Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11

Tags:
11 2008 2012 77 9/11 93 Afghanistan Air Al Alex Aliens Amero Aquarius Army Blackwater Britain Bush Change Cheney China Christian Clinton Combat Commission Debunked Democrat Elections Europe Fakery Feith Force Haarp Hearings Hologram Hydrogen Impeachment
Freedomlover911
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    Freedomlove...
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 648
  • Added: 15-Apr-08

Watch this video in HIGH QUALITY!!

Thanks for all of the comments and research assistance in the past several months since I first uploaded a raw version of this evidence. I hope this is presented in a way that creates more understanding in what occurred at the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Please rate, leave your comments and pass this on to everyone!

UPDATE:
Also now on Google Video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4650204243222697402

Here is a very interesting link I found pertaining to remote control aircraft and military drones:
http://911exposed.org/Missile.htm

**********************************
Added July 25, 2008 -Reply to FAQs:

The laser movement was one item that confused me for awhile as I do know that LDs are typically stationary. It wasn't until I found the UAV moving at high speeds that it made sense. Also finding the reflections from above (in the smoke) and on the FNM building exposed the angle and approach of the source (the airborne platform). Observing the flight path and timing of the UAV makes this more clear. Had the UAV been following (behind) the Boeing it (the Laser signature) would have been stationary.

Here is where I have to insert my own theory: the UAV was off of the intended flight path and approached from the SW instead of S as the Boeing traveled. It may have been late to the target and in order to catch up, it cut the angle and projected the laser just moments before impact. Also, this UAV drone likely equipped with a Williams Research turbine jet has a max speed of approx 250mph and the Boeing was traveling at least twice that fast. Because of the laser appearing on the building in the foreground (appears to be next to towers) I have estimated that the UAV must be at a much higher altitude and actually out over the bay at the time of the targeting operation.

As you can see in the video, the moment sensors on the Boeing pick up the laser, the remote controlled plane banks to port (left) and hits just below the laser. The plane appeared to be slightly off course as well. Had the laser been done correctly and timely, the plane would have had more time to correct and would have hit the target on center just like the N Tower job.

This would explain both the moving laser AND why the plane suddenly turned. Had a human pilot been on the plane, there would have been no way at those speeds to detect and correct an off-target approach. The maneuver was entirely mechanical.

You may find it interesting that I give credit to Killtown for helping me find the reflections of the laser. He did a "hit piece" video to show the reflection (paper) on the FNM building. Seeing this I postulated that there may be another reflection in the smoke and I knew where to look now (45 degrees up and to the left). I looked closely and viola! There it was! Perfect timing and brilliance. It all came together.
This confirmed for me at least that all of these associated pieces meant that the plane was real, remote controlled and laser guided.

Here is another FAQ "what happened to the passengers?"
http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html
Reposted here:
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7199
And here:
http://philjayhan.wordpress.com/category/flight-175/
Video links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDshVgRx2Xw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGRyotcPh4

More analysis of the "dot" by "ABC1416" here (thanks for the lead SpudXXXX!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXfaVzfuTkU

One other FAQ:
"why does the laser appear to 'go through' the tower? It couldn't possibly be a reflection!",
and response:
I made the same mistake at first!
You are seeing an optical 2D illusion that makes it appear to "go through" the building. First thing I had to do was to identify that green top building. I looked long and hard on Google Earth for that building and discovered the "Federal National Memorial Building". Turns out it is about six blocks away to the SE. You are actually seeing the reflection off the south side of the south tower to the west side of the FNMB. Most people confuse this building with the Woolworth Building, but upon closer inspection you can see the differences. That is why I point out the two in the video. Pay close attention to the annotations.

