Metacafe Header Takeover

9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show You

Tags:
9/11 Brussell World Trade Center CNN Fox News Hoax Jamie Mae McIntyre Pentagon Shanksville Towers Twins
1Trainwreck
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    1Trainwreck
  • International International
  • Comments: 1
  • Views: 7,211
  • Added: 01-Jun-07

A few excerpts of live television coverage of the events on September 11, 2001. It was clearly a hoax, as many people around the world now believe. These clips are from a 2-hour dvd available at the website http://www.MaeBrussell.com.

There are dozens of indications 9/11/01 wasn't what President Bush wants you to believe. Here are just a few:

*Four planes can't crash and leave no wreckage.

*Demolition charges, not planes, blew up the three buildings in the World Trade Center.

*If real planes had crashed into the same area of the initial detonations wouldn't that screw things up? I would think so.

*The fake CGI video clips of flight 175 approaching the Twin Towers has the plane traveling too fast.
watch?v=63BNIz8IIng
watch?v=zQTsiLX3XbA

*The fake CGI video clips of flight 175 flying through the South Tower show 90 or so percent of the fuel flying out the building, yet the many news cameras in the Trade Center that morning show no evidence or comment of fuel, or smell of fuel, on the streets and people below.

*The fake CGI video clips of flight 175 shows a plane that is a black shadowy plane-shaped cartoon and not a real plane.
watch?v=bqjKeBS1JwE

*Whoever created the CGI of the flight 175 plane not only did a terrible job, but goofed and allowed the nose of the plane to exit the building before exploding:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/missileout/index.htm

*The explosions of the planes smashing through the Twin Towers couldn't be more Hollywood-like. In Star Wars maybe, but the real world just isn't like that.
watch?v=gmjjK2MYKDg

*Everyone now knows that no plane crashed into the Pentagon, yet CNN interviewed a USA Today employee claiming he saw a plane crash and pieces were on the overpass. This type of plant/actor is similar to Col. L. Fletcher Prouty's description in his 1992 book JFK (chapter 3). You can read it in the "Articles, excerpts, & notes" section at http://www.maebrussell.com.

*A small army of these organized terrorists were in the World Trade Center that day. One of them (carrying a large bag) can be seen in the first video clip here. He misses his cue when a real person butts in. The actor turns around and goes back, then returns for his lengthy interview (interview not included here). He says he saw fire in the elevator shafts.

*Still pictures of the damage to the North Tower shown in TV documentaries and on the internet are fake, such as this one: www.whatreallyhappened.com/woman_wtc.jpg
and contradict the video shots aired by CNN that morning (last video clip posted here, or here's another one: /watch?v=1G6TQfIHJPo). Among other things, the beams at the upper right of the North Tower are jutting outward, whereas in the fake pics they have been straightened out.

For many years the late political researcher Mae Brussell exposed just how and why the traditional domestic U.S. eastern establishment powers, such as the Rockefellers and Kennedys, are being wiped out by the more sadistic, foreign interests infiltrating the United States (essentially the same folks we were fighting during WWII). And on Sept. 11, 2001 the Rockefeller-built World Trade Center was blown up littered with jokes and comedy acts for anybody who bothers to look.

Watch out whenever you hear somebody say the following:

*Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover killed JFK.

*IBM's connections to the holocaust.

*The Rockefellers created AIDS.

*We need to do away with the United Nations.

*There was a 17 ft. circular hole in the Pentagon wall on 9/11/01.

