for so long after the crashes

    By Josh14Hockey [Affiliate User] 1204981543 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I'm not the only ...

    I'm not the only one saying it was not the arabs doing this...

    By fabmic [Affiliate User] 1204459490 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
25 Comments | Add Comment