Explanation of Laser Designation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_designator

***********************************
Northwoods Document:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
"drone (unmanned)" on pg 8 (3/b). Page 9 section 6, "military drone aircraft" and "modifying an aircraft" to appear as a Cuban Mig. Page 10 section 8 describes how a "passenger" plane would be disguised and shot down with a fake passenger list.
Also on page 8, section 2/a/11 "mock victims". More about fake passengers...
*******************************

Please feel free to comment!
Peace
FL911


****************************

  1. Categories: News & Events
Comments on

Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11

25 Comments | Add Comment
  • I will have that ...

    I will have that image in a few weeks from a friend. I gave away my DVD that had the blown up image a long time ago without thinking. I never planned to do this YT thing!! The resolution on YT does not allow for posting my original format. I did have the download link until a few weeks ago...it has been pulled down, very unfortunate. Believe me, I will update this channel when I get that extra footage.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214314400 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I didnt see a UAV ...

    I didnt see a UAV in this video...is there another one that clearly shows this...let me know..thanks.

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214314208 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "Laser Targ systems ...

    "Laser Targ systems do not track in lines...."

    And this is exactly what bothered me the last 4 years since I first saw this. It wasn't until I found the UAV in the footage shown 20 seconds after the plane strike did it make any sense. In a clockwise pattern, the flight of the UAV makes perfect time from targeting, target hit and appearance on the video. The angle of the laser from above also confirms this. The entire operation was controlled remotely from ground or airborne control center.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214314093 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • By all means, if ...

    By all means, if you have the HD vid...post it.

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214314068 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • but you can see the ...

    but you can see the plane bank to port as soon as the sensors acquire target. This is a mechanical movement. A human pilot would not know to make any correction at those speeds...especially a "novice" as the supposed terrorist were. The NIR is invisible to the human eye and analog cameras and not hot as you suggest. By the way, I was a Guided Missile Tech and worked with the same systems while in the military. This was not a commonly used or current system. It dates back to my days.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214313832 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This may surprise ...

    This may surprise you, but I have seen blown up images of this from the original higher definition footage that literally shows "light" on the building as though it were a reflection of sunlight. You are correct about the "movement" being unusual. The remote controlled UAV was behind schedule and off target and it was coming in from the left. The first plane was dead center in the N Tower, perfect targeting job. The plane was slightly off for the S Tower. The IR laser didn't help much...

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214313543 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I gave you thumbs ...

    I gave you thumbs up on that one bro. Take care and keep in touch.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214313055 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • then based on the ...

    then based on the size of the floors of the building, we would conclude that the laser is approx 5 to 8 feet wide...know of any white light emitting, motion sensing, satellite based 5-8 foot lasers out there? Not me...and back in 1979, at 9 yrs old, I built my first laser...and then at 12, won an award for building a series of 3 lasers. I don't know everything there is to know about lasers or targ systems, but I know enough to know, that this is just a dead end theory.

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214309412 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • They don't track at ...

    They don't track at all, there are location specific....they target a stationary object, and if the object moves, the ordinance misses.

    Not to mention, if there were light emanating from a laser, at the white spectrum, it would be so hot, that it would cut a line right into the building...and at that point, whats the point of needing missiles anymore?

    Hold on, I have more: Once that debris moves onto the other building, if it is a laser moving along the surface of the building....

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214309093 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I can use your own ...

    I can use your own video as evidence, there are many other white dots, representing debris, that are moving along there own lines as well. perhaps i will have to make a vid of my own to show this.

    All this is pointless tho...Any laser based targeting system of which i am aware, does NOT register white, yellow, or any other bright color on its target.

    Now who is being asked to believe the impossible...literally, as that tech just does not exist. Laser Targ systems do not track in lines....

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214308780 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Ok, now that I ...

    Ok, now that I agree with.

    Let it be known that no matter how much a skeptic like me and a Truther like you may disagree on some points...the points you made above are ones we can def come together on.

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214308575 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Yes indeed. We are ...

    Yes indeed. We are witnessing a "repeat of history". Yet another imperial despot trying to rule the world.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214304772 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I know how badly ...

    I know how badly you wish to be right bambino. Sorry buddy.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214304375 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What is important ...

    What is important about it is that 9/11 was the foundation for making you believe that invading other countries and killing hundreds of thousands of brown people was a great idea. Expose the lie and the entire house of cards falls. Bring down the house and jail the criminals. Justice the world can rejoice about. Lessons about power and corruption. Dispelling the myth that "it can't happen here". Talk about a wake up call. What is more important than all of this?

