KASHTAN-M Anti-aircraft Anti-missile System

Tags:
Anti-aircraft Army Ciws Cruise-missile Missile Russian Tomahawk Армия Зрк
Gromoslawski
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    Gromoslawski
  • International International
  • Comments: 1
  • Views: 4,763
  • Added: 19-Jan-07

Russian ANTY-TOMAHAWK system with artificial intellect (RenTV,Voennaya Tayna)
Narrator A.Prokopenko- military journalist, Commentator A.Zhukov - deputy comstructor
World's only system which has within one turret poweful artillery weapons, multiourpose missiles, radio-locating and optical radar.
Main constructor A.G.Shipunov.
fighting productivity and striking potential of missile-guns system is 2-4 times more effective then only with guns one.
Kashtam-M has better characteristics of both weapons than any analogies
The extremely high striking effect is achieved by:
1)module principle of construction - 1 command module (with own 3-coordinate target detection station "Pozitiv-EM1.2") and up to 6 fighting modules depending on ship class or land proteted area.
2)combination on 1 turret missile - gum weapon and integrated radar weapon controlling system allows to increase the precision of fighting by expeling mistakes caused by of ship hull deformations when weapons and weapon controlling system are disposed in different parts of ship, but this also provides guaranteed elimination of cruising and other missiles by shoting at long range by missiles and at short range by guns, and also to incrase the striking potencial of system in repulsing the massive missile attacks and air raids.
3) Use high-precise interactive targeting (pointing) artifitial intellect system with radio-locating MM-wave band channel -RLS and tv-optical target tracking (following) channel - TOS.
4)super-precise TOS allows to point the missle with less 1 meter accuracy at any altitude flying target. Missle has 5 meter blow radius
5)RLS by using millimeter-wave band with acceptable radar dimensions allows to point the missles at any altitude flying target with 2-3 meter accuracy.It achieved by 2 factors- narrow diagram of directivity and diffus-scattering of dispersing from surface in mm-wave band.
6)Cooperative signal processing of RLS and TOS with automatical chose of the optimal mode of operation also provides high jamming and noise protection of Kashtam-M than systems with only RLS or TOS controlling systems
7)using correlating-contrast signal processing of TOS with a memorization of target shape provides reliable target tracking (following) at any target background environment.
8) using 2 high shooting 30mm guns (GSh-6-30-K) with 6 barrels and 5 400 shots per min (phalanx - 4.7k) - 10 800 total, allows in compare to Goalkeeper(GAU-8/A - gun) reduce suppressing target volley duration for 3 times and reduse 1.5 times middle shooting range up to 300-500 meters, which increase the suppressing probability 1.5-2 times
9)operate and entire automatical regime
Fighting characteristics:
a) 1 Kashtan-M able to suppress 3-4 simultaneously
flying missiles, which is enough for middle tonnage ships. for lager ships which may expect high density of air- missile-raids 2 systems may be installed on each side.Same to land objects.
b)Kashtan-M surpasses by fighting productivity Crotale Naval for 1.5-2 times, Goalkeeper - 2.5-3 times.
Suppressing zone:
missiles
range - 1.5 - 10 km;
altitude 5 meter - 6 km
Guns
range 0.3 - 5 km
altitude 0 - 3 km
Reaction time 5-7 sec
Ammunition:
missiles 8/32
guns 1000
all-time, all-weather regieme
weight
without ammo 7 500 kilo
total 10 000 kilo
PS:NATO armies have no even faint resemblance to such effective guns-missiles-infrared jamming-optical&radiolocating radar systems!Thats even NATO experts confirm!

  1. Categories: How To
Comments on

KASHTAN-M Anti-aircraft Anti-missile System

26 Comments | Add Comment
  • sold ?

    y is iran ! testing these systems

    By aereb 1227946254 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • wow!what a ...

    wow!what a technology...dasvadania usa

    By asdfgh121 [Affiliate User] 1190607932 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Well, even after ...

    Well, even after the cold war, both sides are still suspicious of each other... makes you wonder sometimes as to what the US and Russia are thinking about each other. I do wonder though if the USN might try to create a directed energy missile defense system, similar to METHL.

    By StellarSoldier [Affiliate User] 1190330563 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Once again it ...

    Once again it appears that the Russians are creating weapons from the RoboTech cartoon series!

    By deathcar [Affiliate User] 1190279608 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Dude in the suit ...

    Dude in the suit looks like he just finished off a couple bottles of vodka!

