International
Penn & Teller on 911 conspiracy theorists
and degenerate families?? Thats a little far. Its your family thats the degenerate. Obviously ignorance runs deep in your family. You are the reason the world looks at Americans like a bunch of F**king assholes and morons. First time in my life i have to be ashamed to be from America. Everyone i talk to outside this country thinks were all idiots and retards. And you have proven to me why!
By babak05 [Affiliate User] 1210888495 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewow! lol. you guys are F**king funny. I dont need to do damage control. It's obvious 9/11 was a cover up and inside job. You guys are just too busy jerking each others dicks to know whats going on besides which one of you is ass F**king your sisters. Since you both F**king rednecks maybe next time ill talk about hamms beer and the proper way to wear a wife beater.
By babak05 [Affiliate User] 1210888341 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Remove"i know your anus"
When I lived in Istanbul, the Turks claimed all Persians were queer for little boys' asses. So I'll bet you know a LOT about anuses, you little Farsi Fruit.
babak folan folan shodeh
And the same to that child-F**king Prophet of yours, and Ali ibn Abi Talib, who licks the Shaitan's left testicle in Hell.
"babk05 is just a sock-puppet for the jihadists"
Explains why the little prick acted so F**king dense & wouldn't even look at the video. I didn't notice the all-Persian & Iranian bullshit in his Favorites.
There are a LOT of these Muslim cocksuckers pushing Truther crap on Youtube. Time to start rounding these bastards up & deporting them & their F**king degenerate families.
"These aren't difficult answers. You just don't like 'em"
Not surprising he doesn't like them. babk05 is just a sock-puppet for the jihadists, who have a serious interest in having people believe it wasn't S**k ass Muslim cocksuckers piloting the planes on 9-11.
They figure it might put off the day when we light up Teheran and Mecca with some sizeable nuclear bursts.
Hopefully duing the height of the Hajj.
He knows very well what happened on 9-11. This is just Muslim "damage control."
dude thermite shaped charges will cut exactly at 45 degrees. and the cuts werent sideways they were at 45 degrees. everyone knows that pulling a building means "demolishing a building" so i know your anus is wrapped real tight right now but my definition of "pull" means demolishing a building. here is clip for you to watch "Evidence for thermite and view of the "spire" collapse"
By babak05 [Affiliate User] 1210866165 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removebabk05 -
Didn't you even look at that video of Demo Dave?Why should we bother posting anything if you just ignore it and rattle off nonsense about thermite that nobody (aside from PrisonPlanet groupies) believes?
"im not saying im a demolition expert"
That's pretty obvious, and your "general knowledge" is dead wrong. Thermite cannot cut sideways, makes an unbelievably sloppy cut, and cannot be timed at all, as any soldier with a thermite grenade can attest. That's why it is NEVER, EVER used in controlled demo.
"Pull" means pull with cables. Period. He was talking about pulling out the team in #7, which everyone knew was ready to fall on its own.
These aren't difficult answers. You just don't like 'em.
"the temperature that steel melts at?"
Any idiot can handle that - around 2800F or so. But it's F**king IRRELEVANT since steel softens, warps and fails long before that.
Temp of burning jet fuel is also irrelevant. As every structural engineering article has clearly stated, the jet fuel only STARTED the fires, and most office fires reach 1600-1800F, enough to warp, bust bolts & welds. Most of the strength is gone long before 1800F anyhow.
Read Asteneh's article, or Jrnl of Struc. Mechanix
im not saying im a demolition expert. However i do have some general knowledge. Thermite is the material used to blow columns?correct? thermite charges create those exact 45 degree cuts. I doubt someone will cut as perfectly as that charge. Second i am quoting that F**ker silverstein in which he sais "they had decided to "pull" the building" as in "having it demolished" And no one answered my questions..whats up?? dont have an answer for that one? which is the main question anyway.
By babak05 [Affiliate User] 1210864065 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removewell since your so smary blaupunkt can you tell me the temperature that steel melts at? And what is the max burning temperature of airline fuel? And as far as staying in the shallow end of the pool maybe you hit your head on the deep end and forgot the laws of physics.
By babak05 [Affiliate User] 1210861214 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Remove"support beams that were cut by explosives at a 45 degree angle??"
Another amateur bullshitter that has never seen anything cut by RDX or det cord.
It's a torch cut, dimwit, as any idiot can see.
Controlled demo cuts at two ends, with a kicker charge in between. Where are the two sloppy-ass RDX cuts at each end of each column? And where are the hard-to-miss signs of the kicker charge on each one?
"Pulled" means cable-pulled by equipment in demo talk. It NEVER refers to blasting. Ever.