    Status quo? Hell no!

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214304258 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "there is far ...

    "there is far better evidence that it is debris"

    Can you back up this claim with another source of video that shows this? This is the ultimate test of your theory. By the way, you are competing with other naysayers who say this is a bird, paper or reflection. In all this time though, no one has produced any alternate video source of this anomaly. I looked for 4 years myself.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214303966 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • yeah, you're such a ...

    yeah, you're such a regular that the stool at the bar has your permanent butt prints and all of the patrons know your name...

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214303726 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "OR watch the ...

    "OR watch the internet documentary Zeitgeist."

    You have to be real stupid to fall for that crap. But then again, most CTs are.

    I will give it credit for excellent presentation. It is a wonderful piece of fiction, that was put together very well. To bad that on it's own is not enough to make up for the fact that it's complete BS.

    By bambino291 [Affiliate User] 1214274191 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Anyone that blindly ...

    Anyone that blindly believes that 9/11 was not a staged event involving the U.S government is real ignorant. SImilar events have happened numerous times over the last 100 years. Do some research. OR watch the internet documentary Zeitgeist. Good stuff if your interested in the matter.

    By camd1000 [Affiliate User] 1214242559 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Good for you dude.. ...

    Good for you dude...but to be honest, even if 9/11 was the brainchild of George Bush, I don't really see what's so amazing about it...Yeah I know it meant hundreds of innocent americans died, but to be honest, more than that number have been killed in Afganistan and Iraq in the name of oil, and more have been killed than that by facists in history, and even now...I don't see why it's such a big deal when a lot of other places are doing similarly.

    By heresjonny666 [Affiliate User] 1214236774 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I haven't commented ...

    I haven't commented on this that much. I simply look to see who has replied to my comments than go back.

    Again, your "laser" somehow reflects off of a fireball? A "laser" that wouldn't be seen by the camera in the first place? Not to mention it is flapping...

    Sorry kid, it's a bird or two. You can not offer a valid explanation to the problems I pointed out in your "laser" claim.

    By bambino291 [Affiliate User] 1214234939 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • well we can get ...

    well we can get lost in what it was or wasnt, but to say its a laser, is just dumb to me. Not only is there no evidence of that, there is far better evidence that it is debris.

    But hey, believe what you must...i just wish you guys would actually do real research, and maybe take your 'evidence' to court, not to youtube. Can you imagine any other case being essentially tried on You tube before it gets tried by the people in a proper setting?

    By jandarian [Affiliate User] 1214234533 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Stick around, it's ...

    Stick around, it's not hard to figure out that there are unanswerable questions that demand to be answered. This video is a product of my near 5 years of research on every aspect of 9/11 and the questions that surround it. I have found no evidence that the "official" story is even marginally the truth. I never wanted to come to the conclusions that is the subject matter of my channel. The first time it hit me I almost fell to pieces. I love my country more than any woman truth be known.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214208403 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Eh, fair enough. I ...

    Eh, fair enough.

    I still don't think there's any great conspiracy.

    By heresjonny666 [Affiliate User] 1214204561 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • This footage (with ...

    This footage (with the dot) has appeared on numerous television programs and "conspiracy" documentaries with nary a mention of the "dot". If this were fake, it would have to have come from the person filming. What would be the purpose of adding this dot? Think about it and get back to me. I have made more progress than anyone on calling attention to this anomaly. No one talked about it much before now. I know, I've been looking for another video source of this dot for 4 years. It doesn't exist.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214201267 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "The day may come ...

    "The day may come when people...(me?) may endeavor to find folks like you, and put you where you belong."

    Where would that be partner? So, it's criminal to question the government? Where are we now, no 1st amendment? Are we jailing for "thoughtcrime" now? Is this the kind of country you want? Read "1984". I'm guessing that you haven't.

    By Freedomlover911 [Affiliate User] 1214200980 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
25 Comments | Add Comment