911

Tags:
9/11 911 Afghanistan Attack Bush Cheney Conspiracy Iraq Lies N.w.o. Oil Police Sep.11th State Terrorists Thermite Wars World Trade Center
samus1421
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    samus1421
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 130
  • Added: 23-May-06

Proof of WTC Controlled Demolition.

The buildings oscillated for four minutes & then re-stabilized. Kerosene or jet fuel flashes at about 167 degrees Fahrenheit & burns VERY rapidly. Steel loses its structural integrity at about 2000 degrees Fahrenheit! The only other fuel was common office equipment. This type of material does not achieve considerable temperatures relative to melting steel. NEVER in history has a steel structure building such as this fallen due to fire; not even those who have burned for up to a day!!!
Were plastic explosives used? Why wasn't this even suggested as a possibility? Who gained from this atrocity? PNAC: Project for the New American Century. Look it up. It is real. Prepare yourselves & inform yourselves. Peace!

  1. Categories: How To
  2. Favorite On: soldierx
Comments on

911

25 Comments | Add Comment
  • Nuclear? No wonder ...

    Nuclear? No wonder they cut Michael Moores film, - it would have backed up all the sickness claims from people who live around the towers. These claims by people who are genuinely, clearly sick are presently dismissed by authority.

    By idasputem [Affiliate User] 1206729165 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Controlled ...

    Controlled demolition...end of story.

    By Orwellsbud [Affiliate User] 1206121533 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Jet fuel explodes ...

    Jet fuel explodes and causes combustion.

    By Yrocker [Affiliate User] 1198880946 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • it didn't turn to ...

    it didn't turn to dust all that dust was from all the things it took to build those buildings like sheet rock and all the other material, u really think that a building as big as it was 110 floors each floor 1 acre would simply stack right on top of each other? no it wouldn't..

    By michadam1985 [Affiliate User] 1181226667 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • omg yeah ok

    omg yeah ok

    By michadam1985 [Affiliate User] 1181225271 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Jet fuel burns ...

    Jet fuel burns inside the engines doesn't it. Hello second i didn't say it burns when it's in the jets.
    The fuel has to burn sometime or else the plane wouldn't fly. That creates a lot of heat in the engine
    and they don't melt. Next time read carefully before you start calling people names.And if a building collapsed then it would be stacked on top of itself
    not turn to dust.

    By asustech007455 [Affiliate User] 1181144391 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • how stupid can u be ...

    how stupid can u be first of all jet fuel isnt on fire when its in the jet thats why it doesnt melt the engines just like any kind of fuel (common sense hello) second, concrete is different then steel the building itself didnt melt the steel beams did smart guy causing all the weight of the building above the plane to fall on top of the rest of the building bringing the whole building down, let me remind u people that the WTC was not small each floor was 1 acre

    By michadam1985 [Affiliate User] 1181142847 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Think about this if ...

    Think about this if jet fuel got that hot how could
    you use it in jet engines. Wouldnt it melt the engines. And even if it did how in the sam hell could it melt a damn 110 story building. them builings desinagrated. There ain't no damn way jet fuel alone
    did that. That's not to mention the concrete. Pour
    jet fuel on your sidewalk and see if it melts or pulverizes it. No way! No way! Controlled demolition
    period end of story.

    By asustech007455 [Affiliate User] 1179096879 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Contrary to what ...

    Contrary to what the narrative with this video says, steel loses 75% of it's structural integrity at 600F degrees. Far lower than the 2000 that many people tout. These buildings collapsed because of their truss construction which is very weak under fire conditions. Other buildings that have burned have been steel/concrete core and not truss construction. Get a life people!

    By mhoff19938 [Affiliate User] 1176026991 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • MicroNuke?hmmm...I ...

    MicroNuke?hmmm...I wouldn't put it pass the neocons. However, if you consider the way industrial steel melts, and the physics of it, it wouldn't crumble, it would 'buckle'...NOT crumble! As I said before, industrial MELTS @ 2500*F, Jet A-1 MAX burn is @ 1700*F ! You do the math!