Here is a typical example of bogus information to keep the public hopping:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=o11YmQ7-Ld8

To help understand to what extent these foreign terrorists have infiltrated the U.S. government and news media please check out the following links:

www.maebrussell.com/The%20War/
The%20War%20-%20The%20Balkans.html

www.maebrussell.com/Articles%20and%20
Notes/Yugoslav%20trial.html

www.fuseboxfilms.com/
Ron Hatchett Interview.mp3

www.fuseboxfilms.com/Milosevic Interview.mp3

Other important books to check out:

"Sabotage - The Secret War Against America" by Sayers and Kahn

"Plot Against The Peace" by Sayers and Kahn

"The Bluegrass Conspiracy" by Sally Denton

"On The Trail of the Assassins" by Jim Garrison

"The Last Circle" by Carol Marshall
http://www.lycaeum.org/books/books/last_circle/0.htm

Good luck.

P.S.- Also search "Mae Brussell" at http://video.google.com

  1. Categories: News & Events
  2. Favorite On: mikew0377 SmokenSparta
Comments on

9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show You

26 Comments | Add Comment
  • conspiracy!!!!!

    by the brilliant mind of george bush!!
    the man is a a genius and fooled all americans (except those wise souls who know it is a conspiracy!!!!)

    By TheJapanChannel.com 1226722267 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I have watched the ...

    I have watched the live video and the real pics taken of the pentagon, i've never seen a documentary about 911...

    the pentagon is the easiest to explain... I cant believe that anyone would think that anything BUT a regular airplane hit it...

    By the by, I misspoke, I never intimated that there was no wreckage, there was wreckage, in those trees and scattered about.

    There are many things which can cause explosions other than "Explosives"... man why cant anyone understand that simple fact?

    By ragephene [Affiliate User] 1216068741 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • chillwill, He might ...

    chillwill,
    He might have saw the explosion and later believed it was a plane after seeing it on TV. If you watch the many news stations' coverage you can see there was no fuel (or smell), or wreckage down below. Just people looking up at the buildings. Watch carefully all of the shots of people running as the buildings were blown up. Streets and sidewalks had no evidence of plane wreckage. Nor was there any comment. There was one hub of a wheel under scaffolding, but I believe that was planted.

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1216068628 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Listen Man, My ...

    Listen Man, My father saw the plane crash into the the 2nd tower with his own eyes. You see that Verizon building in your clips? He worked there. There is no question that planes hit the towers. Now if you want to say it was an inside job, that may be, but planes hit the damn building.

    By chillwill120 [Affiliate User] 1216067201 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ragephene wrong. ...

    ragephene wrong. this guy took back his first comments, saying exactly the opposite on a second interview. why should i search for idiot as you say, when i take it out of the open media. see what i mean u shapeshifting goof.

    By whodoweshoot [Affiliate User] 1216066922 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Furthermore, if you ...

    Furthermore, if you wouldn't cherry pick your footage, you'd see that there is more than enough footage of wreckage of all 4 planes...

    Do an iota of research before you believe this guy... thanks

    By ragephene [Affiliate User] 1216066101 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • lol - This is ...

    lol - This is terrible. There was a 17 ft circular hole in the pentagon because the landing gear became a giant bullet... Look at the pictures taken from across the highway of the pentagon, you can see the whole length of the plane's impact on the side of the building.

    The plane in the field: Normal plane crashes leave more debris because they tend to break up and skid into the ground or break up before they hit the ground, this one went straight down and burned up...

    By ragephene [Affiliate User] 1216066031 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Rather has always ...

    Rather has always been a part of the propaganda machine, going back as far as the JFK assassination:

    /spot(dot)acorn(dot)net/jfkplace/09/
    fp.back_issues/05th_Issue/rather(dot)html

    Question: How many times have you seen Dan Rather point out that the planes crashing into the Twin Towers are obvious CGI; there was no plane wreckage at any of the 4 "crash sites"; the witnesses who said they saw planes crash were obvious bad actors; and all 3 buildings were brought down by explosives, not planes?

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1216065147 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • A monkey can see ...

    A monkey can see through this.

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1216064692 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Just wondering- ...

    Just wondering- what does Dan Rather have to do with this?

    By nial66 [Affiliate User] 1216063048 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Looks and sounds ...

    Looks and sounds Italian to me.