    By deathcar [Affiliate User] 1190279451 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • mastercellphone, ...

    mastercellphone,

    Man I'm sorry to sound like I'm lecturing, but man's worst enemy is, yep, oneself (hypocritical, hateful, corrupt and so on). Also, if all of man only just killed off his respective external enemy b4 getting down to progressive work, all would be dead! It's not a logical statement to make then, sorry. Also, it's time for peace in Asia (and your country) bro. No more barbarism...

    By geogenerated [Affiliate User] 1189859077 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • After we get rid of ...

    After we get rid of our enemies.

    By mastercellphone [Affiliate User] 1189723950 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Nice lil system ...

    Nice lil system there, ouch. Of course for every counter-system there's always a damn project goin on for a better attack sys, etc... but that's not the point! Let's unite together and make oil/coal-independent global energy and economy system! For unified, cooperative peace!

    By geogenerated [Affiliate User] 1189339601 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Is that boris ...

    Is that boris jelzin?! :-D

    seems to be he is drunk...

    By KARAKARTAL1000 [Affiliate User] 1188826271 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What a scary weapon ...

    What a scary weapon! sht!

    By zero1breaker [Affiliate User] 1188290501 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • bobazso, Correct! ...

    bobazso,
    Correct!!
    The U.S wanted to take a look in the Russian technology kitchen!
    And the U.S was not looking for Borscht!

    By frankyspeaker [Affiliate User] 1188287720 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • USA also wanted to ...

    USA also wanted to fund the S-500 anti-aircraft anti-ballistic missile system that is in production as we speak but Russian denied their offer.Since the S-400 has twice the capabilities of Patriot system i don't like to think what will S-500 do..

    By bobazso [Affiliate User] 1188272485 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • "We never copied ...

    "We never copied thier failed design" are u an Chief Executive Officer of Lockheed Martin? I dought it you probably a 16yr kid. what franky said was correct!!

    By SFLegacy [Affiliate User] 1188186966 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You said "garbage". ...

    You said "garbage". I'ts enought.

    By Primorsky [Affiliate User] 1188026065 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The only thing that ...

    The only thing that S**ks is that the only one was destroyed when the roof of the building it was being stored in fell on the Buran Crushing it. It would have been a great competitor to the NASA space shuttle probably even better I don't like the fact they scrapped the three unfinished sister vehicles to the original Buran.

    By LuxorVan [Affiliate User] 1187711351 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thus, many ...

    Thus, many differences separate this 2 orbitors, here are some: the Buran shuttle have a higher orbital and deorbital carrying capacity, its 2 engines at the rear enables it to fly during the re-entry in the atmosphere, it is equipped with a more powerful heat shield, but the main difference is that Buran can fly in automatic mode without any pilot on-board, from the takeoff of the rocket to its landing on the tarmac.

    By Zeppski88 [Affiliate User] 1187708215 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Although very ...

    Although very similar by its appearance with the American shuttle, the laws of physics are the same ones for all, the space shuttle Buran ("Буран" in Russian means "Snowstorm") is entirely of Soviet design, from the mechanics to the electronics.

    By Zeppski88 [Affiliate User] 1187708197 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Kastan is a great ...

    Kastan is a great weapon system, far better then the US phanlanx. Right up there with goalkeeper.

    By scannernut [Affiliate User] 1187508952 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Well, shuttles are ...

    Well, shuttles are not junk. I just hate different stupids like Foxbat, who says smt like "Mig crashed at the airshow, then it must be crap".

    By TocTep [Affiliate User] 1187322945 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Shuttles is a junk ...

    Shuttles is a junk
    Soviets made shuttle "buran" it is not reliable and killed lots of astronauts

    By vaninec [Affiliate User] 1187305268 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Dont take such a ...

    Dont take such a thing as copying to discussion, because major part of you "godly" navy carriers technical ideas as dual landing/takeoff tracks, catapult systems, multiple decks for plane storing and many other was implemented to your navy from British ships. And this is only one example.

    By RemembererLT [Affiliate User] 1186842965 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Zdaytona05, This ...

    Zdaytona05,
    This great and one of a kind defence weapon
    shoots indeed Faster Than Light so to speak!

    By frankyspeaker [Affiliate User] 1186672218 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • lol, commie tech FTL

    lol, commie tech FTL

    By Zdaytona05 [Affiliate User] 1186583475 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • You dont need to ...

    You dont need to copy failed design - you make it.
    For example - shuttles.

    By TocTep [Affiliate User] 1186542184 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • foxbat008, What's ...

    foxbat008,
    What's with the name calling??
    Why? What have i done to you?
    I only reacted to your post. With the truth.And with respect.

    By frankyspeaker [Affiliate User] 1186475388 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I see. (: All right ...

    I see. (: All right, thanks.

    By Dalnijrus [Affiliate User] 1186413397 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
26 Comments | Add Comment