    By Arthurox [Affiliate User] 1174760675 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • No way a ...

    No way a thermonuclear device could have been used. First of all, the explosion from the nuclear test he's trying to compare this too was miles wide. On top of that, it was detonated over 600 feet below ground! If a device like that would have been set of in the basement of the towers, everything within a couple miles would have been vaporized, and a huge crater would have formed.

    By 6nschlyer [Affiliate User] 1173063121 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Plastic explosives ...

    Plastic explosives yes, thermal nuclear....WTF do you know how powerful a thermal nuclear bomb is??? Anywayz with all you paranoid people who sound supposedly like "experts" but are basically talking bullshit and having an idiot for a president; i have to say this is why America is starting to go down the drain.

    By Cloud2122 [Affiliate User] 1172709134 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It's amazing how ...

    It's amazing how many people have become experts on S**t they have no clue about...

    By SilverHamer [Affiliate User] 1172436376 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The U.S Government ...

    The U.S Government carried out 9/11. Simple as that....And as time goes by the truth will eventually come out. Americans need to wake up to the truth before there country goes down the toilet.

    By djguy10 [Affiliate User] 1171211873 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • WOW!! I can't ...

    WOW!! I can't believe you people buy into this S**t Why don't you use that money to go back to school and buy a fuckin clue back to reality...

    By SeveredAttempt [Affiliate User] 1165500779 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • its kinda of funny ...

    its kinda of funny how when bush is in president all hell breaks loose.. yet people still follow him.. i wonder if people realize that bush makes money on war..

    By kaleigh79 [Affiliate User] 1165354853 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Because a 757 and a ...

    Because a 757 and a 767 are mere "pencils" to the WTC. Right. A thermonuclear device would have taken out the whole of southern Manhattan. This mockumentary is a joke.

    And hooray for dumbass sheep like the T**t that posted below me. People like you are what is wrong with America. No, the world.

    By JoboHimself [Affiliate User] 1164982373 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You are the F**king ...

    You are the F**king stupidest and most parinoid F**k on the F**king earth you moron! I am so F**king outraged that you think this is an even romotely possible theory! Have you even seen that fuel go off your pea-brained fool! it goes off in a hellish fire storm! and it would melt those steal poles like butter!

    By robindavidmorris [Affiliate User] 1163715633 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Experts in FINLAND!

    Experts in FINLAND!

    By Etzo123 [Affiliate User] 1160537962 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • any sane person, ...

    any sane person, can see or knows this was a demolition. i wonder why the american people just swallow this nonsence about terrorists, and dont take action against this mafia administration in the white house...

    By Floldy [Affiliate User] 1156387384 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • a thermo nuclear ...

    a thermo nuclear device in the basement? The the smoke would have come from the BOTTOM of the towers, not the top. It would also be radioactive and the towers would have VAPORIZED no smoke, no dust.

    Any other arguments you'd like utterly decimated?

    By ImNotWearingPants [Affiliate User] 1156243356 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • LOOK AT THE FACTS? ...

    LOOK AT THE FACTS?
    AMERICA DONT LOVE YOU OR ANYBODY JUST MONEY & POWER OH & SATAN?

    By DESIREMC [Affiliate User] 1149259816 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Who the hell is ...

    Who the hell is this guy and why should I care about his opinion?

    By MarkyX [Affiliate User] 1148627930 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • why would bush send ...

    why would bush send the national guard to the mexican border??? for one reason , so that those bastards, his friends and oil buddies (as seen on farentheite 911) can strike again while all the help is miles away at the boarder, what a government ??

    By jjvaldez [Affiliate User] 1148356828 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Our so-called ...

    Our so-called government is the real terrorist! Inform yourself. Prepare for more & don’t believe their horseshit lies they broadcast through mainstream media. Aka: cnn, nbc, cbs, abc, fox.

    By samus1421 [Affiliate User] 1148355967 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
25 Comments | Add Comment