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1216055491 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • dude at the ...

    dude at the beginning is a taliban they should
    have arrested him

    By hxcmexi [Affiliate User] 1216054282 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Honestly, someone ...

    Honestly, someone on the street claims that there was no plane and that is was a bomb and you take that as fact.


    oh wow...
    You are easily convinced.


    And you claim that it was a hoax filled with actors?

    Have you EVER met someone who lost a family member or a friend in the attacks?! Are you kidding me?? I have met someone who has been effected. You have not.

    This entire video is bullshit.

    By LolliChan703 [Affiliate User] 1216054142 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • People Like You are ...

    People Like You are ignorant and Should Die For even Saying make Believe Crap Like 9/11 was fake and The videos were Made to look like The Planes hit the Buildings hmmm How do u explain the THOUSANDS of New yorkers seeing ther damn things hit the Towers.

    By Comet4life03 [Affiliate User] 1216041586 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • mskydolphin, Which ...

    mskydolphin,
    Which terrorists are you referring to? The ones that showed up alive and well long after 9/11/01?

    If remoted-controlled planes had crashed into the buildings there wouldn't have been beams blasted out from the inside of the North Tower. Also there would have been plane wreckage down below for all to see.

    Interesting how landing gear and engines disintegrate into space dust but a terrorist passport doesn't. They should make planes out of the same stuff.

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1216035748 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • hmm lets think here ...

    hmm lets think here People 4 Planes (full of Passangers)Crashed and their are many FAMILIES that Talk about loosing loved ones on those Planes So where are the People Who Died on the Flights Then if this was supposivly a conspiracy?

    By Comet4life03 [Affiliate User] 1215992329 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • 1Train. They have ...

    1Train. They have the new fireproof
    passports now.
    Good thing they have all that survailence
    footage of the terrorists boarding the planes.

    Imagine the looks on the terroist's faces
    when they realised that the planes were
    being flown by remote-control.

    bah

    ae911Truth. org

    By mskydolphin [Affiliate User] 1215988977 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thanks Spikeybeast. ...

    Thanks Spikeybeast.

    here's another interesting one

    Good video on Pentagon vs wtc

    google

    The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself

    By mskydolphin [Affiliate User] 1215988764 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Yeah, sure they did ...

    Yeah, sure they did. Right next to Atta's passport.

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1215988182 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ok, except they did ...

    ok, except they did find the black box from both planes that hit the world trade center, the pentegon, and the one in PA. 4 for 4

    By jsmith28500 [Affiliate User] 1215981552 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • you are a retard ...

    you are a retard loser libtard charles, take your conspircay theory and put it wher the sun doesnt shine. And move out of your mommies basement while your at it, your too old to still be living their

    By jsmith28500 [Affiliate User] 1215981476 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • jsmith, Not ...

    jsmith,
    Not possible for 4 100-ton planes to crash and leave zero tons of wreckage. Would have been carcass of planes, engines, black boxes, bodies, luggage, jet fuel (especially smell), and landing gear for all to see. There was nothing but obviously fake video and some b-actors saying they say planes. Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland came down in a fireball when it was bombed. Much of that was pieced together in a hanger (front cover of Time Magazine even showed it).

    By 1Trainwreck [Affiliate User] 1215977377 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • i agree with ...

    i agree with mskydolphin

    By spikeybeast28 [Affiliate User] 1215974216 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • he only turned ...

    he only turned around because of the cop car coming is way

    By spikeybeast28 [Affiliate User] 1215974055 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Your retarded or ...

    Your retarded or blind jsmith28500.

    By charlesrosaly [Affiliate User] 1215971671 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • yes its been almost ...

    yes its been almost 50 years since kennedy and i see we found out the truth. Just get off your conspiracy theory, ok the plane traveled 500 mph straight down head first into the ground, thats why ther are few remains

    By jsmith28500 [Affiliate User] 1215965772 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
26 Comments | Add Comment