"to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 707"
Yes, but what they did NOT factor in was a plane at FULL SPEED, with that much fuel, and fires that burned out of control & couldn't even be fought, as the Empire State crash was.
Most structural engineers think that if the fires could have been fought, WTC might have stood at least long enough for total evacuation.
Cherry-picking data seems to be a specialty of you sock-puppets for PrisonPlanet.
Try reading an article by structural engrs.
"the beams are clearly cut at 45 degree angles and that would never happen in a real collapse"
Because it DIDN'T happen during the collapse. It was done with demo torches. On some close-ups you can even see the hinge joint at the top that controls the fall when the grapple picks it up. Video of "Demo Dave" on Youtube, describing it as it happens:
youtube. com/watch?v=FfgSr2eBXls
People who don't know S**t about demo or torches should stay in the shallow end of the pool.
"David Ray Griffin wrote a book"
Gosh -- a theology professor who believes in ESP, telekinesis & the usual paranormal crap .. now THERE's a really scientific source. You should read some of the other strange S**t he's written.
So now your giant conspiracy includes a few thousand people in the Hearst Corp, also?
Everybody that doesn't listen to PrisonPlanet is on this plot?
It's called paranoia, boy. Take your Lithium.
pumapaulwaul, your inability to respond with anything meaningful only confirms your ignorance. Please don't waste my time with your simplistic and narrow minded dribblings of thought. Find yourself a video game or a blow up doll and leave the informed discourse to people who actually care about what is going on in our country.
By boelinRR [Affiliate User] 1210211563 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removebed wetter
By pumapaulwaul [Affiliate User] 1210166410 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe Popular Mechanics issue, (not a book) was not an "independent investigation". It was another attempt by the Hearst organization to mislead and mis-direct the public regarding 9/11. They only touched on the weakest arguments, and used the same flawed reasoning to discredit questioners of the "official version" that the 9/11 commission used. 47 massive steel columns do not all fail simultaneously due to asymmetric impact and fire damage. Twice. On the same day. Not to mention WTC#7. Wake up.
By boelinRR [Affiliate User] 1210159209 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down Removei read it... did you read Griffin's book? check it out.
Peace!
The Popular Mechanics book was an independent investigation. I'm sorry if you refuse to accept that.
By pumapaulwaul [Affiliate User] 1210083957 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveThe engineers on the WTC design team were John Skilling and Les Robertson. They are on record as having designed the building to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 707. On YouTube search, type in "WTC design (Part 2)" for some enlightenment. Nice of you to respond with such eloquence; "Absolute bullshit". Also impressive is your grasp of the English language; "What all the ones I've seen interviewed..." You are probably a shill anyway, but for anyone else reading, this might be helpful.
By boelinRR [Affiliate User] 1210044963 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveDavid Ray Griffin wrote a book called Debunking 9/11 Debunking. It is a well written book in response to popular mechanics.
We need an independent investigation not a government cover up.
Popular Mechanics did an independent study. You might want to check it out.
By pumapaulwaul [Affiliate User] 1209703877 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveLOL you had to stick Bill in there didn't you?
By pumapaulwaul [Affiliate User] 1209703782 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveF**k you fork. the beams i am talking about are the ones with th FIRE FIGHTERS in front of them. the only crap around here is the S**t between your ears. heres a suggestion, wipe that S**t out of your head and look at the pictures sheep! the beams are clearly cut at 45 degree angles and that would never happen in a real collapse. you probably wont understand what im talking about cause this does not relate to beer or wearing wife beaters!
By babak05 [Affiliate User] 1209317518 Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down RemoveRated 3.57 | 771 Views
Rated 4.30 | 34,819 Views
By thekid
Rated 4.08 | 34,928 Views
By Mr.Crack
Rated 4.23 | 91,938 Views
By 406323
Rated 4.04 | 29,928 Views
Rated 3.11 | 103,476 Views
By JuggyJasmine
911-Possibility Of Explosives In The WTC
Rated 4.21 | 5,418 Views
By mooncat56
Rated 3.76 | 4,195 Views
By LEVA1989
911 Conspiracy Puppet Nutcase TNN - The Tr...uth Network Power Hour
Rated 3.20 | 1,630 Views
By deangriff500
911 Attack-A Link Of Physics And Chemistry
Rated 3.32 | 3,293 Views
Rated 4.41 | 34,187 Views
By mezon
Baldfaced Corporate Conspiracy
Rated 2.41 | 185 Views
Rated 4.20 | 8,775 Views
By Beagle28681
Conspiracy 2 [13+]
Rated 3.93 | 3,149 Views
By the4thmonkey
Nissan Skyline GTR Vs Porsche 911
Rated 4.20 | 11,007 Views
By very_fast
911 Coincidences? Weird And Unbelievable!
Rated 3.92 | 8,622 Views